Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

drosengarden

Easylanguage - Track Order Fills, Partials, Avg Entry Price

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I noticed that there is a lot of help and information offered here when questions are asked. I will be opening my TS account in the next week or so. I have programming experience - and I am trying to prepare for programming once I get access.

 

I believe I have enough knowledge and seen the appropriate functions and words that will allow me to put my stategy in place.

 

However - I will be using a position pyramiding technique. I need to track info on each individual position (order) entered and I'm having dificulty finding the correct functions/words, etc.

 

Here's what I'm trying to do:

 

1. Track the status of an order (open, partial fill, how many remaining.)

2. Cancel any partial remaining open order upon a certain condition being met.

3. Track the actual number of shares opened for the order.

4. Track the average entry price of the shares opened for the order.

5. Immediately place stop loss for each share opened - as the share is opened. (eg - order 5000, 5 partials complete the order, as the 1st 1000 filled - have stop loss for 1000 shares entered, as 2nd 1000, add the 1000 to current 1000 stop loss, etc.)

 

I appreciate any insight given.

 

Also - is it true that TS treats a stop loss order only for the current bar and then cancels it? I would want a stop loss order entered and I would want it to STAY until I tell it to cancel.

 

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tams,

 

Thanks for pointing out the more "targeted" functions/words.

 

Call me blind - but I'm still having the darndest time envisioning how the sytem reports back to me the AVERAGE Entry Price during live trading.

 

It would appear that AvgEntryPrice is only usable to evaluate the strategy - which I take to mean is not a function you can use trading the strategy live.

 

Does the EntryPrice function return the price at which the strategy indicated to enter the trade - or will it in fact report back to me the true AVERAGE Entry Price for the position entered? (My list item 4) If it does not give average entry price - would there be any way to do this for the individual order entered? (I could be tracking the average entry price for 4, 5, 6 or more indivudally pyramided positions.)

 

As for determining if an order is still open - would I have to create a "while" statement that continually counted the number of shares open versus my total number of shares to be open goal and then exit the loop either at completion of goal - or a condition was met? Also during that while - update a standing stop loss order with REAL TIME number of shares in case the market moved fast? (My list items 1-3, and 5)

 

Sorry - I am Googling quite a bit and getting results. ('Cuz I know you say you can't help me if I don't at least know how to do that! :) ) I thought I had a SLEW more questions- but continued reading the EasyLanguage Reference guide based on the commands you listed for me. The above still stumps me - however.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  drosengarden said:
...

Does the EntryPrice function return the price at which the strategy indicated to enter the trade - or will it in fact report back to me ...

 

 

the answer you are looking for can be found in the dictionary...

so I won't repeat them here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tams,

 

Perhaps I can share with you what I see in the "dictionary" so you can see why I asked the question:

 

EasyLanguage Functions and Reserved Words Reference

598

EntryPrice (Reserved Word)

Disclaimer

Returns the entry price for the specified position.

EntryPrice(Num)

Where Num is a numeric expression representing the number of positions ago (up to a maximum of ten).

Remarks

This function can only be used in the evaluation of strategies. It does not require an input, however, by using the input

Num, you can obtain the specified value from a previous position, up to ten positions ago.

Example

EntryPrice(2) might return a value of 101.19 as the entry price of 2 positions ago on a chart of Microsoft stock.

 

----

That definition does not CLEARLY answer my question. The entry price at the price which the order was to be entered would seem to make more sense. (But then I wouldn't need the function because I would just save the price I placed the order in a variable or array.)

 

However, in theory I could say "enter the order at $20.00" but the first fill doesn't happen until $20.01 - so technically the order was "entered" at $20.01.

 

Either way neither of these helps me because I'm looking for the total average price of the order entered upon it being completed. So if this function is not the answer - this is what I'm trying to say that I'm having difficulty finding.

 

Also - this definition calls for another "only used in evaluation of strategies." So am I to take it that this entire exercise becomes useless to me anyway because I cannot use it during live trading?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

KISS...

 

don't try to look for something that's not there,

take the definition at it face value...

if it is not what you are looking for,

move on,

go build the function that can give you the data you want.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I take it you mean "Keep It Simple Superstar," right?

 

Let me guess - you always wanted to be like Yoda? "Riddles to me speak do you!"

 

Well - I've already formulated how to build the function (as you refer) that will yield the results I desire. I'm concerned it will slow down my processing time because it will use the function to get the position average price - and that definition warns of "intense processor useage." Not having experienced it yet - I'm just hoping it doesn't slow it down to a "detrimental" pace.

 

But during our beloved time together - I've continued reading and researching - and I "get it" now. I make what I want. I'll just have to learn more about what the "face value" of functions means as I go along.

 

I'm certain I would be a difficult student for you - considering you would be qualifed to teach. I don't exactly take much of anything at face value. There's ALWAYS a way to think outside the box - and stretch the limits. And I seem to do that quite often - think of something that someone else hasn't seen yet...too-da-loo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.