Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

maxima

Fastest Automatic Trading Software Available for Retail Users

Recommended Posts

There were many comments on "best" software and also on the best for backtesting.

 

What would be the fastest (data feed, calculations and execution altogether) software that is available for the retail traders?

 

Lets exclude latency between execution server and the user computer. Lets just take on account the natural data feed delays, speed of execution and the (least important I think) the speed of the platform itself to calculate the automated logic (mostly it is about the software being able to use compiled code or interpreted code).

 

For instance - Sierra and Ninja use compiled code. What about TS and MultiCharts? Are their languages being precompiled before use and run as a native computer code or they are being interpreted at the time of the execution?

 

What about data speed and execution speed of TS and Multicharts ? What about OEC and NeoTicker? How is Zen-Fire data and execution speeds together?

 

Which combination of data/software/execution broker can be trusted for a system which sends trades every 3 seconds (for example)?

 

I think less than 3s will require a colocation near exchange and the whole lot of other organisation and monetary efforts which I believe will make the project outside the scope of this discussion - DIY automated system?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MultiCharts indicators are compiled.

 

My understanding of TradeStation (I could be wrong) is it uses p-code.

 

 

Theoretically compiled code is slightly (ever so slightly) faster than p-code,

but practically, with today's CPU, and with the requirements of trading applications,

it doesn't matter: You won't see a noticeable difference, not even if you are doing multiple regression type of analysis.

 

 

Someone did an experiment on MultiCharts,

he nested 10 MACDs, one on top of the other,

applied it to the same symbol 10 times,

then replicated the set up in 10 charts.

 

ie. the computer has to calculate the MACD 1000 iterations every time a tick comes in.

 

Well.... it hardly budged the CPU.

 

I don't think this is just MultiCharts,

pretty well every charting software can do the same.

If not, blame it on the CPU and buy a more powerful computer.

 

 

 

p.s. one exception might be web based charting software, because they are not designed to do heavy duty work like this.

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tams, do you know any of attempts to compare data feed lags say MultiCharts vs TS vs Zen?

 

Regarding CPU I disagree. 1000 MACDs is nothing in computing time iteslf. Tell the guy to compare 10 Jurik MAs.. He'd see the difference

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tams, do you know any of attempts to compare data feed lags say MultiCharts vs TS vs Zen?

 

Regarding CPU I disagree. 1000 MACDs is nothing in computing time iteslf. Tell the guy to compare 10 Jurik MAs.. He'd see the difference

 

 

I don't use Jurik, so I don't know the requirement...

the MACD is just an example done by someone...

Is it representational?

Probably not.

I don't think his original purpose was to make a point,

he was only doing it for experiment's sake,

without any scientific basis or benchmark for comparison.

Does it serve to illustrate a point?

it would only mean something to someone if he think it has value.

Each MACD is 2 moving averages smoothed again by a moving average...

I doubt many real life trader has to drive so much TA and requires so much iteration in one tick.

but then there's always someone doing the unusual thing... so you'd never know.

 

The point is, no matter how slow your software is,

the difference between 1,000 MACD vs 10 Jurik is not material...

it won't be slower than the latency between your eyes and your finger,

nor the latency between your computer and the broker's server.

 

 

I don't know anybody who has tested the Trader/Datafeed/Broker latency.

I doubt any retail trader has the tools, the expertize,

nor all the software/datafeed/broker combination to carry out such a test.

Probably the only people who can do such test is a magazine...

 

 

If you are bend on doing high frequency trading,

the best bet is to do it through a professional trading environment.

e.g. a prop or a fund that has the infrastructure to handle the required speed.

In a home based trading station, or a standard office building,

the Last Mile is your unavoidable weakest link.

 

 

This is only my 2c.

:-)>

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no that was the exact point - CPU heavy computations like jurik or some signal processing filters will influent time of the system reaction even on high-end servers, MACD will not even on low-end desktop...

 

and the subsecond delays arent that difficult to measure. if you show me two feeds side-by-side i can tell the difference with 50 ms accuracy.

 

but i have found that multichart can be fed from rithmic, so i have no more questions about it... Would like to know how fast TS feed and execution though...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
btw tams, i know you are fan of MC. I cant find how MC connects to TT... is it by xtrader API or is it by TT FIX :confused: thank you

 

hahah... am I a fan ? ... LOL... I am only a user of MultiCharts.

I have used many other software... they all have strength and weakness... nothing is perfect.

 

Back to your question,

You can connect MultiCharts to TT via a supplied dll.

 

I assume it is through API,

because FIX is very expensive, and it has to be individually setup.

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
no that was the exact point - CPU heavy computations like jurik or some signal processing filters will influent time of the system reaction even on high-end servers, MACD will not even on low-end desktop...

 

and the subsecond delays arent that difficult to measure. if you show me two feeds side-by-side i can tell the difference with 50 ms accuracy.

 

but i have found that multichart can be fed from rithmic, so i have no more questions about it... Would like to know how fast TS feed and execution though...

 

 

MultiCharts cannot do sub-second analysis yet.

According to one of their forum replies, they are considering adding this feature.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is Multichart better than Ninja Trader?

 

Tams : whick broker and datafeeder do you use witk MultiCharts?

 

Thx

 

 

MultiCharts and NinjaTrader are TWO very different programs.

 

Both have trial versions, you should download and try them out yourself.

 

 

MultiCharts uses EasyLanguage while Ninja uses C#.

 

There are lots of free EasyLanguage indicators on the web;

C# is more powerful, but also requires more skill to code.

 

Each has its own strength. You really have to find out for yourself.

 

 

p.s. I use InteractiveBrokers for broker and datafeed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
p.s. I use InteractiveBrokers for broker and datafeed.

 

Are you not facing problems for backtesting ?

Because IB has only 24 historical data.

 

You probably import data but from where ? ;)

Thks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Are you not facing problems for backtesting ?

Because IB has only 24 historical data.

 

You probably import data but from where ? ;)

Thks

 

 

IB has more than 24 hist data

 

 

besides,

I don't do much long term intraday backtest.

 

The only long term tests I do are with EOD index data, which I can get from Yahoo or Google Finance.

 

e.g.

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/hp?s=^HSI

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/hp?s=^SPX

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think its a bit silly to worry about this..it would be to assume your analysis is so precise that adding 1 second to your signal would mess up the back test to any meaningfull degree...You can test this yourself, just add a timer and +1 to your entry signal.

Unless you are trying to incorporate book data it would make far more sense to pick the platform you are most comfortable with as to get the most work done possible.

If you are trying to incorporate book data you will almost certainly need to move up a level beyond retail any, where latency of the feed and execution will become a huge issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

True, but that is not to say that it isnt random if its going for or against you.

Of course there are strategies that latency would be of the essense, but you should be looking at FIX with a direct connection to the exchange, hosted close to the exchange your trading. It just doesn't make sense IMO to split hairs at the retail level over this at the cost of productivity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to prove my point. I have 2.5ms connection to a server which is 0.5ms away from CME and my algo on empty test run can demonstrate 40 microseconds order release. And I still think myself a retail. And the hair splitting I did helped me to achieve this.

 

Sent from my GT-P1000 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just to prove my point. I have 2.5ms connection to a server which is 0.5ms away from CME and my algo on empty test run can demonstrate 40 microseconds order release. And I still think myself a retail. And the hair splitting I did helped me to achieve this.

 

Sent from my GT-P1000 using Tapatalk

 

Where's your algo run from though? If it's London, there's still going to be lag. Fair enough if it's right next to the CME.

Edited by TheNegotiator

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 3rd April 2025.   Gold Prices Pull Back After Record High as Traders Eye Trump’s Tariffs.   Key Takeaways:   Gold prices retreated after hitting a record high of $3,167.57 per ounce due to profit-taking. President Trump announced a 10% baseline tariff on all US imports, escalating trade tensions. Gold remains exempt from reciprocal tariffs, reinforcing its safe-haven appeal. Investors await US non-farm payroll data for further market direction. Fed rate cut bets and weaker US Treasury yields underpin gold’s bullish outlook. Gold Prices Retreat from Record Highs Amid Profit-Taking Gold prices saw a pullback on Thursday as traders opted to take profits following a historic surge. Spot gold declined 0.4% to $3,122.10 per ounce as of 0710 GMT, retreating from its fresh all-time high of $3,167.57. Meanwhile, US gold futures slipped 0.7% to $3,145.00 per ounce, reflecting broader market uncertainty over economic and geopolitical developments.   The recent rally was largely fueled by concerns over escalating trade tensions after President Donald Trump unveiled sweeping new import tariffs. The 10% baseline tariff on all goods entering the US further deepened the global trade conflict, intensifying investor demand for safe-haven assets like gold. However, as traders locked in gains from the surge, prices saw a modest retracement.   Trump’s Tariffs and Their Market Implications On Wednesday, Trump introduced a sweeping tariff policy imposing a 10% baseline duty on all imports, with significantly higher tariffs on select nations. While this move was aimed at bolstering domestic manufacturing, it sent shockwaves across global markets, fueling inflation concerns and heightening trade war fears.   Gold’s Role Amid Trade War Escalations Despite the widespread tariff measures, the White House clarified that reciprocal tariffs do not apply to gold, energy, and ‘certain minerals that are not available in the US’. This exemption suggests that central banks and institutional investors may continue favouring gold as a hedge against economic instability. One of the key factors supporting gold is the slowdown that these tariffs could cause in the US economy, which raises the likelihood of future Federal Reserve rate cuts. Gold is currently in a pure momentum trade. Market participants are on the sidelines and until we see a significant shakeout, this momentum could persist.   Impact on the US Dollar and Bond Yields Gold prices typically move inversely to the US dollar, and the latest developments have pushed the dollar to its weakest level since October 2024. Market participants are increasingly pricing in the possibility of a Fed rate cut, as the tariffs could weigh on economic growth.   Additionally, US Treasury yields have plummeted, reflecting growing recession fears. Lower bond yields reduce the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets like gold, making it a more attractive investment.         Technical Analysis: Key Levels to Watch Gold’s recent rally has pushed it into overbought territory, with the Relative Strength Index (RSI) above 70. This indicates a potential short-term pullback before the uptrend resumes. The immediate support level lies at $3,115, aligning with the Asian session low. A further decline could bring gold towards the $3,100 psychological level, which has previously acted as a strong support zone. Below this, the $3,076–$3,057 region represents a critical weekly support range where buyers may re-enter the market. In the event of a more significant correction, $3,000 stands as a major psychological floor.   On the upside, gold faces immediate resistance at $3,149. A break above this level could signal renewed bullish momentum, potentially leading to a retest of the record high at $3,167. If bullish momentum persists, the next target is the $3,200 psychological barrier, which could pave the way for further gains. Despite the recent pullback, the broader trend remains bullish, with dips likely to be viewed as buying opportunities.   Looking Ahead: Non-Farm Payrolls and Fed Policy Traders are closely monitoring Friday’s US non-farm payrolls (NFP) report, which could provide critical insights into the Federal Reserve’s next policy moves. A weaker-than-expected jobs report may strengthen expectations for an interest rate cut, further boosting gold prices.   Other key economic data releases, such as jobless claims and the ISM Services PMI, may also impact market sentiment in the short term. However, with rising geopolitical uncertainties, trade tensions, and a weakening US dollar, gold’s safe-haven appeal remains strong.   Conclusion: While short-term profit-taking may trigger minor corrections, gold’s long-term outlook remains bullish. As global trade tensions mount and the Federal Reserve leans toward a more accommodative stance, gold could see further gains in the months ahead.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock, nice buying at the 187.26 triple+ support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
    • DELL Dell Technologies stock, good day moving higher off the 90.99 double support area, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?DELL
    • MCK Mckesson stock, nice trend and continuation breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?MCK
    • lmfx just officially launched their own LMGX token, Im planning to grab a couple of hundred and maybe have the option to stake them. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.