Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Soultrader

Bid-Ask Pressure Indicator for Tradestation

Recommended Posts

I know it can be done... i've been trying to do it after seeing almost the exact idea coded into an .eld from the folks at eotpro...

 

Seemed like a hugely impressive piece of information once you weeded out the small and medium sized traders and just stuck with the direction of the big fish.

 

I just don't know how to code it... and as of yet have been unable to find someone who could.

 

Cheers!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I can't seem to open this .eld file. I'm using Multicharts which should be same as Tradestation. Do you have in word format? Thanks.

 

Mike

 

You are winding me up ????????????????????????????????????????

 

 

 

just scroll up a few posts from yours..................................:o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Sorry, forgot to mention that I tried the one that was on the thread but it didn't work. I thought maybe it was specially for TS 2000i and not compatible with Multicharts. If it's same as for current TS then it should've worked. Anyway, just checking if it was different. I'll try again. Thanks for the codes.

 

Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i copied the code into Easylanguage power editor but when i try and verify it it doesnt like the

'intrabarpersist MyCurrentBar(0),' code. it highlights MyCurrent bar

error message is word not recognised by Easylanguage. I am using 2000i. Could anyone please help with that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I can't seem to open this .eld file. I'm using Multicharts which should be same as Tradestation. Do you have in word format? Thanks.

 

Mike

 

3 or 4 posts back its quoted in plain ascii text. Cut and paste that into MC's PLEditor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

there's seems to be some error in the script because when i compile in PLEditor and try to insert the study on the chart it says the study is not compiled so to check for errors and compile the study

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Good idea spyro, Blu-Ray, can this be done? if it can, and if you have time, can you please change the code to reflect spyro reply?

 

If not no worries

 

Thanks

 

Hi Blu-ray,

 

Dont know if this helps with my question above?

 

currentcontracts is a reserved word

 

Value1 = currentcontracts;

 

My problem now is how to get this intergrated with the rest of the Bid/Ask indicator. Hope you can help us out.

 

Many thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Blu-Ray

 

I went through the Tradestation forum, and I found this code, please correct me if I'm wrong, I think it dispalys contracts based on users input. Would you mind having a look at it , I've plotted it on my machine, and I think it might do? But it would be better if it was like an oscillator, and color coding it i.e. green/red for buying / selling.

 

 

What do you think?

 

Thanks

 

Inputs: 
Level  (25); 

Variables: 
VolQty  (0); 

if BarType >= 2 then begin 
if Volume >= Level then VolQty = Volume; 
if Volume < Level then VolQty = 0; 
end else begin 
if Ticks >= Level then VolQty = Ticks; 
if Ticks < Level then VolQty = 0; 
end;	  

Plot1( VolQty, "Volume" )

Edited by theman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Blu-Ray

 

I went through the Tradestation forum, and I found this code, please correct me if I'm wrong, I think it dispalys contracts based on users input. Would you mind having a look at it , I've plotted it on my machine, and I think it might do? But it would be better if it was like an oscillator, and color coding it i.e. green/red for buying / selling.

 

 

What do you think?

 

Thanks

 

Inputs: 
Level  (25); 

Variables: 
VolQty  (0); 

if BarType >= 2 then begin 
if Volume >= Level then VolQty = Volume; 
if Volume < Level then VolQty = 0; 
end else begin 
if Ticks >= Level then VolQty = Ticks; 
if Ticks < Level then VolQty = 0; 
end;	  

Plot1( VolQty, "Volume" )

 

Hi theman

 

That code won't do the trick, basically what that code is doing is showing volume over 25 for the whole bar, if the volume for the whole bar is less than 25 it will plot 0.

 

I know how to code it up, but have been struggling for time a little bit lately, I'll hopefully get around to doing it at the weekend.

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

blu

 

just little another thing

 

if you can and if it not so hard to make the bars fat or thin if it for example more or less then 100 contracts so we can see if it push up hard or low

 

 

thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
blu

 

just little another thing

 

if you can and if it not so hard to make the bars fat or thin if it for example more or less then 100 contracts so we can see if it push up hard or low

 

 

thanks

 

Sorry, I don't get what you're trying to portray, as we'll just be showing contracts over 100 anyway.

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think spyro is bascially saying the following:

 

This is from e otpro's site:

 

The size of the dot tells you how much volume is in that particular bar, relative to the last 3 half-cycles. So, a large dot means greater than average volume is flowing into the bar for that type of trade. A tiny dot means not much volume.

 

It was important to split out the dot sizes, because… say you have a big push down from the large traders, and then the dots start drifting back towards the zero line. That drift up could be happening because they are buying, but it could also be happening because they aren’t doing anything. If no volume prints for their size, the dots will tend toward zero from wherever they are. I wanted to differentiate action from non-action. It’s working well to do so, today.

 

And this is the image (its the bottom indicator)

 

splatter1-300x209.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just curious... BidAsk, huh.. realtime... As I understand this it only takes the bidsize and asksize, not the actually trades.

How can this be interesting? What about hidden orders? And what about bids coming and going just to tease or trick the ask-side, viceversa.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just curious... BidAsk, huh.. realtime... As I understand this it only takes the bidsize and asksize, not the actually trades.

How can this be interesting? What about hidden orders? And what about bids coming and going just to tease or trick the ask-side, viceversa.

 

No it takes actual trades. It compares volume traded @ bid against volume traded @ ask. Aggressive sellers vs aggressive buyers.

 

Marketdelta.com & Investor RT are the sites to go to find out more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So it's a sort of the volume/ tick delta indicator? And what's the difference then?

 

And may I then ask why it doesn't work at historic data?

 

The reason for my questions, is that I'm currently working at something similar (maybe) :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, as far as I can tell its is a volume delta that has been smoothed with an ema (maybe double smoothed?).

 

The problem with getting it to work with historic data is if you are using say minute bars you would need to build these with tick by tick data for bid ask and trade data to build the delta. Neoticker allows this I believe and Ninja are promising something like this for version 7. Investor RT can probably cope with it somehow but not sure of the details as I have never used it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.