Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

nab999

No Signals On BB System

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I have coded the following to get a system to buy a low bolinger band and sell a high bollinger band, but it will not take any trades.

 

If I change the code to say If close¨of 1 bar ago is less than the lower band and the close is now above the lower band, then buy at market, and visa versa for shorts, then it does take the trades, but I want it to enter as it hits the lower band from below and the upper band from above, not wait till a close.

 

 

Here is my code.....

 

inputs:

Length( 20 ),

NumDevsUp( 2 ),

NumDevsDn( 2 );

variables:

Avg( 0 ),

SDev( 0 ),

LowerBand( 0 ),

UpperBand( 0 ),BollingerPrice(0),TradeLine(0);

 

BollingerPrice=Close of data1 / close of data2;

TradeLine= Close of data1 / close of data2;

 

Avg = AverageFC( BollingerPrice, Length ) ;

SDev = StandardDev( BollingerPrice, Length, 1 ) ;

UpperBand = Avg + NumDevsUp * SDev ;

LowerBand = Avg - NumDevsDn * SDev ;

 

if Tradeline< Lowerband then Buy next bar at Lowerband stop;

if Tradeline> Upperband then Sellshort next bar upperband stop;

 

if Marketposition>=1 and tradeline<Upperband then sell next bar at upperband stop;

if Marketposition<=-1 and tradeline>Lowerband then buytocover next bar at Lowerband stop;

 

 

 

Many thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  nab999 said:
Hi Tams,

 

Yes I already had this enabled for the strategy, but still no trades

 

 

do you have this code in an indicator?

 

if not, change the following code:

 

if Tradeline< Lowerband then Buy next bar at Lowerband stop;
if Tradeline> Upperband then Sellshort next bar upperband stop;

 

to

 

if Tradeline< Lowerband then plot10(Lowerband, "B-Lowerband");
if Tradeline> Upperband then plot10(upperband, "S-upperband");

 

 

set the plot type to a large dot... you should be able to see if your logic is firing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I made the indicator and it is plotting correctly, i.e. a red dot when over the upperband and a green dot when under the lowerband, so it is detecting when the conditions for entry are met, it is just that the system will not take any entries, as described in my first post

 

Many thanks for your help.

Ind.thumb.gif.b3b84354c1d75c6e1d6e091b6c839880.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What you're best off doing is......

 

Post a chart ( zoomed in ) showing BOTH symbols and timeframes with the indicators on, annotate the chart where there should be an entry and we'll have a better idea of what's what.

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the error is here

 

just remove the stop below:

 

 

  Quote
if Tradeline< Lowerband then Buy next bar at Lowerband stop;

if Tradeline> Upperband then Sellshort next bar upperband stop;

 

 

 

p.s.

1. as Blue-Ray suggested, you should super-impose the price bar, BB, and indicators to see if the triggers are firing at the right places.

2. use the code box when posting codes. See the little "mountain" icon at the top of the message window.

3. always acknowledge helps people rendered you. You have 2 previous threads that you have not responded.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Attached is a zoomed in chart. the symbols are both stocks Do (data1) and Rig (data2) 5 min timeframe.

 

The spread of data1-data2 is shown in white in the subraph, with bollinger bands of the spread in the same subgraph.

 

Above this are the dots for the indi you suggested Tams, which show that it is detecting correctly when the spread is above / below the bollinger bands

 

I tried to just remove the word Stop from the code as you suggested, but TS will not verify this, it states that there must be Stop, Limit or Shares at the end of the line of code

 

Many thanks for your help

5aa70f42c065e_CloseUp.thumb.gif.d70b323200e1ceef15a70f7c7c7a570e.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nab999

 

The reason it's not placing any trades is because of this :

 

BollingerPrice=Close of data1 / close of data2;

TradeLine= Close of data1 / close of data2;

 

As you can see in my attached chart..... When it's plotting a signal, the ACTUAL value of it is nowhere near where your data1 price is at.

 

It's firing at a value of 1.15507 but data1 ( DO ) is running at the 105 price band..... so your code is placing the stop orders, but price is never going to hit them.

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=14501&stc=1&d=1256295193

 

 

Hope this helps

 

Blu-Ray

Nab999.thumb.png.a9ddc490ac1a36d46d57871258a5d003.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Blue Ray,

 

Could you suggest how the code can be modified, so that it will take a trade on data1when the bollinger bands ( based on data1/data2) are hit by the TradeLine (based on data1/data2) please.

 

Many thanks for your help with this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  nab999 said:
Hi Blue Ray,

 

Could you suggest how the code can be modified, so that it will take a trade on data1when the bollinger bands ( based on data1/data2) are hit by the TradeLine (based on data1/data2) please.

 

Many thanks for your help with this

 

The easiest way for starters is to just purchase at market..... then you'll be able to see your entries..... then you can refine them from there if needs be. It may occur that you need to define a spot, for example, when the tradeline crosses the bollinger band you might need to reference a price on data1 at the time of the cross then set that as your price to buy/sell.

 

 

Here's the code for market :

 

if Tradeline< Lowerband then Buy next bar at market;
if Tradeline> Upperband then Sellshort next bar at market;

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, many thanks for the continued help.

 

I can get the system to take trades by just stating if Tradeline<Lowerband then buy next bar at market. I can refine this to a degree by stating if Tradeline[1]<Lowerband and Tradeline>Lowerband then buy next bar at market.

 

The problem I am having is getting it to buy data1 when the Tradeband is below the Lowerband and them comes up and touches the Lowerband, enter at market, i.e. not have to wait for next bar at market.

 

  Quote
you need to define a spot, for example, when the tradeline crosses the bollinger band you might need to reference a price on data1 at the time of the cross then set that as your price to buy/sell.

 

Could you advise as to how I can do this please.

 

Again, many thanks for your continued help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  nab999 said:

The problem I am having is getting it to buy data1 when the Tradeband is below the Lowerband and them comes up and touches the Lowerband, enter at market, i.e. not have to wait for next bar at market.

 

Ok try this.

 

if Tradeline crosses above Lowerband then Buy next bar at market;
if Tradeline crosses below Upperband then Sellshort next bar at market;

 

Also enable intrabar order generation..... meaning it will buy/sell at market on next tick of bar rather than waiting for a new bar to form.

 

Hope this helps

 

Blu-Ray

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.