Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

O66

Zenfire and DTN Feed Different?

Recommended Posts

Fulcrum,

can you confirm from your experience that,considering the lag from Eurex Exchange to USA, the **SEQUENCE** of bid/ask is syncronized with the contracts_exchange data so, that the EUREX.DTN data can offer a correct cumulative delta approach?

(using i.e. The GomCD indicators for Ninja)

 

 

Thanks

 

Paolo

 

So far from over a hundred traders I know using my developed CD based trading methods in the EU and other various countries outside the US, I have not yet heard any problems reported with DTN feed (as compared to the speed of TT Fix or zenfire used for the trade execution feed). As a matter of fact, the gentlemen who have developed the TradeVec platform (based in the EU) are currently using DTN as the feed to power the charting with their very well developed CD tools. TradeVec then uses TT Fix adapter feed for the trade Execution Zone to execute trades. I have not yet heard of any feed lag problems from the TradeVec crew and all their testing with DTN, but I will ask them Monday (I trade LIVE on TradeVec myself in the same configuration with vCap Futures as my broker........ TradeVec - Algorithmic Trading Platform | vCapFutures.com ).

 

Hopefully if there is a DTN feed lag issue with some EU based customers this problem can be resolved with some combined efforts.....the TEAMwork approach usually has more leverage (Together Everyone Achieves More).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
However despite this you where recommending it as such up until the recent CME reporting changes. It is certainly not "unusable for proper bid/ask data needs". You are assuming that everyones needs are the same as yours. Sure if you want to do cumulative work it is probably inappropriate and it would make sense to use something like DTN.IQ. However if you are a scalper using relative V@B V@A or if timeliness is of greater concern than completeness then Zen is likely a better choice. Also consider that using 'delta' as a proxy for order flow/inventory is likely to only be around 80% accurate at best anyway.

 

.....and as I have properly stated, those broker supplied feeds are just fine for the non-bid/ask tracking needs of retail trades. I think I have been crystal clear in my complaints of the broker supplied feeds only in the category of proper bid/ask tracking.

 

WOW....80%.....I will take those odds in a NY second! :)

 

I have stopped trading for the month of June and I am taking a little break until July 1st....for the month of June I had double digit monthly returns in all my various accounts, so I have no complaints with the information provided by the bid/ask differential tracking (used for trade entry determinations). Using Cumulative Delta in all my trading has had a substantial dynamic expansion of my month over month returns these past years.....it has really made the difference for me.

Edited by FulcrumTrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
.....and as I have properly stated, those broker supplied feeds are just fine for the non-bid/ask tracking needs of retail trades. I think I have been crystal clear in my complaints of the broker supplied feeds only in the category of proper bid/ask tracking.

 

WOW....80%.....I will take those odds in a NY second! :)

 

My point is they may be fine for non cumulative bid ask work too (e.g. relative work or delta oscillators where inaccuracies become stale quickly). Anyway lets hope Zenfire make the necessary changes to get things where they were a year or so ago it's a shame there is not much real choice in the retail space.

 

Hehe I'd tale those odds too :D:D though before people get too excited I should stress I was referring to accuracy in using delta to determining direction of order flow, still a far better starting point than a whole bunch of other metrics - but still some way to go to incorporate that information into ones trading!

 

Edit: Enjoy your break btw

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My point is they may be fine for non cumulative bid ask work too (e.g. relative work or delta oscillators where inaccuracies become stale quickly). Anyway lets hope Zenfire make the necessary changes to get things where they were a year or so ago it's a shame there is not much real choice in the retail space.

 

Hehe I'd tale those odds too :D:D though before people get too excited I should stress I was referring to accuracy in using delta to determining direction of order flow, still a far better starting point than a whole bunch of other metrics - but still some way to go to incorporate that information into ones trading!

 

Edit: Enjoy your break btw

 

Yes indeed.......it would sure be nice if these various broker supplied feed companies could do what is needed from an infrastructure stand point and get their feeds set up for proper and accurate bid/ask tracking (why do you think I keep challenging them so much.....LOL!). Also, I have heard the rumors of Tradestation revamping their entire data feed and charting to exactly enable accurate bid/ask order flow tracking (by late summer).....I really hope this is true!!! :) The more companies working to add bid/ask tracking the better imo for additional options of charting and feeds to track Cumulative Delta.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A real simple solution for those that do not have the infrastructure to handle large ammounts of order book data would be to simply flag each trade saying @BB true/false @BA true/false. That adds a measly 2 bits of information to each trade packet, pretty trivial. Of course that is not good enough for more intricate studies (like tracking pulled orders) but would certainly be a decent compromise..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use market delta with DTN IQ and execute through Ninja/Zen

 

I trade news releases, today I had an issue.

Today 6/29 right after the consumer confidence number came out the iq feed and zen fire stayed the same at first but about 15 seconds after the release there was a difference of up to 2 points in the es.

 

I rely on the IQ Feed to be accurate and am confident it was but this presented a huge problem for me.

My point is if you were running MD or IRT off the zen feed and using dtn ma for back fill you would have incorrect data that would be corrected later. This is only the second time I have ever noticed a difference, the other time was on the euro.

 

I would rate IQ Feed as #1 after not only what I have read here but also a friend and I went out to lunch with some guys he works with that run a huge arb operation and they use IQ Feed also, not the much more expensive data from DTN (forgot name) and cost is not an issue at all I imagine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DTN/IQ does provide DOM, but it's an extra $20

 

https://www.iqfeed.net/index.cfm?displayaction=data&section=account&menu=1&signup=premiums

 

Ive used IQ for 5ish years now. I've never missed a tick - it's always up. I admit now and then I do get a very small lag (1/2 sec), but its rare and doesnt bother me for how I trade.

 

I've no experience with Zenfire or Ninja.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DTN/IQ does provide DOM, but it's an extra $20

 

https://www.iqfeed.net/index.cfm?displayaction=data&section=account&menu=1&signup=premiums

 

Ive used IQ for 5ish years now. I've never missed a tick - it's always up. I admit now and then I do get a very small lag (1/2 sec), but its rare and doesnt bother me for how I trade.

 

I've no experience with Zenfire or Ninja.

 

Thanks for the link, I figured Zen Fire was wrong not DTN. My post was a little unclear

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

im using IRT (=marketdelta) and Ninja Dom, both are feeded with Zenfire.

 

"Today 6/29 right after the consumer confidence number came out the iq feed and zen fire stayed the same at first but about 15 seconds after the release there was a difference of up to 2 points in the es."

 

I had the samething, IRT was for almost a minute 2 points behind the Ninja Dom

 

Both are based on the same feed. Not sure if IRT or Ninja is the problem but there was a big difference.

Edited by O66

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for the link, I figured Zen Fire was wrong not DTN. My post was a little unclear

 

I am not sure that is a valid assumption. DTN prioritises completeness over timeliness, round news is when Zen might well drop packets however it is likely to have the freshest prices for those couple of seconds. Not saying that is what happened just that it may not be a safe assumption.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
More Canadian Penny Stock News with an average of 209% gainers

 

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP--->Free Newsletter[/size]

 

Go away.......................

Edited by TLAdmin
spam url removed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Correct....that may be possible (have no idea what would cause this for EU based traders though). BTW, I know many EU and Dubai based traders using CD trading methods I have developed (with DTN as their feed for CD work), so I will have to talk with all of them Monday to see what they are detecting.

 

Hi FulcrumTrader! Any news from your EU based traders yet?

 

Btw I gote a message from Rithmic that they use TCP for order routing AND their data feed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Btw I gote a message from Rithmic that they use TCP for order routing AND their data feed.

 

Hmmm interesting. If that is the case then they must purposely drop ticks under certain conditions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could anyone provide feedback on eSignal's data feed. DTN has proven to be unreliable when used with Neoticker to track more then 200 symbols. Although I can confirm that their data is very clean.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Zenfire's ES data is only slightly less error ridden than Think or Swims (TD Bank owned), which is god awful. Gaps ranging from several minutes to 2 hours and 40 minutes last week alone on zenfire/ninja.

 

It's therefore little wonder that NinjaTrader has allied itself with many LaSalle St. 'bucket shops'.

 

As the Roman crowd is able to consolidate ownership of data sources from the trading floors, your data will become increasingly unreliable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Zenfire's ES data is only slightly less error ridden than Think or Swims (TD Bank owned), which is god awful. Gaps ranging from several minutes to 2 hours and 40 minutes last week alone on zenfire/ninja.

 

 

That's weird, I have only ever seen holes of a second or two, never minutes let alone hours. Having said that I don't spend that much time in front of the PC at the moment. When did the 2h 40m outtage occur and did the client show disconnected? Usually an outage of that length the forums and chat rooms would be incandescent with fury. I wonder if you are experiencing another issue as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's the most recent on this...?

 

I've abandoned NT as a possibility--I am going to go with either Investor RT or Sierra Chart, which is much faster and intuitive than NT.

 

I'm trying to decide whether to go with a TT feed from Veocity, a Rithmic feed from Optimus/Vision, or to spring for the $80 or so for a separate IQFeed.

 

After reading this thread it seems no service is perfect--the question is, is IQFeed at $80-100 a month worth it as compared to a free Rithmic feed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

*** UPDATE ***

 

When tracking any sort of BID/ASK differential tools (Cumulative Delta candlesticks, footprint charts, GomLadder, the new "Prometheus" tool over at bigmiketrading, etc) you MUST use CLEAN DATA ! I have tracked Cumulative Delta now for 8 years and this is the current proper way to track Cumulative Delta;

 

Investor RT Pro/MarketDelta.com connected to DTN.IQ feed

 

SC connected to DTN.IQ feed

 

NT7 connected to DTN.IQ feed

 

TradeVec connected to DTN.IQ feed

 

Multicharts connected to DTN.IQ feed (YES indeed!!! I have been working with Multicharts past weeks and they are going to offer Cumulative Delta tools in the months ahead......I have already tested their initial Cumulative Delta candlesticks and I suggested they go ahead and release CD tools for public "beta" testing/feedback........YEEEEEEHAAAAAAA!!!!!)

 

 

*** I DO NOT ever recommend using continuous contracts for proper Cumulative Delta tracking or ever doing backfill data (good DTN.IQ feed thrown on top of junk broker supplied data).......DON'T do layering of data for CD tracking. Also, I have not yet found consistent BID/ASK data from Esignal, so I would not use that data at all. I also do not at all suggest using Zenfire, TT Fix, TS data, OEC data, Transact data, IB data, etc. With DTN.IQ feed you get CLEAN exceptionally reliable BID/ASK data with 30 days of historical BID/ASK data access.....this is the only feed I use for BID/ASK data at this time.

 

For additional details, there is a free webinar over at bigmiketrading this Thursday that covers all aspects of Cumulative Delta usage and data needs.

 

Hope this info helps!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.