Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

bakrob99

CME Changes to the Transaction Reporting Process

Recommended Posts

I received an email yesterday which alerted me to the fact that the CME has changed the way they report transactions. I am told that previoulsy, some transaction were lumped together when reported resulting in tick bar values which were inaccurate. They have now corrected this. The point of the email was:

 

If you use tick charts to trade e-mini S&Ps, you may have noticed an increase in the speed with which your charting software produces tick bars on Monday and today from the speed that it produced the same size tick bars on Friday.

 

As of Sunday, October 4th, the CME Group enhanced the reporting of trades to provide more information at greater speed. The effect of this upgrade is to produce more ticks over the same price action than were produced before.

 

You can get more information at http://www.cmegroup.com/globex/files/EquityFuturesEnhancements.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I set up a Chart with 10,000 tick bars and compared the last several weeks with the 2 days this week. There is no doubt that these changes are significant. You can see about twice the number of bars for the day, compared to the prior days.

2009-10-07_0752_Tick_Chart_Change_at_CME.thumb.png.82c635767f4aa39f1adefd8edc3a3cf9.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it only on the ES?

 

I'm not noticing the same stuff on the NQ...

 

*edit*... now i maybe am.... I just took a look at the 10000 tick bar on the nq and there is a noticeable wider day starting on the 5th...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe that it applies to all Stock Index futures but not commodities (Metals, Energy) I am not sure about Futures like Currency futures on the CME. I will have to do some more homework on these.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am not sure about Futures like Currency futures on the CME. I will have to do some more homework on these.

 

They changed the behavior for the Currency futures some weeks ago. I wondered some weeks ago why the T/S shows 1 lot trades on over 97 % compared to the days before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I can tell this 2.5 rule is bullshit.

 

I just did my own analysis, average bars per day on different tick charts prior to the 5th, and post 5th... and if you do a standard (your tick timeframe) X 2.5 = (your new tick timeframe) you won't be trading the same "timeframe" as before if you get my meaning.

 

By their standards, a 233T should be a 582T. (233X2.5).

 

What I found was that a 233T prior to the 5th is closest to a 400T afterwards. Which means the actual conversion is closer to 1.5X's to 1.75X's as much data, but certainly not 2.5x's as much.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=14188&stc=1&d=1255293197

 

 

I've attached a barcounter.eld for tradestation users to do their own conversions.

 

Cheers!

BARCOUNTER.ELD

Untitled.png.269e73b206e7303ee5a1839248ac702d.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the current (Post Oct. 4th) Avg. 3-day Tick Stats.

Also see one of my prior test for @ES.D and @NQ.D (in Excel).

 

I think it is approximately twice the number of bars in @ES.D and @NQ.D

after Oct. 4th.

 

Regards,

Suri

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=14190&stc=1&d=1255299634

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=14191&stc=1&d=1255299634

TICKBarStats_Oct0909.gif.b2ba862bd7dc41c26422ae1d253cff75.gif

esnqbartimes_2008.thumb.gif.256efe04f0cb0860445ad1294c20aa06.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The new feed makes my tick charts much more choppy. The difference is a factor of about 2.5. (2.5 more data is being sent since breaking up large orders in their data feed). I scalp the YM with 89 tick charts, I found that multipling 89 times the 2.5 factor give me a 223 tick chart which "smooths" out the chart -- bringing me back to where it used to be, so to speak. Those of you who use tick charts might want to try this and see how it works out for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The post I made earlier was based on very limited data. After reviewing a full week after the change, there were 820k trades during the day sessions of the past week (on the ES) versus 1.55m the previous week. So based on this information, the multiplier should be 1.89. However, the volume was about 30% lighter this week than it was last week. Therefore, the multiplier should be increased by 30% as well bring it back to 2.46 which is very close to my original number (2.5), so I'll stick with that number for now.

 

Some recommended conversions for tickbar periodicities below:

 

233t becomes 582t

377t becomes 942t

 

However, I believe numbers like 233 and 377 were chosen because they are numbers in the Fibonacci sequence. So if that is more important than maintaining the same number of bars as before, it might make more sense to change 233 to 610....and 377 to 987.

Edited by LS_Chad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One correction to my post above, the 820k trades were for the week beginning Sept 28th (week before CME change). The 1.55m are for the week beginning Oct 5th (week after the change). I reported those backwards above. And these were for the day session only (ignoring overnight trades).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Bakrob and Daedulous. I had taken a snapshot of 5days of data, 3days before and 2 day after and saw the same results as mentioned. Unfortunately right after I sent that file to my mentor to comment upon, I deleted the email and have no attachment to accompany with this post.

 

Transferring to a 2.5x factor worked for a few days and not everyday on my tick charts. Which could be attributed to both lack of testing and/or low volume days or both. For now 2.5x remains the de facto change, but transferring to range bars has helped. They can hide volume, ticks, T&S and trade size but can't hide price action itself..can they?

 

I can't seem to notice the difference on the currency futures but that could be lack of observation as well.

 

And of course Barry Taylor at emini watch.com has a take on it as well (CME Says Better, Faster, Cheaper – I Don’t Think So). And this is a view which is entirely logical and cogent.

 

BTW - my mentor has moved to 2.5x on the ES.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • "To make more capable, powerful AI models, developers need a steady flow of fresh data to train their models on. However, they’re starting to run out. Current generative AIs have scraped everything from the Internet that can be scraped. The alternative is to use “synthetic” data—training data generated by earlier forms of AI instead of original sources found on the Internet.  Using synthetic data is tempting. It’s cheaper than licensing datasets (an increasingly common requirement); there’s virtually no limit to the amount of data, text, or images AIs can create; and no one’s privacy is violated. The problem is that, over several generations, AIs trained synthetically develop what has been called “Model Autophagy Disorder,” or MAD, by the researchers at Rice University who discovered it. They like the acronym “MAD” because it’s similar to “Mad Cow Disease,” a calamitous, fatal brain disease that turned up in beef cattle in the 1980s when they were fed the ground-up remains of their butchered colleagues.  The word “autophagy” is a combination of the Greek “auto,” meaning self, and “phagy,” to eat. After training successive visual AI models on synthesized data, the scientists found a disturbing pattern: images of faces began to show grid-patterned scratch marks and eventually began more and more to look like the same face. Images of numbers gradually distorted until they became a mass of unintelligible squiggles.  “Even after a few generations of such training, the new models can become irreparably corrupted,” computer engineer Richard Baraniuk said in a university press statement.  As synthetic data, and synthetically trained AIs, proliferate online, the problem will feed on itself and become steadily worse, he warned. “One doomsday scenario is that if left uncontrolled for many generations, MAD could poison the data quality and diversity of the entire Internet,” Baraniuk said. “Short of this, it seems inevitable that as-to-now-unseen unintended consequences will arise from AI autophagy even in the near term. “Without enough fresh real data,” he added, “future generative models are doomed to MADness.” TRENDPOST: If AI developers come to believe that it is no longer possible to advance generative AI much beyond its current state, two things will happen. First, engineers will switch from developing new models to tweaking existing ones and continue customizing them to make off-the-shelf versions for specific industries. Second, developers will turn their obsession with AI power from generative systems to general AI, which can reason and make decisions without the need for human guidance.  That day might be closer than any of us, including AI engineers, are ready to deal with." Zgbs73                        
    • TS Tenaris stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 39.17 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TS
    • UAL United Airlines stock nice breakout setup at https://stockconsultant.com/?UAL
    • AAL American Airlines stock, good trend, watch for a range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?AAL
    • Date: 10th January 2025. Why is the British Pound Declining?   The Great British Pound is the worst performing currency of 2025 so far after witnessing sharp declines for 3 consecutive days. The decline is largely being triggered by the bond selloff, lack of business confidence due to the UK Autumn budget and political uncertainty. Will the trend continue?     The GBP Index Declines 2% In 2025! Why Is The Pound Dropping? The Great British Pound is the worst performing currency of the week and of the year so far. Below you can see a table showing the Pound’s performance in January 2025 so far. GBPUSD -2.25% EURGBP +1.69% GBPJPY -1.44% GBPCHF -1.42% GBPAUD -1.91% GBPCAD -2.00% A key reason for the GBP’s decline is the latest labor budget, which is driving a selloff in UK bonds. Bonds across the global market are declining, including in the US and Germany. However, the global decline is mainly due to monetary policy. The decline in UK bond yields is due to concerns regarding the UK budget, higher costs for business and investor confidence. As a result, investors are selling UK bonds, but also reducing their exposure to the Pound. Bond Selloff and Rising Yields: Higher bond yields can sometimes strengthen a currency by attracting increased investor demand. However, this effect is unlikely when rising yields result from a bond selloff driven by declining investor confidence. The UK 30-Year Bond Yields are at their highest level since 1998 and the 10-Year Bond Yields are up to the highest level since the banking crisis of 2008. Investors’ concerns are that the higher costs for business will be passed onto consumers, triggering higher stickier inflation. As a result, the Bank of England will struggle to reduce the cost of borrowing in 2025 and foreign investors will become more cautious of operations in the UK. The short-term impact is that the UK Chancellor may struggle to meet her fiscal rules. Her budget margin of £9.9bn to avoid overshooting borrowing has likely shrunk to about £1 billion due to market shifts, even before the OBR updates its forecasts. This uncertainty may force the Treasury to cut future spending plans, but the full picture won’t emerge until the OBR's March forecast. According to reports, the UK Chancellor cannot risk higher increases in taxes and will be forced to cut public spending. The GBPUSD Falls To A 60-Week Low! The GBP is struggling against all currencies, but the sharpest decline can be seen against the USD. The GBP’s decline is partially due to the incoming president, Donald Trump, who is expected to introduce Dollar-supporting measures, but also potentially impose tariffs on the UK.   The new White House administration is likely to impose new tariffs on imports from China, Canada, and Mexico. This is likely to potentially disrupt supply chains and prompt the Federal Reserve to adopt tighter monetary policy, thereby strengthening the national currency. Some experts believe the UK will face tariffs or be pressured to adopt more pro-American economic policies. This is also something the EU will likely experience. In addition to this, reports suggest that the UK Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, and Trump supporters are not on good terms, nor agree on much including on Geo-politics. Therefore, the decline is also related to concerns the UK may be put into a difficult position by the new US administration. According to analysts, Dollar strength is likely to continue throughout the year due to the new administration’s measures, but also due to a hawkish Federal Reserve. In the latest FOMC meeting minutes, the committee stated it expects interest rates to decline at a slower pace. The Federal Reserve is likely to only cut 0.50% in 2025 and may not cut until May or June. Liz Truss 2022 Or James Callaghan 1976? Is this the first Pound crisis? The GBP has experienced many "sterling crises” in the past. For example, Black Wednesday from 1992 and after Brexit in 2016. However, there have been similar crises in the past which are very similar to the current situation. For example, the Liz Truss Budget from 2022 which saw the GBP decline more than 23%. During the Sterling Crisis of 1976 the GBPUSD fell from 2.0231 to 1.5669. Both sterling crises were due to the budget, inflation and rising bond yields. Today’s issues for the GBP and UK are very similar, however, the performance of the GBP will depend on if the new SI contributions triggers lower economic activity, inflation and if the Federal Reserve indeed avoids cutting interest rates in the near future. If inflation rises it will dampen consumer demand and the Bank of England will be forced to pause any rate adjustments. As a result, the economy may contract or stall further pressuring the GBP. However, this cannot yet be certain. KPMG experts anticipate accelerated economic growth this year, supported by monetary policy and increased government spending. They project GDP to rise to 1.7%, more than doubling last year’s 0.8%. This growth, according to their estimates, will be driven by a recovery in consumer spending, expected to increase by 1.8% compared to 1.0% last year. In addition to this, if the Federal Reserve unexpectedly opts for more frequent rate cuts, the GBP and EUR are likely to benefit. When monitoring the price movement and patterns which can be seen in the exchange rate, the decline looks similar to the price movement seen in 2022, during the Truss reign. The price has now fallen below the support level from April 2024. The next support levels can be seen at 1.20391 and 1.17992. Technical analysis for the GBP can also be viewed in HFM’s latest Live Trading Session.   Key Takeaways: The Great British Pound is the worst performing currency of the year so far, having declined by more than 2.00%. A key reason for the GBP’s decline is the latest labor budget, which is driving a selloff in UK bonds. UK 30-year bond yields are at their highest since 1998, while 10-year yields have reached levels last seen during the 2008 banking crisis. Investors reduce exposure to the GBP as the US edges closer to a new president and pro-Dollar supportive measures. The UK labour government will not reconsider higher taxes but may be forced to reduce public spending. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.