Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Internal formations with increasing volume on second bar annotated.Ftp's and fbp's are annotated accordingly no matter what the second bar color.Sym's and eh's the annotation varies depending on color of second bar.hth

5aa711966ea98_symswithincvolume.thumb.PNG.4fa1873af589303eb6e719a204282b7b.PNG

5aa7119676761_ehswithincvolume.thumb.PNG.f9ef5855342c7f6c9524a6fa12cf9b6e.PNG

5aa71196d87cb_fbpwithincvolume.thumb.PNG.8f2ac5ccb74e963f662d0de630f0d13a.PNG

5aa71196e0b25_ftpswithincvolume.thumb.PNG.88be43a2ecdb39e7402de533da061299.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

VE – Volatility Expansion(see attached) – ‘pushing out’ of the Left Trend Line refinement starts with the "zone" in this case the thicker trendline container's "zone"(see attached).Market needs a close on or beyond the ltl on the v.e. bar at bar close to be in the "zone"(see attached).hth

VE.jpg.fbdccbfe858a9023994af54b79da2a2c.jpg

5aa71196e96a1_VEZones.JPG.791a074b7e67da53e8d66589bba18ccd.JPG

5aa71196edffe_VEintheZONEexample.JPG.64c44ed77d3b8398360af6a1acb8b0b3.JPG

Edited by patrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would it be possible that, in the attached chart from jbarnby, the thin line I marked with "A" is the fanned version of the thin line marked with "B"?

 

Thanks, and a Happy New Year to everyone!

Heisenberg

traverse1fan.thumb.png.7ba9c487e0a6d085a32a1c3d9c4dc4d7.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Would it be possible that, in the attached chart from jbarnby, the thin line I marked with "A" is the fanned version of the thin line marked with "B"?

 

Thanks, and a Happy New Year to everyone!

Heisenberg

 

I suggest you look at some of spyders charts. It looks like a different fractal

Edited by wilddog

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I suggest you look at some of spyders charts. It looks like a different fractal

 

Actually, Spyder never posted a fully annotated chart with only three fractals. Older charts from previous threads were annotated in a different fashion, and often contained much more than three fractals. Perhaps that's why he frequently encouraged folks to ONLY study this thread. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the trend (fractal) complete yet, or is there more to come? How would you know? Some of the best advice Spyder personally gave to me was to spend more time studying the volume pane of my chart. The trendlines tell us where our points reside, but the volume tells us what we've built.

010213.thumb.png.e057bde285672d7f5f3d23ecbf3e3c2d.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is the trend (fractal) complete yet, or is there more to come? How would you know? Some of the best advice Spyder personally gave to me was to spend more time studying the volume pane of my chart. The trendlines tell us where our points reside, but the volume tells us what we've built.

 

I'd say that the trend is not complete yet because we have a higher volume peak(volume increasing). First post of this thread: if Volume is increasing, then the Price Trend is continuing.

 

Heisenberg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'd say that the trend is not complete yet because we have a higher volume peak(volume increasing). First post of this thread: if Volume is increasing, then the Price Trend is continuing.

 

Heisenberg

 

Well hopefully you noted that the peak is around 1600 - nothing unusual there. But there are other ways of knowing. Sequences!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is the trend (fractal) complete yet, or is there more to come? How would you know? Some of the best advice Spyder personally gave to me was to spend more time studying the volume pane of my chart. The trendlines tell us where our points reside, but the volume tells us what we've built.

 

I have the benefit of todays price action.

However, when reading your post before today opened my thoughts were this:

 

1. Yes there is more to come.

2. Assuming your green trend lines are a Tape, then we require a further 2r2b (thin) due to the Tape Ve'ing at 15.55 ?

 

But that's from price rather than volume ?

 

Thx for helping out here on TL..

 

Kind regards

 

PS: did you mean to have a B2B on top of a B2B of the same gaussian thickness at the start of your posted chart from 15.30 ?

Edited by FilterTip

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is the trend (fractal) complete yet, or is there more to come? How would you know? Some of the best advice Spyder personally gave to me was to spend more time studying the volume pane of my chart. The trendlines tell us where our points reside, but the volume tells us what we've built.

 

So if I read this correctly, this is what you do:

 

a. Draw the 3 containers

b. Draw the 3 corresponding gaussians

c. Now you can see from the volume pane what fractal you've built

 

Heisenberg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So if I read this correctly, this is what you do:

 

a. Draw the 3 containers

b. Draw the 3 corresponding gaussians

c. Now you can see from the volume pane what fractal you've built

 

Heisenberg

 

Well, honestly it's quite a bit more involved than that, but i suppose that's a good place to start. There are many other considerations as well, and one must understand the concept of nesting the fractals too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is the trend (fractal) complete yet, or is there more to come? How would you know? Some of the best advice Spyder personally gave to me was to spend more time studying the volume pane of my chart. The trendlines tell us where our points reside, but the volume tells us what we've built.
A slightly different view (green and purple RTLs and gaussians, orange laterals).

5aa7119916cfc_010213jbarnbyschart.png.c899795eff3e98c72fa21bca09270f8e.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, honestly it's quite a bit more involved than that, but i suppose that's a good place to start. There are many other considerations as well, and one must understand the concept of nesting the fractals too.

 

Yes I'm aware that it's not that simple, but can you start from that concept?

I'm not sure I correctly understand what the concept of nesting fractals is. Is it enough to say that, for example, a channel contains 3 traverses, and each traverse contains 3 tapes?

 

Sidenote: from what I see in your charts, there aren't always 3 tapes? Sometimes a single tape seems enough.

 

Heisenberg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes I'm aware that it's not that simple, but can you start from that concept?

I'm not sure I correctly understand what the concept of nesting fractals is. Is it enough to say that, for example, a channel contains 3 traverses, and each traverse contains 3 tapes?

 

Sidenote: from what I see in your charts, there aren't always 3 tapes? Sometimes a single tape seems enough.

 

Heisenberg

 

There was good discussion in this thread in Oct 2010 about nesting. Additionally, pace can influence how a fractal is constructed, and what is observable vs what is not observable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Take a look at the attached Chart snip from today (08/04/2009) ...

 

What did the market form?

How do you know?

 

If you know neither answer ...

 

How many different ways can you annotate the chart snippet? Test to determine which of those ways represent the only correct method.

 

HTH.

 

- Spydertrader

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=12707&stc=1&d=1249433003

This is a nice annotation drill to check your fractal jumping propensity :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is a nice annotation drill to check your fractal jumping propensity :)

 

Take a look at the attached Chart snip from today (08/04/2009) ...

 

What did the market form?

How do you know?

 

If you know neither answer ...

 

How many different ways can you annotate the chart snippet? Test to determine which of those ways represent the only correct method.

 

HTH.

 

- Spydertrader

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=12707&stc=1&d=1249433003

 

 

How, using this chart snippet would you, as you say, check your fractal jumping propensity ?

 

Spyder replied, at the time to Ezzy:

Originally Posted by Ezzy »

So it wasn't necessarily about the snippet (in a vacuum). It was the bigger picture, what came before it should have told us WMCN.

 

with:

 

That which developed before the snippet told you, in the most unambiguous way possible, what the snippet would be.

 

- Spydertrader

 

Thx

Edited by FilterTip

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

jbarnby

re your post# 3708:

 

Is the trend (fractal) complete yet, or is there more to come? How would you know? Some of the best advice Spyder personally gave to me was to spend more time studying the volume pane of my chart. The trendlines tell us where our points reside, but the volume tells us what we've built.

 

As previously posted, would this be correct ?

 

 

1. Yes there is more to come.

2. Assuming your green trend lines are a Tape, then we require a further 2r2b (thin) due to the Tape Ve'ing at 15.55 ?

 

But that's from price rather than volume ?

 

Thx for helping out here on TL..

 

Kind regards

 

 

Many thx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How, using this chart snippet would you, as you say, check your fractal jumping propensity ?

 

Spyder replied, at the time to Ezzy:

 

 

with:

 

 

 

Thx

By testing if one can correctly identify the exact bar that ends the medium line down container in real time, without having the benefit of seeing what followed.

One can correctly annotate the snippet (the medium line down container), without knowing what happened before it started. I believe that in his reply Spydertrater was saying that one can anticipate that the snippet won't accelerate down and its dominance by analyzing the context, and he didn't say that the snippet cannot be annotated without the benefit of more information than what he originally posted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is it an up traverse like this?

 

Heisenberg

No it is a down traverse. Follow the link to Spydertrader's post for the discussion of the drill.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Originally Posted by Heisenberg »

Is it an up traverse like this?

 

Heisenberg

 

No it is a down traverse. Follow the link to Spydertrader's post for the discussion of the drill.

 

Reading through the posts for that discussion:

 

ehorn thought it was a down Tape:

romanus thought it was a down Traverse:

cnms2 thought it was a down Channel:

 

Spyder infers (only by referring to what came before the posted chart)

that it was a down Tape. to the 15.35 bar, from which we get the last 2B up Tape

to complete an up Traverse.

 

I stand corrected if I've mis-understood those series of past posts.

 

Thx

 

PS: logic would suggest that one would need to have known how to correctly annotate the "thing" prior to the chart in question in order to have correctly annotated the chart in question etc..etc.. !

Edited by FilterTip

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.