Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

brownsfan019

Trader P/L 2010

Recommended Posts

  Dinerotrader said:
Quick note: I've started almost exclusively using sell or buy stops in the direction of my trade which seems to be helping me stay out some bad trades. It is so nice when you see a good setup, put in a stop order to get you in when price starts moving your way and then price just moves opposite the way your setup was indicating but you never get in the trade because of that stop order.

 

  brownsfan019 said:
That's the ONLY way I enter my trades.

 

I use stops to enter 90%+ of my trades to enter, 9% straight market orders, and 1% the rare limit order (usually I missed my preferred entry and the market has moved too far for me to use a market)

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Edited by thalestrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  brownsfan019 said:

The only way to mimic this in sim is to have OEC set your sim account size to the same as your real one. I think the default is $50k. If you want to make it realistic, send a support ticket asking to reset it based on what you think you will start with.

 

Hi Dinero / Brownsfan

 

You can do this instantly from your account management web page:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=19034&stc=1&d=1265662318

 

Sorry if that is what you meant but it sounds like you might be sending an e-mail to support.

5aa70fc958ca5_oecaccountmanagement.png.6d2ca94f8b493d669e407beca6c37de7.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Started with a wake up 2am stop out , but got it right. Almost got smacked. I think I will make some coffee, maybe put some trousers on and not trade in my pajamas...

Mr autoentry-bot got me into a couple of good ones, and I got shaken out of the 100 tick long...sigh...

5aa70fc96984d_2-8-20107-52-32AM.thumb.png.a093885b186e9ba2e0960beac0e102c1.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Welp. My day is done and I wiped out my gains on Friday.

I've learned over the past two years that a good risk size for me (with what I'm doing) is a max of .25% of equity. So, being that I'm trading with about $210K, my max risk size (which includes commission and estimated slippage) is $525 per position. Sometimes (unfortunately), my slippage causes me to even loose more than $525, but that's because I estimate slippage before entry.

Anyway, today just happened to be one of those horrific days when almost every one of my system's trades was a looser... I hate starting the week off having to dig myself out of the hole. But that's unfortunately just sometimes the way the old ball bounces for me.....

 

Jason

5aa70fc962ebc_2-8-20104-00-54PM.png.e5ab4e96f0a6071a18c476db69e1941f.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SIM

+$212

 

What a crappy day. I was down $1,700 at one point, then got stopped out of long positions before the rally by 2 ticks on the 6E and the Russel. Caught the rally on oil and natural gas. Overall, poor entry selection. The gap up this morning threw a lot of confusion into my analysis. I was playing for strength because of the gap and buying support reversals and they just kept stopping me out.

 

Once I got back to the positive zone I had lost my nerve from fear of going negative again so I had to stop trading.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=19087&stc=1&d=1265736954

5aa70fcb17388_2-9-20102.png.63225156496feac0d4a89294ae42d189.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like I pulled some cash back in the front door today. I always hope to have a profitable week, but day to day, it's always up-in-the-air. Along side of my normal blotter, I'm going to also include a screen shot of a piece of monitor software that I wrote. My automated trading system is pretty wired as far as monitoring is concerned. I co-locate the server in a local co-location facility near my home and it sends my phone (via text messages) an update every 20 minutes (throughout the trading day) and also texts me when problems arise. I'm also usually connected to my system via remote desktop, but in case I'm somewhere else, I have a web server running on my box that hosts a nice little monitoring application that I've written as well. This second screen shot is from my remote monitoring application. Sometimes (because of the way Interactive Brokers reports unrealized and realized P&L), my worst case line makes a few weird pops and hickups (as you can see in the attached screen shot). Anyway, I love always having a known worst-case throughout the day. It helps me breathe a little easier knowing that "this is as bad as it can get".......

 

Jason

5aa70fcb224e1_2-9-2010P-and-L.png.e773a04ee29a56af563ea52a86ef28e0.png

5aa70fcb2df20_2-9-2010Daily-P-and-L-Graph.thumb.png.1de92885d3f18f316aa194d069ae1f0f.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Dinerotrader said:
SIM

+$212

 

What a crappy day. I was down $1,700 at one point

 

Any day I find myself down by a nearly 2 grand and finish positive is hardly what I would call a "crappy" day. Be a "half full," not a "half empty" kind of guy, dinero.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Any day I find myself down by a nearly 2 grand and finish positive is hardly what I would call a "crappy" day. Be a "half full," not a "half empty" kind of guy, dinero.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Well, the "crappines" was derived not from the P/L but from my trade executions. Do you ever find yourself getting into trades and sitting there thinking, "what was I thinking entering into this trade?" That happened several times today. I haven't yet had time to nail down why. I would hope I could say I had a good trading day even if my P/L was in the red because of the way I executed my trades.

 

That all being said, being a complaining, "half empty" person is not my goal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today you had a learning day dinero.

 

On a day you made money or didn't but followed your plan/process you would have had a good day.

 

If you fail to learn from it ... then it truly is a crappy day :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Dinerotrader said:
That all being said, being a complaining, "half empty" person is not my goal.

 

I know its not ... I was just giving you a reminder. I understand what you mean about deviating from your plan, but you should take heart that you did get back on track, and that once you did get back to plan, your positive results outstripped the damage the earlier mistakes had caused.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Edited by thalestrader
typo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SIM

+$1,075

 

Tried a few new things that worked out. Getting pretty anxious to start trading real money but still have some ironing to do on myself and methods. Its interesting. The first time I tried to trade natural gas I decided the movements were horrible and not for me. Now I practically rely on it for my big moves.

 

Still not sure about trading silver but I like the idea of having some metals in the mix. Gold is too cliche, right. :) We'll see if I can pull some consistent profits out of it.

 

I always thought the idea of revenge in trading was for the weak minded before I got trading. Well, either I am weak minded or revenge emotions exist for everyone. Just because I had a bad day on the Russel (RLM) yesterday, I find myself almost muttering under my breath when I look at the chart today just waiting to get my money back. LOL:rofl:. I lost again of course.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=19117&stc=1&d=1265819743

5aa70fcc18072_2-10-20101.png.26c8556e024657059cfee709b3a6ceb2.png

Edited by Dinerotrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  emios said:
Hey dinero, you might want to start looking at refineries stocks etc considering you're focusing on oil futures.Can help you to maximise profits... Good trading btw!

 

Thanks, even though its all just SIM right now.

 

The only reason I trade what I trade is because of the price movement. I don't think any fundamental understanding I have about the future price of oil makes me any better at trading it. However, the way oil moves seems to be much easier to trade than other futures I have looked at. So basically, if you can find more instruments to trade that have similar price movements to oil, I would be interested but the mere associated of the underlying goods is irrelevent for me. I appreciate the idea though. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone trade varying lot sizes depending on how "good" the setup is? I remember some market wizards saying that they did this. I only trade 1 contract on every trade because I have no good way of testing the statistics of my setups so that I could concretely say that one is better than another. I may think some are better but I can't prove it so how could I bet on it.

 

Changing lot sizes sounds like a very risky proposition to me unless you have some great way to put rules around it that make sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Dinerotrader said:
Does anyone trade varying lot sizes depending on how "good" the setup is? I remember some market wizards saying that they did this. I only trade 1 contract on every trade because I have no good way of testing the statistics of my setups so that I could concretely say that one is better than another. I may think some are better but I can't prove it so how could I bet on it.

 

Changing lot sizes sounds like a very risky proposition to me unless you have some great way to put rules around it that make sense.

 

I do in my personal account, the one I post here is one contract, I would possibly go up to two. I keep detailed records of trades and setups to know the probability of it working.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  sappjason said:
Another crappy day. Down $1616.

 

sappjason,

 

Without sharing more than you're comfortable sharing, what is the basis behind your program trading setups, exits, money management, etc?

 

It would be nice to have a program trade for me. Then I could yell at the computer program instead of myself on loss days.;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really active on the forums anymore, but thought I'd add my two cents.

  Dinerotrader said:
Does anyone trade varying lot sizes depending on how "good" the setup is?

Yes, I do this often. I don't know the exact probabilities of my setups (and frankly, I'm not sure I could since market conditions are always changing). However, I do know relative probabilities. For people who trade on the extreme (Wyckoff, MP, or any other interpretation of auction market theory), trades in the middle have a less probability of working (and require larger stops). Thus, away from the "optimal" areas, I use smaller positions (usually half size).

 

* goes back into hole :) *

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh trust me, I still yell at myself on down days (lol)..... There have been a few times throughout the last couple years where I've had months that end flat or down. I'm still in the midst of a DD that I was really hoping to pop out of today, but that didn't happen (you can see the attached graph for my YTD Net P/L).

 

My worst DD has been 8%. Without divulging too much of the specifics of what I do, my software basically looks to get into stocks that are trading on abnormally large volume and ride the momentum. I have done thousands of backtests and simulations to try and determine the best type of exit, but I have never found anything that beats a simple 1:1 trailing stop after I've been in a trade for over 1 hour. I still have a "take profit" limit order at 8X my stop size, but as you might guess, that rarely gets hit. It got hit a hell of a lot more in 2008 than it has in the past year.

 

As far as money management is concerned, my position sizes are based on my stop size and I always try and size my position at .25% of my equity (a little over $500 per trade at this point). Now, on days where there are lots of stocks moving, my software will scale that size down until I run out of buying power. Basically, I try and max out my buying power every day, but I also don't want to miss trades. This balance took a lot of work and I came up with a rather complicated algorithm that simply ratchets my risk size downward as my buying power decreases. But I only ratchet down after I get to certain points.

 

Another thing that I do is I have a "slippage estimation" algorithm that attempts to estimate slippage for a given position size (before entry) and then down-sizes my initial position until my total slippage cost doesn't exceed 5% of my risk size. So (often times) on lower ave vol stocks, my max risk is considerably less than .25% of account equity.

 

If you want to talk more, please feel free to PM anytime you'd like.

 

Jason

 

 

  Dinerotrader said:
sappjason,

 

Without sharing more than you're comfortable sharing, what is the basis behind your program trading setups, exits, money management, etc?

 

It would be nice to have a program trade for me. Then I could yell at the computer program instead of myself on loss days.;)

2010-Net-PL.thumb.png.2722de204226b2bfd99c5e5f0e70519a.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SIM

-$750

 

Tomorrow's another day. Silver slaughtered me. Got stopped out of its rally by one tick. Natural gas saved the day again but it took staying in one trade for 2 hours. It seems like everything was moving in tandem today except GNG. Almost called it a day when I was up $300 but I didn't.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=19174&stc=1&d=1265917445

5aa70fcdcaaa9_2-11-20101.png.2635c2755ec06c4ee66fbc8e552a99c8.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kind-of a bothersome day.... I made money (+$602), but my account was up over $1400 at one point. After doing this for almost 2 years, I really hesitate messing with anything during the day (in a discretionary manner). Many times, I wish I would, but I just can't bring myself to do so. I just let the math play out and over the long run, I strongly believe that this brings in more profit for me.

 

Jason

2010-02-11.PNG.b6d943efd318eab29b5220ca2d35806a.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.