Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Dinerotrader

Interesting Charts for Technical Trades

Recommended Posts

  Dinerotrader said:
I'll try to get some more large cap stocks in the mix. Feel free to throw some in also.

 

In my book, if its less than $10, its a penny stock. I just figured I do a scroll through penny land to find something to share here in your thread.

 

Market cap has nothing to do with it, either. For example, Citigroup has so many shares outstanding, I think they were still a large cap at 98 cents/share. A large cap penny stock, that is.

 

Here is a source I have used week after week for many years now to find candiates for my watch list.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

IBD 100 as of 12-11-2009.xlsFetching info...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Dinerotrader said:
KTII

 

Here is where I would like a breakout to play. We'll see what we get.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=16557&stc=1&d=1260742176

 

Hi Dinerotrader,

 

Because I use seperate computer for internet browsing and trading or trading platform, I didnt look at more of the data i.e left edge and sometimes that fact can change things....that said.

 

now thats a good looking clear chart..

Thats a good looking chart... and if it can succesfully breakout it has a lot of room to potentialy run, making it a good trade from a business stand point.

 

Since Im not a breakout trader and its because Im not used to buying rallies and nothing more.

I would have gotten positioned on and near the trendline touch you have on your chart.

 

last of all, thales brings up an old but vital consideration, no matter how great a stock looks the index futures will influence its movement.

 

When I used to daytrade stocks, a long time ago, I had one eye on the stock and one eye on its index. one of the main reasons why I decided to daytrade futures exclusively.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Hi Dinero,

 

I'll join your penny stock parade. I'm not initiating any new longs right now given the current market action, but, if the markets intentions were clearly to continue up, this is what I would be looking for: SRLS has established a nice, orderly uptrend over several months, and it is now puling back after getting to within 34 pennies of its all time high according to the data I have on Telecharts. I like this little pullback to 3.50, so I would be looking to buy if Friday's high is bttered by at least a dime, and my stop loss would be a penny below Friday's low. I'd be watchful at the 4.50 level (all time high $4.54), but my intention would be to hold this for a few bags if it pushed tonew all time highs.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Hi Dinero,

 

I'm still not looking to initiate any new longs at this time, but I still like this action on SRLS. Buy stop is 3.84, as noted a week ago. Buy stop has not yet triggered, but another pullback to 3.50 occurred.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

SRLS1.thumb.jpg.0f42bc74888814979e66d53abb2b4c9a.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
Hi Dinero,

 

I'm still not looking to initiate any new longs at this time, but I still like this action on SRLS. Buy stop is 3.84, as noted a week ago. Buy stop has not yet triggered, but another pullback to 3.50 occurred.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Please do post a quick note here when you begin to initiate any longs and why.

 

Do you have specific criteria you use to decide if you are willing to enter new long positions or is it just a general feeling after considering all the market factors you observe?

 

What did you think of my H-L-HL here?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
I'm still not looking to initiate any new longs at this time, but I still like this action on SRLS. Buy stop is 3.84, as noted a week ago. Buy stop has not yet triggered, but another pullback to 3.50 occurred.

 

SRLS did print at 3.84, and while I doubt I would have been filled based on that lone print, for the sake of this paper trade, we will assume that I own SRLS at 3.84. The fact that 3.84 was the high tick since posting this stock, we are safe in assuming that I would now own it at no more than 3.84/share.

 

I'll track this here as though I own it. Stop loss is as noted - $3.84.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

SRLS2.thumb.jpg.069a0a4acce5f6f5fe022d7d5238cf04.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CKH

Here is a confusing one to me which I wouldn't trade because I am torn between a long and short position. I see an obvious head and shoulder pattern but I also see a pretty strong S/R level that price just moved up from.

 

I'll be back posting more charts on Monday and posting some follow ups on charts I posted that I took real trades on.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=16862&stc=1&d=1261790588

5aa70f8a238af_12-25-20091.thumb.png.dd4d22492d1e7d5b7f1681cab803deb9.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Dinerotrader said:
SWSI

 

This one is just interesting. Resistence at one level and Support was just a bit above that in the past. That would me me leary of taking any breakout move on this until we cleared the 2nd hurdle.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=16634&stc=1&d=1260914642

 

It would be easier if you just numbered the charts in order to make it easy to respond to multiple post.

Way too late to play the breakout IMO, if anything I would be looking to fade exhaustion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  natedredd10 said:
It would be easier if you just numbered the charts in order to make it easy to respond to multiple post.

Way too late to play the breakout IMO, if anything I would be looking to fade exhaustion.

 

I was thinking that the stock symbol would work for referencing on responses or just quoting the post. If I used numbers, wouldn't everyone just have to start using a legend to look up what we are talking about? Quoting the post works best so everyone can see the original chart that was posted. I'll try to put together a summary post on Monday for all the charts I have posted. Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Dinerotrader said:
I was thinking that the stock symbol would work for referencing on responses or just quoting the post. If I used numbers, wouldn't everyone just have to start using a legend to look up what we are talking about? Quoting the post works best so everyone can see the original chart that was posted. I'll try to put together a summary post on Monday for all the charts I have posted. Thanks.

 

 

 

 

How does it work if we insert the stock symbol into the "Title" of each post? This way, scrolling through, we can easily identify related posts. If the post is of a general nature, then we can leave the thread title in the title line.

 

Just a suggestion - its your thread, of course. I'm just trying to help.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

  thalestrader said:
AIXG paper trade as of end of week, long at 34.13 (theoretical) stop loss 32.46

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

AIXG1.thumb.jpg.e624cfc173faa351c116067af25fc55e.jpg

AIXG3.thumb.jpg.3eb6614f04fe019d7ef435f8cf8d7871.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So far I am really enjoying this thread. It is amazing how putting these ideas in a thread is so much more meaningful than just making mental notes while I scan through stocks. I’ve also been making some real money on a few of those that I took trades on. So far I have traded RAIL, OCNF, MBI, and ARP. I sold RAIL for an 8% gain, I am up 28% on MBI, and I’m up 17% on ARP (as of 12/27/09).

 

What stocks to scan through?

I try to look at most of these picks from a mostly technical view but I do give some fundamental bias for some. The question for me right now is whether I should just trade any stock with a good chart or should I only look for technical setups on stocks with strong fundamentals. Thales noted that he primarily considers IBD 100 for his picks so he can incorporate reasonable fundamentals into his selections.

I do like a small cap stock subscription I use from Motley Fool. I throw their picks in the mix of stocks I look through and only trade the ones that have a good technical entry point.

Does anyone else have what they believe is a good way to find a group of strong fundamental stocks that can then be sorted through technically?

 

I think I will try to start posting where my stop loss would be in red and my entry level in green

 

Summary

To summarize the thread thus far, here are all the charts I have posted and the couple Thales posted.

 

My charts

  • PMI
  • GKK
  • EPAX
  • RAIL - Traded for an 8% gain.
  • DNN
  • NCS
  • AGO
  • GVA
  • OCNF - Traded and stopped out for 5% loss
  • MBI - Still own
  • S
  • TLAB
  • ARP - Still own
  • MCO
  • GME
  • KTII
  • CENX
  • F
  • JOYG
  • CBR
  • MDTH
  • SWSI
  • SCSC
  • CKH

 

Thales

  • AIXG
  • SRLS

 

I am really gearing up for a lot more analysis and research in 2010 to fine tune my trading methods. Let's make some money!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Dinerotrader said:
So far I am really enjoying this thread. I sold RAIL for an 8% gain, I am up 28% on MBI, and I’m up 17% on ARP (as of 12/27/09).

 

 

Does anyone else have what they believe is a good way to find a group of strong fundamental stocks that can then be sorted through technically?

 

 

[!

 

Glad to hear that you are Making some profits that is allways fun...I just wanted to touch on IBD with a little more detail.

 

Combining TA and some solid fundamentals can be powerful combination. I will admit that I'm not a high frequincy or active stock trader.

 

In the past What I use to do was very simple, IBD's market research In my observation is excelent, they are the only service that I have ever found to provide some solid value.

All the stock I traded were in IBD recommnedation list.... the next step is to watch the main market indices(Dow nasdaq s&p) to make sure you are not intiating any trades durring an exhausition point etc..

and for timing your stocks use what ever TA you are confident in.

For me, back several years ago, This is what I was doing and mostly because I didnt want to spend to much time on stock and my main focus has allways been futures.

I Took all the oil related stocks from the IBD list and placed them inside a Watch-list. Then I opened a chart for each stock and made my analysis and any notations on the chart and saved the chart. Every night I would look at each chart to see if a trade was near triggering a potential trade--if so I would either place an order right then or make it a priority to watch that stock in the morning to get order placed.

This worked out really well for me and I was using some simple TA like buying trendline touch or s/r level nothing complicated.

 

IBD also has a web based scanner which you can use to scan for the stocks that you prefer using their indicators. that is another tool that used and liked very much.

 

In short ,personaly,There are only two types of stocks I would ever trade/invest.

1st. stocks that I understand, i.e. their product makes sense to me as aconsumer and I have strong feeling that its a good product and its a new inovative product just hitting the market. This allows for the stck to have tremendous growth.

e.g. Im a big movie fan and when Netflix first started to offer movies being dilevered via US mail, with no late fees possible (context; back then we didnt have naything like On-Demand, only options were to go to the Movie theater or drive and wait in line at the local video rental store and if your late then you have ot pay late fees )- I instantly new this was a company that was going to take off. Netflix is just one example of many.

 

2nd. The stock has to be in the IBD list, it just makes trading easier.

 

I also tend to stay away from stocks that are too cheap <$5. however, there are allways exceptions, for example buying citigroup around $1 right after the Saudi prince came on CNBC saying that he has increased his holdings in citi and purchsed another several billion dollars of citigroup, Knowing the ties betweent eh Saudi's and the US gov. that was the best clue one will get that the US gov. will net let citigroup go under and buying at around $1 became very attractive investment.

Edited by sep34

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefuly TLAB will reverse at R and enter the buy zone on my chart....if so then a potential buying opportunity may occur, if not then so be it.

I just cant see TLAB moveing too far from the location it stopped and reversed up. If we are to get a meaningful move up to test the 2008 high I believe we have to break one more time before we have strong rally.

TLAB2.thumb.PNG.db6529ab29df1dc53b11fc7e66de7872.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dine, do you ever look at the sector charts of the stock your looking at ??

If yes could you post a chart of BGH sector chart.

By the way if and when I hear myself mumbling something like I dont want to short here because I cant tell if the momentum has run out yet, I will usually listen to that because its a red flag. simply my intution/subconscious is telling me to becareful. Normaly I will let that trade pass until Im more clear about the trade.

Looking at other instruments that are related to the stock im looking to trade can sometimes give me more clarity....this is why I asked if you ever look at the sector chart as a whole to get a feel for all the stock in that sector.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.