Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

chrisp

Trading the es friday 13 nov with mp

Recommended Posts

Hello to the forum. I have benefited immensely from the contributions here and wanted to post something as a contribution. The action on the ES on Friday 13 NOV was very interesting and what follows is how I saw the market pre-open and then how I adjusted my analysis as the market developed. Please critique and comment freely.

BTW I am a paper trader, still very much a learner and I am not saying in any way “this is how to trade”.

 

Please note: I am on central European time and my opening bracket is D.

 

EOD Analysis of ES Thursday 12 NOV

 

From my journal

 

Direction down vol1741K which is higher than Previous Day & higher than average for this unit, VA is wider than PD & wider than average: trade is being facilitated to downside. Buyers made a b in G-M but fresh selling came in in N, forming a spike.

 

BIAS TO DOWNSIDE TESTING LO OF UNIT AT 74.00

 

LOOK FOR RESPECT AT G & E SINGLES 0911

 

Analysis of ES after open on Friday 13 NOV

 

D and E brackets started to build value in the Previous Day spike starting at N. However I missed the significance of price respecting the single print at G on 09 NOV: this was the first clue that the 12 NOV spike at N was not sufficient selling to counter the buyers in the Long Liquidation Break of the G-M period on 12 NOV. CF MP graphic.

 

A psychological aside: I missed this chance to change my downward bias altho I had noted this in my EOD analysis for 12 NOV: I find it extraordinarily hard to keep all elements of my analysis co-ordinated as the market develops.

 

A second chance to change my downward bias came when I looked at the 15 minute chart. Here is the excerpt from my journal:

 

I identified accumulation on the 15 minute chart which confirmed the G-M b loop, Analysis as follows:

1 ultra vol-152K

2 3 4 confirm this as buying

4 hi is the top of the b loop

so it looks like the buyers in the b loop are active today

 

For entry I looked at the 4 minute chart. The white diamond bar was my reference because of hi volume and good facilitation. Following this my analysis was VSA based so I will leave this out. However the ellipse at 1 can be considered a Long Liquidation Break on a minor scale (on a small time frame market profile a b shape would appear). This was a heads up for me and an entry long around 91.50.

 

Post Trade Analysis

 

And how did the trade turn out? Adequate R/R but nothing special. My data feed was interrupted but it looks like J was the high and thereafter value built overlapping to higher above the G-M loop. Which brings me to time frames, something which I am very unsure about, but this is how I see it:

 

12 NOV N spike day time frame takes control EOD (BTW if anyone has ideas about why these spikes develop EOD I would be very interested: it seems often like traders covering or liquidating and making a loss, but I can't figure out why.)

 

13 NOV BO from 12 NOV LLB loop, swing/overnight traders now in control in the day frame but longer TF is still selling as indicated in the EOD analysis at the beginning. If this is so then Monday (tomorrow) or the following days should see more downside.

 

If (a big if) I have the time frame analysis right then my long trade was OK but it kept me out of the better trade which was to fade the G-M Break Out up so I would be aligned with the longer time frame trader. My grandmother would probably reply” a bird in the hand...”

5aa70f5ab851b_ESMARKETPROFILE.thumb.jpg.e67d0b7b2ee1037c0b30847d493fe3ae.jpg

5aa70f5ac0cf5_ES15MINUTEACCUMULATION.thumb.jpg.98bdb7d31fa18062940d5c6a05becf5e.jpg

5aa70f5ac514e_ES4MINUTE.thumb.jpg.a3a97e7e628bf6e63d9428d792cf08b9.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest that you look at the order flow at your critical s and r areas. just looking at volume the way you are is not telling you much. mp gives greqat structure and shows where value is travelling but you need more info to actually time and validate the trade, and that for me is order flow. I'm teaching my daughter to trade and the basis of what I teach her is to use ordere flow within the MP structires. I have a couple of examples in the blog we use to document what we do.

Edited by electroniclocal
typo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would love to be able to read order flow in the sense of T&S. Sadly I don't believe it is possible to acquire this skill without a mentor and personal instruction. Please correct me if you think I am wrong in this. I am less convinced by Market Delta, at least from an MP point of view.

I do know a profitable trader who enters trades almost exclusively on the basis of the profile. However he also has:1) deep pockets 2)excellent trade management 3) almost flawless discipline. I admire him but if I tried to emulate him I would quickly be broke and probably divorced. I try to redress the balance by employing VSA/Wyckoff ideas. In this thread I have kept the emphasis on MP.

Chris

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.