Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

ant

Trading with Market Profile

Recommended Posts

As today's POC widens, the more difficult it becomes to get away from it. To get away from a wide POC you need force - manifest in volume - otherwise the POC will most likely be revisited.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a difficult bet to think price will move away and STAY away from an existing wide POC. That said, late in day there is very likely to be a move above the high or below the low set earlier in day -- as volume comes back into the market late in day. The N bar is one of the best range bars of the day (volume surges on this bar) so this is the most likely time of day for a violation of an earlier high or low and attempt to break away from value. That said, MP is all about 'imbalance' -- including the imbalance of volume -- not just raw volume. So reading this imbalance in real time is another way to think about 'monitoring for continuation'.

 

In a nutshell, while value is being established currently, and this is expected to continue further -- there should be a move away later in day -- this attempt could very well end up failing and go right back to the (wide) POC. Given this situation, its best to just enter 'with or in anticipation of...' that expected rush of volume and then 'ladder out' as price moves to/through the earlier high or low -- and/or trail a breakeven stop on partial, imo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In a nutshell, while value is being established currently, and this is expected to continue further -- there should be a move away later in day -- this attempt could very well end up failing and go right back to the (wide) POC. Given this situation, its best to just enter 'with or in anticipation of...' that expected rush of volume and then 'ladder out' as price moves to/through the earlier high or low -- and/or trail a breakeven stop on partial, imo.

 

On a rotational day like today, my preference is to fade the extremes (responsive trade) as opposed to take an initiative trade. I'm hoping to get a short opportunity near the day's high and then have the possibility of the market taking out the day's low. It's just a matter of trading style I think. Thanks for your post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm starting to feel like short-term traders are getting too long here. The profile is starting to resemble a P-shape with a poor high. A poor high could also form because short-term traders are too long and they are feeling the anxiety of being long. Everytime the market trades near the high, short-term traders sell. I believe longer-term traders may be taking the other side of their trade and a long trap is forming. If I'm correct, we can get long liquidation break later in the day. Getting this kind of market feel is still something I'm working on. I'm still looking for a short opportunity.

 

Note: At 2pm EST the FOMC minutes will be released.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll share with you one of my mental issues. I currently have a short bias and think that we could see a liquidation break. Sometimes I get hung up on trying to find an exact or optimal entry instead of just getting short, which is probably what I should do right now. I have found that always looking for exact entries and exits in trading is not the right thing to do. I don't think that long-term, successful traders look for such exactness in trading. I think I will miss my short trade because I'm looking for the market to take out today's high.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that a premature move up or down is not 'likely' to sustain and fadeable.

 

I would note though that the market just doesn't make high AND low both late in day very often. It should be one or the other. For example, how often in past 2 years has there been a high and low made BOTH in 'J or later'?? -- this is easily quantifiable:

 

last 540 days, this has happened 31 times, which is <6%. This is not a forecast for today, just a statement of historical fact.

 

edit: note that several of these 31 occurences were on FOMC days and so these stats might actually overstate the odds relative to today.

Edited by Frank

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't think that long-term, successful traders look for such exactness in trading.

 

Perhaps not. But then they don't have to.

 

Sometimes I get hung up on trying to find an exact or optimal entry instead of just getting short, which is probably what I should do right now.

 

Whether or not you do may depend in large part on how much you're willing to allow the trade to go against you once you've entered.

 

Sometimes we just have to let them go. But seeing what they then do provides us with additional information that may make or break the next trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Db, I was thinking along those lines as well, but it really helps to hear it from other traders.

 

Sometimes we just have to let them go. But seeing what they then do provides us with additional information that may make or break the next trade.

 

I think you're spot on with this. I will continue doing what I'm currently doing since I have to manage my risk as you stated, which means I'll miss some trades. C'est la vie...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think you're spot on with this. I will continue doing what I'm currently doing since I have to manage my risk as you stated, which means I'll miss some trades. C'est la vie...

 

I'd like to be spot on enough never to miss the trade. Unfortunately...

 

For me, the most important point you've made regarded MP providing information on the structure of the market rather than trading signals. Knowing where to look for the potential trade is perhaps more important than most people realize. How to take it is of course important, but a failure-prone focus if one is looking in the wrong place. Or, if one wanted to put it as a riddle, when is a reversal not a reversal (or a breakout not a breakout, etc)?

 

The whole nail the entry thing can make the trader feel like a dog chasing his tail. The theory is that it doesn't matter. Practically, however, it does. But the trader has to decide how wide or tight the stop should be (and goes back and forth over this), whether or not and how he should try again if the first effort fails (and goes back and forth over this), how to tell if he's "right" or not (and goes back and forth over this), and the less he understands the nature of the market, or the less he trusts what he knows regarding the nature of the market, the longer he will spin round and round.

 

Incidentally, your post #12 should be printed out and pinned to the wall.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me, the most important point you've made regarded MP providing information on the structure of the market rather than trading signals.

 

Yes, this is the focus of this thread, not the trade signals. I'm trying to demonstrate how I use MP to understand what the market is trying to do, identify good trade location, keep me out of the bad trades, and keep me from overtrading. For those who have been reading this thread, please focus on the decision-making process.

 

EDIT: Also important is using MP to monitor trade continuation. For example, I think the risk of long trades is significant and any short-term long trade should have been liquidated by now. That doesn't mean that the market can't go higher, but that the risk on long trades is high based on market structure.

Edited by ant

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm starting to feel like short-term traders are getting too long here. The profile is starting to resemble a P-shape with a poor high. A poor high could also form because short-term traders are too long and they are feeling the anxiety of being long. Everytime the market trades near the high, short-term traders sell. I believe longer-term traders may be taking the other side of their trade and a long trap is forming. If I'm correct, we can get long liquidation break later in the day. Getting this kind of market feel is still something I'm working on. I'm still looking for a short opportunity.

Note: At 2pm EST the FOMC minutes will be released.

 

 

also long weekend next Monday... many people start winding down their trading today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, this is the focus of this thread, not the trade signals. I'm trying to demonstrate how I use MP to understand what the market is trying to do, identify good trade location, keep me out of the bad trades, and keep me from overtrading. For those who have been reading this thread, please focus on the decision-making process.

 

And I'm glad you chose a day that you suspected would not be "easy".

 

A great thread, and much appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The width from high to low of the fat part of the P-formation is only about 4 points - not worth trading. The up auction does not look complete to me as there is still a poor high. Let's see if the longs today have to liquidate by the close in order to go home flat. I'm done for the day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1:01PM EST: I'm starting to feel like short-term traders are getting too long here. The profile is starting to resemble a P-shape with a poor high. A poor high could also form because short-term traders are too long and they are feeling the anxiety of being long. Everytime the market trades near the high, short-term traders sell. I believe longer-term traders may be taking the other side of their trade and a long trap is forming. If I'm correct, we can get long liquidation break later in the day. Getting this kind of market feel is still something I'm working on. I'm still looking for a short opportunity.

 

Well we got a decent break considering today's 8.75 pt range. Here is the final MP for today.

 

Final-Sept2.GIF.36e3be20ee11f632ef696915882204fa.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is my ES analysis for Sept. 3rd.

 

The chart below reviews the relevant balance areas on the daily chart. Yesterday, we broke down from the higher balance area and we continue to trade within the previous balance area between 1016 and 975.50. The odds favor testing the balance area low at 975.50. By the way, there is a gap that hasn't been filled yet between 975.50 and 975. It's important to review the bigger picture so that you're aware of what's possible in the market. For example, if the market trades down to 975.50 tomorrow, not saying that it will do that, will it catch you by surprise?

 

Daily.GIF.ce8ac8ea16958936330201bce2b8d0da.GIF

 

The next chart shows today's profile which contains a poor high and a very prominent POC. The two trade scenarios I will be considering for tomorrow is to (1) buy below value since the odds are high that the prominent POC will be revisited and that the poor high will be taken out. This does not mean that we have to trade back up through the single prints from 9/1. (2) Sell above value since the prominent POC is likely to be revisited, the current auction is down, and the destination is still 975.50. I would prefer to see the POC revisited and the poor high taken out before heading lower since that would provide more confidence in the down move.

 

Profile.thumb.GIF.3327a57d1b3e10ff3b2559b70bcc157e.GIF

 

Here's another perspective I'd like to share (see chart below). If you combine the lower distribution from yesterday's trend day and today's profile, you have a pretty tight balance area ready for a breakout. The balance area high would be around 1002.75. If we get accepted above 1002.75, we could start to retrace the single prints from 9/1. I like to have that scenario in mind so that I'm not so focused on the short side. Be cautious of a failed breakout to the upside though, where the market looks above either today's high and fails or looks above 1002.75 and fails. The move in the opposite direction could be dynamic.

 

Balance.GIF.641a228343c0da85ba6d48d9fea03b15.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a terrific thread. Thank you so very much for sharing. I watch Volume Profile on an intraday, 5-day, and whole-contract basis. It helps me keep track of multiple trading ranges simultaneously on one screen. Different way to view the same market data... I also use similar "long term" big picture charts to keep an eye on long term participants.

 

All the best,

 

Stone

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I will probably exit the entire long trade a point or so below yesterday's POC around 999. I also moved my stop to below yesterday's low. I don't have high expectations for this trade given the low confidence market today.

 

Can you explain why you entered a long trade?

From your earlier posts I understood that the bias is to get short.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Can you explain why you entered a long trade?

From your earlier posts I understood that the bias is to get short.

 

fed2008, I am referencing the relevant posts where I commented on that. Basically, when a rotational day is expected, as suggested in Post #14 and #17 below, the strategy is to fade the extremes and trade in both directions. Go for singles and doubles, no home runs.

 

Post #14: There is support around 989.75. However, if the market starts trading down there, lower value will be building there making long trades a bit risky. If we get a rotational type of day, which is usually expected after a trend day like today, that trade is do-able in my opinion.

 

Post #17: This indicates a low confidence opening and the likelihood of a rotational day. Will trade on both sides of the market (long and short). So within the first 15 mins of the day, the tone has been set as to how I would probably trade the rest of the day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm also curious - what about Globex session, nobody seems to trade during it, and nobody seems to consider the data from it.

Any clues why?

 

I will comment on that in my next post. Stay tuned...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Reviewing the pre-market action in the ES... The overnight inventory is long since most of the overnight trading has occurred above yesterday's settle. It is typical for the overnight weak longs to be pressured in the early morning. This is not always the case, but usually. This provides more support for short trades. If the market does not pressure the overnight longs, this could indicate that the market is strong and that longer-term buyers were active in the overnight session.

 

So when monitoring a trade for continuation, do you know what to look at? Here are the short-term references that I look at (prices are based as of this posting) to see how the market is trading through them:

 

  • the overnight high at 1004.25
  • the overnight low at 991.75
  • yesterday's high at 999.75
  • yesterday's low at 991
  • yesterday's settle at 994
  • today's open
  • And of course, all of the other references mentioned in my post with the analysis for today

As the market opens, focus on where the market is going to open relative to yesterday (i.e., in or out of balance and to what degree), if the market is showing high or low confidence (and to what degree), and estimate what value is likely to be for the day. To determine if a market is showing high or low confidence, pay attention to how the market trades around the short-term references mentioned above. If the market is trading exactly to those numbers or a tick away, those are short-term traders and indicates a low confidence market. Once you have a feel for what value may be for the day, trade value and not price. That is, if value is likely to be lower, why would you be taking long trades? This alone will keep you out of a lot of bad trades. Don't get suckered by price. I think that one of the challenges for traders starting to trade with MP is changing their mindset to trade value and not price. Once you come up with an assessment for the day, it can change throughout the day. Knowing how you will trade the rest of the day early on takes a lot of pressure away from trading.

 

Good luck trading today!

Edited by ant

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

re Globex -- decide if globex session is strong one or not --- if strong -- that direction will generally generate a move beyond that globex extreme. if its up but weak, then that would be consistent with a selling tail and might hold all day.

 

here is snapshot from a globex volume perspective for today

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=13199&stc=1&d=1251984681

5aa70f1da16fa_20090903AMThurs.thumb.png.196e2f626ed18df0d6f9a9132b8352d4.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A recap on what's happened so far:

 

  • ES opened within yesterday's range
  • Prominent POC revisited
  • Yesterday's high taken out - poor high corrected
  • trading back within yesterday's range
  • POC revisited
  • traded to opening price
  • ES has slowed near POC - this is natural, this is not a signal to take a long trade

Let's see if we can trade through the POC and if the overnight weak longs will throw in the towel and sell. If we start trading below the POC, we could see acceleration.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.