The Price / Volume Relationship

[ljyoung 10]

Perhaps it was subconscious? To remove a Thank you simply look to the right of the Thank you and press the "Remove" button.

 

BTW that chart you are referring to is a daily chart. Which error are you referring to please?

 

 

Do you mean that on 8/26 price bounced off the RTL, but on 8/27 it broke out of the RTL? If not, please provide a snippet to illustrate your thought.

 

No. Definitely sleep deficit which admittedly can be a pathway to previously unexplored realms of the mind. In fact I was thinking of your 8-26 chart.

 

Which RTL are you speaking of, aside from which such an event [bounce - no bounce] sounds like a consequence of something?

[romanus 10]

Friday, August 28, 2009

[rs5 10]

Fridau 28 August 2009

[ClearlyTechnical 10]

It's easy to tell difference between someone who analyzes the market and someone who actually trades the market.

Edited August 29, 2009 by ClearlyTechnical

[NYCMB 10]

Friday, August 28, 2009

 

Hi romanus and all friends who are interested in Price and Volume Relationship,

 

The attached chart (annotated by romanus) shows the point 3 of the pink ES 5 Min Traverse located within the 2nd Dominant Srquence. Normally, point 3 should be laid inside or partially inside the Non-Dominant (retrace) trendlines. Are there any trendlines missed on the chart? Or, gaussians should be placed differently?

 

I have tried many different ways for annotating this chart; but, no satisfied solution came out yet. Would you offer your suggestion please? TIA

[romanus 10]

... Normally, point 3 should be laid inside or partially inside the Non-Dominant (retrace) trendlines. ...

IMO, the highlighted doesn't appear to accurately describe the necessary and sufficient conditions for "geometrical" Point 3. E.g. attached context.

[cnms2 10]

Hi romanus and all friends who are interested in Price and Volume Relationship,

 

The attached chart (annotated by romanus) shows the point 3 of the pink ES 5 Min Traverse located within the 2nd Dominant Srquence. Normally, point 3 should be laid inside or partially inside the Non-Dominant (retrace) trendlines. Are there any trendlines missed on the chart? Or, gaussians should be placed differently?

 

I have tried many different ways for annotating this chart; but, no satisfied solution came out yet. Would you offer your suggestion please? TIA

There's nothing wrong in drawing it this way. Is there?

[NYCMB 10]

There's nothing wrong in drawing it this way. Is there?

 

Thank you cnms2 for your suggestion. Bars A,B,C, D & E after point 3 (circled) are not inside the pink heavy trendline . How do you handle these 5 bars? TIA

[cnms2 10]

Thank you cnms2 for your suggestion. Bars A,B,C, D & E after point 3 (circled) are not inside the pink heavy trendline . How do you handle these 5 bars? TIA

In the spirit of this thread: what do you think are the reasons to hold / reverse / exit in each of those cases?

[padrotshik 10]

There's nothing wrong in drawing it this way. Is there?

 

If, in order to change at a bigger fractal we must COMPLETE a sequence at a faster fractal, then, yes there is something wrong in drawing this way.

[romanus 10]

Friday, August 28, 2009

Correction to the previously posted chart.

[rs5 10]

Monday 31 August 2009

[romanus 10]

Monday, August 31, 2009.

[Monkman 10]

I find that identify the sequences, and drawing the TLs becomes very difficult on low volulme. It seems several flaw start to form at this point making it a difficult MA process for me. Attached is my chart from the AM.

[romanus 10]

I find that identify the sequences, ...

Your 15:05 bar from Fri is black. You got to fix your bar coloring - doing so will alert you to the fact that your medium R2R doesn't have any decreasing red colume bars.

[ptunic 10]

Thursday, August 27, 2009

Friday, August 28, 2009

[Ezzy 10]

In the annotation drill snippet (across the first 9 bars) we go:

 

Stitch

FBP

OB

FTP

FBP

OB

 

What do we know about flaws?

 

@ 14:10 we begin moving up:

 

First bar DBV

Second Bar DBV

 

Is there something about tapes TO DV?

 

IBV does show up at 14:20...

 

How does it form?

 

 

If I review the sequences through here - I can only conclude one correct way to annotate this snippet which applies to every other thing on the same fractal.

 

Were you just referring to "hold" with the reference to flaws, or something else?

[rs5 10]

Tuesday 1 September 2009

[romanus 10]

Tuesday, September 1, 2009.

[ptunic 10]

Monday, August 31, 2009

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

[nkhoi 10]

Jack for 9/2/2009, the rest is at bwon thread.

[innersky 10]

Tuesday, September 1, 2009.

 

romanus,

 

at 14:05 there is an IBGS that pierces the lateral formation, shouldn't this end the lateral?

 

--

thanks,

 

innersky

[Zan-shin 10]

romanus,

 

at 14:05 there is an IBGS that pierces the lateral formation, shouldn't this end the lateral?

 

--

thanks,

 

innersky

 

It should, but it doesn't. What does that tell you?

[innersky 10]

It should, but it doesn't. What does that tell you?

 

Assuming that you are right about the fact that the lateral continues here, it means that an IBGS that pierces a lateral does not always ends it. (perhaps it must pierce it on the RTL to be a lateral killer?)

 

--

innersky

[Gregor_S 10]

This is my chart for yesterday. As for WMCN today I have the same sequence as nkhoi.