Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

bunny

Please Analyse This Chart from VSA Perspective

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Please analyse this chart from VSA perspective. I have my opinions about it, but prefer not to share them to avoid bias. Hence, I have posted a vanilla plain chart without its name or any annotation.

tl2.png

Thank you,

-Bunny.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know VSA. But volume is a primary indicator for me. If you don't mind, I will share my analysis. Albeit, without the benefit of larger context surrounding the chart.

tl2.png.cd13bd5fc434cade8394f92f474d21fd.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey guys,

Please analyse this chart from VSA perspective. I have my opinions about it, but prefer not to share them to avoid bias. Hence, I have posted a vanilla plain chart without its name or any annotation.

 

Thank you,

-Bunny.

 

I have some opinions too, but I prefer not to share them with you in order to avoid confusion. :)

 

I think you will find that you receive a lot more help if you show that you are willing to put in some effort from your side first. Just my :2c:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have some opinions too, but I prefer not to share them with you in order to avoid confusion. :)

 

I think you will find that you receive a lot more help if you show that you are willing to put in some effort from your side first. Just my :2c:

Sure,

There is a lot of confusion on the last few bars. The 2nd last bar is just kissing a support line and the next immediate bar is closing on the high.

 

Signs of strength IMO.

 

Please share your opinions.

 

Thank you,

-Bunny.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ehorn,

I observed that some of the trendlines drawn by you have their guiding pivots just after the next one or two bars. I that a OK? I am asking because I was told that the pivots used for drawing the trendlines should be well-spaced.

 

Also, the lines that extend in future - are they purely trendlines or have to added some concepts like Elliot Wave and Wolfe Waves into it? I have no knowledge about EW/WW so just wondering of it is that.

 

Thank you,

-Bunny.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ehorn,

I observed that some of the trendlines drawn by you have their guiding pivots just after the next one or two bars. I that a OK? I am asking because I was told that the pivots used for drawing the trendlines should be well-spaced.

 

Also, the lines that extend in future - are they purely trendlines or have to added some concepts like Elliot Wave and Wolfe Waves into it? I have no knowledge about EW/WW so just wondering of it is that.

 

Thank you,

-Bunny.

 

The analysis, and projections are based on a few key concepts which I observe:

 

Markets are fractal in nature (larger fractals are comprised of smaller fractals)

There is a demonstrable and consistently repeatable volume pattern on each fractal.

Trends overlap

 

The annotations are a picture of how I would apply these principles of Price and Volume to anticipate sequences of current and future price movement.

 

HTH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

Just a quick VSA stab at the chart.

Bar#11:

-ultra wide spread down bar with high relative volume

--those conditions are putting a VSA chartist on contrarian alert, thinking that there's the strong possibility that market makers are spiking price down and herd follows-possibly on negative news/numbers/events...all in order to accumulate long positions at lower prices

Bar#14:

-higher relative volume, relatively narrow range closing in the middle, could be result of preset resting limit buy orders stopping the market a bit in a narrow range

---now looking for an attempt to go lower but volume drying up, possibly indicating most of the supply has been removed absorbed

Bar#16:

-volume significantly lower than previous volume periods (especially previous two bars), attempt to go down on narrow range, could be end of lower prices,possibly indicating professionals are withdrawing their interest in selling the market any lower

***very aggressive trader might enter long on breach of Bar#16's high

****more conservative entry might be close of bar#17-possibly showing us that a few professionals realized around the same time that prices were at a buyer's bargain, creating a strong up move relative to previous bars, thus possibly locking in traders who went short which could help move prices higher once their stops begun to get run...creating a group of weak holders

*****very conservative long entry, wait for low volume attempt to go down that fails after Bar#17

examples: Bar#43 & 44, fairly low volume with weak attempt to go down; Bar#19 is interesting too for this, though I assume a decent group of traders took some profits there, but that profit taking didn't turn into a change of sentiment, so perhaps a decent entry there as well.

 

I'm a little foggy and tired, so I apologize in advance for the limited discussion I provided. Perhaps I'll add more later. And, yes, I understand that I chose all those bars in hindsight and that limits the true potency/substance of my analysis, however, the bars I chose do indeed follow, to the best of my knowledge, basic VSA principles. specifically I'm referring to 2 principles at the top and 2 at the bottom: a) hidden potential buying/selling (bar#11), b) no supply/demand (bar#16, 43, 44). I look forward to those with more experience in VSA to correcting & improving my commentary :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm warning all to not give CC# to TradeGuider or VSA club as they will never stop charging you. And refunds dont come... lots of talk but then I dont know why that happens is retort. I had to get visa involved and 3 months charges still havent been returned. Just FYI

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just continuing on with the subject of this thread; Would someone be able to give there VSA analysis of AGO Atlas Iron (ASX). It seems to be capped lately. I'll attach a chart but your probably better off using your own chart package for the analysis.

 

Cheers

AGO.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.