Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

...haven't had any questions yet...

.... not much to disclose

 

This is like TRO but with all semblance of context removed so as to preclude any sense of intelligibility.

 

Have you considered posting a chart, a few words of explanation, etc.? There is such a thing as providing so little information, that others do not know how to begin to formulate a question.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems pretty simple to figure. It looks like the guy is looking for reversals after the daily average true range ( or some take on that number ) has been accomplished. If they don't manifest, he decreases the daily ATR from the previous week by 1/2 a point ie 9 to 8.5. If they overshoot, he increases the daily ATR figure he used from the week before.

I'm sure I didn't hit the nail on the head but I think that might give you guys someplace to start.

Edited by clmacdougall
spelling mistake

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...sorry...

..i thought i posted some explanation somewhere....

 

... let me find it and i will repost it....

 

page 5 ? is that not good enough ?

 

if you need more explanation... just let know and I will be happy to try again

 

 

This is like TRO but with all semblance of context removed so as to preclude any sense of intelligibility.

 

Have you considered posting a chart, a few words of explanation, etc.? There is such a thing as providing so little information, that others do not know how to begin to formulate a question.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Edited by elovemer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no. much more simple than that.

 

1. fade a ten point move.

2. 9 points is good enough sometimes

 

about 8.5..... i was just commenting that there were no signals lately because the moves were less than 9 points

 

 

Seems pretty simple to figure. It looks like the guy is looking for reversals after the daily average true range ( or some take on that number ) has been accomplished. If they don't manifest, he decreases the daily ATR from the previous week by 1/2 a point ie 9 to 8.5. If they overshoot, he increases the daily ATR figure he used from the week before.

I'm sure I didn't hit the nail on the head but I think that might give you guys someplace to start.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
no. much more simple than that.

 

1. fade a ten point move.

2. 9 points is good enough sometimes

 

about 8.5..... i was just commenting that there were no signals lately because the moves were less than 9 points

 

From which point do you begin to consider a 10 point move has begun? For example, from 3 days ago, or within the timframe of a single session?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

... it doesn't have to do with time as much as with distance... 10 points distance

did you look at page 5 as i referred to above ?

i am using 5m chart... a move can cover more than one session

... it is not about deciding where to start..... it is about where does it finish

..actually.. .the best way i can think of to explain how to see this...

... is to just go to the chart ... 5m globex chart

 

... now find all the 9-10 point moves... using ES contract

.... sometimes it will turn... sometimes it will pull back only a little

....sometimes it will go 20 points

.... sometimes it will go 13 points and come back to test the 10 point before continuing

...sometimes it will go 12 points and turn

..and when it does turn... sometimes the pullback will be small... sometimes it will be a full 10 points

... but to get a feel for it... it is best to just go over the chart... and see for yourself

..... somebody trying to explain it is sometimes not the easiest way

 

... you know... i could say this and that...

... then you come back and say "hey this didn't work here like you said it would"

...it's better to just explore it for yourself

 

... not trying to avoid the question... just trying to help

... and i will say this... it works best when there is no trend or when the trend is changing

....when the trend is strong... it is better to fade the system and go with the direction of the 10 point moves as the pullbacks will be very small

 

From which point do you begin to consider a 10 point move has begun?

For example, from 3 days ago, or within the timframe of a single session?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

... take yesterday for example...on globex

 

from 44.25... you would look for 34.25

... it ended up going to 33

-------------------------------------------------------------

next pivot is 37.75 during rth

.. so from there you would look for 27.75

it ended up going to 27.75

--------------------------------------------------------------

so you see... on the first signal... the pullback was small

 

but on the next one... it went all the way up to 37

...so you would reverse your position at 37 to short

... and you already have 10 points in the bag assuming you held

 

ended up going to 32.25

..from 32.25... if it gets to 42.25 you would go short again

 

... from 32.25 ... if it can't get past that 37.... and goes back down..

... then you would go long at 27 if it gets down there subsequently

 

...there are other rules... but you get the idea...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... take yesterday for example...on globex

 

from 44.25... you would look for 34.25

... it ended up going to 33

-------------------------------------------------------------

next pivot is 37.75 during rth

.. so from there you would look for 27.75

it ended up going to 27.75

--------------------------------------------------------------

so you see... on the first signal... the pullback was small

 

but on the next one... it went all the way up to 37

...so you would reverse your position at 37 to short

... and you already have 10 points in the bag assuming you held

 

ended up going to 32.25

..from 32.25... if it gets to 42.25 you would go short again

 

... from 32.25 ... if it can't get past that 37.... and goes back down..

... then you would go long at 27 if it gets down there subsequently

 

...there are other rules... but you get the idea...

 

A picture is worth a thousand words (wink wink)

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.... actually i am happy to help...

... but honestly... i did not start the thread as something for others...

.... i started it as a kind of journal for myself...

... so i didn't really care if anyone understood anything...

 

... if someone is interested... i am happy to help out if i can...

This is like TRO but with all semblance of context removed so as to preclude any sense of intelligibility.

Have you considered posting a chart, a few words of explanation, etc.? There is such a thing as providing so little information, that others do not know how to begin to formulate a question.

Best Wishes,

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

..... start what ?

... start posting a tutorial ?

 

...i'd rather not... but i am happy to answer any questions you may have if they are specific

... it's really not complicated

... and it really is best if one explores the chart themselves... and then comes back with a question from the chart

 

... how about i just continue what i was doing... which was posting signals that i see

... and if there are any questions... i can just field them

 

does that sound ok ?

... that would probably lead to some kind of progression.. which would be good maybe

please do start it

thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

how about this....

...i just continue posting signals... but with charts this time for the thousand words thing

...then if there are questions.... we can just go from there ?

 

i am glad others are interested... because i think it is a swell method

... but it is definitely not easy... and definitely not programmable

 

...and as i have said already... i did not come up with this method

Edited by elovemer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.