Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

UrmaBlume

Biggest Net Short by Commercial in Recent Memory

Recommended Posts

Today's trade (09/01) recorded the biggest net short by commercials in recent memory.

 

We track daily net longs and shorts by commercials and today's trade showed a net short of 188,604 contracts. The closest we can find to that was a net short of 153,682 contracts which occurred on 2/10 this year amid all that frenzied selling right before the low in March of this year.

 

You can see a blow by blow of today's trade here.

 

es090109nnt1.jpg

 

This shot of the HUD which was taken less than 2 hours after the open reflects the selling which continued throughout the day.

 

tlhuds1.jpg

Edited by UrmaBlume

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is misleading lingo UB. I presume you are actually tracking the imbalance in aggresive/passive (or patient/impatient) buyers/sellers? It is a complete fallacy to assume that just because someone sells aggressively.that they are opening a short position.

 

I am sure you know this, however you have a duty of care to your more naive readers! :) (actually you don't in the slightest but I am sure as a responsible poster you would not want them to go away with any misguided notions). For newer traders this sort of wrong thinking can cause no end of problems down the road.

 

Talking of naivety i think it is naive to assume that when the commercials are accumulating or distributing a large position they do so impatiently. Now whether cumulative contracts aggressively bought or sold is a good indicator of short term price movement is not what I am questioning. what I am questioning is whether you can assume that this represents short interest.

 

Of course if you have a way of getting real time open interest information from the exchange hats off to you!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is misleading lingo UB. I presume you are actually tracking the imbalance in aggresive/passive (or patient/impatient) buyers/sellers? It is a complete fallacy to assume that just because someone sells aggressively.that they are opening a short position.I am sure you know this, however you have a duty of care to your more naive readers! :) (actually you don't in the slightest but I am sure as a responsible poster you would not want them to go away with any misguided notions). For newer traders this sort of wrong thinking can cause no end of problems down the road.Talking of naivety i think it is naive to assume that when the commercials are accumulating or distributing a large position they do so impatiently. Now whether cumulative contracts aggressively bought or sold is a good indicator of short term price movement is not what I am questioning. what I am questioning is whether you can assume that this represents short interest.Of course if you have a way of getting real time open interest information from the exchange hats off to you!

 

 

BlowFish,

 

While of course you are correct when you say "It is a complete fallacy to assume that just because someone sells aggressively.that they are opening a short position." I find the rest of your assumptions about this work a bit hasty. As to the naive reader it has never been our intent to craft our content for the lowest common denominator.

 

The indicator in the chart above is !!!!NNTLHHL, the NNT stands for Net New Trade and is indeed our calculation of net new positions by commercial traders this session.

 

Further our work in US and other markets shows that the portion of yesterday's massive selling in all US equity instruments that was NOT net new shorts was a significant, international relocation of equity assets. Further still our work indicates that this move was FROM US equities and while some of these equity assets went to Europe, specifically the DAX, most went to Japan.

 

We use one technology set to track net new trade, another to track commercial intent and intensity and still another to follow equity money around the world. Our charts speak to the efficacy of our concepts, methods and technologies.

 

cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.