Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

brownsfan019

Measuring Strength of a Move Once in a Trade

Recommended Posts

perfect risk managment strategy,,,

 

Grey1

Actually 'staying' with a third is only perfect "risk management strategy" ::helloooo: for a small subset of systems, good "risk management strategy" for another set of systems, at B.E. for another subset of systems, and disastrous for a sizable subset of systems.

 

More would definitely see the ridiculousness of just throwing up a post like

“The perfect risk managment strategy is to just take three ticks off every entry”

than would see the ridiculousness of

“exit two thirds of my position and let the other third run, and run, and run....”

but they are equally ridiculous as general advice!

 

...not criticizing your posts and intentions in general - just beating the drum some more from my recent posts for TL posters to abstain from discussing exits in isolation from the system behind it... it may seem like it helps others but it doesn't... and it's ET like...

Edited by zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'll say this on runners - they've NEVER worked for me. I'm all-in or all-out. That's just what works for me.

 

+1. I can never rationalize the total Risk : Reward variance in scaling out positions vs. a full stop out... but thats just my personal preference.

 

All in all out forces me to hold trades and stay accountable to my proper exits.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm with zdo. It depends:

- what you are trading

- what your entry strategy is

- what moves you are trying to capture

 

My personal approach is to test each exit separately. If you then find that the pf on a quick exit is 2+ with a 60% win and the pf on a trailing or trailing+tightening exit is 2+ with a 30-40% win you might choose to combine them to give a result that:

- has an averaged profit factor

- has a smoothed return (and thus all the resulting system stats).

 

Or you might not find that. But only testing will tell. Generally I think the heuristic that the market rewards you for doing what is hard is true ... but ones personal psychology might combine with hard to generate unprofitable in some cases which could also argue for a staged exit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Actually 'staying' with a third is only perfect "risk management strategy" ::helloooo: for a small subset of systems, good "risk management strategy" for another set of systems, at B.E. for another subset of systems, and disastrous for a sizable subset of systems.

 

More would definitely see the ridiculousness of just throwing up a post like

“The perfect risk managment strategy is to just take three ticks off every entry”

than would see the ridiculousness of

“exit two thirds of my position and let the other third run, and run, and run....”

but they are equally ridiculous as general advice!

 

...not criticizing your posts and intentions in general - just beating the drum some more from my recent posts for TL posters to abstain from discussing exits in isolation from the system behind it... it may seem like it helps others but it doesn't... and it's ET like...

 

you obviously are new to this game,,,very new it seems.. get yourself a Neural net and keep all your inputs constant and optimise your out put ( exit) .. once done that then go back and edit your post above

 

Grey1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes....sorry about the ridiculous advice....I was not specific enough.

While I may take two thirds off and run the last third, it still carries a stop as well. Its just that it does not have a take profit level.

If you view that there are generally three levels/ways to exit, a stop with a loss, a stop with a profit, and a take profit level. I may enter a trade - use a take profit for two thirds of my position, and let the last third run until it is stopped out, by a trailing stop.

For me this actually has noting to do with risk management - thats factored in with the actual reason for taking a trade, the position sizing and stop settings etc;

This is more a physc thing that works for me, and works for when I believe the trade can be a real trender. It allows me to combine both short term trading and longer term trend trades.

Given the thread is about measuring the strength of the move, I hope it would add to the discussion.... basically in that by letting the move occur and me being a part of it without me trying to measure it or judge it allows me to stay on some big moves. I just let the stop take me out, not a profit target.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
+1. I can never rationalize the total Risk : Reward variance in scaling out positions vs. a full stop out... but thats just my personal preference.

 

All in all out forces me to hold trades and stay accountable to my proper exits.

 

There are millions of combinations in scaling out of pos which affects the final P/L out come but one can simulate the out come using Monta carlo ( assuming randon walk as a strategy for simplicity ONLY) and ATR as a means of measuring P/L for both stop and traget to find a reasonable risk managment strategy ,, The best tool I suggest is to optimise using a Genetic adaptive NN

 

Grey1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

grey1, " assuming randon walk as a strategy" ???????????????

... hopefully the noobies, including the quant noobies, perked their ears up on that one after the scent went straight to their hindbrains...

 

My naivite' astounds me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
grey1, " assuming randon walk as a strategy" ???????????????

... hopefully the noobies, including the quant noobies, perked their ears up on that one after the scent went straight to their hindbrains...

 

My naivite' astounds me

 

If I was you I would use a more techncial approach to reply to my posts .. We never get any where if you come up with statement as above ,, they are neither constructive nor mathematical ..

 

Grey1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Like I said, it's a mental game I play w/ myself regularly - the 'what if' game... What if I stayed in all day and just MOC'd. the trade. Then the next day - good thing I got out when I did!

 

Got a few ideas working here, but it's all rudimentary at this point. In the end, my gut says that to just keep doing what I am doing and be happy.

 

Thanks for the feedback everyone. While the exit holy grail probably doesn't exist, sometimes I need to get a thread like this going to reinforce what I've been doing is not half bad.

 

;)

 

bf, sounds like you may be done with this thread but I’ll make a few more comments about the ‘stay - no stay’ decisions that traders must make all the time. Most systems should not have any ‘stay’ type exits, and per system, exits should be target (fixed or % of margin or… etc.), PA, trailing (via 'trend'lines see below or other trailing stop methods) or some combo. The dissonance from missing the occasional great move is part of it – hence your “be happy”. Also, some systems should have a mix of ‘stay’ and ‘no stay’ exits.

 

The main point of all my posts in this thread is that the exit methodology must be matched as precisely as possible with the system itself. Most systems are designed to play for points and that is what they should do via ‘no stay’ exits and they are as you say “not half bad””. Joe Montana had no long ball and he played for points, but he turned sub 30 yard throws into super, etc.

 

A very few systems are ‘stay’ unconditionally period and the number of traders who are sufficiently ‘comfortable’ with systems that reward ‘stay’ unconditionally (with the ‘trend’ btw) is also small. These systems play for position, not points. With full ‘stay’ systems “ … the most important aspect of any trading decision is never the condition of the market, but rather that of your own position. The trick is to be constantly moving toward a position of strength, both within an individual trade and within the marketplace at large. Just like basketball, chess, or any other activity that requires focus, you know you’re in the ‘zone’ of trading when you start playing for position, not for points.” Jonathan Hoenig, CapitalistPig

 

Personally, I can make very good money 'scalping', a little bit of money swinging, sporadically good money breakout trading - but my really homerun years were when I had (just barely) enough stones to ‘stay’ and the seasonal / trend went parabolic. It has taken me nearly 20 years of work to really accept / assimilate / accomodate / routinely include this way of trading as my nature is more suited to ‘start clicking them in and then start clicking them out’. And, btw, this system is still not ‘trend’ trading proper – I still got a ways to go before I’m ready for real trend trading. :(:roll eyes:

 

re the lines... Am currently starting to build a short position in the indexes and as previously discussed will use the right most line (see attached) to determine my ‘stay’. It should be noted that the right most ‘live’ line is extremely mutable - I have changed its angle 3 times in as many days on this half day chart and it may be considerably steeper by Monday. I would not be surprised or disappointed if most of the position is stopped out at the green line and look forward to putting more on at a higher level. I would also not be surprised if this ‘collectively inevitable’ next leg / crash down doesn’t analogue typically (in ndx/usd terms at least), but I do want to be positioned for the possibility.

 

To review - the optimum exit methodology is determined by the system itself. Your bringing up the topic may indicate a need for just a tiny tweak to your exits rather than a need to make a big shift along the ‘stay – no stay’ continuum… hth Have a great weekend all.

StayLines090925AM.thumb.jpg.7ac2427ccaa0e13598f573efbdeca82a.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tams - just looking for some ideas, maybe something will spark an idea on my end. I'm not averse to indicators, but prefer to have 'cleaner' charts. To each his own though.

 

 

actually I wanted to tell you all you need is to watch the volume...

but knowing your aversion to the value of volume analysis, I gave you the next best thing.

 

 

 

p.s. channels help too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
actually I wanted to tell you all you need is to watch the volume...

but knowing your aversion to the value of volume analysis, I gave you the next best thing.

p.s. channels help too.

 

I appreciate the assistance. When I find something that shows how to use volume w/ a consistent result, I'll consider it. Till then, I'm going to have to accept it as is b/c I'm sure not going to be drawing crazy lines all over my charts or coloring different stacks of volume with crazy lines on those as well... ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

bf,

fwiw, I'm 'bloggin' - not specifically about "Measuring Strength of a Move Once in a Trade"

but about whether and how to 'stay' or 'no stay' once in a trade...

It doesn't use volume but unfortunately it does have lines - but only one active line at any given time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I appreciate the assistance. When I find something that shows how to use volume w/ a consistent result, I'll consider it. Till then, I'm going to have to accept it as is b/c I'm sure not going to be drawing crazy lines all over my charts or coloring different stacks of volume with crazy lines on those as well... ;)

 

 

there are more than one way to skin a cat... I won't suggest you to sweat it.

 

 

.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BF surrendering to indicators ??? my, the World must be changing.

 

 

Here's a little "indicator" that might help:

 

set the look back to 2 bars,

if the price never closed beyond the 2 bars, there is really no reason to exit.

(of course you have to tune to a resolution that does not give you the noise,

or increase the "look back" so that you don't get taken out by a spike)

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f46/scalpers-hl-bracket-sound-6084.html'>http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f46/scalpers-hl-bracket-sound-6084.html

 

11041d1243739733-scalpers-hl-bracket-sound-scalper_hl_bracket.jpg

 

 

Hope the idea helps

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f46/scalpers-hl-bracket-sound-6084.html

Tam

 

Have you got an mt4 version of this Indicatore available

 

 

Barry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use a market internal display that gives read out of advance decline and Volume

of NYSE and NASDAQ also measures the amount of ticks and I can tell by tracking these numbers if market is getting stronger or weaker.

It was written in spreadsheet and it tracks live

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I use a market internal display that gives read out of advance decline and Volume

of NYSE and NASDAQ also measures the amount of ticks and I can tell by tracking these numbers if market is getting stronger or weaker.

It was written in spreadsheet and it tracks live

 

Care to share some examples of this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 7th April 2025.   Asian Markets Plunge as US-China Trade War Escalates; Wall Street Futures Signal Further Turmoil.   Global financial markets extended last week’s massive sell-off as tensions between the US and its major trading partners deepened, rattling investors and prompting sharp declines across equities, commodities, and currencies. The fallout from President Trump’s sweeping new tariff measures continued to spread, raising fears of a full-blown trade war and economic recession.   Asian stock markets plunged on Monday, extending a global market rout fueled by rising tensions between the US and China. The latest wave of aggressive tariffs and retaliatory measures has unnerved investors worldwide, triggering sharp sell-offs across the Asia-Pacific region.   Asian equities led the global rout on Monday, with dramatic losses seen across the region. Japan’s Nikkei 225 index tumbled more than 8% shortly after the open, while the broader Topix fell over 6.5%, recovering only slightly from steeper losses. In mainland China, the Shanghai Composite sank 6.7%, and the blue-chip CSI300 dropped 7.5% as markets reopened following a public holiday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index opened more than 9% lower, reflecting deep concerns about escalating trade tensions.           South Korea’s Kospi dropped 4.8%, triggering a circuit breaker designed to curb panic selling. Taiwan’s Taiex index collapsed by nearly 10%, with major tech exporters like TSMC and Foxconn hitting circuit breaker limits after each fell close to 10%. Meanwhile, Australia’s ASX 200 shed as much as 6.3%, and New Zealand’s NZX 50 lost over 3.5%.   Despite the escalation, Beijing has adopted a measured tone. Chinese officials urged investors not to panic and assured markets that the country has the tools to mitigate economic shocks. At the same time, they left the door open for renewed trade talks, though no specific timeline has been set.   US Stock Futures Plunge Ahead of Monday Open   US stock futures pointed to another brutal day on Wall Street. Futures tied to the S&P 500 dropped over 3%, Nasdaq futures sank 4%, and Dow Jones futures lost 2.5%—equivalent to nearly 1,000 points. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, down more than 20% from its recent highs, while the S&P 500 is nearing bear territory. The Dow closed last week in correction. Oil prices followed suit, with WTI crude dropping over 4% to $59.49 per barrel—its lowest since April 2021.   Wall Street closed last week in disarray, erasing more than $5 trillion in value amid fears of an all-out trade war. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, sinking more than 20% from its recent peak. The S&P 500 is approaching bear territory, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average has slipped firmly into correction territory.   German Banks Hit Hard Amid Escalating Trade Tensions   German banking stocks were among the worst hit in Europe. Shares of Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank plunged between 9.5% and 10.3% during early Frankfurt trading, compounding Friday’s steep losses. Fears over a global trade war and looming recession are severely impacting the financial sector, particularly export-driven economies like Germany.   Eurozone Growth at Risk   Eurozone officials are bracing for economic fallout, with Greek central bank governor Yannis Stournaras warning that Trump’s tariff policy could reduce eurozone GDP by up to 1%. The EU is preparing retaliatory tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods—ranging from steel and aluminium to consumer products like dental floss and luxury jewellery.   Starting Wednesday, the US is expected to impose 25% tariffs on key EU exports, with Brussels ready to respond with its own 20% levies on nearly all remaining American imports.   UK Faces £22 Billion Economic Blow   In the UK, fresh research from KPMG revealed that the British economy could shrink by £21.6 billion by 2027 due to US-imposed tariffs. The analysis points to a 0.8% dip in economic output over the next two years, undermining Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ growth agenda. The report also warned of additional fiscal pressure that may lead to future tax increases and public spending cuts.   Wall Street Braces for Recession   Goldman Sachs revised its US recession probability to 45% within the next year, citing tighter financial conditions and rising policy uncertainty. This marks a sharp jump from the 35% risk estimated just last month—and more than double January’s 20% projection. J.P. Morgan issued a bleaker outlook, now forecasting a 60% chance of recession both in the US and globally.   Global Leaders Respond as Trade Tensions Deepen   The dramatic market sell-off was triggered by China’s sweeping retaliation to a new round of US tariffs, which included a 34% levy on all American imports. Beijing’s state-run People’s Daily released a defiant statement, asserting that China has the tools and resilience to withstand economic pressure from Washington. ‘We’ve built up experience after years of trade conflict and are prepared with a full arsenal of countermeasures,’ it stated.   Around the world, policymakers are responding to the growing threat of a trade-led economic slowdown. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced plans to appeal directly to Washington and push for tariff relief, following the US administration’s decision to impose a blanket 24% tariff on Japanese imports. He aims to visit the US soon to present Japan’s case as a fair trade partner.   In Taiwan, President Lai Ching-te said his administration would work closely with Washington to remove trade barriers and increase purchases of American goods in an effort to reduce the bilateral trade deficit. The island's defence ministry has also submitted a new list of US military procurements to highlight its strategic partnership.   Economists and strategists are warning of deeper economic consequences. Ronald Temple, chief market strategist at Lazard, said the scale and speed of these tariffs could result in far more severe damage than previously anticipated. ‘This isn’t just a bilateral conflict anymore — more countries are likely to respond in the coming weeks,’ he noted.   Analysts at Barclays cautioned that smaller Asian economies, such as Singapore and South Korea, may face challenges in negotiating with Washington and are already adjusting their economic growth forecasts downward in response to the unfolding trade crisis.           Oil Prices Sink on Demand Concerns   Crude oil continued its sharp slide on Monday, driven by recession fears and weakened global demand. Brent fell 3.9% to $63.04 a barrel, while WTI plunged over 4% to $59.49—both benchmarks marking weekly losses exceeding 10%. Analysts say inflationary pressures and slowing economic activity may drag demand down, even though energy imports were excluded from the latest round of tariffs.   Vandana Hari of Vanda Insights noted, ‘The market is struggling to find a bottom. Until there’s a clear signal from Trump that calms recession fears, crude prices will remain under pressure.’   OPEC+ Adds Further Pressure with Output Hike   Bearish sentiment intensified after OPEC+ announced it would boost production by 411,000 barrels per day in May, far surpassing the expected 135,000 bpd. The alliance called on overproducing nations to submit compensation plans by April 15. Analysts fear this surprise move could undo years of supply discipline and weigh further on already fragile oil markets.   Global political risks also flared over the weekend. Iran rejected US proposals for direct nuclear negotiations and warned of potential military action. Meanwhile, Russia claimed fresh territorial gains in Ukraine’s Sumy region and ramped up attacks on surrounding areas—further darkening the outlook for markets.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock watch, good buying (+313%) toi hold onto the 173.32 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
    • META stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 507.48, 557.84 at https://stockconsultant.com/?META
    • TMUS T-Mobile stock, watch for a top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?TMUS
    • KULR KULR Technology stock watch, pullback to 1.25 triple support area with bullish indicators at https://stockconsultant.com/?KULR
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.