Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

UrmaBlume

The Evolution of Market Profile Theory

Recommended Posts

Is this thread re-opnened?

 

 

for those for who are willing to play hide and seek, with a cute mixture of silliness, mock arrogance, and potential bigotry, the answer is YES.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't necessarily have any insight into this subject, but I can share a tool that might be useful in the analysis. Our Zig Zag indicator has been enhanced with an option to label each leg with a variety of statistics including Volume (that traded during leg), Delta (of volume traded during leg), and Delta Per Price, among others. I think Delta Per Price might be especially helpful as it takes the delta of all volume that traded in each leg/trend, and divides it by the price change of each leg/move. So for instance, 100,000 contracts may have traded during an uptrend/leg that moved up 5 points or 20 ticks/prices (on ES)...with a delta of +10,000. So the delta per price would be +10,000/20 or 500.0. It essentially measure the average positive delta required to move the price up one tick.

 

Here is an example using a Zig Zag with minimum price change of $3 (each leg/move is at least a $3 move):

 

Images | ChartHub.com

 

DeltaPerPrice.png

 

It may also be interesting to further normalize these labels/stats to divide delta by (Prices * Volume).

 

Chad

Chad, in your post about your zigzag indicator who did you mean as 'we'. Is this an indicator you are selling or is available somewhere in the forums or what?

 

thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Interestingly the OP decided to dump some of his pictures over at ET. The response was exactly what one would expect to such reused material. I renew my plea that should more threads be started we be treated to new pictures.

 

Don't understand this bit, what's the OP? is ET Elite trader?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today in reply to this thread a very astute poster noted his feelings about Market Profile as "This is really great stuff, thanks for even posting Urma. I've read every article and book there is relating to Market Profile and knew that it was just the start of being on the right track. The next step was to throw away most of it because it leads to nowheresville. But what's left is the beginning of market understanding.

 

While this thread is about the technical Evolution of Market Profile theory and some of the technologies that have been developed by me and others that are based on Market Profile theory, most of our in-house traders have moved on from the Profile Graphic.

 

We do have at least one die hard who keeps one of his 8 screens on 30 minute profiles. This pic is taken from a recent update to a market report that shows these 30 minute structures as they reflect the strong buying in the first couple of hours of today's (09/09) trade that propelled price to new highs.

 

The structures cover 30 minutes each and the Dots show the net buying or selling in each structure as read from the index on the left. Each structure shown reflects net buying:

 

090909rpt3.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Urma, this thread is fascinating. Please help me to understand why volume is better than time at price when understanding value. Doesn't time at price remove the problem of the daily "U" shaped volume profile in the ES, or even worse the problem of increasing volume as the night session ends and the day session of the ES is about to begin.

Don't these and other volume irregularities remove the value of following volume to find value rather than TPO's?

The problem I've had with volume is it seems to lie about value and instead points to panic areas of buying or selling at market openings and closings. It seems that most volume can be attributed to portfolio balancing when at either the start or end of the RTH large commercial traders are handed the present reality of price and react to it.

Would it be fair to say that time at price, no matter how weak in volume during the night, rotated/moved due to massive volume being traded in stock markets or forex markets on the other side of the planet. In this way doesn't using TPO's allow for a proper valuing of sentiment which occured throughout the night or simply at a low volume time?

Any help you can give would be greatly appreciated. Since finishing all there is publicly available to read concerning MP, your threads have been so refreshing and thought provoking. Please continue to share some insights on the new understanding of Market Profile out there today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One other question for you Urma, when you mention order flow in your previous posts, has it now become the medium to which you apply your MP methods both old and new?

Through reading your posts there seems to be an abandonement of concentrating on price and a real energy in your posts concerning order flow. Is order flow your core concentration when applying the balance to imbalance understanding found in MP teaching? It seems that you are able to indentify and take advantage of any buyer - seller imbalance, is this the most profitable and repeatable application of MP understandings?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Urma, this thread is fascinating. Please help me to understand why volume is better than time at price when understanding value. Doesn't time at price remove the problem of the daily "U" shaped volume profile in the ES, or even worse the problem of increasing volume as the night session ends and the day session of the ES is about to begin. Don't these and other volume irregularities remove the value of following volume to find value rather than TPO's?The problem I've had with volume is it seems to lie about value and instead points to panic areas of buying or selling at market openings and closings. It seems that most volume can be attributed to portfolio balancing when at either the start or end of the RTH large commercial traders are handed the present reality of price and react to it.Would it be fair to say that time at price, no matter how weak in volume during the night, rotated/moved due to massive volume being traded in stock markets or forex markets on the other side of the planet. In this way doesn't using TPO's allow for a proper valuing of sentiment which occured throughout the night or simply at a low volume time?Any help you can give would be greatly appreciated. Since finishing all there is publicly available to read concerning MP, your threads have been so refreshing and thought provoking. Please continue to share some insights on the new understanding of Market Profile out there today.

 

clmacdougall,

 

First of all thank you very much for the kind words.

 

Peter introduced time at price as a method of approximating online volume from the pits when online volume from the pits was not available. For starters how can an estimate or an approximation be as useful as the real number? Its a matter of metrics and method.

 

Almost every commercial trader I know has a background in Market Profile theory but only 1 of them still uses it as a method. We also teach market profile theory to our in-house traders but only as concepts key to basic market understanding - never as a method.

 

The reason we teach it that way is because we believe that there are trade decision support technologies that while based on market profile theory as it was taught in the old days they are able to more precisely present the information that the profile was designed to approximate but fails in today's enviornment.

 

For example you can see in my posts on the Harmonic, HUD, Balance of Trade, primer on the construction of an index of weighted biases, Order Flow and Commercial Intensity that they all present information on topics basic to market profile theory but impossible to read from the market profile graphic.

 

Market Profile as a theory should be basic to any trader's education. As a key to understanding general market dynamics for sure - as a method - its time has passed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

UB, can you remind me what you mean when you say "commercial traders"? Is that synonymous with "professional"? Or is it something different? I think you already answered that question in one of your threads, but I haven't been able to find that post. Thank you for sharing some of your tools and viewpoints.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
UB, can you remind me what you mean when you say "commercial traders"? Is that synonymous with "professional"? Or is it something different? I think you already answered that question in one of your threads, but I haven't been able to find that post. Thank you for sharing some of your tools and viewpoints.

 

diablo272,

 

Thanks for the kind words.

 

At 1224 PST, less than an hour before the close on last Thursday 09/17 a single trading entity sold suddenly and sold big accross all three equity futures and coordinated that trade down to the sub 1 second time frame.

 

In each of the three charts below for NQ, YM & ES you can see the sell spikes that drove price down and see that it was coordinated to the second in all three markets.

 

This is the signature of what we call commercial trade - trade done by whomever that is of such volume and intensity that it creates local extremes as was the case with the trade shown below. This was the second such spike of the day and you can see them both discussed in a thread here.

 

While Peter always taught the importance of spotting commercial trade and the indicator shown below does exactly that - as this trade occured well into the value area none of this activity would have been apparent to users of the profile graphic.

 

 

091709rpt7.jpg

 

 

 

091709rpt8.jpg

 

 

091709rpt9.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One other question for you Urma, when you mention order flow in your previous posts, has it now become the medium to which you apply your MP methods both old and new? Through reading your posts there seems to be an abandonement of concentrating on price and a real energy in your posts concerning order flow. Is order flow your core concentration when applying the balance to imbalance understanding found in MP teaching? It seems that you are able to indentify and take advantage of any buyer - seller imbalance, is this the most profitable and repeatable application of MP understandings?

 

In the past Peter taught that the best indicators of future price don't have price as part of their calculation. We agree. Price based indicators cannot lead price because they can't change until AFTER price changes.

 

In the screenshot bleow the lines are Jurik's AMA on the mid-points of the price bars. Note that on this chart, with time as the bottom axis, that the lines are to the right of price which means they come after or they LAG price. Next note the dots which represent an index of weighted biases whose construction is described here. Please note that the dots, in almost every case, are to the left of price which means they lead price. Certainly we reference price but indicators such as this index are heavily weighted towards indicacations taken from our calculation of the balance of trade/order flow.

 

leading.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you UB for the time you took to answer my questions. Could I ask, do you begin the day with a slant towards the short or long side of the market before you even apply your market generated information, or do you simply apply your weighted biases indicators and run with them? Thanks again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just one more question UB, would it be fair to say that your weighted index is far more tuned to price reversals than a delta footprint chart and could you please give your opinion on the delta footprint charts usefulness. Thanks again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
diablo272,

 

Thanks for the kind words.

 

At 1224 PST, less than an hour before the close on last Thursday 09/17 a single trading entity sold suddenly and sold big accross all three equity futures and coordinated that trade down to the sub 1 second time frame.

 

In each of the three charts below for NQ, YM & ES you can see the sell spikes that drove price down and see that it was coordinated to the second in all three markets.

 

This is the signature of what we call commercial trade - trade done by whomever that is of such volume and intensity that it creates local extremes as was the case with the trade shown below. This was the second such spike of the day and you can see them both discussed in a thread here.

 

While Peter always taught the importance of spotting commercial trade and the indicator shown below does exactly that - as this trade occured well into the value area none of this activity would have been apparent to users of the profile graphic.

 

 

091709rpt7.jpg

 

 

 

091709rpt8.jpg

 

 

091709rpt9.jpg

 

af9ec928-84bc-44f8-9a6e-d29ab2596cb0

 

I have missed out on many pages, but from what I read all I could hear what indicator gloating... Unless he has given you the definition... this is fairly easy to create...9-22-2009%205-23-38%20AM.png

Edited by Tooker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also use traditional profile theory with a heavy heavy focus on market logic. I understand you disagree with older market profile concepts. I can see where you are coming from, it is really a matter of application. I believe the profile should be used for market understanding. I use my market logic + market understanding as the core of my market strategy. I use various other measures to determine the shorter term and longer term auction and position myself in the direction of the dominant auction to secure free exposure.

 

Again, I believe a complete understanding of how markets function and a complete understanding of market logic should be the core of everyone's methodology... but thats just me... All the indicators and harmonic cycle tuners really just creates more noise... at least on my time-frame. I told positions in a very similar manner to Ant...

 

Assuming you are a scalper, or a smaller time-frame than I am... and you have used and internalized all these indicators to completely understand how they function.. I'm sure you can be very profitable with them...

 

In fact you can be very profitable with any method you would like - if you use correct position sizing and risk management. I cannot believe there is not a greater focus on risk management and position sizing in the trading community. It has to be due to the lack of understanding and the attraction to pretty indicators...

 

You make some very interesting points, I will be reading through all you have written on the forum over the next couple of days... and great idea on the trade intensity indicator... I really like it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Very easy to create your intense commercial measure.

 

9-22-2009 5-23-38 AM

 

Ok Tooker, very easy to create for you......... I've an idea of What UrmaB tell us and It's very interesting and usefull to analyze the logic of the market in a different way than before, but what I've created is not so close to UrmaB indicator as yours.

Can you specify the logic or the code to obtain an indicator as yours so close to the Urmablume one ?

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, I am really shocked you guys have not figured it out yet. I will post definitions and variations of it later on. I am currently studying his other chart examples, I am fairly confident I can create them all... Its all volume baby...with a dash of frequency....

 

It's all about how you split and look at the volume that makes greatest difference.

 

It looks as though my variation actually has less noise as well...

 

Urmablume I am not trying to flame or attack you... just friendly competition... I do not see any logic behind doing that. I would rather collaborate...

 

Oh and fade the open. At these prices 67-68 very low risk considering your sitting against the top of the current range extreme...

Edited by Tooker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wow, I am really shocked you guys have not figured it out yet. I will post definitions and variations of it later on. I am currently studying his other chart examples, I am fairly confident I can create them all... Its all volume baby...with a dash of frequency....

 

It's all about how you split and look at the volume that makes greatest difference.

 

It looks as though my variation actually has less noise as well...

 

Urmablume I am not trying to flame or attack you... just friendly competition... I do not see any logic behind doing that. I would rather collaborate...

 

In my opinion, the Logic behind Intraday Intensity is just frequency x volume.

Most of the datafeed have seconds as minimum timestamp, so to discover frequency in just 1 second I have to work with single tick, make a tick counter and count how many ticks in just a second. In this way I have frequency. Then I multiply frequency with volume of eache single tick.

This is my way (example):

10 different trades in just a second.

1 x 13 contracts = 13

2 x 5 contracts = 10

3 x 86 contracts = 258

4 x 113 contracts = 452

5 x 37 contracts = 185

6 x 3 contracts = 18

7 x 21 contracts = 147

8 x 1 contract = 8

9 x 234 contracts = 2106

10 x 9 contracts = 90

----------------------------------

Total 10 different trades (that's my frequency)

Total 522 contracts (That's my cumulative volume in that second)

Total 3287 (intraday Intensity) = cumulative (Frequency x single Volume)

 

This is my way..............Am I wrong ??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay here it is... in a standard indicator in the Market Delta Software. Results directly mimic those of the one I was duplicating, with less noise. Although I have a feeling it will be attacked by the original creator (Which I can understand, after having attracted so much forum attention with it)

 

9-22-2009%207-43-35%20AM.png

 

Results speak for themselves.

 

9-22-2009%205-23-38%20AM.png

9-22-2009%207-53-33%20AM.png

Edited by Tooker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To me, increased volume on a move means the move was opposed - higher total volume on an up move means that selling was encountered. We believe that the power of a move, in any time frame, is derived from the extent of the imbalance and NOT the total volume in the move.

 

I'm not sure I fully understand your reasoning. This is how I understand AMT as it applies to your statement. Forgive me, this is wordy, but I want you to see my thought process:

 

Any time a transaction is recorded, there is a buyer and a seller. If there weren't, there would be no price activity recorded and the prices would simply gap higher (in an up move) as participants bid higher and higher trying to facilitate trade (i.e. attract sellers), or prices would fall to levels where trade has been done in the recent past. That's why short squeezes can be so dangerous, if one entity owns a large part of the market and won't sell, prices can spiral out of control as the shorts bid frantically.

 

So, whether there is high or low volume on a move, you encounter those willing to sell since every transaction has to have participants on either side. I agree with you in that imbalance is more important than volume, because imbalance creates opportunity, but then you seem to invalidate that by saying high volume on a move means a lot of opposition and makes the move less attractive.

 

To me it's just a measure of the extent of participation, and can be indicative of who is participating. If you have imbalance on very high volume, that tells me commercials are involved and the chances that they'll "cap" the imbalance are lower. In other words, the wider perception of the true value of a security has changed and been accepted by those traders who can take positions and truly move that price.

 

However, if the imbalance occurs on low volume oftentimes your big commercial level traders don't perceive a real imbalance, and will often trade what they see as an improper pricing of the security, i.e. fade and push prices back into value.

 

I was taught that moves in price are but advertisements for opposing activity and until that opposing activity begins the move is likely to continue. Further, that oposing activity slows/ends moves and adds volume. It is all in how you break down the balance of trade.

 

I always considered price an advertisement for activity period. Think about it, in a stock bull market, as prices are higher you find participants willing to pay these higher prices. That is why prices move higher and will stay higher - the common perception of value by those who hold positions (not day traders) moves higher over time. Prices move up and find activity, but it's confirming of the present trend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest honvlyy
In my opinion, the Logic behind Intraday Intensity is just frequency x volume.

Most of the datafeed have seconds as minimum timestamp, so to discover frequency in just 1 second I have to work with single tick, make a tick counter and count how many ticks in just a second. In this way I have frequency. Then I multiply frequency with volume of eache single tick.

This is my way (example):

10 different trades in just a second.

1 x 13 contracts = 13

2 x 5 contracts = 10

3 x 86 contracts = 258

4 x 113 contracts = 452

5 x 37 contracts = 185

6 x 3 contracts = 18

7 x 21 contracts = 147

8 x 1 contract = 8

9 x 234 contracts = 2106

10 x 9 contracts = 90

----------------------------------

Total 10 different trades (that's my frequency)

Total 522 contracts (That's my cumulative volume in that second)

Total 3287 (intraday Intensity) = cumulative (Frequency x single Volume)

 

This is my way..............Am I wrong ??

 

Wouldn't the intensity be largely different if the 234 contract trade occured first rather than 9th? How do you maintain numerical accuracy with this implementation?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wouldn't the intensity be largely different if the 234 contract trade occured first rather than 9th? How do you maintain numerical accuracy with this implementation?

Surely your note is correct and that's why I ask for the correct forumulation of the Intraday Intensity.

The correct logic to build the correct and functional indicator.

Maybe it could be in the same second:

(Frequency x cumulative volume) @ ASK -- (Frequency x CUmulative Volume)@ Bid = Intraday Intensity

 

In this way I've to slice the Bid from ASK and caclulate for each side

Frequency (Numbers of trades in that second) x Cumulative Volume @ Ask

Frequency (Numbers of trades in that second) x Cumulative Volume @ Bid

and then subtract the firsts from the seconds

 

In this way each trade and each volume at that frequency has the same weight (the firs is equal weighted than the last).

Is this way correct ??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello citizens of the U.S. The hundred year trade war has leaked over into a trading war. Your equity holdings are under attack by huge sovereign funds shorting relentlessly... running basically the opposite of  PPT operations.  As an American you are blessed to be totally responsible for your own assets - the govt won’t and can’t take care of you, your lame ass whuss ‘retail’ fund managers go catatonic  and can't / won’t help you, etc etc.... If you’re going to hold your positions, it’s on you to hedge your holdings.   Don’t blame Trump, don’t blame the system, don’t even blame the ‘enemies’ - ie don’t blame period.  Just occupy the freedom and responsibility you have and act.  The only mistake ‘Trump’ made so far was not to warn you more explicitly and remind you of your options to hedge weeks ago.   FWIW when Trump got elected... I also failed to explicitly remind you... just sayin’
    • Date: 7th April 2025.   Asian Markets Plunge as US-China Trade War Escalates; Wall Street Futures Signal Further Turmoil.   Global financial markets extended last week’s massive sell-off as tensions between the US and its major trading partners deepened, rattling investors and prompting sharp declines across equities, commodities, and currencies. The fallout from President Trump’s sweeping new tariff measures continued to spread, raising fears of a full-blown trade war and economic recession.   Asian stock markets plunged on Monday, extending a global market rout fueled by rising tensions between the US and China. The latest wave of aggressive tariffs and retaliatory measures has unnerved investors worldwide, triggering sharp sell-offs across the Asia-Pacific region.   Asian equities led the global rout on Monday, with dramatic losses seen across the region. Japan’s Nikkei 225 index tumbled more than 8% shortly after the open, while the broader Topix fell over 6.5%, recovering only slightly from steeper losses. In mainland China, the Shanghai Composite sank 6.7%, and the blue-chip CSI300 dropped 7.5% as markets reopened following a public holiday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index opened more than 9% lower, reflecting deep concerns about escalating trade tensions.           South Korea’s Kospi dropped 4.8%, triggering a circuit breaker designed to curb panic selling. Taiwan’s Taiex index collapsed by nearly 10%, with major tech exporters like TSMC and Foxconn hitting circuit breaker limits after each fell close to 10%. Meanwhile, Australia’s ASX 200 shed as much as 6.3%, and New Zealand’s NZX 50 lost over 3.5%.   Despite the escalation, Beijing has adopted a measured tone. Chinese officials urged investors not to panic and assured markets that the country has the tools to mitigate economic shocks. At the same time, they left the door open for renewed trade talks, though no specific timeline has been set.   US Stock Futures Plunge Ahead of Monday Open   US stock futures pointed to another brutal day on Wall Street. Futures tied to the S&P 500 dropped over 3%, Nasdaq futures sank 4%, and Dow Jones futures lost 2.5%—equivalent to nearly 1,000 points. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, down more than 20% from its recent highs, while the S&P 500 is nearing bear territory. The Dow closed last week in correction. Oil prices followed suit, with WTI crude dropping over 4% to $59.49 per barrel—its lowest since April 2021.   Wall Street closed last week in disarray, erasing more than $5 trillion in value amid fears of an all-out trade war. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, sinking more than 20% from its recent peak. The S&P 500 is approaching bear territory, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average has slipped firmly into correction territory.   German Banks Hit Hard Amid Escalating Trade Tensions   German banking stocks were among the worst hit in Europe. Shares of Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank plunged between 9.5% and 10.3% during early Frankfurt trading, compounding Friday’s steep losses. Fears over a global trade war and looming recession are severely impacting the financial sector, particularly export-driven economies like Germany.   Eurozone Growth at Risk   Eurozone officials are bracing for economic fallout, with Greek central bank governor Yannis Stournaras warning that Trump’s tariff policy could reduce eurozone GDP by up to 1%. The EU is preparing retaliatory tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods—ranging from steel and aluminium to consumer products like dental floss and luxury jewellery.   Starting Wednesday, the US is expected to impose 25% tariffs on key EU exports, with Brussels ready to respond with its own 20% levies on nearly all remaining American imports.   UK Faces £22 Billion Economic Blow   In the UK, fresh research from KPMG revealed that the British economy could shrink by £21.6 billion by 2027 due to US-imposed tariffs. The analysis points to a 0.8% dip in economic output over the next two years, undermining Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ growth agenda. The report also warned of additional fiscal pressure that may lead to future tax increases and public spending cuts.   Wall Street Braces for Recession   Goldman Sachs revised its US recession probability to 45% within the next year, citing tighter financial conditions and rising policy uncertainty. This marks a sharp jump from the 35% risk estimated just last month—and more than double January’s 20% projection. J.P. Morgan issued a bleaker outlook, now forecasting a 60% chance of recession both in the US and globally.   Global Leaders Respond as Trade Tensions Deepen   The dramatic market sell-off was triggered by China’s sweeping retaliation to a new round of US tariffs, which included a 34% levy on all American imports. Beijing’s state-run People’s Daily released a defiant statement, asserting that China has the tools and resilience to withstand economic pressure from Washington. ‘We’ve built up experience after years of trade conflict and are prepared with a full arsenal of countermeasures,’ it stated.   Around the world, policymakers are responding to the growing threat of a trade-led economic slowdown. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced plans to appeal directly to Washington and push for tariff relief, following the US administration’s decision to impose a blanket 24% tariff on Japanese imports. He aims to visit the US soon to present Japan’s case as a fair trade partner.   In Taiwan, President Lai Ching-te said his administration would work closely with Washington to remove trade barriers and increase purchases of American goods in an effort to reduce the bilateral trade deficit. The island's defence ministry has also submitted a new list of US military procurements to highlight its strategic partnership.   Economists and strategists are warning of deeper economic consequences. Ronald Temple, chief market strategist at Lazard, said the scale and speed of these tariffs could result in far more severe damage than previously anticipated. ‘This isn’t just a bilateral conflict anymore — more countries are likely to respond in the coming weeks,’ he noted.   Analysts at Barclays cautioned that smaller Asian economies, such as Singapore and South Korea, may face challenges in negotiating with Washington and are already adjusting their economic growth forecasts downward in response to the unfolding trade crisis.           Oil Prices Sink on Demand Concerns   Crude oil continued its sharp slide on Monday, driven by recession fears and weakened global demand. Brent fell 3.9% to $63.04 a barrel, while WTI plunged over 4% to $59.49—both benchmarks marking weekly losses exceeding 10%. Analysts say inflationary pressures and slowing economic activity may drag demand down, even though energy imports were excluded from the latest round of tariffs.   Vandana Hari of Vanda Insights noted, ‘The market is struggling to find a bottom. Until there’s a clear signal from Trump that calms recession fears, crude prices will remain under pressure.’   OPEC+ Adds Further Pressure with Output Hike   Bearish sentiment intensified after OPEC+ announced it would boost production by 411,000 barrels per day in May, far surpassing the expected 135,000 bpd. The alliance called on overproducing nations to submit compensation plans by April 15. Analysts fear this surprise move could undo years of supply discipline and weigh further on already fragile oil markets.   Global political risks also flared over the weekend. Iran rejected US proposals for direct nuclear negotiations and warned of potential military action. Meanwhile, Russia claimed fresh territorial gains in Ukraine’s Sumy region and ramped up attacks on surrounding areas—further darkening the outlook for markets.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock watch, good buying (+313%) toi hold onto the 173.32 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
    • META stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 507.48, 557.84 at https://stockconsultant.com/?META
    • TMUS T-Mobile stock, watch for a top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?TMUS
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.