Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Hi, I'm thinking about opening an account with OEC. I'll be mainly trading FESX.

 

What enticed me was their $0.50 per side commission for the lifetime of the account (special email offer). Is this too good to be true? Infinity charges about 5-6 euros roundturn for the FESX (I think), and there has to be some catch to this! 0.50 just seems ridiculous for commission.

 

That aside, has anyone experienced any problems with OEC? Particularly issues related to execution and data feed reliability.

 

Happy trading

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a pretty good deal since the exchange fees alone for FESX are more than 1 US dollar per R/T.

 

And by pretty good deal, I mean that it's probably too good to be true, but why not send them an e-mail or call them to confirm? OEC is a reputable broker if that's what you're asking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just emailed them and it looks like the exchange fees for the FESX are $0.72 R/T, so it's not as bad I (or diablo) thought it was.

 

I also asked them about fees per trade for international customers and it seems they don't charge those either, which is great for me :D!

 

I will most likely take the plunge, will keep you guys informed how it goes.

 

Happy trading

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think its a good time --- OEC just did a very major software upgrade and is rapidly improving the platform. OEC still does have some limits in its functionality --- but I believe they are on the right path and are strong in the areas that count most -- latency, outages and total cost of ownership (low commission rates and no hidden fees).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Except, and I hope I've just missed something, it seems it costs 24.95/month to use their platform for demo rather than live trades after you've opened an account. Good luck testing something new...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  gooni said:
Except, and I hope I've just missed something, it seems it costs 24.95/month to use their platform for demo rather than live trades after you've opened an account. Good luck testing something new...

 

If you $24.95 a month is too much for you to test out something new, then you probably should not be trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  sevensa said:
If you $24.95 a month is too much for you to test out something new, then you probably should not be trading.

Yeah, affordability is obviously the point here :doh:

 

When OEC make such bold claims as to how there are no hidden costs for their platform, and then tacks on this one hidden cost for live customers, well it certainly doesn't impress.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  gooni said:
Yeah, affordability is obviously the point here :doh:

 

When OEC make such bold claims as to how there are no hidden costs for their platform, and then tacks on this one hidden cost for live customers, well it certainly doesn't impress.

 

What are you talking about 'hidden' costs?

 

If you trade live and with real money, the platform plus data is FREE. You get the platform, charts and as much data as you could possibly ever want for FREE.

 

Now if you have to pay $24.95/mo for demo, which also includes data, that's still a bargain. Call up DTN and ask how much data would be if you wanted US indexes, bonds, Eurex indexes, Eurex bonds, oil, gold, and whatever else you might want. See how much that costs and then let us know if $24.95/mo is a bad deal.

 

:roll eyes:

 

Note - I could be wrong, but I believe they charge $24.95/mo to those that aren't trading live. In other words, if you aren't generating any commissions for them, then yeah, they might charge you a tiny fee for demo trading. And that is still an incredible bargain.

 

Also - you get a 2 week trail by default (for free) and if you need longer, then ask nicely and they might extend that out for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  brownsfan019 said:
What are you talking about 'hidden' costs?
What hidden costs? Oh let me see..
  brownsfan019 said:
If you trade live and with real money, the platform plus data is FREE.
And if you have an account with them have haven't placed a trade, maybe because you want to make sure you completely understand the platform first?
  brownsfan019 said:
Now if you have to pay $24.95/mo for demo, which also includes data, that's still a bargain. Call up DTN and ask how much data would be if you wanted US indexes, bonds, Eurex indexes, Eurex bonds, oil, gold, and whatever else you might want. See how much that costs and then let us know if $24.95/mo is a bad deal.
Everyone seems fixated on the price. I don't deny it's a bargain. You shouldn't deny that it's one piece of information that isn't readily available before you open an account, so I thought people should know. I'll still be using OEC for data since that part of things is generous.
  brownsfan019 said:
Note - I could be wrong, but I believe they charge $24.95/mo to those that aren't trading live. In other words, if you aren't generating any commissions for them, then yeah, they might charge you a tiny fee for demo trading. And that is still an incredible bargain.
We'll see..
  brownsfan019 said:
Also - you get a 2 week trail by default (for free) and if you need longer, then ask nicely and they might extend that out for you.
That goes without saying.

 

I'm done knocking my head against the wall on this for apologists. I just don't understand *why* they wouldn't allow demo trading for live customers for free, when that customer is already receiving the very same data for free. At least someone who was ignorant of this before opening an account (such as myself) will now know.

 

(I'd still have opened my account).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  gooni said:
What hidden costs? Oh let me see..

And if you have an account with them have haven't placed a trade, maybe because you want to make sure you completely understand the platform first?

Everyone seems fixated on the price. I don't deny it's a bargain. You shouldn't deny that it's one piece of information that isn't readily available before you open an account, so I thought people should know. I'll still be using OEC for data since that part of things is generous.

We'll see..

That goes without saying.

 

I'm done knocking my head against the wall on this for apologists. I just don't understand *why* they wouldn't allow demo trading for live customers for free, when that customer is already receiving the very same data for free. At least someone who was ignorant of this before opening an account (such as myself) will now know.

 

(I'd still have opened my account).

 

 

You did not point out ANY hidden costs. Please explain.

 

As I said, you get a 2 week trial and you can extend that out if you ask them. You SHOULD be testing the platform out BEFORE sending them money. There's no reason to be sending money when you don't even know if you like the platform... why would you do that?

 

I don't understand your complaint here when the demo period is plenty generous and provides plenty of time to do what you are asking - see if you like the platform. You get 2 weeks right away and can get more if you request it. And if they say no, you can pay a whole 25 bucks for a month, which means for 25 bucks you can test it out for 6 weeks and that includes your data feed.

 

As they say... you can't make everyone happy.

 

:roll eyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly, can you just forget about the amount of money for 15 seconds, that's not the point here.

 

From OEC website:

 

"Most software providers charge a monthly fee to use their trading platforms. Regardless of whether or not you actually complete a trade! Worse yet, some software providers actually charge a minimum monthly usage fee. OEC feels so strongly about the value of our software that we never charge a "monthly" or "minimum" usage fee to use the OEC Trader!"

 

Is it just my poor assumption that this would include demo trading 'where you don't actually want to complete a trade'?

 

Where can you find on the OEC website that it costs 24.95 for demo trading? I couldn't find it until after I opened an account.

 

And yes while I tried the demo, I did intend to continue using it after opening an account. For someone who doesn't trade live much, demo trading is important for more than just 14 days. If it costs money, it costs money - it just should NOT be represented differently.

 

Anything that is off that point is irrelevant.

 

Regardless, these are the best commission rates I have received, and the cheapest data for live trading also. I'm just making sure that people understand the extra cost, insignificant as it may be. I don't know about you, but if someone charges me even $1 but is 'sneaky' about that cost, it irks me. When a company goes to such lengths to state they charge nothing for charts and data (but something for demo execution is not mentioned) - well, it's going to rub me up the wrong way.

 

Moving on..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this is pretty ridiculous gooni. They say 'OEC Trader' in the disclaimer -- not 'OEC Trader Demo Platform'. I think its a reasonable assumption that they will not stream free data to everyone for demo trading. I have never paid a platform fee so there are no hidden costs -- disclaimer is just fine as is....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Frank said:
this is pretty ridiculous gooni. They say 'OEC Trader' in the disclaimer -- not 'OEC Trader Demo Platform'. I think its a reasonable assumption that they will not stream free data to everyone for demo trading. I have never paid a platform fee so there are no hidden costs -- disclaimer is just fine as is....
Only posting to ensure whoever is considering an account actually understands what I'm saying, which is:

 

I have an open, funded account with OEC - I'm not 'just anyone' who wants free data. It was not until after I opened an account that it was possible to find out anywhere on their site that the 'simulated' execution on their platform was not included in everything else that was free.

 

I still think it's a good deal, but as far as I'm concerned, this aspect was hidden because you can't find out until after you open the account. Or read this thread.. And that was the only point of me posting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  sevensa said:
If you $24.95 a month is too much for you to test out something new, then you probably should not be trading.

 

It amazes me that people think that is too much. Go ahead and compare getting a data feed like DTN+charting service, or Esignal or TS. I was paying hundreds each month for that stuff and not getting 1/4th of the data. If $25/month is too rich for you, then I agree with sevensa, trading is probably not for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  trader273 said:
It amazes me that people think that is too much.
It amazes me that reading comprehension has failed so miserably time and time again. Never once have I said that $25/month is too much for data. I've repeatedly stated that the only point is you don't know the demo platform costs money until after you've opened an account - it's a transparency thing. If it cost $5/month I'd still be upset that it wasn't disclosed and is impossible to find out without specifically asking the question, especially for a company that makes such a big deal about there being no costs to holding the account.

 

Don't believe me? check for yourself

 

I'm honestly, genuinely surprised that they would charge anything since they are giving the very same data for free to those same customers for life anyway. I can't see the reasoning.

 

Anyway, clearly I'm in the minority that thinks full disclosure or transparency is a good thing. So be it. I hope my post will at least be useful to someone thinking about opening an account for demo purposes and knowing upfront what their costs are going to be.

Edited by gooni

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I ve been with OEC for about 2 years now, trading mostly Eurex futs. And all I can say is: Yes, the integrated platform is awesome, the execution speed as well. But what really sucks is their unreliable datafeed.

I can still remember the awesome unfiltered datafeed before OEC was bought by OptionsXpress and afterwards it deteriorated so badly :(

Volume in the DOM misses out about 20% of total volume. At least this is my experience for Fgbl and Fesx - I could live with that. But what is totally unacceptable are their notorious disconnects and data freezes. And I am a bit astonished nobody here complains about it.

 

ps. didn t intend my first post to be a critical one :hmmmm:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly, that's why I still haven't pulled the trigger.

 

I've been suffering chronic DCs in the fast few days using their demo account. It's been fine for the past several months at my apartment though. Maybe it's my home connection? I don't know. I remember it used to be like this (but not as bad) a year ago at my home connection as well.

 

However I have noticed that Infinity's datafeed has never frozen for me, so I might go with them instead. BUT their commissions are about 3 times as expensive :(

 

I'm also looking at AMP and Mirus but I don't really like NT for some reason. Maybe because I've had so much trouble trying to get demo accounts running on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  garak said:
I ve been with OEC for about 2 years now, trading mostly Eurex futs. And all I can say is: Yes, the integrated platform is awesome, the execution speed as well. But what really sucks is their unreliable datafeed.

I can still remember the awesome unfiltered datafeed before OEC was bought by OptionsXpress and afterwards it deteriorated so badly :(

Volume in the DOM misses out about 20% of total volume. At least this is my experience for Fgbl and Fesx - I could live with that. But what is totally unacceptable are their notorious disconnects and data freezes. And I am a bit astonished nobody here complains about it.

 

ps. didn t intend my first post to be a critical one :hmmmm:

 

I have only seen issues after a big upgrade. Other than that, running fine here but I don't trade FGBL or FESX.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  eric341 said:
Exactly, that's why I still haven't pulled the trigger.

 

I've been suffering chronic DCs in the fast few days using their demo account. It's been fine for the past several months at my apartment though. Maybe it's my home connection? I don't know. I remember it used to be like this (but not as bad) a year ago at my home connection as well.

 

However I have noticed that Infinity's datafeed has never frozen for me, so I might go with them instead. BUT their commissions are about 3 times as expensive :(

 

I'm also looking at AMP and Mirus but I don't really like NT for some reason. Maybe because I've had so much trouble trying to get demo accounts running on it.

 

Cheap commissions don't mean much if you can't execute your system correctly :-), you'll lose far more than what you are saving on the round turns. :missy:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly.

 

I'm going to go with either AMP or Infinity.

 

AMP has slightly cheaper commissions but Infinity appears to have stronger support/service.

 

Decisions decisions.

 

I have heard some bad things about Infinity over at ET, whilst amp has been getting better reviews there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.