Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Soultrader

How Important is Intuition in Your Trading?

Recommended Posts

How Important is Intuition in Your Trading?

I definitely rely alot on intuition based on global market information, market reaction to earnings/news, and then determining the potential of a trade at a S&R level. As a result my style is shifted heavily towards the discretionary side which lacks any type of systematic approach. I do not have concreate rules at all except risk management. Perhaps my style has transformed this way due to my lack of progamming skills or perhaps by being around and learning from discretionary traders. We often phrase the markets in such ways like, "Market smells funny", "Market feels ready for a bounce", "Markets smell like fear", etc...

 

The topic here is how much intuition do you use in your trading? What are the factors that you consider part of your intuition? Is there an edge for intuitive traders vs systematic traders? Are intuitive traders more flexible in adjusting with the markets? I often view my trading as "free style trading". Very quick to change my mind, and S&R levels are often dynamic adjusting levels throughout the day and night. If I was told to write a book explaining my methodology, I probably could not at this point in my career.

 

Lets get this discussion rolling :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I learned a long time ago James that my intuition was most definitely not the way for me to trade... In order to eliminate those 'feelings' I must trade w/in a rule set.

 

For those that have it though, that's a great weapon in your arsenal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im actually on the exact opposite side of brownsfan. Having strict rules was okay for execution but psychologically it was damaging for me. I was too attached to my trades which resulted in cheating and moving my stops. Also I could not bear the frustration of missing a move when my signals did not fire but felt intuitively the markets may move.

 

Rule following also seems to be a direct conflict between who I am as a person. As a result intuitive trading works for me as long as strict risk management is in place. I also do not want ppl reading this to misinterpret intuitive with impulsive. Having a plan is vitally important... but I do often ditch the initial plan and create a new plan as the day evolves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its interesting that I am in the process of completely eliminating intuition from my daily trading.

 

Having spent 5 years watching the market and trading it in real time (HSI, SPI, STW) I realized that my intuition about the markets, my real time execution, and my attention to operational details were not my fundamental strengths. Said another way, it had become boring and I suspected that I wasn't going to get better at it.

 

So, in my inimitable style I decided on a radical change.

 

My strengths are: understanding of the market and setups, solving problems and programming. I like newness and I love problems and the satisfaction I get solving them.

 

So I am in the process of automating my trading style. My first system, Peewee, was an attempt at it and didn't quite work. I ended up with something that I didn't really like but it had a nice profit factor and even on really ugly markets stayed above 1.5 so I implemented it. I've been live on it for 2 weeks now and I'm getting kinda fond of it. While I work on Popsicle, Peewee trades HSI. Every so often TWS pipes up and says "Trade Entered" and I check to see what happened and whether it looks ok. I no longer jump each time this happens. In the first week I intuitively interfered with it about every second trade but after 3 days I realized it was better off without me so now I let it go.

 

And the damned thing makes money almost every day. I now reserve my intuition for generating ideas to test and program. Once they're implemented I just let them go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Its interesting that I am in the process of completely eliminating intuition from my daily trading.

 

Having spent 5 years watching the market and trading it in real time (HSI, SPI, STW) I realized that my intuition about the markets, my real time execution, and my attention to operational details were not my fundamental strengths. Said another way, it had become boring and I suspected that I wasn't going to get better at it.

 

So, in my inimitable style I decided on a radical change.

 

My strengths are: understanding of the market and setups, solving problems and programming. I like newness and I love problems and the satisfaction I get solving them.

 

So I am in the process of automating my trading style. My first system, Peewee, was an attempt at it and didn't quite work. I ended up with something that I didn't really like but it had a nice profit factor and even on really ugly markets stayed above 1.5 so I implemented it. I've been live on it for 2 weeks now and I'm getting kinda fond of it. While I work on Popsicle, Peewee trades HSI. Every so often TWS pipes up and says "Trade Entered" and I check to see what happened and whether it looks ok. I no longer jump each time this happens. In the first week I intuitively interfered with it about every second trade but after 3 days I realized it was better off without me so now I let it go.

 

And the damned thing makes money almost every day. I now reserve my intuition for generating ideas to test and program. Once they're implemented I just let them go.

 

Hi Kiwi, definitely something I wish I could do as well if I could program. I know in the back of my mind programming will be a requirement for trading and its a matter of me dedicating a few years to learning it.

 

I did notice you have been discussing your system frequently hence the realization I had that you had probably adjusted your trading. Quick question regarding your current execution... is your system able to place complex order types? Im actually with a buddy of mine as I write who is backtesting a few things related to the Dax and Euro Stoxx 50 but the platform he uses can only do market orders for entry. Do you know of any retail platforms available that could also implement smart order types?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How smart?

 

I currently use limit and stop-limit entries with OCO brackets to protect the order and limit adjustment to exit on trailing profit capture (rather than stops because hsi can be so thin). I think the Sierra Chart team would implement anything that we could make the case would be useful to a reasonable group of customers.

 

I'm using SC to drive Interactive Broker's TWS but it can be used with other platform. I write my systems as dlls using C++ but you can also design systems using the SC worksheet interface. Worksheets will never be quite as flexible or efficient as a dll though.

 

The most important element of this change has been that I no longer attend to the market real time and I don't feel any guilt/blame/pain when the system makes a suboptimal decision ... its just statistics in action.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Kiwi, those are actually what we were looking for. OCO bracket orders and stop limits. In addition I would be interested if system trades can be made depending on the offer and bid sizes.

 

Its unfortunate IB no longer accepts Japanese citizens due to the FSA wanting locals to trade Japanese markets only. Will need to establish an offshore entity and create an account as an institution for IB. That would probably put me under the radar with the tax agency here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. You can create any combination of factors from the data available.

 

I have found three things:

 

- I can out trade my systems because my visual perception is better than my ability to code it but I can't trade 2 different strategies on 4 different markets (short time frame) at the same time.

 

- I am using more indicators simply because some of them generate a good summary that is equivalent to what I am looking for by eye (they simplify programming)

 

- People talk about systems that are adaptable and frequently mean automatic adaptation (use AR or ATR say) but markets don't change in a nice linear fashion, they move in jumps so my adaptation will consist of periodically reviewing the main variables to see if they should change because the way that market participants are acting has changed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think there are a lot more platforms besides TWS that offer OCO. Off the top of my head, the only ones that I know of are Ninja, CQG, and X Trader (you have to use some kind of plugin with X Trader though I think).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would think there are a lot more platforms besides TWS that offer OCO. Off the top of my head, the only ones that I know of are Ninja, CQG, and X Trader (you have to use some kind of plugin with X Trader though I think).

 

CQG definitely can not as I use it at the moment. Even with the Apama plugin, smart orders can not be routed. Im a bit worried about X Trader data as well as they are not direct market data vendors. Would you know where they obtain their data? Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know you know way more about CQG than I do, given that I've never even used it before, but they do say they support OCO on their website...I'm just curious now, since it's right there on their website. It also could be that we're talking about completely different things, since I don't know much about automated trading which seems to be the topic of discussion right now. I don't know what you think about Ninja, but I use OCO usually multiple times per day with Ninja on Globex, and I have no complaints about that part of the platform. Though I'm not sure what data feed you'd have access to there that would work with Ninja.

 

CQG Order Types

 

Edit: I also just noticed that CQG lists the bid/ask size trigger that you mentioned:

 

# DOM-Triggered Stop - The order is triggered when the bid/ask order size in the exchange’s order book falls below the QTS order's trigger level.

# DOM-Triggered Stop Limit - The limit order is triggered when the bid/ask order size in the exchange’s order book falls below the QTS order's trigger level.

Edited by diablo272

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I know you know way more about CQG than I do, given that I've never even used it before, but they do say they support OCO on their website...I'm just curious now, since it's right there on their website. It also could be that we're talking about completely different things, since I don't know much about automated trading which seems to be the topic of discussion right now. I don't know what you think about Ninja, but I use OCO usually multiple times per day with Ninja on Globex, and I have no complaints about that part of the platform. Though I'm not sure what data feed you'd have access to there that would work with Ninja.

 

CQG Order Types

 

Those need to be inputted manually. With automation CQG only provides market order as the order type. With the Apama plugin, additional order types can be added but after seeing a demo of it Im not convinced in paying around $1500/month for it. Regarding datafeed, CQG is also a direct market data vendor so I get my data from CQG as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont have any statistics of course, but my 'intuition' seems like its usually right the overwhelming majority of the time.

 

Anyone ever see a trade that doesn't' seem to be one of the typical obvious trades you take? Sometimes I see trades and I don't know for what reason I see it that way? It must be something subconscious I have seen before, as sometimes they don't fit some nice neat price pattern you've learned to recognize over time.

 

Putting this into something useful and something that generates fabulous returns is a different story of course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I come from a strong programming background before entering the trading arena so it was natural for me to assume that system trading was going to be my forte. Anything that wasn't testable with a rigid ruleset so it could be reapplied consistently was discarded. I hammered away like this for years not finding anything consistent or acceptable within my risk tolerances. For me, the problem was always about the contexts of the patterns. They became too varied and diverse, but I could sum them up easily with vague but general statements about the conditions. Of course though, for systems, vague and general ain't gonna cut it.

 

Eventually I had enough of the struggle and let myself go as an experiment. It sounds somewhat similar to what James described earlier on. I relied on my gut and executed within a loose plan that was free to change as I saw the day unfold. Letting myself go was a shock as it is out of character for me, but it was also a pleasant result as my trading started to become profitable. I need more work on risk management though, and would be grateful if James would like to start the ball rolling on that topic too as he did state how crucial it was to him.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MK's point is very good.

 

Choosing to automate is likely to be a choice to forgo some strategy options. If the context is too hard to program then you can't do it. I am finding that trying to code things generates an enormous number of questions as I make new "discoveries"- but also that 5 years of discretionary trading gives me enormous resources of ideas and intuitions about what might work that I didn't have before I traded.

 

A question for the intuitive is "what is it about the context that is so hard to program and what edges might that give us?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MK's point is very good.

 

Choosing to automate is likely to be a choice to forgo some strategy options. If the context is too hard to program then you can't do it. I am finding that trying to code things generates an enormous number of questions as I make new "discoveries"- but also that 5 years of discretionary trading gives me enormous resources of ideas and intuitions about what might work that I didn't have before I traded.

 

A question for the intuitive is "what is it about the context that is so hard to program and what edges might that give us?"

 

For me Kiwi, I haven't gone automated b/c my exits are not exactly a perfected science. I guess in that regard I do rely on some intuition b/c there's plenty of times where my predefined exit is within a couple ticks of being executed but price starts to pause and I just hit the flatten button. I suppose something like that could be coded, but sometimes I just rely on my gut to take a trade out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
......so my adaptation will consist of periodically reviewing the Main Variables to see if they should change because the way that market participants are acting has changed.

 

Is it possible for you to talk about what these main variables are?

 

What are those rectangle shape in the background of bars on your charts, are they higher timeframe bars?

 

Thanks for your inputs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The rectangles are higher timeframe bars. They usually have nothing to do with the strategies - I just like to know where things are wrt the longer time bars.

 

Main variables are whatever they are. They are the things that make your strategy succeed or fail or the things that change in the market. One example might be some criteria for how much a double top can be tested before it becomes a break. Over time the players in the market will move such things around - can't make it to simple for the plebes after all. Or maybe you use the slope of an ma as a qualifier - does it change in summer or something.

 

The issue is that you design a strategy to catch some sort of activity. Then you test it to see if it does. But the nature of that activity will change over time as the market evolves and you need to adjust the strategy to reflect the change in its nature. Or design it to be so crude and robust that it doesn't need that. One needs to be careful that you are really adapting to market changes and not just curve fitting though or you will always find that today doesn't fit your curve - a nice thing about Peewee is that it is performing better now than it did in its test period.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting as I have been struggling with trying to more automate my trading....

 

Me - I have traded for many years, and combine both systems and intuition. I use the systems to give me triggers, and to position size. That way everything becomes consistent.

But I use intuition to avoid certain trades that just dont fit into the "context" that a binary fully automated system would probably take. Otherwise I try to keep to my rules as much as possible.

While I would like to more automate the trading as i would like to spend more time away from the computer, currently my intuition reduces my PL volatility as I avoid certain losses and hence generally means I make more money.

 

A few points i would like to add. Intuition is only really relevant if you have experience....otherwise its just guess work.

plus i think a lot of the intuition people talk about is actually the media/blogs/other peoples ideas, that cloud their thinking. Before allowing intuition into the mix i think traders should first be able to define their rules, have a plan and ONLY then use intuition to enable them to add to the trading.

Even the most discretionary traders have a plan or strategy..... I am sure its not completely random.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What exactly are you calling intuition?

Do you wake up in the morning and think, "there is no way this market is going up?" Or, do you look at your charts, hear the news, and get a feel that there is no way the market can go up?

 

IMO, one is intuition, the other is not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why not to simply connect you account to myfxbook which will collect all this data automatically for you? The process you described looks tedious and a bit obsolete but may work for you though.
    • The big breakthrough with AI right now is “natural language computing.”   Meaning, you can speak in natural language to a computer and it can go through huge data sets, make sense out of them, and speak back to you in natural language.   That alone is a huge breakthrough.   The next leg? AI agents. Where they don’t just speak back to you.   They take action. Here’s the definition I like best: an AI agent is an autonomous system that uses tools, memory, and context to accomplish goals that require multiple steps.   Everything from simple tasks (analyzing web traffic) to more complex goals (building executive briefings or optimizing websites).   They can:   > Reason across multiple steps.   >Use tools like a real assistant (Excel spreadsheets, budgeting apps, search engines, etc.)   > Remember things.   And AI agents are not islands. They talk to other agents.   They can collaborate. Specialized agents that excel at narrow tasks can communicate and amplify one another’s strengths—whether it’s reasoning, data processing, or real-time monitoring.   What it Looks Like You wake up one morning, drink your coffee, and tell your AI agent, “I need to save $500 a month.”   It gets to work.   First, it finds all your recurring subscriptions. Turns out you’re paying $8.99 for a streaming service you forgot you had.   It cancels it. Then it calls your internet provider, negotiates a lower bill, and saves you another $40. Finally, it finds you car insurance that’s $200 cheaper per year.   What used to take you hours—digging through statements, talking to customer service reps on hold for an hour, comparing plans—is done while you’re scrolling Twitter.   Another example: one agent tracks your home maintenance needs and gets information from a local weather-monitoring agent. Result: "Rain forecast next week - should we schedule gutter cleaning now?"   Another: an AI agent will plan your vacations (“Book me a week in Italy for under $2,000”), find the cheapest flights, and sort out hotels with a view.   It’ll remind you to pay bills, schedule doctor’s appointments, and track expenses so you’re not wondering where your paycheck went every month.   The old world gave you tools—Excel spreadsheets, search engines, budgeting apps. The new world gives you agents who do the work for you.   Don’t Get Too Scared (or Excited) Yet William Gibson famously said: "The future is already here – it's just not evenly distributed."   AI agents will distribute it. For decades, the tools that billionaires and corporations used to get ahead—personal assistants, financial advisors, lawyers—were out of reach for regular people.   AI agents could change that.   BUT, remember…   We’re in inning one.   AI agents have a ways to go.   They’re imperfect. They mess up. They need more defenses to get ready for prime time.   To be sure, AI is powerful, but it’s not a miracle worker. It’s great at helping humans solve problems, but it’s not going to replace all jobs overnight.   Instead of fearing AI, think of it as a tool to A.] save you time on boring stuff and B.] amplify what you’re already good at. Right now is the BEST time to start experimenting. It’s also the best time to find investments that will “make AI work for you”. Author: Chris Campbell (AltucherConfidential)   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/     
    • What a wild year.   AI seems to be appearing everywhere you look, Paris hosted a weird Olympics, unrest continues in the Middle East, the US endured a crazy-heated election, and the largest rocket ever to fly successfully landed in a giant pair of robot arms.   Okay, but what about the $money stuff?   Well, this year we've seen a load of uncertainty - inflation is still biting and many businesses have gone down.   Property has been very fractured, with developments becoming prohibitively expensive, while other markets have boomed.   It hasn't been an easy ride, that's for sure.   However, the stock market has had some outstanding results, and for those who know how to trade, some have done VERY well for themselves.   Some have replaced their incomes. Some have set themselves up for the rest of their days on this planet.   How about you? How did you go? Author: Louise Bedford    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/  
    • U Unity Software stock watch, attempting to move higher off the 22.4 triple+ support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?U  
    • TSSI TSS stock, watch for an ascending triangle breakout above 11.49, target 15 area at https://stockconsultant.com/?TSSI
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.