Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

dhelmin

Multi Time Frame Indicator

Recommended Posts

Looking for a TradeStation indicator that lights up when one indicator points in the same direction on three different time frames? Also, can this be done using shares instead of minutes?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Looking for a TradeStation indicator that lights up when one indicator points in the same direction on three different time frames? Also, can this be done using shares instead of minutes?

 

 

This question was answered 3 times in the last 4 weeks.

You are looking for an easy answer;

you have not given any effort before posting.

 

The search button is at the top right corner of this page.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This question was answered 3 times in the last 4 weeks. You are looking for an easy answer;

you have not given any effort before posting.

The search button is at the top right corner of this page.

 

Tams,

 

I don't think anybody here is as patient and continuously helpful to beginners as well to advanced players as you. I thank you and many, many on the board have also thanked you.

 

Like you I sometimes lose patience with those that make very low content posts or almost no posts and just leech code.

 

Still it is a community and we must add what value we can if we are to expect the ability/right to take value.

 

Your technical understanding is vast and your help is appreciated.

 

cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trust me I've put lots of time into trying to figure out how to do this on my own. My brain seems to work the opposite way a programmer's does. I was able to "write" my own strategy for a single time frame. I just can't grasp ADE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Trust me I've put lots of time into trying to figure out how to do this on my own. My brain seems to work the opposite way a programmer's does. I was able to "write" my own strategy for a single time frame. I just can't grasp ADE.

 

 

is ADE the only way?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
is ADE the only way?

 

Nope, but I guess you know that :)

 

dehlmin look for a thread called how to plot globex highs and lows (or something similar) several techniques are discussed. By changing the bits that tests time to testing a barcount you can synthesise higher time periods.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
is ADE the only way?

I use global variables e.g. GVSETNAMEDINT and GVGETNamedint.

 

There is a whole (excuse the pun) array of them that prove extremely useful for passing and storing values within and between windows

 

Charlton

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can do this 2 ways. First and easiest is to put the 3 timeframes on 1 chart, then you don't need to use Global Variables. The Global Variable option can only be used in real time, you can't look at past data using that method.

 

This is because TS loads up chart by chart, not minute by minute. You can use volume, ticks or time bars.

 

If you are testing for direction, you have another issue to overcome...

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=13079&stc=1&d=1251176260

 

 

The chart has the e-mini 1 min (shown) and the e-mini 10 min (hidden)

The first CCi indicator is on the 1 min

The second CCi indicator is on the 10 min

The last #PD_MTF_TEST indicator shows the direction of the CCi,red = down, green = up. The first row of dots is the 1 min, the second row of dots is the 10 min.

 

So you can see that 7:20-7:30 the CCi 10 min was up slightly but this isn't shown 'in the dots' until the bar closes at 7:30. The bottom row of red dots showing direction of the CCi from 7:30 to 7:40 is based on it's direction from 7:20 to 7:30.

 

Likewise, the bottom row of red dots from 7:40 to 7:50 shows red which is based on the CCi direction from 7:30 to 7:40.

 

Whilst this is all just sample code to show the concept, what I was trying to do generally is use higher timeframes to give direction and lower timeframes for entry. This isn't much use if you can't get the 10 min direction as it's changing.

 

Now - in real time this is different - you will see the CCi direction moving for the current 10 min bar as the bar is in progress. Even after the first minute of the 10 minute bar, if the strength of the move is enough to change the direction of the 10 minute bar, you use that immediately.

 

The answer is in the use of synthetic bars. The second attachment shows the same indicator with a 'synthetic' version overlayed and how you can see the higher time frame indicator plotted out closer to the way it does in real time.

 

Whilst a lot of people don't seem to be able to wrap their heads around this issue, what it means is that you you use these indicators in multiple timeframes in a strategy, your strategy entries & real-time entries will be different & the results you get will not be based on the entry technique you think you are coding....

 

Pete

MTFIssue.gif.31979ad00a5401853865c3b104624c04.gif

MTFSolution.thumb.jpg.1a6b6adcb41cf3cd361b3b1505fe1d81.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting approach with the synthetic candles. I presume there's an overhead here of having to rewrite all indicators which use synthetic candles. Do you keep that in EasyLanguage or call out to C/C++ code for speed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's an overhead both in the extra time it takes to write/test the indicators as well as at execution time and the overhead is hughe.

 

Saying that, I only use strategy code for testing a strategy, for real time execution, I use code with embedded macros which allows you to build in some redundancy. For instance, with macro code you can place a stop order as well as code to monitor the current price vs stop price. If you go through the stop price, you can place a market order as a 'backup' to your stop order.

 

It may seem like overkill but I prefer to have that extra degree of control you get with the macros.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.