Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Frank

Regime Change in Volatility

Recommended Posts

'Regime Change' is quant terminology for when a market takes on a different environment. Typical 'regimes' are inflationary vs recessionary regimes, mean-reverting vs trending regimes etc....

 

Basically, the idea is that the market environment changes dramatically from time to time and blows up all the strategies that have been optimized to the 'last regime'.

 

I present data to discuss 'MP based Regime Change: TPO Count as Measure of Volatility in S&P Futures'. That is, wider 30-min bars represent a different regime than a narrow 30-min bar market does.

 

Here is some recent data:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=13913&stc=1&d=1254488248

 

note how TPO count (Volatility) has been dropping for 11 straight months (scan column on far left). Despite VIX remaining elevated, the S&P futures went into very narrow action over past few months. The last few days seemed to be start of a new regime. I propose that we get an upcoming 'regime' that shows some better range than past few months. But let's track it here and see how it goes.

5aa70f326caae_TPOCountThroughOct12009.thumb.png.05c37e047e51022d2b043ca599d9facb.png

Edited by Frank

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hi dam,

 

I have data back to 2002 -- its 25,000 rows so I will just present the Monthly Average In table form.

 

As you can see, there is a very wide range of values and it is somewhat similar to a VIX chart -- I will overlay them but here is the data table to chew on. I added 1 calculation this time which relates TPO's to the closing value --- while 1 tick is $12.50 no matter what the level of S&Ps, thought I should put it on there anyway.

 

One possible reason for an increase in volatility is not so much the level of TPO's -- but the general seasonal uptick --- the last 7 years have been flat or up from September to October --- and the fact that its basically gone down every month this year.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=13938&stc=1&d=1254580412

5aa70f3309936_TPOCountByMonth2002-2009.thumb.png.c386ac6a0470fc81003f31519d124cac.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's put some data behind this -- first just update the data table for new month-to-date data. As can see, TPO counts are down again this month.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=14268&stc=1&d=1255558570

 

 

A second look at traditional market profile would be to look at range and its relationship to the first hours range. What is odd about this market is that it has in general been doing first hour range consistent with 2007's type of average -- ~7.75 - 8.00 pts ---- but then there is not much range past the first hour. so while overall range for the day is similar to 2003-2006, ~11-13 pts -- it is skewed more towards the beginning of the day. This isn't meant as something I expect to continue or a forecast in any way -- just pointing out the nature of the profile relative to history.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=14269&stc=1&d=1255559152

5aa70f3c5ecac_TPOCountOct2009.thumb.png.7bb4c65da20f1478857077e8dfc7868d.png

5aa70f3c66156_RangevsFirstHourRangeOct2009.thumb.png.4ae4f50545ac96dc5bcdcedc38b60cb2.png

Edited by Frank

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

“façade exhausted bulls and broke, beat up bears” was a comment from my blog. But something else is going on - narrowed ‘volatility’ coupled with very atypical slope (ie HUGE movement in short time period and virtually nonexistent scotoperiods). Hm ??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

one way to get better grip on this is to look at historical statistics comparing THAT DAYS intraday volatility. The concept being that if TPO count is low in morning, the afternoon will rarely show dramatically different TPO counts -- thus, can adjust to that days volatility to some extent --- with statistical caveats of 'outliers' always in back of mind.

 

So I did this a while ago and updated it -- basically it compares the first 7 pit session bar TPO counts to the final 7. And basically, the FINAL tpo count has fallen into a range that is 1.7 -2.1x the first 7 30-min bar TPO count. Thus, a general idea would be that to temper profit objectives on any afternoon trades in low TPO count days. And perhaps look for incrementally more in high TPO count environments.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=14275&stc=1&d=1255619974

5aa70f3c96218_TPOFrequencyOct142009.thumb.png.422a1a0cc597090a94b7d561e73f838d.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgot to mention the main point of last post:

 

'Regime Change' will show itself when the TPO counts in the morning start getting high. Once again today, very low TPO counts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

did a shorter term study on that --- working on expanding it. but idea is that market forms 2 extremes during globex and then takes out one or the other relatively early in day. that 'violation' can trigger reversal -- or continuation -- which is critical time to watch.. with 1 idea playing for that extreme as target and exiting --- not waiting around to see if continuation or not.. but at end of day, narrow is narrow and good analysis is still only going to get small wins if range is narrow so that is the dominant thing at moment.

Edited by Frank

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe today jumpstarted volatility --- hard to say but will continue to track it.

 

The real 'issue' with volatility has been death of afternoon volatility. Its not the only time that afternoon volatlility has gone into a funk -- it usually reverses.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=14458&stc=1&d=1256176924

attachment.php?attachmentid=14459&stc=1&d=1256176924

5aa70f41413e0_LastHourRangeasFirstHourRangeRecent.thumb.png.e082a3fe56b3bc6e72cb8f55925c858a.png

5aa70f414bb4f_LastHourRangeas.thumb.png.7347e3fadfe1830741b066d2b0d2bf9c.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the best post i've ever read on the internet about trading. The 'regime change in volatility' as you put it, caused me to put the strategy that i was trading back in the draw for now. I ended up not trading for 3 weeks at the end of sept and beginning of oct as i developed a new strategy that could cope with the change in volatility better.

 

Adapt or die as they say....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the feedback, nice to know it helped.

 

I got that terminology from a book I read on quant trading -- what is interesting about your comments is that the theme of the book was that you need to put your quant models within a 'super model' which switches on and off depending on the 'regime' -- which is what you intuitively did. Nice job.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well, October did a small seasonal uptick and that was it --- then a ski slope down... January usually better than December but so far not the case - thinking this seasonal should kick in soon -- but we'll see.

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=17710&stc=1&d=1263417417

Range.thumb.png.ff62a5e1f780f5b8c70c39765760a2f3.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also ties in with the idea a lot of systemised managed futures traders go with of continually adjusting their models for the type of market and the volatility of the market at the time.

While some traders are purists and claim that a robust system needs to be maintained over the long run to be any good - through good and bad times - others realise that certain markets and systems work well together.

(I hear with recent volatility reductions in both implied and historical volatilities that many option trading firms are felling the pinch as well. Changes in volatility definitely affects traders opportunities and mindsets.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, 1 more chart:

 

you do not really need to 'guess' -- you can just watch the morning session -- if its high TPO count -- that generally begets high afternoon count. conversely, 'crap begets crap' (no range in morning means day is probably a dud)... I find this concept very very useful for thinking about profit targets. keep them low if range is low -- but expand them a bit if range expands:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=18177&stc=1&d=1264137627

5aa70fb0b3341_TPOCountIntraday.thumb.png.a9e255c0305f6450c48f5672a755fa15.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.