Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

a.cherkezov

Guidelines Towards a Trading Career

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

 

I am currently doing an undergraduate degree in Financial Management and I have one year and a half until I graduate. I would like to pursue a trading career but I don't know where to start from.

 

Could someone give me some guidelines of what I should be doing? Should I get my degree first and then look at trading or can I start doing something now? I know that there is a lot of information on the Internet and courses that I could do online but I prefer to something like a job which involves trading or a course(but not an online one). I think that I have dedication but I need something to start me off before I can start practicing and learning by myself.

 

By the way I have read James Dalton's book Mind Over Markets and I am interested in Market Profile but I don't know much about it.

 

Thank you in advance!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are capatilized, say $50,000 to trade, and want to make trading a career move, particularly trading stocks, I suggest you think about the following:

 

1. Working closely with a qualified, actively and successfully trading coach - to gain the confidence, competence, and consistently profitable performance results.

 

2. It's all about the games we play in life. All trading is about games - strategy, tactics, rules, and so on - find and trade a winner's game, for sure, not a loser's game - ask your coach.

 

3. Trading with your coach and other winners, not gossipy losers, in a winner's stock trading room.

 

Hope that helps...

 

John

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So brand new person #1 asks what to do and brand new #2 person (whose username would imply they are a trading 'coach') suggests that they get a coach.

 

Big surprise.

 

Where is #3 asking for the website of #2 so that they can just 'help' out #1?

 

:rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

cherkezov, I suggest you open a tiny fx account and just start trading it. At first just use the individual results to tell what you need to learn, then as you build some net results use those to identify what you need to work on for the bigger picture. You must ultimately fit your style to yourself – so why waste years fitting yourself to the styles of others. Just about any old 'top ten rules' of trading you can find anywhere on the internet is all the reading you really need to do… the education is finding how, what, where, when they mean to you and how you can make you own living rules that are not conflictual to live by.

 

brownsfan you know you don’t have to be so shy and unassertive … you can just come out and say what you mean ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are lots of differing opinions as to the best way to get started. You have to consider the cost both in terms of hard cash and in opportunity costs for time spent studying trading as opposed to studies needed for you to complete your degree.

 

Whatever way you choose, your best bet is to find a broker that will let you use a simulated account at little or know charge. The one which comes to mind is Think or Swim, but I'm sure there are others. Although with Think or Swim the quotes on an unfunded account will be delayed. You could open a small funded account with them and just trade simulator to get real time quotes, since I don't think they have have quote fees.

 

 

Practice and learn until you're consistently profitable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

re:

Whatever way you choose, your best bet is to find a broker that will let you use a simulated account at little or know charge.

 

Sim screens ultimately do not decrease the pool of ‘loosers’.

But forget statistics! If indeed you are a winner then get freakin busy trading and don’t waste a minute or an opportunity on a sim screen. ‘All’ the brokers (of course), ‘all’ the coaches, ‘all’ the helpful online posters, ‘all’ the magazine articles and advertisements, even ‘all’ the poker ‘pros’, advise noobies to sim trade… heck, it’s a blooming paradigm.

The premise behind that advice – practice practice practice – is very sound! However, I advise noobies to go real from the beginning with a small account and with real do that core learning activity – practice practice practice.

You will learn far more about yourself going real from the beginning. You will prepare yourself to deal far more realistically and effectively with suddenly changing conditions going real from the beginning. You will find out much more accurately and quickly whether or not and to what extent the trading game is for you going real from the beginning.

Going sim is not bad advice. But there are just better alternatives to sim training these days (unless you just want to stroke yourself) . As a beginner, you will still have to do the same explorations in styles, edges, money management, etc ... just make it real. Real is harder and more direct – but it is real.

 

"Train like you fight. Fight like you train" Which comes closer? Sim or real?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was watching some BMX biking videos with my son the other day and they were talking about the development of the foam pit. A large pit filled with foam block that you can land in without hurting yourself. They were doing huge tricks off ramps and stuff.

 

I said: Wimps!

Go real or don't go at all. You will learn so much more about yourselves with that six months in the hospital recovery time between tries, than you will practicing with the foam pit. You will be a better biker in the end. Or you might be dead or just too crippled to try anymore...

:bang head:

JH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the BMX analogy, but no analogies are necessary. It just doesn't make any sense at all to throw money away on real trades before you can be profitable on SIM.

 

Starting out with real money, rather than SIM, knowing you'll lose money in the is a sign that you lack the psychological discipline to do the technically correct thing in trading in the first place.

 

YES there are differences in the ease of trades in SIM including ease of fill and psychological differences, but that doesn't negate the usefulness of SIM in training for those first starting out, trying a new strategy or system, or doing any modifications or corrections to their trading rules and practices.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You guys’ responses were as if I was saying something was wrong with sim. Check the post. It says “Going sim is not bad advice. But there are just better alternatives to sim training these days…” Maybe I should have prefaced my remarks with “If your drive is to be in the pareto of the pareto, then skip sim…”. If your drive is just to get into the game - sim away.

 

Cruiser is right, no analogies are necessary. I am actually saying learning how to lose real money should take precedence to learning how to win sim money. Take a survey, most everyone else disagrees. There is the crowd consensus and there are the outliers in every game. The crowd forms the great middling. The outliers form the elite. The elite are definitely ‘talented’ – but for them, the talent is way overrated by the crowd.

 

And btw, padded BMX is not sim. It is BMX with ‘stops’ in place… you can still snap your freakin spinal cord. That’s real - not sim. More noobies than should will sim with the crowd and more noobies than should will be net ‘loosers’. I'm really only talking to the few who will push through and chew real. So, prefaced properly with --- if you’re really serious about mastering this game --- then these days, a very small real FX account is a better alternative for all the beginner work and play that needs to unfold for each individual than an unrealistically funded (for most beginners) sim account … hth one or two noobs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

simming bad practices reinforces bad habits

 

I know this guy... he came to tell me how wonderful his system was because he "made" $XXXXXXXXX sim dollars.

 

I was very happy for him and ask how he did it...

he said he bought 50 contracts of ES at the opening...

 

great, I said.

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
learning how to lose real money should take precedence to learning how to win sim money.

:applaud:

 

:security: Now, why did anyone not tell me this before.

 

Thanks, zdo. :yes sir:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
simming bad practices reinforces bad habits ....

 

Precisely!

 

“When you practice something ‘wrong’ you get really really good at the ‘wrong’ thing.

The longer you practice failure, the harder it becomes to recognize success.

Be careful what you practice, you may get really good at the wrong thing!”

–Tony Blauer

 

Imo - sim trading, papertrading, even certain modes of 'backtesting' / studying 'old' charts all raise the risk of quite unconsciously and unintentionally getting good at the 'wrong' things... yet another reason to forward test 'ideas', etc. with real money at each step of one's journey...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

however i am not against sim trading

 

 

consider yourself a student pilot

you can fly the Flight Simulator as one of the learning processes

 

you have a lesson plan

you have learning objectives

you have exercises to perform

you have results to review and evaluate

(how many trade simmers have the above?)

 

bear in mind:

no student can learn to fly by sim alone

no student would learn anything if there is no lesson plans and learning objectives

 

(assuming the sim meets the basic requirements)

if a student fails the sim... he is not likely to do well in real flying

but if a student made it in sim... there is no guarantee that he will do well in real life

 

 

YMMV

 

just my 2c

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tams, sim piloting is probably the best and most used analogy in the ‘industry’ and your take on it is more grounded and balanced than most.

 

… I will sidestep how loss of money is best not associated with loss of life, or how the consequences of mistakes in flying are distributed SO differently from the consequences of mistakes in trading, etc…

 

I am not against sim either. A below average pilot (or trading) “trainee” would indeed be advised to spend a greater proportion of time on the sim than the real and be subject to a more structured progression. However, when I think about it, I come to the same conclusion as I have about sim trading - The average to excellent pilot (and trader) reaches the limits of benefits from sim very quickly and needs to get up on a real stick! .. and would in the end be a lot better pilot if the time on sim was miniscule compared to the time in real flight practicing responses to real circumstances – even if the ‘real’ is only in a piper cub / tiny FX acct.

 

If you think about it from the pilot’s perspective, most sim in flying has purposes not truly aligned with creating the very best in a pilot. 'Corporate' reasons drive the emphasis on sim in flight… I suspect they drive the emphasis on sim in trading too – to the detriment of individual traders who are attempting to develop.

 

Why don’t we see more ‘first kiss’ analogies instead of sim piloting analogies? :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear fellow-traders,

 

If one is going to be a full time trader, what type of corporation should he establish to manage his trade account?

Can he work as a self employed or there is a better issue?

 

If one trades a futures E-mini, should he calculate his gain/loss each contract for his tax return? but if one is scalping, it could be a hundred of orders each day, should he report them all?

Or, maybe calculating gross gain/loss once in a day, or a month, or a year is enough?

 

Best Regards,

Good Luck in Your Trading!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been trading for 30 yeears, some as a local, and am teaching my youngest daughter to trade electronically and I'm documenting it in a blog.

 

She started off SIM trading. SIM trading is a must, in my opinion, to learn the methodology and mechanics of your business and to hone your skills.

 

How can you expect to be profitable live if you cannot be profitable in a SIM. Its a rehearsal for the real thing. Even Michael Jackson rehearsed.

Edited by electroniclocal
typo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I totally Agree Sim is definitely a must.....its short term/medium insurance against losing ones hard earned money off the bat..........Many people say Ah but losing real money teaches you many things Sim cant....while that is true , the bottom line is People (and I put myself at the top of this list) are really , really stupid when it comes to the first few years of their trading.....until they start to find their way...if certain people want to delude themselves into thinking that they can trade making fake money with Sim after 6-12 months then these types should dip their toe into real money as these types are suffering a phantasy life that is totally unreal.

 

One of the major pitfalls with Sim is that it can also build a rich phantasy life in the wrong hands....discipline goes out the window too easily in this situation.

 

Quiet often a combination of using both and how one decides when to use both is best I have personally found. One needs a strong reflection on ones trading data (real or in sim) to hone in on the shortage of skills that are causing the mistakes that constantly get made...SIm can help prove/disprove that one has fixed a weakness cheaply and hence aquired a "better" skill.

 

Both trading situations can be very dangerous but each type of trading can teach the other type and more importantly the actual person about trading. The trick is to know how to filter through the crap and go with what one knows is real in terms of finding and developing an edge and then exploiting that edge. What way are you going to do that ...? There are these days more and more ways to do this....

 

Sim is just another way to protect ones capital while learning and hopefully if the person is serious about it he/she can use it to find the edge they need to succeed.

 

Just a side not on this issue re sim trading....A different form of it occurs with 80% of the volume of most markets, possibly more these days....ie backward and forward testing of a strategy...especially the forward part....so Sim is criitcal for many blackbox systems to find their edge in the first place...without this they wouldnt be trading...discretionary traders are just using a crude, inconsistent form of it when trading sim manually and most of them likely without a true edge 99% of the time...

 

 

 

Just my 2 cents worth...

 

Best

John

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dear fellow-traders,

 

If one is going to be a full time trader, what type of corporation should he establish to manage his trade account?

Can he work as a self employed or there is a better issue?

 

If one trades a futures E-mini, should he calculate his gain/loss each contract for his tax return? but if one is scalping, it could be a hundred of orders each day, should he report them all?

Or, maybe calculating gross gain/loss once in a day, or a month, or a year is enough?

 

Best Regards,

Good Luck in Your Trading!

 

Step 1 is becoming consistently profitable.

 

Are you at that point?

 

If not, these other questions are of no use until you can trade making money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Step 1 is becoming consistently profitable.

 

Are you at that point?

 

If not, these other questions are of no use until you can trade making money.

 

Yeap, dear Brownsfan, looks like that...

And even if that is not, who wants to mess with a Tax Man afterwards?...

 

Regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeap, dear Brownsfan, looks like that...

And even if that is not, who wants to mess with a Tax Man afterwards?...

 

Regards

 

The tax man is pretty easy to deal w/ if you are a losing trader. And it's not bad if a winning trader, but until you can make money consistently there's not much to discuss.

 

So to clarify - are you a consistently profitable trader?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The tax man is pretty easy to deal w/ if you are a losing trader. And it's not bad if a winning trader, but until you can make money consistently there's not much to discuss.

 

So to clarify - are you a consistently profitable trader?

 

Agree with above. Don't spend any money on setting up entities to avoid tax until you are making enough money to warrant it. If you plan to trade full time you might pay a little exra tax just before you get rid of your job, after that your income will taper off until you ramp up the trading account (unless you can cut your full time hours over time rather than in one hit).

 

As for the number of trades etc, just give your end of month statements to your accountant, or better yet your broker may do an end of year tax statement for you to give to him(or her). No need for any book keeping that way, just focus on your trading :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The tax man is pretty easy to deal w/ if you are a losing trader. And it's not bad if a winning trader, but until you can make money consistently there's not much to discuss.

 

So to clarify - are you a consistently profitable trader?

 

Yes, I am.

For about a year out of 3-year practice period.

Very intrigued already...

Regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.