Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

throughthemud

FX Ellioticians

Recommended Posts

End of Week Euro Analysis

 

Unfortunately it appears the EUR/USD has not yet topped. The move downward was in 3 waves and the wave v (circle) was not fully retraced so I'm reentered on the long side and have changed what I was previously counting as the entirety of wave v (circle) as being wave (i) of wave v (circle).

 

If you look at the 15 minute chart of the euro I have labeled what I believe to be a series of ones and twos leading to a high momentum rise for wave iii of (iii). Minimal targets will be 1.4793 but I expect it will go higher than 1.4840.

 

I have also attached a couple daily charts. The first shows the subdivisions of wave 5 of ©. As shown on the chart the equality target for wave i (circle) and wave v (circle) is about 1.4943. Not shown is that the target where wave (i) is 0.618 the length of the entire wave v (circle) which is just 40 pips beyond that at about 1.4988.

 

The last chart is also a daily a chart showing a trendline from the tops of wave 1 and 3 and also price targets for equality between waves 1 and 5. These projections are farther out and it's too soon to see if any of these will matter.

eurusd9-25EOW15min1.618targets.PNG.922fd3705d59c959159f75f47fc32fbc.PNG

eurusd9-25EOWdailyzoomtargets.PNG.53455043e32369be1c92b6a7b6c93485.PNG

eurusd9-25EOWdailytargets.PNG.b90d720dd5e824ab3ed9200eba5b8fce.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a weekly chart of the EUR/GBP. I might start trading this also since it would help me with my euro and pound trades. As I have the chart labeled the euro is in a bullish primary wave 1 (circle) move against the pound. This might alternatively be wave B circle but no matter which is corrective it appears the euro will continue to advance against the pound for quick some time. This fits with my forecast for the EUR/USD and GBP/USD pairs.

eurgbp9-25weekly.PNG.7e874ca019b900efbb3600fda928853e.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

GBP/USD End of Week Analysis

 

I was expecting a new low today but we got a truncation at best. I'm not completely comfortable with calling that the end of the wave but I am trying a cautious long play anyway. Looks like we'll have an upward correction next followed by a lot more bearishness. Wave 3 looks like it has the power to be an extension so my minimal targets are the 1.618 levels on the daily chart.

 

There are a few things that make me nervous about where the pound has been. The first thing is that ugly correction after wave 1. Second the overlap between wave (iv) and wave (i) of wave i (circle). The third is the questionable truncation that occurred yesterday. My count still fits the form of the bigger picture so I'll keep trading that way until I'm proven wrong.

gbp9-25EOW15min.PNG.fc0446536732d37756dd735f1ab08894.PNG

gbp9-25EOWhourly.PNG.03fe39ab53c41945ed05cd176bec6454.PNG

gbp9-25EOWdailytargets.PNG.470effc745c2886ca1df34723889e0a9.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the last 5 wave structure down on the euro had an overlap on the fourth wave triangle and all 3 waves down were about equal in magnitude. There are two ways of counting this. It is either a c wave of a larger degree or the first wave down of a larger degree. The most likely is that it was the entirety of wave 1 down. There is another possibility that I have not seen since I've been trading elliott waves and that is where there are 5 approximately equal waves down (an undefined extension). I will of course trade the highest probability interpretation and change if price invalidates it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

here are my top counts. right now I favor the count where we just ended wave i (circle) down and will now start (a) of ii (circle). The only problem I see is the wave (iii) of i (circle) I have labeled overlaps itself. Alternated count puts us at the bottom of wave (i) of iii (circle). The way you know which it is is by the form the waves takes and their strength as they develop.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yesterdays forecast for downside was a mistake as I somehow failed to realize that the C wave had not yet completed 5 waves (all c waves are 5 wave movements) so using elliott wave analysis the correction could not have been completed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - you guys still watching this?

 

I'm a new convert to Elliott and have limited myself to EUR/USD so far.

 

I'd be interested to hear what you have to say about a count on 4H.

 

I thought I had a triangle forming (attached), so expected a continuation break on the upside after e - it seemed to post a throw-under to the support at 14800 (therefore not a valid triangle?).

 

Following this EUR rallied to a new short-term high - I read this as a wave 1 - now following this (attached 2) and would appreciate your count.

 

Thanks,

 

VR

5aa70f6cdc042_triangle4h.thumb.gif.14f4e1aeb31031f9c3a5e0de2885525e.gif

5aa70f6ce22db_3rdwaveoff14900.thumb.gif.bd800b96889302cf35fa4c7efcd81f27.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've taken on more responsibility outside trading markets and the decreased leverage means forex is no longer my main source of income. I'm trading on a little longer time frame then before. I'm going to try to start posting again but I think the markets are clearing up now so it won't be as difficult to see what's coming next anyway. Here's one chart that is food for thought.

usd.PNG.9b4a2f0bc7892101448a5e55f670d597.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi VR,

Your analysis is good. I was watching the same thing. The throw over/throw under is actually more common than not for a triangle's e wave. This turned out to be part of a more complex pattern so I hope you didn't get killed expecting that 5th wave you were hoping for. I always play 4th and 5th waves very cautiously.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The USD has made a movement that can be counted as 5 waves and therefore complete for a few days but I don't believe the movement is actually complete. If you look at my chart of the euro the movement since wave 1 down has only been about 1.618 times wave 1. That should be the minimum movement for wave 3. Also this movement has not been nearly as long as the wave 1 for primary wave 1 down. I've been short on this since the beginning of this wave but I won't be adding anymore until it becomes more clear whether this is the end of 1 or just wave 3 or 4.

eurusd12-11.PNG.b646d8295da126059c68b23037f1e5a9.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi VR,

Your analysis is good. I was watching the same thing. The throw over/throw under is actually more common than not for a triangle's e wave. This turned out to be part of a more complex pattern so I hope you didn't get killed expecting that 5th wave you were hoping for. I always play 4th and 5th waves very cautiously.

Hi..Thanks very much...I did make the mistake of holding out for the 4th & 5th...can't complain though +60pts

 

I'm currently liking € on the downside and will post my next count when I have something

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you look at the chart I attached you will see where I think the wave count stands. I think wave 3 of (1) of primary 3 has concluded and we will see wave 4 starting Sunday. Here are some calculations I did...

_______________________________

wave 1 down of primary 3

 

1 of (1) of 3 (circle)

origin 1.51436

terminus 1.48277

 

length 315.9

 

2 of (1) of 3 (circle)

origin 1.48277

terminus 1.51406

 

length 312.9

retracement 99.05%

 

3 of (1) of 3 (circle)

origin 1.51406

terminus (1.46680/1.45855/1.42608)

 

length (472.6/555.1/879.8)

extension of 1(1.496/1.757/2.785)

_________________________________________________

 

There are 3 points for the terminus of wave 3 due to different possibilities I see but the second is more likely than the first and the third is the most likely of all (the count I'm trading by). That is the most likely count because it is near a common fib level in relation to wave 1, the RSI has diverged and there has not been a movement I would feel comfortable calling a wave 4. Last week I posted that I felt is wasn't long enough because of its relation to wave (1) of primary 1. It has now surpassed the magnitude of that wave (not surprisingly).

 

Looking into the future this correction is likely to be somewhat sideways with a retracement to at least 1.4595 (38%). If the first section of the correction is sharp I will likely only play that section to the upside and then reenter on the downside and wait out the rest of wave 4 without playing it. There's a good chance that wave 4 could consume all of next week.

euro12-18.PNG.fcad9c26045be514c2f05a840b5746d7.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi TMT,

 

I had been trying to get into an 'easy-to-take' short since the $ turnaround...unsurprisingly the €/$ got sold off before hitting really obvious levels until I managed to hook into the resistance @ 14585 on 16th - my setup was I had a 5-wave count down then what looked like an expanding flat correction.

 

14585 was a previous SR level already marked on my chart

+/- a 50% retracement of my 5-wave count down

168% of A off the bottom of B

Had Stochastic overbot on the 1H & 15M (+ a 15M divergence)

1H MACD looked to be failing to break up thru the 0 line

 

Clearly a correction is due but this break-down is already extended...I think I'll stick with trying to get all my ducks in a row on the smaller timeframes and carry on plugging away...the 14585 paid out 200pts on a 20pt initial stop.

 

It'll be interesting to see tomorrow whether this bounce pans out or not

 

Tks,

 

VR

5aa70f86ada4b_14585retrace.thumb.gif.0402e57cf14102b55ce4e76efba74ea8.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.