Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

pmsinc

Shorting Both BULL and BEAR ETF's

Recommended Posts

I have done a little backtesting on the concept of Shortng BOTH the FAS and the FAZ. I short each at the open of every day and close them both out at he end ofthe day. I adjust the shares baaed on the ratio of the opening prices otherwise I would have a big differneces in volatility/range. So if the FAZ is $100 and the FAS is $25 I would short 100 shares of FAZ and 400 shares of FAS.

 

Over 199 trades I come up with an expectancy of $0.57 from 11/19/08 to 09/03/09.

% Win/Loss Avg Win/Loss

Win 115 $170.09 57.8% $1.48

Loss 84 $(56.30) 42.2% $(0.67)

Total 199 $113.789

Expectenancy $0.57

 

I am looking for advice from seasoned traders on the viability of this approach.

Short FAS FAZ Equity Curve.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it looks to me like there was a price anomaly early in the ETF's life that caused Opening Prices to be 'off' relative to each other. Note that the return in your chart is highly influenced by Nov-Jan 2009. The anomaly was likely the result of a low-volume ETF.

 

These ETF's, once liquid, track benchmarks quite well on a 'closing price to closing price' basis --- so this anomaly is really about 'are open prices of these ETF's consistently mis-stated'. If you plot the volume of these ETF's --- you can see that once volume reached high levels (and pricing therefore more accurate) --- the anomaly of the opening price mis-stating became very marginal at best.

 

Perhaps there is an anomaly with new ETF's before they gain critical mass to be exploited in the future for small nimble accounts -- but more likely, there are just likely a lot of single prints on the opening price which you wouldn't be able to short at that price in a real-time practical example (ie, price opens at $25.00 on 100 share lot and next print is $24.86 and you fill $24.84 and lock in nothing but transaction costs).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.