Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

  Quote
Hint: It's yellow.

 

And finally, its still about money/trade management.

 

My problem are mainly stops,

but maybe I have already overcome this issue.

 

Anyway, somehow its seems to me,

that if you are not able to trade one line (lagging or not?!)

more lines may be more difficult.

 

Excuse me, and best wishes for your thread.

This indicator itself, seems to be a good one.

 

 

Regards,

 

Hal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Tams-

 

The jpegs above seem to referennce the Juriks AMA which was replaced and greatly improved by the JMA.

 

Additionally, the inputs for the "*BP AMA", which I assume you refer to as Juriks, do not match the AMA input selections from Jurik.

 

Could you post the code, please? Then I could verify its accuracy.

 

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Power555 said:
Hey Tams-

 

The jpegs above seem to referennce the Juriks AMA which was replaced and greatly improved by the JMA.

 

Additionally, the inputs for the "*BP AMA", which I assume you refer to as Juriks, do not match the AMA input selections from Jurik.

 

Could you post the code, please? Then I could verify its accuracy.

 

Thanks!

 

 

Those are not my charts.

pls see link in my post for original creator.

 

I am re-posting these charts for general interest,

and as a point for discussion only.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Tams said:
Those are not my charts.

pls see link in my post for original creator.

 

I am re-posting these charts for general interest,

and as a point for discussion only.

 

Is your intent to support this thread and its discussion of code for Jurik indicators?

The periods of the MA's on the JPEG vary from 3 to 10. Not a valid comparison at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Power555 said:
Is your intent to support this thread and its discussion of code for Jurik indicators?

The periods of the MA's on the JPEG vary from 3 to 10. Not a valid comparison at all.

 

 

depends on what you want to compare,

fixed period of MA "A" vs MA "B" ?

 

or see how a specific MA can approximate its price movements

and to see its ability to smooth out the noise and filter out the false signals?

 

you can use a fixed period as a starting point of comparison,

but it really does not lend much value to a smoothing end result,

because each MA goes through different iterations in its calculations.

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Power555 said:
...

Could you post the code, please? Then I could verify its accuracy.

 

Thanks!

 

 

  Power555 said:
Is your intent to support this thread and its discussion of code for Jurik indicators?

...

 

 

I don't have the codes for the Jurik indicators.

 

Various versions of clones are available here:

Trading Indicators - Traders Laboratory

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We use the JMA for most all our data smoothing work, we have found none better.

 

While I feel that Mark is a bit weak when it comes to market and trading concepts, he works hard to keep his indicators up to date and to the best of my knowledge has always been fair with his customers and very giving of his time.

 

He promises new and "fantastic," (his words) functions to come. I for one am skeptical of these new "fantasitc" functions as Mark's entire body of work is lacking of both original work and market understanding.

 

Mark is very protective of his work and very tech savvy and my guess is that it will be very difficult to reverse engineer his indicators and their dlls.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Urma uses the correct term when he describes Mark Jurik's work as smoothing.

 

He's applying mathematical/electrical engineering techniques to the problem of smoothing data with the lowest lag and least overshoot. This is an interesting thing to do but its questionable if most will extract much profit from a faster smoother (mas are the common form of smoothers but it is unlikely that a JMA is strictly speaking and average). Better value will be achieved by spending time on understanding market structure and market action.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While, what you say is correct about the moving average itself, Mark Jurik has combined the JMA with other common indicators like RSI, CCI , ADX and Stochastics to produce smoothed versions that are responsive. What is the experience of those that have used these indicators called RSX, CCX, DMX and VEL?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is one of my trade entry set-up charts where I do use some Jurik indicators for reference entry criteria as I look at Price / Cumulative Delta / Smoothed CD in the three panes shown.

 

Images | ChartHub.com

 

So far I am pleased with the Jurik indicators for my use to reference points for trade entry criteria while tracking both Price and Cumulative Delta.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have known Mark for more than a decade.

 

His site is Jurik Research and posted on that site is his phone of 719-686-0074.

 

He has always been very giving of his time. As I mentioned before we have found no better utility to smooth data than his JMA.

 

The JMA can be also used to build such indicators as RSI, MACD, Stochastic, etc., that are much smoother and with less lag.

 

cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have also had favorable contacts with Mark since the early 90's

and his JAMA function has been a mainstay (with a specific, not general, purpose) in my systems work for a long time now.

Its main value to me is that it gets flat quicker and more accurately than ANY of the other averages out there.

Posted this elsewhere - the HULL ma is often a little bit quicker in the turns, can track closer in some condiitons, but can have also have more overrun than JMA

 

re "have used these indicators called RSX, CCX, DMX and VEL"

In my limited experience, all his stuff except the adaptive MA is basically worthless... but that's only for MY needs... someone else may find creative and profitable uses for them...most 'smoothing' is an act of denial... learn to work with the jagged edge

Edited by zdo
add more bs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Zdo, Could you please post some pictures of how you use the indicaqtors with say an eMini, or Stock or currency pair chart? There are several templates provided with the indicators that combine indicators and smooth them out as well. I was looking for ideas how to use them for timing entries and exits.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  zdo said:
I have also had favorable contacts with Mark since the early 90's

and his JAMA function has been a mainstay (with a specific, not general, purpose) in my systems work for a long time now.

Its main value to me is that it gets flat quicker and more accurately than ANY of the other averages out there.

Posted this elsewhere - the HULL ma is often a little bit quicker in the turns, can track closer in some condiitons, but can have also have more overrun than JMA

 

re "have used these indicators called RSX, CCX, DMX and VEL"

In my limited experience, all his stuff except the adaptive MA is basically worthless... but that's only for MY needs... someone else may find creative and profitable uses for them...most 'smoothing' is an act of denial... learn to work with the jagged edge

 

Yes, I was looking at Fulcrum's pictures from this page and noticed how smoothing plus the use of Heiken Ashi removed the edges - which does make staying in easy. But with the edges went support and resistance opportunities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Kiwi said:
Yes, I was looking at Fulcrum's pictures from this page and noticed how smoothing plus the use of Heiken Ashi removed the edges - which does make staying in easy. But with the edges went support and resistance opportunities.

Resting inventory support & resitance for the "where" to take a trade from is already determined through Cumulative Delta volume distribution tracking....the scalp indicator set-up is used for "at the moment" final trade entry determination.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wanted to post some of the indicators in relation to price action on a similar time frame on the same trading instrument. I hope this post helps people understand these indicators. I also had a chance to speak to Mark Jurik and he is willing to provide his input on the forum.

 

:missy:

GBPJPY-Bands2.thumb.jpg.8a7ac540315120267b389e24a4203bf0.jpg

5aa70f1ea1726_GBPJPYVel2.thumb.jpg.abfe257161576449e04e3e0b73600c99.jpg

GBPJPY-BB2.thumb.jpg.84da8c5b82c97e1070558bd0a7645727.jpg

GBPJPY-CCX2.thumb.jpg.12429da77b7c402f234da0674524260d.jpg

GBPJPY-CFBChanIndex2.thumb.jpg.428423082733b96d648c13bd7ff37e0a.jpg

GBPJPY-DMX2.thumb.jpg.549b8bbb4c47b6eef4560c15d78853ed.jpg

5aa70f1f2c1ff_GBPJPY-JMADouble2.thumb.jpg.d2bdd1c13be2595a6133f3087528b438.jpg

5aa70f1f31ed5_GBPJPY-JMAdStoch2.thumb.jpg.fb0405f035578805c6ee6214a5820bf4.jpg

5aa70f1f369a3_GBPJPY-JMADWMA2.thumb.jpg.7b8107991ac13df7241bddb3efa41664.jpg

GBPJPY-RSX2.thumb.jpg.1caff5365a05a07bba9cc2a4b98f50f1.jpg

GBPJPY-RSX4.thumb.jpg.dac0e536a6d7b3c53635574049893ace.jpg

5aa70f1f463f9_GBPJPY-RSXDouble2.thumb.jpg.09b2d8c9d2dd89ffa8da546d2fc575ed.jpg

5aa70f1f4b836_GBPJPY-VelDouble2.thumb.jpg.fa956f9776cddfef92088ca2ca1d1ef4.jpg

5aa70f1f50904_GBPJPY-VELonJMA2.thumb.jpg.6caef2907c326777fcf42eae8bcef1a4.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.