Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

JohnnyB12

Bid/Ask Volume Contradictions

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

This is my first post on the forum. This is in regards to my studying up on support & resistance and how I've been finding that some of the stocks I've been buying/following lately have had what I consider odd shifts.

 

For instance, I have stocks in LRT.UN, which has had a significantly higher volume of bids than asks (in some cases 80 to 30), with a very small spread, yet the bulls catch the play.

 

I am working hard to understand the concept of volume and what I find on the web only states that things should go the other way.

 

How can I better anticipate what the brokers are fixing?

 

Thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There have been several threads here in the past on 'delta' (Vol@bid and Vol@Ask) you should be able to find them if you look round. http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f6/order-flow-analytics-7173.html is the most recent.

 

My hunch is that a lot of what you read was based on false assumptions. If you take a look at that thread I made a post recently listing why I have reservations about 'delta' as a proxy for order flow.

 

I haven't traded stocks for ages but when I did at times you would see Goldies sitting best bid (or a level or two outside) absorbing 100's of thousands (or even millions) of shares. Needless to say price would eventually rise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlowFish said:
There have been several threads here in the past on 'delta' (Vol@bid and Vol@Ask) you should be able to find them if you look round. http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f6/order-flow-analytics-7173.html is the most recent.

 

My hunch is that a lot of what you read was based on false assumptions. If you take a look at that thread I made a post recently listing why I have reservations about 'delta' as a proxy for order flow.

 

I haven't traded stocks for ages but when I did at times you would see Goldies sitting best bid (or a level or two outside) absorbing 100's of thousands (or even millions) of shares. Needless to say price would eventually rise.

 

The main reason I love to use Cumulative Delta for my primary trading analysis is the fact that I keep seeing the exact same "supply & demand" patterns repeat over and over again. Successful trading is a "pattern" identification business in my mind, and developing a method to identify repeating patterns is exceptionally important to me. Another very important advantage of tracking order flow with Cumulative Delta is the ability to see about 80% to 90% of commercials order entries/exits. Commercials blast in and out order flow with market orders for the majority of their trading activities.....so I definitely want to be able to see that order flow and how it is distributed each day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  FulcrumTrader said:
....... Cumulative Delta is the ability to see about 80% to 90% of commercials order entries/exits. Commercials blast in and out order flow with market orders for the majority of their trading activities.....so I definitely want to be able to see that order flow and how it is distributed each day.

 

What makes you think the 'commercials' use market orders to accumulate a position? I wonder if you saw my post about accumulation in the other thread? I wonder if you might have a crack at answering that as I do have respect for the stuff you have written despite being somewhat doubtful about your core assumptions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlowFish said:
What makes you think the 'commercials' use market orders to accumulate a position? I wonder if you saw my post about accumulation in the other thread? I wonder if you might have a crack at answering that as I do have respect for the stuff you have written despite being somewhat doubtful about your core assumptions.

 

I KNOW Commercials use market order entries and exits for the majority of their trade activity due to aquired knowledge I have about their automated order entry systems. I also have Chicago based contacts throughout the past years and have verified how Commercials work their positions in and out of the market. You have to realize that current technologies offer Commercials the BEST ability to hide their order entry and exits through automation with "at the moment" initiated market order operations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FulcrumTRader,

can you make an example of :

"the BEST ability to hide their order entry and exits through automation".

Thanks

 

 

 

 

  FulcrumTrader said:
I KNOW Commercials use market order entries and exits for the majority of their trade activity due to aquired knowledge I have about their automated order entry systems. I also have Chicago based contacts throughout the past years and have verified how Commercials work their positions in and out of the market. You have to realize that current technologies offer Commercials the BEST ability to hide their order entry and exits through automation with "at the moment" initiated market order operations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  paolfili said:
FulcrumTRader,

can you make an example of :

"the BEST ability to hide their order entry and exits through automation".

Thanks

 

Commercials SELL into markets frequently that are at the moment trading higher and BUY into markets that are at the moment trading lower. For an example, as Commercials price targets are met (for whatever system they use to decide WHEN to get into a market) they will start to sell at the moment into a rising market with market orders. Commercials initiate trade frequently into a movement of price that at the moment is counter to the intended direction of their trade.....they don't wait until after price rolls over in a rally to sell into. Commercials initiate trade with rapid automated order entry of market orders into movements of price that will BEST hide their order entry maneuvering (while getting a good entry price and not creating slippage from their heavy entry into the market).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  FulcrumTrader said:
I KNOW Commercials use market order entries and exits for the majority of their trade activity due to aquired knowledge I have about their automated order entry systems. I also have Chicago based contacts throughout the past years and have verified how Commercials work their positions in and out of the market. You have to realize that current technologies offer Commercials the BEST ability to hide their order entry and exits through automation with "at the moment" initiated market order operations.

 

The very best way to hide your order is to use a market order! I'll certainly acquiesce to that:D Rather than repeating ourselves here I wonder if you saw my post here http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/6/order-flow-analytics-7173-4.html#post82577 I really would welcome your comments as I do find your work most interesting. In a nutshell have difficulty with the core assumption that 'commercials' trade aggressively and 'non commercials' (retail?)passively.My experience of a variety of 'commercial' participants in a variety of markets is difference to yours. Another angle is to have a 'commercial' trading aggressively on one side and a 'non-commercial' trading passively on the other you need roughly equal volume on both sides. A quick look at the Co shows this not to be the case. Another thing, a cursory investigation into market micostructure would show that there are numerous types of informed traders using quite different methods to conduct there business.

 

As I have said I do have respect for your work (otherwise I would not bother pursuing this,) not only does it seem to fit together coherently but it seems to provide you with a decent framework to make your trading decisions. (This is of course what's important.) The trouble that I have is with the core premise that participants accumulating or distributing inventory predominantly do so aggressively.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.