Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

UrmaBlume

Very Strong Coordinated Technical Commercial Selling in ES, YM & NQ

Recommended Posts

Todays trade saw unusually strong, perfectly coordinated selling by commercials in all major US equity markets.

 

At EXACTLY 0828 PST, 1128 EST there was very strong, computer based technical selling in the S&P Futures, The Dow Future and the NASDAQ 100 future. I can verify that this selling was coordinated down to the millisecond.

 

Here are the 3 screenshots that tell the story:

 

091709rpt4.jpg

 

091709rpt5.jpg

 

091709rpt6.jpg

Edited by UrmaBlume

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The same selling noted in the previous post happened again at 1224 PST, and again in all 3 markets:

 

In addition this indicator game up 3 great trades today (09/17) which can be seen here

 

091709rpt7.jpg

 

091709rpt8.jpg

 

091709rpt9.jpg

Edited by UrmaBlume

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I can verify that this selling was coordinated down to the millisecond.

 

 

I think it was your very post here that I quizzed you about your infrastructure. I thought you where using Tradestation data? Or are you getting a data feed that is time stamped at the exchange? I am going to go out on a limb here and call hyperbole. That's not to say that this is not a pretty interesting post but as I've said a million times (hehe) milisecond accuracy isn't plausible. Transactional latency on the CME systems is likely to be up to an order of magnitude greater than milliseconds. I hope I am not sounding pedantic but it might shape other peoples expectations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think it was your very post here that I quizzed you about your infrastructure. I thought you where using Tradestation data? Or are you getting a data feed that is time stamped at the exchange? I am going to go out on a limb here and call hyperbole. That's not to say that this is not a pretty interesting post but as I've said a million times (hehe) milisecond accuracy isn't plausible. Transactional latency on the CME systems is likely to be up to an order of magnitude greater than milliseconds. I hope I am not sounding pedantic but it might shape other peoples expectations.

 

Easy BlowFish. The point of interest here is that precisely coordinated selling at an abnormal intensity in 3 related markets got knocked off.

 

Of course you are right about millisecond accuracy. Everybody with experience at that level of operation knows that. The point is that the code is written to millisecond or even microsecond time stamps so that is the time frame most practioners use as a reference. Also, there are, indeed, ways to handle Trade Station data FROM inside Trade Station with millisecond granularity. Not as good as thousand dollar a day data sources that put you cheek to cheek with the exchange but certainly close enough for practical application.

 

For everybody but the Goldman's of the world and from a practical standpoint the issue has always been one of method rather than of latency.

 

Whether I work with milliseconds, microseconds or half-hours is not nearly so to the point as the fact that in the sub 1 minute time frame this indicator spotted this very significant anomaly in commercial trade in 3 different markets.

 

Certainly the signals were timely engouh to allow entry at very advantageous prices and after all shouldn't accurate, timely indications of profitable Trade Points be the most valuable product of any Trader's Laboratory?

 

Call the millisecond, micorsecond, half-second point poetic and or technical license and liberty and take a broader look at a very rare view of a rare occurrence.

Edited by UrmaBlume

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely. Interesting post. I was in two minds whether to say anything but I figured it might have some value to people that are following your work (and that is quite a few if the PM's I have had about code are anything to go by). Certainly it wasn't just to be argumentative and I apologise if it seemed overly critical. Some people perhaps don't have a good idea of 'scale' and perhaps it might be helpful to them (particularly if trying to come up with their own indicators, that level of precision is not necessary and probably unattainable in windows on PC hardware).

 

For example when an app requests data from disk it can take 10 or even 20 milliseconds before the first byte is delivered. DSL local loop delay can be 30 ms. Light will get about 300km in a vaccum in a bit over a millisecond.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So what?

 

You have a great indicator and the rest of the world doesn't. Good for you and bad for us. Why do you get such pleasure rubbing it in our faces? We recognize your superiority and mastery over the markets. Poor retail schlebs like us aren't as blessed or gifted.

 

We all understand your theory and how the indicator supports it, but give it a rest already. Unless you open up the kimono (which you said you won't), there is nothing more to be learned by plastering the forum with these charts day after day.

 

What your doing here is exactly the same thing you did at ET and you got banned for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

have a question,

 

in most of these screen shots you post there is a simple pattern -- a ton of block orders after a swing in one direction followed by a moving average crossover in the other direction, which seems to confirm it was buying or selling. (I am not talking trade set-up here, just recognizing commercial activity). if you see a situation that doesn't qualify for this, large block orders with a MA crossover against last swing -- can you discuss perhaps why that would not be a good way to track commercial activity? if there is no edge past the opening 2 minutes of this occurence, then I would say its just a short-term scalp and so there is nothing in these screenshots that will ever be useful to anyone here. If that is the answer, then so be it -- just curious.

Edited by Frank

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Absolutely. Interesting post. I was in two minds whether to say anything but I figured it might have some value to people that are following your work (and that is quite a few if the PM's I have had about code are anything to go by). Certainly it wasn't just to be argumentative and I apologise if it seemed overly critical. Some people perhaps don't have a good idea of 'scale' and perhaps it might be helpful to them (particularly if trying to come up with their own indicators, that level of precision is not necessary and probably unattainable in windows on PC hardware).For example when an app requests data from disk it can take 10 or even 20 milliseconds before the first byte is delivered. DSL local loop delay can be 30 ms. Light will get about 300km in a vaccum in a bit over a millisecond.

 

BlowFish,

 

Thanks for the kind words.

 

I too have had many PMs & emails about this and other or our indicators and I am very appreciative that the vast marjority of them have been so complimentary and suppotive.

 

I especially applaud those with the intellectual capital, market understanding and technical ability that report a significant increase in the efficacy of their trading as a result of their efforts to build their own versions of our work.

 

Long-term successful trading is not about instinct, divine inspiration or spontaneous intellectual combustion. It is about intelligent data processing and sound method and those willing to think for themselves and do their own work will usually lead the pack in any endeavor.

 

Thanks again for the kind words and your many contributions to this community.

 

cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
have a question, in most of these screen shots you post there is a simple pattern -- a ton of block orders after a swing in one direction followed by a moving average crossover in the other direction, which seems to confirm it was buying or selling. (I am not talking trade set-up here, just recognizing commercial activity). if you see a situation that doesn't qualify for this, large block orders with a MA crossover against last swing -- can you discuss perhaps why that would not be a good way to track commercial activity? if there is no edge past the opening 2 minutes of this occurence, then I would say its just a short-term scalp and so there is nothing in these screenshots that will ever be useful to anyone here. If that is the answer, then so be it -- just curious.

 

Frank,

 

Thank you for your query.

 

You are indeed correct when you note that big blocks mark commercial activity, 1-10 lot traders NEVER trade 100's or bigger. The fact of the big blocks is sometimes a warning that it is NOT the KIND of commercail activity that forms local extremes. It all depends on how you measure the metrics of the order flow.

 

Block trades and MA crossovers have nothing to do with the calculation of this indicator or how it should be used. On reason the method you discuss might lack efficacy is that those block trades could be premium arbitrage and the fact of a block trade says little as to whether it is buying or selling.

 

The calculation of this indicator involves much more that just volume over time. "When taken in combination, the acceleration and deceleration of buying and selling volumes, total volume and the velocity/rate of change in the balance of trade reveal a certain dynamic that we find present at many, if not most, intra-session extremes."

 

For those with greater than retail market understanding that are also technically astute the value in these screenshots and the accompaying text has been, or so they report, two fold 1) the screenshots document that the indication occurs at almost all session extremes and many intra-session local extremes. 2) the value of the accompanying text to those same informed, technically competent traders is that they have been able to gleen from that text enough informaiton to build their own. The value of the ability to locate session highs and lows as or slightly BEFORE they occur speaks for itself.

 

Speaking generally - of course those are the traders with above averge intellect and ability. The lowest intellectual common denomiator has never done well in this game and most likely never will. It has always been a very small percentage of the players that win at this game and what separates them from the masses is not their size but is their understanding and ability.

 

Some of what is so wonderful about this game we both play is that to win you don't have to have a license, you don't have to have anyone's approval, you don't have to be a member of anything and you don't need tremendous capital - all you have to be is right and if you are right you wont be little for long. There is and always has been unlimited backing for those that can demonstrate either great efficacy in their personal trading or the understanding and ability to construct profitable automated systems.

 

cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ok ---

 

I point this out for others and for my own reminder.

 

there are all these threads like 'trade intensity' and this one is ' Very Strong Coordinated Technical Commercial Selling in ES, YM & NQ' --- but the indicator in the charts is actually an index of indicators measuring a number of things on different timeframes. so the size of the bar in the indicator pane --- the one in the histogram --- is building up when the INDEX adds up. There is likely a perception here that the histogram is a summation of some kind of filtered volume for large block orders --- because of the title of these threads makes it sound like this is a volume indicator -- like figuring out if that last 2k contract trade was a buy or a sell. but the histogram in the indicator pane is actually an index that is stacking up biases in combination and just because there are large block orders passing doesn't mean the index will build.

 

for example, (this is structure of the indicator only, done intentionally in oversimplified 'if/then' branching programming statements for structure only)

 

1) if trade is strong given this time of day then +1

2) if the velocity of trade on X timeframe has DECREASED then +1

3) if the velocity of trade on Y timeframe has DECREASED then +1

 

so the index would be +3 in this example.

 

if block orders ARE passing without the above conditions, then it is possible that the index may be 0 or whatever, big block orders without a signal

 

I was not implying that the MA crossover was a part of the indicator -- I was just suggesting that action just after a signal would confirm the signal and this is quite easily seen in the MA crossover.

 

 

edited

Edited by Frank

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ok --- I point this out for others and for my own reminder.there are all these threads like 'trade intensity' and this one is ' Very Strong Coordinated Technical Commercial Selling in ES, YM & NQ' --- but the indicator in the charts is actually an index of indicators measuring a number of things on different timeframes. so the size of the bar in the indicator pane --- the one in the histogram --- is building up when the INDEX adds up (right?) There is likely a perception here that the histogram is a summation of some kind of filtered volume for large block orders --- because of the title of these threads makes it sound like this is a volume indicator -- like figuring out if that last 2k contract trade was a buy or a sell. but the histogram in the indicator pane is actually an index that is stacking up biases in combination and just because there are large block orders passing doesn't mean the index will build.for example, (this is structure of the indicator only, done intentionally in oversimplified 'if/then' branching programming statements for structure only)1) if trade is strong given this time of day then +12) if the velocity of trade on X timeframe has DECREASED then +1) if the velocity of trade on Y timeframe has DECREASED then +1 so the index would be +3 in this example.if block orders ARE passing without the above conditions, then it is possible that the index may be 0 or whatever...I was not implying that the MA crossover was a part of the indicator -- I was just suggesting that action just after a signal would confirm the signal and this is quite easily seen in the MA crossover.edited

 

 

You analysis of this indicator mixes in waaay too much from the thread I started as a primer on the construction of an index of weighted biases. That is not the way this indicator is calculated plus almost all of the inputs for this indicator are preprocessed from a single time/volume frame and that is waaaaay sub 1 minute.

 

Again to get closer to the essence of this dynamic I recommend that you reduce your focus on blocks - they are not to the point here.

 

While slightly off-topic yet still related and another clue for the AI folks here - Does anyone else here use MARS (Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines) from Salford systems as part of their final layer of processing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
almost all of the inputs for this indicator are preprocessed from a single time/volume frame and that is waaaaay sub 1 minute

 

ok, thanks - that is what I was wondering. but one thing still remains unclear. the indicator exists on a sub 1 minute level --- but it is unclear on the timeframe for how long an extreme reading remains relevant. I ask because this is central --- while the INDICATOR exists on this timeframe --- is it only the high-speed execution of this signal what accounts for profits or losses? if you are saying that it often marks the time of the 'day session extreme' -- then certainly this is a signal that is good on a higher level --- something that does not require an application written in machine language and a server within 10 feet of a major internet backbone for sub-second execution.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ok, thanks - that is what I was wondering. but one thing still remains unclear. the indicator exists on a sub 1 minute level --- but it is unclear on the timeframe for how long an extreme reading remains relevant. I ask because this is central --- while the INDICATOR exists on this timeframe --- is it only the high-speed execution of this signal what accounts for profits or losses? if you are saying that it often marks the time of the 'day session extreme' -- then certainly this is a signal that is good on a higher level --- something that does not require an application written in machine language and a server within 10 feet of a major internet backbone for sub-second execution.

 

Very astute. Yes indeed the indicator is calculated with sub-second granularity but no we do not depend on sub-second execution except in our very high frequency tick systems.

 

You are also right about not needing to be cheek to cheek w/exchange data to operate. From a practical perspective for all but the Goldman's of the world the difference between a thousand dollar a day connection and feeds such as ZenFire are not meaningful.

 

We have done this work in both TradeStation and Ninja and we find no practical advantage to either. While we know that ZenFire is faster we have ways to add much more granularity to Trade Station data than their 1 minute time stamp allows. The net is that for our purposes we find no practical difference so we stay with Trade Station because we are very familiar with the platfrom and that over the years we have written several thousand indicators, paint bars, show me, activity bars, functions, strategies and dlls based on Easy Language plus we find Ninja to be very young in its presentation and cumbersome to use.

 

Day after day I post here and in certain reports the occurence of this indication on session extremes for a variety of markets and yes indeed we treat and trade this as a "longer" term intra-session indicator and execute, sometimes more than a few times in the same direction from a single such indication. How many of these entries and how long we stay i them is taken from indications of order flow and the rate of change in the balance of trade on volume charts that range in time frame from about 20 second bars to 3 min bars.

 

BTW I used to live in your neck of the woods. Lived in HIllsborough, just to the South, and had offices on New Montgomery next to the Sheraton Palace. Did many a drunken biz lunch at the long gone House of Shields accross the street, great food and evern better bar.

 

cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks

 

yes, I remember the House of Shields, I worked within 2 blocks of there from 1993 - 2003 and went to many conferences at the Sheraton Palace. Ate at Henry Hunans many times too -- best chinese food ever -- New Montgomer and Natoma St.

 

So you are in Vegas, you play any World Series events this year?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
thanksyes, I remember the House of Shields, I worked within 2 blocks of there from 1993 - 2003 and went to many conferences at the Sheraton Palace. Ate at Henry Hunans many times too -- best chinese food ever -- New Montgomer and Natoma St.So you are in Vegas, you play any World Series events this year?

 

No WSOP for me for the last several years. My last big events were a couple of the Party Poker Million cruises that I won online. They were really great parties. The whole ship chartered for a week's trip to Mexico and nothing but poker players onboard - tequila, lobster, poker and a shot at a million what a week and I while I didn't cash in either event I won both $14k entries by moving up from a $25 satellite.

 

Party was great back then. They had just moved to Gibraltar and flew me to Gib to do some consulting for them.

 

As to the House of Shields, San Francisco has always been a great "eating" town. If you play poker maybe you should visit the Garden City poker room in San Jose. Not the best poker in the bay area but certainly the best food of any poker room in the bay area.

 

While you can certainly eat well here in Vegas it is almost always in one of the "name" joints where dinner costs a grand and that's only if you don't drink a lot. I miss the bay area for all its small, out of the way, hole in the wall resturants that are soooo good across so many cultures. Two exceptions to that here in Vegas are the King and I on Trop for Thai and Mamacitas on Fremont for Cuban/Mexican.

 

cheers

 

PS - While we are waaaay off topic here is a shot of the Miraflores Locks in the Panama Canal that updates everytime it is loaded or refreshed, in my days as a sailor I made a dozen passages of the canal and all of them were fascinating.

 

miraflores.jpg

Edited by UrmaBlume

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Todays trade saw unusually strong, perfectly coordinated selling by commercials in all major US equity markets.

 

At EXACTLY 0828 PST, 1128 EST there was very strong, computer based technical selling in the S&P Futures, The Dow Future and the NASDAQ 100 future. I can verify that this selling was coordinated down to the millisecond.

 

Here are the 3 screenshots that tell the story:

 

091709rpt4.jpg

 

091709rpt5.jpg

 

091709rpt6.jpg

 

Clearly, you can imply from the screenshot that the concerted effort to "push" down price in all US markets worked and, erroneously, you can conclude that each time they attempt to push prices they will succeed. I think the more interesting screenshots would be the other 7 out of 10 screenshots that show them failing or actually getting their arse handed to them because price didn’t react as they expected and now need to liquidate.

 

It looks like another good way to overtrade your account.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.