Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

snowbird

Color Code MA for Range Bar Indicator

Recommended Posts

I'm stuck on what I thought would be a simple coding task for Uli's range bar expansion indicator.

 

My goal was to color code the two moving averages EMA34 and LSMA red and magenta respectively when slope is down; green and blue when slope is up. Full original code is posted below.

 

My attempt to color code EMA34 by it's slope (shown next) failed:

 

original plot line (17 lines from the end):

 

if plotEMA34 then plot1[1](EMA34[value1],"LBEMA34")

 

 

my failed code attempt (just turns MA green):

 

if plotema34 and

EMA34[value1] > EMA34[value1-1]then

plot1[1](EMA34[value1],"LBEMA34",Green)

else if

plotema34 and

EMA34[value1] < EMA34[value1-1]then

plot1[1](EMA34[value1],"LBEMA34",red);

 

I believe the problem has to do with the fact that this is built within an array.

Any savy coders able to lend some ideas?

 

Thanks in advance!,

snowbird

 

-------------------------------------------------

//Range Expansion Bars by Uli Schmuli

 

inputs: BarRange(3.75),

PlotRangeBars(true),

PlotExpansionBars(true),

PlotExpansionPotential(true),

BullBarColor(green),

BearBarColor(red),

RBThickness(3),

PlotEMA34(true),

PlotLSMA(true);

 

var:RangeHigh(0),

RangeLow(0),

RangeOpen(open),

RangeClose(0),

RBcolor(green),

LBLow(0),

LBHigh(0),

LBOpen(0),

LBClose(0),

offset(0),

LBxAvg(0),

SmoothingFactor(2/35),

LSMAtemp(0);

 

Array: EMA34[100](0),

RBHigh[100](close),

RBLow[100](close),

RBOpen[100](Close),

RBClose[100](close),

LSMA[100](close);

 

if barnumber = 1 then //1st bar initialization

 

begin

 

if range < BarRange then

begin

RangeHigh = high;

RangeLow = Low;

end;

 

if range > BarRange then

begin

RangeHigh = High;

RangeLow = Low;

end;

 

LSMA[1] = close;

EMA34[1] = close;

RBclose[1] = close;

LSMA[1] = close;

LBopen = open;

 

end else //all other bars

 

Begin

if date <> date[1] then //new day, begin new bar & close out prior bar

 

begin

LBHigh = RangeHigh;

LBlow = RangeLow;

LBOpen = RangeOpen;

LBclose = iff(close<RBclose[1],RangeLow,RangeHigh);

For Value1 = 100 downto 2

begin

 

EMA34[value1] = EMA34[value1-1];

RBHigh[value1] = RBHigh[Value1-1];

RBLow[value1] = RBLow[Value1-1];

RBOpen[value1] = RBOpen[Value1-1];

RBClose[value1] = RBClose[value1-1];

LSMA[value1] = LSMA[value1-1];

end;

 

RBHigh[1] = LBHigh;

RBLow[1] = LBLow;

RBOpen[1] = LBOpen;

RBClose[1] = LBClose;

 

EMA34[1] = EMA34[2] + SmoothingFactor * (RBclose[1] - EMA34[2]);

value1 = LinRegArray(RBClose,25, 0, value2, value3,value4, LSMAtemp);

LSMA[1] = LSMAtemp;

RangeOpen = Open;

RangeHigh = High;

RangeLow = low;

RangeClose = close;

offset = 1;

end;

 

if offset[1] = 1 and date = date[1] then offset = 0;

if low >= rangelow and high <= rangehigh then //Bar totally in barrange

begin

 

 

end;

 

if high > Rangehigh and low >= rangelow then //new high value

begin

 

 

rangehigh = high;

 

If high - rangelow > barrange then //New Higher bar detected

begin

LBlow = RangeLow;

LBHigh = RangeLow + BarRange;

LBOpen = RangeOpen;

LBclose = LBHigh;

For Value1 = 100 downto 2

begin

 

EMA34[value1] = EMA34[value1-1];

RBHigh[value1] = RBHigh[Value1-1];

RBLow[value1] = RBLow[Value1-1];

RBOpen[value1] = RBOpen[Value1-1];

RBClose[value1] = RBClose[value1-1];

LSMA[value1] = LSMA[value1-1];

end;

 

RBHigh[1] = LBHigh;

RBLow[1] = LBLow;

RBOpen[1] = LBOpen;

RBClose[1] = LBClose;

EMA34[1] = EMA34[2] + SmoothingFactor * (RBclose[1] - EMA34[2]);

value1 = LinRegArray(RBClose,25, 0, value2, value3,value4, LSMAtemp);

LSMA[1] = LSMAtemp;

 

rangeopen = Rangelow + barrange;

rangeLow = Rangelow + barrange;

RangeClose = rangeopen;

offset = 1;

end;

end;

 

if low < RangeLow and high <= rangehigh then//new low value

begin

Rangelow = low;

 

if rangehigh - low > barrange then //New lower bar detected

begin

LBHigh = RangeHigh;

LBlow = RangeHigh - barrange;

LBOpen = RangeOpen;

LBclose = LBlow;

For Value1 = 100 downto 2

begin

 

EMA34[value1] = EMA34[value1-1];

RBHigh[value1] = RBHigh[Value1-1];

RBLow[value1] = RBLow[Value1-1];

RBOpen[value1] = RBOpen[Value1-1];

RBClose[value1] = RBClose[value1-1];

LSMA[value1] = LSMA[value1-1];

end;

RBHigh[1] = LBHigh;

RBLow[1] = LBLow;

RBOpen[1] = LBOpen;

RBClose[1] = LBClose;

 

EMA34[1] = EMA34[2] + SmoothingFactor * (RBclose[1] - EMA34[2]);

value1 = LinRegArray(RBClose,25, 0, value2, value3,value4, LSMAtemp);

LSMA[1] = LSMAtemp;

 

RangeOpen = LBclose;

RangeHigh = LBclose;

RangeLow = low;

RangeClose = close;

offset = 1;

end;

end;

 

if high > RangeHigh and Low < RangeLow and rangehigh - rangelow > barrange then//engulfing bar

begin

RangeLow = low;

RangeHigh = high;

end;

end;

 

 

 

begin

 

if offset = 1 then //new bar begun

begin

 

if RBclose[1] < RBclose[2] then RBcolor = BearBarColor else RBcolor = BullBarColor;

plot15[1](RBHigh[value1],"RBHighL",RBColor,default,RBthickness);

plot16[1](RBLow[value1],"RBLowL",RBcolor,default,RBthickness);

plot17[1](RBopen[value1],"RBopenL",RBcolor,default,RBthickness);

Plot18[1](RBClose[value1],"RBcloseL",RBColor,default,RBthickness);

if plotEMA34 then plot1[1](EMA34[value1],"LBEMA34")

if plotLSMA then plot5[1](LSMA[Value1],"LSMA");

end;

 

if close < LBclose then RBcolor = darkred else RBcolor = darkgreen;

 

if PlotExpansionBars then

begin

plot20(rangehigh,"chigh",RBColor,default,1);

plot21(rangelow,"clow",RBcolor,default,1);

plot22(rangeopen,"copen",RBcolor,default,1);

Plot23(Close,"cclose",RBColor,default,1);

end;

 

if PlotExpansionPotential then

begin

Plot24(rangehigh-barrange,"PotLow");

Plot25(RangeLow+barrange,"PotHigh");

end;

 

end;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you are making it way too complicated.

 

try this:

 

if plotema34 then
begin
plot1[1]( EMA34[value1], "LBEMA34");

if EMA34[value1] > EMA34[value1-1] then
SetPlotColor( 1, green )
else
SetPlotColor( 1, red );
end;

 

 

 

ps. I don't understand why you use plot1[1].

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow... quick response TAM's!!

 

I was definatly making it too hard (can you tell I'm NOT a coder)

 

but unfortunately the code simplification still does not work (I believe it has to do either with how often Uli samples the Array, or his smoothing algorithm in line #69

 

EMA34[1] = EMA34[2] + SmoothingFactor * (RBclose[1] - EMA34[2]);

 

Don't know if this will port to MT... but that's what it might take to figure this one out... I posted a chart that shows the MA color changes in the indicator with your code... never does go red... but we do get patches of green!

 

I do not know why Uli uses plot1[1]... but figured it had something to do with his array setup and calculations. If you eliminate the [1] then the MA just plots green (up and down!)

 

snowbird

rangeBarMA.thumb.jpg.b00511eeea8dfe654e09a37becf59d61.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

maybe your array is not serial...

 

try this:

the var ema.34 should isolate the sequence.

 

 

var:
ema.34(0);

ema.34 = EMA34[value1];

if plotema34 then
begin
plot1[1]( EMA.34, "LBEMA34");

if EMA.34 > EMA.34[1] then
SetPlotColor( 1, green )
else
SetPlotColor( 1, red );
end;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...I do not know why Uli uses plot1[1]... but figured it had something to do with his array setup and calculations. If you eliminate the [1] then the MA just plots green (up and down!)

 

snowbird

 

 

plot[1] ... plots the previous bar.

 

i.e. it goes back one bar to plot the color/value.

 

I don't know if he is changing the color/value of the previous bar? or simply skipping the plot on the current bar.

 

 

 

 

.

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason plot[1] is used for the range bar is because when using tick data input, you don't know if a bar is closed until the range has been exceeded on the next bar. So, if a range has been filled, then the proper place to plot the bar is one bar back.

 

You do realize that range bars are now one of the chart types that can be selected, yes? In other words, range bars are now part of the Tradestation platform. I wrote this code as a workaround until they released a version that included range bars.

 

While is may seem that with the native range bars in Tradestation that this code is now obsolete, it does have a useful purpose. If you are running a strategy using a range bar chart, you cannot use intrabar order generation. The code I provided allows you to take action within the current bar, effectively allowing you to generate orders & other actions "intrabar."

 

Also, I would like to draw your attention to an error in the code. A new bar generated by this code creates a range bar that has the same open value as the prior bar close. This is not correct. The open should be 1 tick above/below the prior bar close and the bar range calculated from there.

 

Uli

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Uli,

 

I'm actually using the range "Expansion" bars which are not available in tradestation.

 

You will probably laugh when you hear how I am using them... My major issue is patience and discipline (I tend to jump the gun too early and overtrade).

I've been using the range expansion bars in three ways to help:

 

1. Don't trade the chop (blue rectangle on chart, where you get an up/down/up sequence of expanded bars

 

2. Wait for a "signal" range expansion bar (each of the 3 green bars in a range downtrend on this chart are what I use as "signal" bars , and then I wait for a break below the low of the previous bar in this case to enter (3 yellow arrow trend re-entries on the chart)

 

3. But my favorites are the breakouts from consolidations. These are where significant time elapses between range expansion bars (green and red rectangles in the chart). I try and set the expansion factor at ~2x the ATR (been thinking about possible changes to the code to make this automatic!

 

I was also wondering what criteria you use for color coding bars between range expansion bars?

 

... and as you can see... I still have not completely figured out color coding of the EMA (issue is due to the smoothing algorithm I believe).

 

TAMS has been a great help as I now have portions that turn both red and green... its the parts in-between I'm missing!

 

Thanks again,

 

snowbird

Uli_range.thumb.jpg.d838034a47112db645649955bc8a7a56.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
can someone post codes to plot point on an indicator i.e. CCI (2nd paragraph plotted with 133 tick as data1) to show Open of Range Expansion Bar.I am using MC.

 

 

can you post a mock up?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tams, what is mock and how i post it

 

a mock up is a hand drawn chart; a model to illustrate the position and format of your proposed plots.

 

for posting attachments:

when you are making reply to this post, look under the message box, you will see a section for Additional Options. Look for the "Manage Attachments" button

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tams;

i have attched Mock . 2nd paragraph , ihave cci indicator valuecci = cci(ccilength)

circle shows cci value when LBclose and new bar begins. i wanted to plot those Point on cci when LBclose . !st paragraph has 233 tick chart as data1 and Range Expansion Bar indicator

(codes for that are posted in the begining of this topic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

follwing codes ,modified from range expension bars code provided by

snowbird. I wanted to plot point when RB close. attached codes does it but not on top of cci. dots as shown in Mock , points plotted are not aligned on top of cci indicator.

can some one help tocorrect the codes so that points can be plotted on top of cci

 

//Range Expansion Bars by Uli Schmuli

 

inputs: BarRange(3.75),ccilen(14),

PlotRangeBars(true),

PlotExpansionBars(true),

PlotExpansionPotential(true),

BullBarColor(green),

BearBarColor(red),

RBThickness(3),

PlotEMA34(true),

PlotLSMA(true);

 

var:RangeHigh(0),

RangeLow(0),

RangeOpen(open),

RangeClose(0),

RBcolor(green),

LBLow(0),

LBHigh(0),

LBOpen(0),

LBClose(0),

offset(0),

LBxAvg(0),

SmoothingFactor(2/35),mycci(0),

LSMAtemp(0);

 

Array: EMA34[100](0),

RBHigh[100](close),

RBLow[100](close),

RBOpen[100](Close),

RBClose[100](close),

LSMA[100](close),

hvalue[100](0);

mycci = cci(ccilen);

if barnumber = 1 then //1st bar initialization

 

begin

 

if range < BarRange then

begin

RangeHigh = high;

RangeLow = Low;

end;

 

if range > BarRange then

begin

RangeHigh = High;

RangeLow = Low;

end;

hvalue[1] = mycci;

LSMA[1] = close;

EMA34[1] = close;

RBclose[1] = close;

LSMA[1] = close;

LBopen = open;

 

end else //all other bars

 

Begin

if date <> date[1] then //new day, begin new bar & close out prior bar

 

begin

LBHigh = RangeHigh;

LBlow = RangeLow;

LBOpen = RangeOpen;

LBclose = iff(close<RBclose[1],RangeLow,RangeHigh);

For Value1 = 100 downto 2

begin

hvalue[value1] = hvalue[value1-1];

EMA34[value1] = EMA34[value1-1];

RBHigh[value1] = RBHigh[Value1-1];

RBLow[value1] = RBLow[Value1-1];

RBOpen[value1] = RBOpen[Value1-1];

RBClose[value1] = RBClose[value1-1];

LSMA[value1] = LSMA[value1-1];

end;

 

RBHigh[1] = LBHigh;

RBLow[1] = LBLow;

RBOpen[1] = LBOpen;

RBClose[1] = LBClose;

hvalue[1] = mycci;

EMA34[1] = EMA34[2] + SmoothingFactor * (RBclose[1] - EMA34[2]);

value1 = LinRegArray(RBClose,25, 0, value2, value3,value4, LSMAtemp);

LSMA[1] = LSMAtemp;

RangeOpen = Open;

RangeHigh = High;

RangeLow = low;

RangeClose = close;

offset = 1;

end;

 

if offset[1] = 1 and date = date[1] then offset = 0;

if low >= rangelow and high <= rangehigh then //Bar totally in barrange

begin

 

 

end;

 

if high > Rangehigh and low >= rangelow then //new high value

begin

 

 

rangehigh = high;

 

If high - rangelow > barrange then //New Higher bar detected

begin

LBlow = RangeLow;

LBHigh = RangeLow + BarRange;

LBOpen = RangeOpen;

LBclose = LBHigh;

For Value1 = 100 downto 2

begin

hvalue[value1] = hvalue[value1-1];

EMA34[value1] = EMA34[value1-1];

RBHigh[value1] = RBHigh[Value1-1];

RBLow[value1] = RBLow[Value1-1];

RBOpen[value1] = RBOpen[Value1-1];

RBClose[value1] = RBClose[value1-1];

LSMA[value1] = LSMA[value1-1];

end;

hvalue[1] = mycci;

RBHigh[1] = LBHigh;

RBLow[1] = LBLow;

RBOpen[1] = LBOpen;

RBClose[1] = LBClose;

EMA34[1] = EMA34[2] + SmoothingFactor * (RBclose[1] - EMA34[2]);

value1 = LinRegArray(RBClose,25, 0, value2, value3,value4, LSMAtemp);

LSMA[1] = LSMAtemp;

 

rangeopen = Rangelow + barrange;

rangeLow = Rangelow + barrange;

RangeClose = rangeopen;

offset = 1;

end;

end;

 

if low < RangeLow and high <= rangehigh then//new low value

begin

Rangelow = low;

 

if rangehigh - low > barrange then //New lower bar detected

begin

LBHigh = RangeHigh;

LBlow = RangeHigh - barrange;

LBOpen = RangeOpen;

LBclose = LBlow;

For Value1 = 100 downto 2

begin

hvalue[value1] = hvalue[value1-1];

EMA34[value1] = EMA34[value1-1];

RBHigh[value1] = RBHigh[Value1-1];

RBLow[value1] = RBLow[Value1-1];

RBOpen[value1] = RBOpen[Value1-1];

RBClose[value1] = RBClose[value1-1];

LSMA[value1] = LSMA[value1-1];

end;

RBHigh[1] = LBHigh;

RBLow[1] = LBLow;

RBOpen[1] = LBOpen;

RBClose[1] = LBClose;

hvalue[1] = mycci;

EMA34[1] = EMA34[2] + SmoothingFactor * (RBclose[1] - EMA34[2]);

value1 = LinRegArray(RBClose,25, 0, value2, value3,value4, LSMAtemp);

LSMA[1] = LSMAtemp;

 

RangeOpen = LBclose;

RangeHigh = LBclose;

RangeLow = low;

RangeClose = close;

offset = 1;

end;

end;

 

if high > RangeHigh and Low < RangeLow and rangehigh - rangelow > barrange then//engulfing bar

begin

RangeLow = low;

RangeHigh = high;

end;

end;

 

 

 

begin

 

if offset = 1 then //new bar begun

begin

 

if RBclose[1] < RBclose[2] then RBcolor = BearBarColor else RBcolor = BullBarColor;

 

plot19[1](hvalue[value1],"ccpoint",RBcolor,default,RBThickness);

end;

 

 

 

 

 

end;

picture1.thumb.png.8fc471630d5e74b49ecb32686be2b66e.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
follwing codes ,modified from range expension bars code provided by

snowbird. I wanted to plot point when RB close. attached codes does it but not on top of cci. dots as shown in Mock , points plotted are not aligned on top of cci indicator.

can some one help tocorrect the codes so that points can be plotted on top of cci

 

 

I am not sure if I understand what you mean/want.

 

you can put the mock up in the Paint program and add arrows/lines to point out to the specific place you are talking about... then add notes on the chart to describe the following:

 

1. what the code is doing now,

2. what you want the code to do.

3. what is triggering the "highlight" on the chart.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.