Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

AgeKay

Why Does Support Turn into Resistance and Vice Versa?

Recommended Posts

I think it started sometime back in history with some valid basis - like value of stock based on company performance where once the price crossed the 'resistance' no one was willing to consider a price lower to sell.

 

Ever since tech analysis has become mainstream i think it is the stops that more or less drive it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The basis is supply and demand. When price returns to a prior resistance pivot more supply comes into the market. If the market pushes it higher through the resistance then once it returns to this prior reistance point there "should" be less supply therefore it turns now to support. Note these support/resistance areas are zones and not exact levels.

 

See following IBM chart as an example of resistance turning to support which now on Friday returned to resistance. Also the close on Thursday had already showed react to this zone. This area was also S/R back in May/July/Aug '08.

IBM.png.bf933a222568c89b28ad5d5f31d27130.png

Edited by SunTrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It depends on the market. In the bund, S/R is accurate to the tick.

 

Hmmm ... most times yes. But it remains a market with many traders and big volume.

 

Sometimes it proceeds like a communcation protocol, price moves to S as a message, climbs a little distance as an ACK,

comes back as a message asking for confirmation, climbs agains as ACK or falls thru as NAK.

 

So traders may be communicating to each other using price as a channel and R/S as a protocol.

Edited by Marko23
Added some thoughts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hmmm ... most times yes. But it remains a market with many traders and big volume.

 

Sometimes it proceeds like a communcation protocol, price moves to S as a message, climbs a little distance as an ACK,

comes back as a message asking for confirmation, climbs agains as ACK or falls thru as NAK.

 

So traders may be communicating to each other using price as a channel and R/S as a protocol.

 

hahaha - think the algos are feeling each other up :0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The main reason for supports/ resistance not holding is the pattern recognition algo's used by block traders... These algo's once confirm a trending down / up in a major index then no longer use their oscillator based module to trade and hence support or resistance becomes far far less effective in their exit strategy . ( hence going through support )

There was a very strong support on GS @ 160 but there was over 12 block trades ranging from 1.2mil to 5 mil last past two trading days to cut through the 160 level like hot knife through the butter,,,

 

hope this makes sense

 

Grey1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some people will not like this way to think about “S/R” but perhaps it may be helpful to others:

 

Assume that S/R is a valid concept.

(Perhaps even “to the tick” as was posted here)

 

Then it would be trivial to design a highly profitable strategy from it:

- When price is going down and approaching support: Position a buy order with size X (less than 50% of the buying power of the account) at support.

- If price goes up after touching support stay in the position until your profit target is reached (or exit at break-even if price is moving back down)

- If price breaks support (going further down) reverse position to short with size 2*X. Then stay (at your discretion) in the position until the loss vanishes (break-even) or ride the downtrend to the next lower support.

 

If it would be safely possible to spot S/R the outlined strategy would be fail-safe and it would at worst break even, never loose.

Therefore it would be easy to make nearly unlimited amounts of profit using this strategy.

 

 

Since we know that this does not work so simply some other idea might be considered:

 

“Support” and “Resistance” are concepts that work sometimes but only on a rather statistical basis and they are in many cases just expressions of random processes.

(Please do not think that I am adherer to the random walk hypothesis of the markets – I am certainly not. Just quite skeptical about the validity of S/R).

 

So trying to answer the question “why does S turn into R?”

S and R are not really well-defined.

At least much worse defined than people think.

And mathematical logic says that it is impossible to answer a question in which the words of which it is constituted are not clearly defined.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it would be safely possible to spot S/R the outlined strategy would be fail-safe and it would at worst break even, never loose.

 

You're always risking at least 1 tick (2 ticks if you use stop orders) whenever you enter a position. Just because S/R breaks, does not mean that it will move far enough to make it worthwhile. And I don't know what market your trading but the bund does not always move in discrete steps. If you check today's chart, you can see that it literally jumped from 123.41 to 50 at 11:17am CET.

 

“Support” and “Resistance” are concepts that work sometimes but only on a rather statistical basis and they are in many cases just expressions of random processes.

 

I agree. I my opinion, S/R is less about how often it works (accuracy) but more about finding good entries. If you're S/R is broken, you know you're wrong.

 

S and R are not really well-defined.

At least much worse defined than people think.

 

I agree that many people use it very broadly. For me, S/R are prices where a price move has reversed repeatedly.

 

For example, if you look at today's chart of bund, between 9:07 and 9:45 CET, the bund bounced off of 123.26/27 exactly 29 times and then another 3 times off of 123.25. If this wasn't Support that I don't know what is. During the same time, it bounced off of 123.29/30 also 19 times. So that was the corresponding Resistance which later on (13:40 CET) turned into support and then after climbing 14 ticks bounced off of 123.44, of which it bounced off of earlier twice (12:12 and 12:32 CET).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's the ultimate slap in the face, the price action definition of a breakout.

 

Imagine Resistance being the Bear and the Bull approaches him says right to his face you are now one of us, and the Bear joins the Bull to become one.

 

Nemesis

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I got an email this morning asking me why I had not not been back in a while to the forums. Then I stopped back to see if any interesting discussions were happening and spotted this thread. I read the entire thread and then realized why I hadn't been back for a while.

 

There were a few traders stating that "Support becomes Resistance and vice versa . . . to the tick" but no one posted a chart to show this interesting phenomenon. Seeing that it NEVER happens consistently, how could anyone use this as a trading tool?

 

Support and Resistance are the fundamental building blocks to every chart. It is not only critical that your charts create readable Support & Resistance but you understand how to recognize those points on your chart. What is consistent is that the creation of Support will ALWAYS be followed by the creation of Resistance which will ALWAYS be followed by the creation of Support which will ALWAYS be followed by the creation of Resistance which will ALWAYS be followed by the . . . . forever and ever and ever.

 

Support and Resistance points are proof that price action is cyclic but what is important is the cycle itself not that the cycle has a specific duration (which they do not) nor that specific cycle tops become specific cycle bottoms which does not happen with any useful consistency.

 

Once you understand that Support & Resistance are constants (if your charts are built without the variable aspects of time) then trading becomes as simple as trading from established and confirmed Support toward established and confirmed Resistance and trading from established and confirmed Resistance toward established and confirmed Support. You can take it a step farther if you understand there are 2 distinct levels of Support and Resistance, Prime & Minor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Take away the indicators, the moving averages, and the colored bars. In fact, take away the bars and the entire idea of a graphical representation and what are you left with? A price. A value placed upon some underlying object (or paper, or contract), determined by who will or will not pay a particular amount for it. That is it. Nothing more or less. ...

 

EDIT: Also, I highly recommend reading DbPhoenix's write-up on this topic.

hey hey lookie who is here :) arent you dbphoenix himself? disguised as a common man!

 

p.s. i always knew phenix is russian :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The behaviour of markets in general and price in particular can be viewed as a search for liquidity. The reason that these areas are visited and re visited is that they are areas where liquidity (orders) might be found.
yeah, cant agree more

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very interesting discussion -- the real question, it seems to me is how to find support and resistance. A quantifiable solution exists and is more reliable than just eyeballing a chart.

 

If you've ever looked back in time on any chart it seems that price reacts to the same levels over and over -- what was support/resistance 2 years ago is likely to hold in the present.

 

My two pennies. . .

Champ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have come to the realization that it might actually be my explanation b) after looking at the DOM for some time. There are certain prices that everyone is watching, e.g. high and low of day. And since S/R are good entries, you usually see a lot of volume transact at these prices. The winner of those battles then immediately post huge bid/offers to prevent the losers from getting out break-even of their positions. Everyone who is on the losing side wishes they were on the other and since breaks of important S/R signify trend changes, no one wants to be on the losing side any more and the previous S/R looks like a good price to go with the new trend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There were a few traders stating that "Support becomes Resistance and vice versa . . . to the tick" but no one posted a chart to show this interesting phenomenon. Seeing that it NEVER happens consistently, how could anyone use this as a trading tool?

 

The gold is not found in the consistency, such consistency will only be found in strong trends, the gold in this lies in that they do act as mini pivots, allowing you to enter with minimal risk and landing a winner should you be right on direction; which is for the most part, the key to trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a live example not in hindsight.

 

Expect the first tests to hold, whatever happens next, it's anyone's guess, but the fact that we approached precisely this level just before new earning seasons is far from a coincidence. If you were long, as you should had been, this level was a magnet.

SPY.Weekly.thumb.png.e9e2026fc2e9653cf7b438dce6e3c159.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There were a few traders stating that "Support becomes Resistance and vice versa . . . to the tick" but no one posted a chart to show this interesting phenomenon. Seeing that it NEVER happens consistently, how could anyone use this as a trading tool?

 

You won't see it on bar charts or candle stick charts. I developed my own time chart where it does show up consistently, but I am not going to post it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here's a live example not in hindsight.

 

Expect the first tests to hold, whatever happens next, it's anyone's guess, .......

I'm sure you are not meaning the posted chart's exact point but I look for a "zone" of support or resistance, especially when it involves a bar with a spike bottom or vice versa top. A daily chart for that zone shows weekly high/low and how price and volume reacted just prior to and into big selloff in Sept/Oct '08.

SPXdaily.png.11c2c395589479bf5ee03d327694baad.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm sure you are not meaning the posted chart's exact point but I look for a "zone" of support or resistance, especially when it involves a bar with a spike bottom or vice versa top. A daily chart for that zone shows weekly high/low and how price and volume reacted just prior to and into big selloff in Sept/Oct '08.

 

Yes, it's an area not an exact number, particularly in a chart as big as this (weekly).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You won't see it on bar charts or candle stick charts. I developed my own time chart where it does show up consistently, but I am not going to post it.

 

Keep that grail secret.

 

The whole idea is that once the level that the longs entered positions at is broken, they are still in losing trades or had their stops taken out. Now, some of these longs will want to get out at break even, so they exit once price returns to the broken support, creating resistance. Also, the shorts who missed the first wave enter on a retest and some prior shorts add. Either way, the only thing that causes support to become resistance (and vice versa) is traders. They can act as buyers or sellers.

Edited by martinguitar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The whole idea is that once the level that the longs entered positions at is broken, they are still in losing trades or had their stops taken out. Now, some of these longs will want to get out at break even, so they exit once price returns to the broken support, creating resistance. Also, the shorts who missed the first wave enter on a retest and some prior shorts add. Either way, the only thing that causes support to become resistance (and vice versa) is traders. They can act as buyers or sellers.

 

Exactly. That's what I was trying to say with my post although your post describes it much better than mine and yours is easier to understand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.