Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

O66

Zenfire and DTN Feed Different?

Recommended Posts

I’m using zenfire feed with Investor RT (Linnsoft)

(Zenfire via Mirus futures)

Via Irt I also have backfilling possibility via DTN

 

My charts are quite often completely different after backfill

 

See indicator pane (cumulative delta (bidxask)):

 

http://www.charthub.com/images/2009/12/14/Fulcrum_4

 

and after DTN backfill:

http://www.charthub.com/images/2009/12/14/Fulcrum_5

 

I compared my chart with other traders who are using Zenfire with Ninja charts and they have exactly the same chart as my first chart (before backfill)

My conclusion is that it is not Irt or my connection but there is a difference between Zenfire and DTN

 

Both feeds are known as quality feeds.

 

Any ideas?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting. Price data seem to be the same but the indicator differs. How is the indicator calculated? Or is it provided directly by the data providers?

Do you backfill tick-by-tick data? Does backfill contain information about bid and ask on tick-by-tick basis? Maybe the indicator can be calculated properly only on real-time data. I am just guessing, of course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

indicator is based on bidxask, but same issue in Ninja with Zenfire

 

charts in Irt and Ninja feeded with zenfie are equal, when backfilling chart in IRT with DTN feed its changing

 

the backfilled chart is equal as chart with DTN used for livefeed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  O66 said:
I’m using zenfire feed with Investor RT (Linnsoft)

(Zenfire via Mirus futures)

Via Irt I also have backfilling possibility via DTN

 

My charts are quite often completely different after backfill

 

See indicator pane (cumulative delta (bidxask)):

 

Images | ChartHub.com

 

and after DTN backfill:

Images | ChartHub.com

 

I compared my chart with other traders who are using Zenfire with Ninja charts and they have exactly the same chart as my first chart (before backfill)

My conclusion is that it is not Irt or my connection but there is a difference between Zenfire and DTN

 

Both feeds are known as quality feeds.

 

Any ideas?

 

I have been doing some research on this apparent problem now with Zenfire feed linked to Ninjatrader for bid/ask Delta computations, and I think I have found the problem. I should have the verification of what I suspected was the problem on Monday next week....I will pass on the info as soon as I get the answer (and also what the entities involved will be doing to correct their problem).

 

Here is a verified Investor RT with DTN.IQ feed data run of the Delta for that time period.......

 

Images | ChartHub.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have always been a bit suspicious (but everyone thinks I am just a kill joy :D). From what you say the client implimentation does not seem to be the issue however I am also a little suspicious of how some of the ninja stuff is written. I do believe that it is neccsaary to use onMarketData to get all the market data to make sure that everything is handled syncronously.

 

Incidentaly Globex alway used to reserve the right to aggregate ticks in fast markets too. I am not sure if that is still the case, the last time I looked on their web site I could not find the bulletin. presumably that would not account for differences between data providers.

 

Be very interested to hear what you find out FT ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlowFish said:
I have always been a bit suspicious (but everyone thinks I am just a kill joy :D). From what you say the client implimentation does not seem to be the issue however I am also a little suspicious of how some of the ninja stuff is written. I do believe that it is neccsaary to use onMarketData to get all the market data to make sure that everything is handled syncronously.

 

Incidentaly Globex alway used to reserve the right to aggregate ticks in fast markets too. I am not sure if that is still the case, the last time I looked on their web site I could not find the bulletin. presumably that would not account for differences between data providers.

 

Be very interested to hear what you find out FT ;)

 

I do agree that Ninjatrader is not the most robust option for tracking Delta and other more data intensive work (for instance, the TT Fix Adapter feed has to be somewhat coalesced just to work in NT). The potential problem with Rithmic based Zenfire feed imo may stem from the recent CME data outflow enhancements. I have some in depth research into this matter and I should have my answers by Monday.....this is important imo to figure out since imo Zenfire has been a good option for data feed. As Rithmic offers alternative branded versions of their feed to various charting platforms, it would be nice to know that their feed can be used for proper bid/ask data runs. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  diablo272 said:
My understanding is that most data feeds will have slightly different data output due to differences in hardware on both your end and their end.

 

The data will only be potentially tainted for very detailed work if it is coalesced......if you have access to uncoalesced data from the CME then you have the perfect set up. Now what you do with that data as it is pumped into your charting application is then your responsibilty to make sure your computational factors are verified proper.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the links Fulcrum Trader.

 

Having browsed the sites, I'm still a little unsure about the difference between the two. Basically i'm using investor rt and just want a decent broker and feed. Also, if i'm leasing a seat from CME what would be the best options regarding execution. By the way, i'm not leasing a seat just curious to learn more. This area is all a little hazy to me.

 

Sorry if this is the wrong place to ask these questions, but you seemed to know what you're talking about.

 

Thanks so much.

Tony

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK......feed update;

 

Rithmic and Zenfire feeds MAY have data drop off as it is routed to a Ninjatrader platform or Investor RT platform as a result of the way they put out the data over the internet (unlike a DTN.IQ feed they do not have any "ticker plant" to verify ALL the data ALL the time before it gets to the end user) since the feed is for basic charting and for order entry use.

 

So it looks as if a person will have to "backfill" data with DTN.IQ feed to make sure your bid/ask data runs are proper, this is a result of the recent CME data output increases to all data providers. It looks as if the recent CME data granularity increase has overwhelmed the basic infrastructure of most retail traders set ups (their internet, their data, and their platforms), if they try to use a broker provided feed for any Cumulative Delta bid/ask volume work.

 

Using a DTN.IQ feed to "backfill" the broker provided feed seems to be the only solution for those who do not use a regular feed into whatever trade/charting platform they have.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  FulcrumTrader said:
OK......feed update;

 

Rithmic and Zenfire feeds MAY have data drop off as it is routed to a Ninjatrader platform or Investor RT platform as a result of the way they put out the data over the internet (unlike a DTN.IQ feed they do not have any "ticker plant" to verify ALL the data ALL the time before it gets to the end user) since the feed is for basic charting and for order entry use.

 

 

Thanks for the update.

 

The priorities for a feed that has an order entry engine are somewhat different than those for a simple data feed. Timeliness is more important than completeness. In the old days (again not verified for years) Globex had a kind of two tier setup where clearing house/brokerage type operations would sometimes get more current pricing information at the expense of not getting every tick.

 

Incidentally do we know for sure that bid ask and last changes are fully syncronised for DTN.IQ ? Can we even be sure that the exchange actually provides that information synchronously? (Rather than giving precedent to actual completed order information over quote changes for example).

 

At the end of the day things might be 'good enough' depending on what your objectives are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlowFish said:
Thanks for the update.

 

Incidentally do we know for sure that bid ask and last changes are fully syncronised for DTN.IQ ? Can we even be sure that the exchange actually provides that information synchronously? (Rather than giving precedent to actual completed order information over quote changes for example).

 

At the end of the day things might be 'good enough' depending on what your objectives are.

 

Yes.....I have mentioned before that I have verified DTN.IQ feed.....it is the ONLY regular feed that I use and have been able to verify.

 

I do think that CQG probably has exceptional feed too....Esignal does not have clean bid/ask data last I checked and I am not sure why. Tradestations feed is a mess so I will not even go into that one.....LOL!

 

Anyone trying to use OEC or Transact feed will definitely have to "backfill" imo with DTN.IQ to make sure they have clean bid/ask data runs each day. If you use Investor RT or Marketdelta with DTN.IQ feed you are set up perfect for bid/ask data work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  FulcrumTrader said:
Yes.....I have mentioned before that I have verified DTN.IQ feed.....it is the ONLY regular feed that I use and have been able to verify.

 

I do think that CQG probably has exceptional feed too....Esignal does not have clean bid/ask data last I checked and I am not sure why. Tradestations feed is a mess so I will not even go into that one.....LOL!

 

Anyone trying to use OEC or Transact feed will definitely have to "backfill" imo with DTN.IQ to make sure they have clean bid/ask data runs each day. If you use Investor RT or Marketdelta with DTN.IQ feed you are set up perfect for bid/ask data work.

 

I was wondering how you can verify it is complete and synchronised? Against what? You would need co-located ticker plant and even then data loss could be encountered at the exchange (do CME guarentee too provide every bid ask change synchronously with each trade)? Just being my usual sceptical/devils advocate self :) and hopefully encouraging people to think for themselves. (Which O66 the OP is clearly doing!)

 

Tradestation also has some weaknesses in the client (even if the data was up to snuff), I wouldn't go there personally. Also just to add a comment on Multicharts too. There are some issues in the client that have been discussed recently on the TSSupport forum. Possibly fixed in version 6 beta 1 possibly not. A while back I posted some code for doing delta type calculations and various types of block size filtering. A couple of people commented that they where getting inconsistent results on different charts running in the same workspace...... well it turns out that MC can miss ticks as well as not handling bid ask changes synchronously.

 

Anyway sadly it seems that currently we don't have too many options for this type of work though NeoTicker should easily be up to the task as well as IRT/MD at least giving some choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlowFish said:
I was wondering how you can verify it is complete and synchronised? Against what? You would need co-located ticker plant and even then data loss could be encountered at the exchange (do CME guarentee too provide every bid ask change synchronously with each trade)? Just being my usual sceptical/devils advocate self :) and hopefully encouraging people to think for themselves. (Which O66 the OP is clearly doing!)

 

Yes I have mentioned this before I do have access to CME data runs and that is what I use to verify......DTN.IQ feed is as solid as you can get.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  FulcrumTrader said:
Yes I have mentioned this before I do have access to CME data runs and that is what I use to verify......DTN.IQ feed is as solid as you can get.

 

That's interesting, I guess by your turn of phrase (data runs) these are histories rather than real time? I wonder what exactly do you mean by 'CME data runs'.... if you don't mind me being nosey that is. Are full order book changes available or just best bid best ask? Are order book changes/best bid best ask changes time stamped or do you need to rely on sequencing (the order of changes)?

 

Or maybe I have it wrong and you have a leased line connection to the CME and are using a comparison to data you are collecting in in real time directly from Globex?

 

Edit: Incidentally FT, as your testing on Zenfire, IQ.Feed and CME data runs have shown no discrepancies I wonder if the issues is actually at O66's end after all:). Quite understandable that the protocol to deliver real time quotes might drop data between zen servers and the client? I understand its fairly well compressed so loosing a packet might actually loose a chunk of data. I would guess it uses UDP rather than TCP.

Edited by BlowFish

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlowFish said:
That's interesting, I guess by your turn of phrase (data runs) these are histories rather than real time? I wonder what exactly do you mean by 'CME data runs'.... if you don't mind me being nosey that is. Are full order book changes available or just best bid best ask? Are order book changes/best bid best ask changes time stamped or do you need to rely on sequencing (the order of changes)?

 

Or maybe I have it wrong and you have a leased line connection to the CME and are using a comparison to data you are collecting in in real time directly from Globex?

 

Edit: Incidentally FT, as your testing on Zenfire, IQ.Feed and CME data runs have shown no discrepancies I wonder if the issues is actually at O66's end after all:). Quite understandable that the protocol to deliver real time quotes might drop data between zen servers and the client? I understand its fairly well compressed so loosing a packet might actually loose a chunk of data. I would guess it uses UDP rather than TCP.

 

A trader can get very granular CME data through brokers/FCM (off their servers) or by paying for higher end feeds.....I will leave it at that. I think Urma Blume has added some good examples of this data feed capability in the past and some of the high monthly costs involved.

 

You are correct that data leaving Zenfire/Rithmic CAN drop data as it is delivered to the end user (so the end users PC capabilities CAN be the cause of SOME data drops). Also, Ninjatrader is not robust enough to catch all data and that CAN also be some of the data drops as the market has periods of high trade rate. So this leaves the need to use a data feed from a regular data provider like DTN.IQ to make sure you get clean bid/ask data for Delta volume work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MoreYummy said:
What is DTN.IQ? Data fee only? Which chart software can use their data?

 

And how is CQG compare to zenfire and DTN.IQ's data completeness/accuracy during real time?

 

Yes, DTN is a widely used and reasonably priced data feed. It is used by several platforms--most of the popular ones support it. I can't answer your other questions though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  FulcrumTrader said:
A trader can get very granular CME data through brokers/FCM (off their servers) or by paying for higher end feeds.....I will leave it at that. I think Urma Blume has added some good examples of this data feed capability in the past and some of the high monthly costs involved.

 

 

Whilst UB contributed some valuable thoughts and insights some of the stuff he wrote, particularly about data feeds, was complete hyperbole. I pulled him on a couple of occasions but did not press the matter as the good stuff far out weighed the more. I always thought it a shame that some one that clearly was well informed with much to contribute on certain topics could talks such nonsense about others.

 

I guess you are talking about things like CQG when you talk of higher end feeds? Probably another good option.

 

From the last few posts it would seem safe to conclude that the problem issue is potentially with any live data feed and infrastructure/capacity limitations. However the original poster suggests that this is not the case and that IQ.Feed matches live and historically. This is odd as Zenfire is fairly highly compressed, it seems to get more ticks in fewer packets so you would expect it to suffer less from data loss. Also your tests would suggest that it matches. Strange.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 7th April 2025.   Asian Markets Plunge as US-China Trade War Escalates; Wall Street Futures Signal Further Turmoil.   Global financial markets extended last week’s massive sell-off as tensions between the US and its major trading partners deepened, rattling investors and prompting sharp declines across equities, commodities, and currencies. The fallout from President Trump’s sweeping new tariff measures continued to spread, raising fears of a full-blown trade war and economic recession.   Asian stock markets plunged on Monday, extending a global market rout fueled by rising tensions between the US and China. The latest wave of aggressive tariffs and retaliatory measures has unnerved investors worldwide, triggering sharp sell-offs across the Asia-Pacific region.   Asian equities led the global rout on Monday, with dramatic losses seen across the region. Japan’s Nikkei 225 index tumbled more than 8% shortly after the open, while the broader Topix fell over 6.5%, recovering only slightly from steeper losses. In mainland China, the Shanghai Composite sank 6.7%, and the blue-chip CSI300 dropped 7.5% as markets reopened following a public holiday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index opened more than 9% lower, reflecting deep concerns about escalating trade tensions.           South Korea’s Kospi dropped 4.8%, triggering a circuit breaker designed to curb panic selling. Taiwan’s Taiex index collapsed by nearly 10%, with major tech exporters like TSMC and Foxconn hitting circuit breaker limits after each fell close to 10%. Meanwhile, Australia’s ASX 200 shed as much as 6.3%, and New Zealand’s NZX 50 lost over 3.5%.   Despite the escalation, Beijing has adopted a measured tone. Chinese officials urged investors not to panic and assured markets that the country has the tools to mitigate economic shocks. At the same time, they left the door open for renewed trade talks, though no specific timeline has been set.   US Stock Futures Plunge Ahead of Monday Open   US stock futures pointed to another brutal day on Wall Street. Futures tied to the S&P 500 dropped over 3%, Nasdaq futures sank 4%, and Dow Jones futures lost 2.5%—equivalent to nearly 1,000 points. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, down more than 20% from its recent highs, while the S&P 500 is nearing bear territory. The Dow closed last week in correction. Oil prices followed suit, with WTI crude dropping over 4% to $59.49 per barrel—its lowest since April 2021.   Wall Street closed last week in disarray, erasing more than $5 trillion in value amid fears of an all-out trade war. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, sinking more than 20% from its recent peak. The S&P 500 is approaching bear territory, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average has slipped firmly into correction territory.   German Banks Hit Hard Amid Escalating Trade Tensions   German banking stocks were among the worst hit in Europe. Shares of Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank plunged between 9.5% and 10.3% during early Frankfurt trading, compounding Friday’s steep losses. Fears over a global trade war and looming recession are severely impacting the financial sector, particularly export-driven economies like Germany.   Eurozone Growth at Risk   Eurozone officials are bracing for economic fallout, with Greek central bank governor Yannis Stournaras warning that Trump’s tariff policy could reduce eurozone GDP by up to 1%. The EU is preparing retaliatory tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods—ranging from steel and aluminium to consumer products like dental floss and luxury jewellery.   Starting Wednesday, the US is expected to impose 25% tariffs on key EU exports, with Brussels ready to respond with its own 20% levies on nearly all remaining American imports.   UK Faces £22 Billion Economic Blow   In the UK, fresh research from KPMG revealed that the British economy could shrink by £21.6 billion by 2027 due to US-imposed tariffs. The analysis points to a 0.8% dip in economic output over the next two years, undermining Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ growth agenda. The report also warned of additional fiscal pressure that may lead to future tax increases and public spending cuts.   Wall Street Braces for Recession   Goldman Sachs revised its US recession probability to 45% within the next year, citing tighter financial conditions and rising policy uncertainty. This marks a sharp jump from the 35% risk estimated just last month—and more than double January’s 20% projection. J.P. Morgan issued a bleaker outlook, now forecasting a 60% chance of recession both in the US and globally.   Global Leaders Respond as Trade Tensions Deepen   The dramatic market sell-off was triggered by China’s sweeping retaliation to a new round of US tariffs, which included a 34% levy on all American imports. Beijing’s state-run People’s Daily released a defiant statement, asserting that China has the tools and resilience to withstand economic pressure from Washington. ‘We’ve built up experience after years of trade conflict and are prepared with a full arsenal of countermeasures,’ it stated.   Around the world, policymakers are responding to the growing threat of a trade-led economic slowdown. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced plans to appeal directly to Washington and push for tariff relief, following the US administration’s decision to impose a blanket 24% tariff on Japanese imports. He aims to visit the US soon to present Japan’s case as a fair trade partner.   In Taiwan, President Lai Ching-te said his administration would work closely with Washington to remove trade barriers and increase purchases of American goods in an effort to reduce the bilateral trade deficit. The island's defence ministry has also submitted a new list of US military procurements to highlight its strategic partnership.   Economists and strategists are warning of deeper economic consequences. Ronald Temple, chief market strategist at Lazard, said the scale and speed of these tariffs could result in far more severe damage than previously anticipated. ‘This isn’t just a bilateral conflict anymore — more countries are likely to respond in the coming weeks,’ he noted.   Analysts at Barclays cautioned that smaller Asian economies, such as Singapore and South Korea, may face challenges in negotiating with Washington and are already adjusting their economic growth forecasts downward in response to the unfolding trade crisis.           Oil Prices Sink on Demand Concerns   Crude oil continued its sharp slide on Monday, driven by recession fears and weakened global demand. Brent fell 3.9% to $63.04 a barrel, while WTI plunged over 4% to $59.49—both benchmarks marking weekly losses exceeding 10%. Analysts say inflationary pressures and slowing economic activity may drag demand down, even though energy imports were excluded from the latest round of tariffs.   Vandana Hari of Vanda Insights noted, ‘The market is struggling to find a bottom. Until there’s a clear signal from Trump that calms recession fears, crude prices will remain under pressure.’   OPEC+ Adds Further Pressure with Output Hike   Bearish sentiment intensified after OPEC+ announced it would boost production by 411,000 barrels per day in May, far surpassing the expected 135,000 bpd. The alliance called on overproducing nations to submit compensation plans by April 15. Analysts fear this surprise move could undo years of supply discipline and weigh further on already fragile oil markets.   Global political risks also flared over the weekend. Iran rejected US proposals for direct nuclear negotiations and warned of potential military action. Meanwhile, Russia claimed fresh territorial gains in Ukraine’s Sumy region and ramped up attacks on surrounding areas—further darkening the outlook for markets.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock watch, good buying (+313%) toi hold onto the 173.32 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
    • META stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 507.48, 557.84 at https://stockconsultant.com/?META
    • TMUS T-Mobile stock, watch for a top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?TMUS
    • KULR KULR Technology stock watch, pullback to 1.25 triple support area with bullish indicators at https://stockconsultant.com/?KULR
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.