Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

UrmaBlume

Daily 10/15

Recommended Posts

Today's Market Report - ES - 10/15/2009

Archive of Daily Market Reorts

Most recent update is on top.

Please Scroll Down to See Today's Entire Report

**

Follow Updates to this Report on Twitter

and on StockTwits.com

***

Today's Numbers

0830 EST Initial and Continuing Jobless Claims, Core CPI, CPI, Empire Manufacturing

1000 Philadelphia Fed

1300 Crude Inventories

************

At just past 0400 PST as the price bested yesterday's high by 1 tick

the seller appeared. This shot of the HUD shows his strength.

At 2 hours before the open trade is at 144% of average volume with a strong sell bias and

net new commercial trade of -16,733 contracts

 

101509hud1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a shot of overnight commercial commitment. It is based on a 1 minute chart so it can be normalized for time of day. The right axis is percentage of normal. Time frames range from 4 minutes to 405 minutes.

 

overnitetc.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  UrmaBlume said:

Day Summary

Another day, Another New High

Trade was on just under average volume with a medium buy bias.

Net New Trade by Commercials was significant at +69, 198 contracts.

 

101509rpt2.jpg

 

How are you determining what net new trade is commercial or not when you no longer have access to as many large blocks of trade given the new changes brought forth by the CME?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  davewolfs said:
How are you determining what net new trade is commercial or not when you no longer have access to as many large blocks of trade given the new changes brought forth by the CME?

 

You have it wrong Dave, they are NOT breaking down large trades. The old way was to combine trades. The new way is much more useful.

 

See this post

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So based on this post, the method of tracking commercial trade is by viewing the volume that takes place during an intensity spike?

 

The direction of price movement that follows will give you an indication if the trades are buys or sells regardless if the trades are happening at the bid or offer.

 

Is this along the longs of detecting this commercial trade?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  davewolfs said:
So based on this post, the method of tracking commercial trade is by viewing the volume that takes place during an intensity spike? The direction of price movement that follows will give you an indication if the trades are buys or sells regardless if the trades are happening at the bid or offer.Is this along the longs of detecting this commercial trade?

 

Dave,

 

No, we don't wait to see which way the market moves after a spike to see whether it was buying or selling. If you will notice on ALL of the graphs of these intisity spikes the sell spikes are blue and the buy spikes are red.

 

There is a certain dynamic inside that trade that gives it away and it is not about trade on the bid or asked. I have posted a description of the calculation of this indicator and it is more than volume and time.

 

That description is "When taken in combination, the acceleration and deceleration of buying and selling volumes, total volume and the velocity/rate of change in the balance of trade reveal a certain dynamic that we find present at many, if not most, intra-session extremes." Another clue is that there is more than one data feed involved.

 

Also you have misunderstood the change in CME reporting - They are not breaking down large trades it is that they are no longer combining smaller trades.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  UrmaBlume said:

 

Another clue is that there is more than one data feed involved.

 

Also you have misunderstood the change in CME reporting - They are not breaking down large trades it is that they are no longer combining smaller trades.

 

I was curious about this second data feed and called TradeStation as the CME is now reporting trades down to the millisecond. I asked them if they were now reporting trades to the millisecond as their data comes from the CME. I was told that indeed, that is the case - their data comes from the CME so their data is now reporting down to the millisecond. I understand that there is no "millisecond chart", so the data needs to be compiled and made into an indicator which can then be put on a volume chart - but if this is the case, I don't understand the need for a 2nd datafeed. I followed up with one more question to TS, and that is - if all the data from the different vendors (CQG, DTN, E-Signal, TS, etc) comes from the same CME feed - isn't it all the same data and what's the difference? I was told that there would be no difference, it's all the same data, and the raw data is shown in the time & sales window. I must be missing something or am told wrong if you say there is a need for a 2nd datafeed. Could you please enlighten me a bit on this? Thanks so much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Believe me, there are MUCH BETTER data feeds then TS.....it has to do with HOW the vendor handles that data BEFORE they pump it to your platform. Some vendor data feeds have bad latency, bundled or throttled reporting, etc, AFTER they get the data from the CME. There are a whole bunch of differences in how various data vendors handle the CME feed before they send it to you.

 

Multiple data feeds to a platform can be one feed for indicator plotting/reporting (the really good feed) and the second feed for orders execution (the standard platform execution feed).....that is only one example.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

indeed, although CME has improved its data report...

sadly, many dataproviders are still aggregating their feed.

if you have 2 feeds, you might notice differences between the two.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  mead said:
I was curious about this second data feed and called TradeStation as the CME is now reporting trades down to the millisecond. I asked them if they were now reporting trades to the millisecond as their data comes from the CME. I was told that indeed, that is the case - their data comes from the CME so their data is now reporting down to the millisecond. I understand that there is no "millisecond chart", so the data needs to be compiled and made into an indicator which can then be put on a volume chart - but if this is the case, I don't understand the need for a 2nd datafeed. I followed up with one more question to TS, and that is - if all the data from the different vendors (CQG, DTN, E-Signal, TS, etc) comes from the same CME feed - isn't it all the same data and what's the difference? I was told that there would be no difference, it's all the same data, and the raw data is shown in the time & sales window. I must be missing something or am told wrong if you say there is a need for a 2nd datafeed. Could you please enlighten me a bit on this? Thanks so much.

 

Naturally it all comes from the same source but different things happen to it from different vendors before it gets to you. The difference is called latency.

 

The problems with the TS platform is that their time stamp only has granularity down to 1 minute.

 

As to the second data feed, its not so much about second data feed as it is about a different input value.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  FulcrumTrader said:
Multiple data feeds to a platform can be one feed for indicator plotting/reporting (the really good feed) and the second feed for orders execution (the standard platform execution feed).....that is only one example.

 

Its not about different feed for different purposes its about different feeds for different input values.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe the second data feed provides something like "Fast Cash" or PREM? This way speculators could be separated from the arbs. eSignal provides EPREM A0, but not to great resolution, maybe down to 1-2 sec. That might get in the ballpark, but not super accurate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  UrmaBlume said:
Its not about different feed for different purposes its about different feeds for different input values.

 

Right - that is what I was thinking, and that is why I asked the question (and I'm thinking I asked it of the wrong person when I asked it of TradeStation) "if all the data is coming from the CME, wouldn't all these different data vendors be providing the same inputs....which can be found in the time and sales window?" I was told yes, that is true - they are all giving time of trade, price, contracts traded (size), and whether it is at the ask or at the bid. But based on what you are saying, it is just not true - different feeds provide different input values. Any further clarification you could provide or to point me in the right direction would be most appreciated. Thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  mead said:
Right - that is what I was thinking, and that is why I asked the question (and I'm thinking I asked it of the wrong person when I asked it of TradeStation) "if all the data is coming from the CME, wouldn't all these different data vendors be providing the same inputs....which can be found in the time and sales window?" I was told yes, that is true - they are all giving time of trade, price, contracts traded (size), and whether it is at the ask or at the bid. But based on what you are saying, it is just not true - different feeds provide different input values. Any further clarification you could provide or to point me in the right direction would be most appreciated. Thank you.

 

I think what UB is saying is not that he has multiple feeds providing the same information, but multiple feeds providing different types of information all at the same time, perhaps feeds of info concerning the seperation and attributing of volume to commercial or retail traders based on technologies or streams of information were not privy to. Just my 2 cents.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  clmacdougall said:
I think what UB is saying is not that he has multiple feeds providing the same information, but multiple feeds providing different types of information all at the same time, perhaps feeds of info concerning the seperation and attributing of volume to commercial or retail traders based on technologies or streams of information were not privy to. Just my 2 cents.

 

I thought so too - so I googled commercial data vendors (as opposed to retail, which is what I figure I am), and went to the companies websites which appeared to cater to the upper end. What I found was that most of them talked about being low latency, but I didn't find them saying that they provided different types of information.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  mead said:
I thought so too - so I googled commercial data vendors (as opposed to retail, which is what I figure I am), and went to the companies websites which appeared to cater to the upper end. What I found was that most of them talked about being low latency, but I didn't find them saying that they provided different types of information.

 

Just remember upfront that UB has been involved in the industry for years on lots of levels and is going to carry that with him wherever he goes. His contacts are no doubt dealing in technologies that are never going to be offered mainstream, so you might as well relax and learn what you can from him. It's theory that matters, not technology! The concepts and ways that the man sees the market everyday are what I'd love to learn, you can keep the computer stuff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  UrmaBlume said:
Dave,

 

No, we don't wait to see which way the market moves after a spike to see whether it was buying or selling. If you will notice on ALL of the graphs of these intisity spikes the sell spikes are blue and the buy spikes are red.

 

There is a certain dynamic inside that trade that gives it away and it is not about trade on the bid or asked. I have posted a description of the calculation of this indicator and it is more than volume and time.

 

That description is "When taken in combination, the acceleration and deceleration of buying and selling volumes, total volume and the velocity/rate of change in the balance of trade reveal a certain dynamic that we find present at many, if not most, intra-session extremes." Another clue is that there is more than one data feed involved.

 

Also you have misunderstood the change in CME reporting - They are not breaking down large trades it is that they are no longer combining smaller trades.

 

 

One thing that I have noticed in my own analysis is that much of the trade on a swing low will be responsive and will therefore occur at the bid while swing highs will also be responsive and therefore occur at the ask. In both cases this institutional buying/selling is acting as a built in break to stop the market in it's tracks and reverse its direction.

 

Regardless of the spike - how does this explain what constitutes as commercial vs non commercial trade? Based on your definitions would trade ever be considered commercial that happens outside of a spike?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MtnDog said:
Maybe the second data feed provides something like "Fast Cash" or PREM? This way speculators could be separated from the arbs. eSignal provides EPREM A0, but not to great resolution, maybe down to 1-2 sec. That might get in the ballpark, but not super accurate.

 

Why does it have to be especially "accurate"?

 

S&P 500 is the futures market for a stock market. If the second data feed was something indicating the volume in the underlying stock market (whether aggregated index, premium, whatever) then couldn't it be possible that a trade intensity spike corresponding to a spike in the volume in the stock market would likely be an arbitrage and therefore something we might ignore... if there is no corresponding spike in volume in the stock market, then we can consider it commercial spike and use it.

 

1-2 second accuracy would be enough, it takes longer than that for the spike to "take affect" anyway. See a spike, check the market internals, no spike there, ok, take the trade. Not sure... but fits the description so far anyway, I think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  taotree said:
Why does it have to be especially "accurate"?

 

S&P 500 is the futures market for a stock market. If the second data feed was something indicating the volume in the underlying stock market (whether aggregated index, premium, whatever) then couldn't it be possible that a trade intensity spike corresponding to a spike in the volume in the stock market would likely be an arbitrage and therefore something we might ignore... if there is no corresponding spike in volume in the stock market, then we can consider it commercial spike and use it.

 

1-2 second accuracy would be enough, it takes longer than that for the spike to "take affect" anyway. See a spike, check the market internals, no spike there, ok, take the trade. Not sure... but fits the description so far anyway, I think.

 

 

What if the second feed was just confirmation of intensity across futures representing different markets i.e. YM, NQ and Russell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  davewolfs said:
What if the second feed was just confirmation of intensity across futures representing different markets i.e. YM, NQ and Russell.

 

Seems to me highly unlikely that a separate feed is required for that. I have a single feed and I can get all that info.

 

Also, an arbitrage trade could include multiple futures symbols at the same time as the stock market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.