Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

* * *

 

You have to find your own method in the end.

 

* * *

 

You seem unaware of blatant contradictions in what you say, but I do agree with this statement.

 

 

The point of all this learning is to be able to extract. If you can do it and don't need to ask questions of others, then that's great. I took the time to answer a person who is not at your level and threw something out there to expand his line of thinking. Evidently, my "beyond Hersheyland" phrase rankled you and probably others. It wasn't meant to step on any toes. Don't worry about what I say. Just continue with your extracting.

 

Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You seem unaware of blatant contradictions in what you say, but I do agree with this statement.

 

 

The point of all this learning is to be able to extract. If you can do it and don't need to ask questions of others, then that's great. I took the time to answer a person who is not at your level and threw something out there to expand his line of thinking. Evidently, my "beyond Hersheyland" phrase rankled you and probably others. It wasn't meant to step on any toes. Don't worry about what I say. Just continue with your extracting.

 

Cheers.

the diff probl lays in a subset of the tools and beyond the available tools.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem. Let me try to explain what I mean with "You have to find your own method in the end."

 

What I mean is..you take aspects from Jack Hershey method that you like... use it, enter, exit where you are comfortable and when you like market conditions and then finally after gaining experience make it truly your own method because only then you can 100% trust your own judgement.

 

This makes sense because it's really a discretionary method. There's no 100% ruleset...what to do and when to do it. It depends on the trader and on the experience gained, interpretation, etc etc... that's why there are so many pages about it, here and on ET.

 

regards,

Ivo

 

 

 

 

 

You seem unaware of blatant contradictions in what you say, but I do agree with this statement.

 

 

The point of all this learning is to be able to extract. If you can do it and don't need to ask questions of others, then that's great. I took the time to answer a person who is not at your level and threw something out there to expand his line of thinking. Evidently, my "beyond Hersheyland" phrase rankled you and probably others. It wasn't meant to step on any toes. Don't worry about what I say. Just continue with your extracting.

 

Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
* * *

 

There's no 100% ruleset...what to do and when to do it. It depends on the trader and on the experience gained, interpretation, etc etc... that's why there are so many pages about it, here and on ET.

 

regards,

Ivo

 

You are just making that up. Whether or not you agree that it can be done, a complete set of rules is exactly what is intended. Maybe you aren't aware of the latest transference method: the flowcharts with n, n+1, and n+2.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The method just helps to see the market. That's all. That's something else then a ruleset when to get in, when to get out etc. Stop after 3 losses, sit thru a point 2-->3, trading HVS, etc etc...These things you really decide for yourself after you understand the market.

 

Actually Spyder did give some beginner rules...enter at FTT, reverse at FTT and out at FBO I think...but really..it's up to the individual trader. How focussed do you want to be? How many trades/opportunities do you want to take? How many lines do you want to draw? Do you understand the market in every aspect? I certainly don't but I trade the things I do understand.

 

Ivo

 

 

 

 

 

You are just making that up. Whether or not you agree that it can be done, a complete set of rules is exactly what is intended. Maybe you aren't aware of the latest transference method: the flowcharts with n, n+1, and n+2.
Edited by ivob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have some questions about the display of Jack's TradeNavigator platform in the attached picture.

 

(1): What are +4.75 and +0.46%?

 

(2): I understand red and green diamonds on ES price pane are bid wall and ask wall. But they are not a reflection of the walls displayed in yellow boxes in the DOM pane. May I know how the platform calculates the placement of "diamonds"?

 

(3): Why part of the background of the OTR pane is colored yellow?

 

Anyone knows? :)

5aa710add8c63_SK0Questions.thumb.jpg.a9907798ceeaa36be0eb898e96e016ac.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have some questions about the display of Jack's TradeNavigator platform in the attached picture.

 

Anyone knows? :)

 

Where did you get the picture from?

 

I don't think that is Jack's. I have only seen Jack's charts from Tradestation and Ninjatrader. Secondly none of his charts have indicators called "Spydertrader..."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Where did you get the picture from?

 

I don't think that is Jack's. I have only seen Jack's charts from Tradestation and Ninjatrader. Secondly none of his charts have indicators called "Spydertrader..."

it's Spyder's tool set available on Trade Navigator only. Channel line is not straight enough for me tho.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Where did you get the picture from?

 

I don't think that is Jack's. I have only seen Jack's charts from Tradestation and Ninjatrader. Secondly none of his charts have indicators called "Spydertrader..."

 

You are incorrect about the picture and indicators. Look harder in ET, you will find more of them, from Jack personally.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Does anybody here have a good understanding of the flowchart Jack created in this thread? Having a hard time understanding it, some of the terms are defined different in different places etc...anybody ever made a clearer version of this Flowchart?

 

Thanks,

 

Vienna

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Does anybody here have a good understanding of the flowchart Jack created in this thread? Having a hard time understanding it' date=' some of the terms are defined different in different places etc...anybody ever made a clearer version of this Flowchart?

 

Thanks,

 

Vienna[/quote']

 

I agree I cannot also make head or tails of the flow chart, please could someone post a clearer version.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I agree I cannot also make head or tails of the flow chart, please could someone post a clearer version.

 

I am creating one, but I need some input here from the old hands that actually understand it... if there are any:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have some questions about the display of Jack's TradeNavigator platform in the attached picture.

 

(1): What are +4.75 and +0.46%?

 

(2): I understand red and green diamonds on ES price pane are bid wall and ask wall. But they are not a reflection of the walls displayed in yellow boxes in the DOM pane. May I know how the platform calculates the placement of "diamonds"?

 

(3): Why part of the background of the OTR pane is colored yellow?

 

Anyone knows? :)

 

1. Points and % up/down since previous days close.

 

2. They were coded wrong, TN fixed it, you might prefer the boxes or arrows for a more accurate reading. http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=2689724

In the latest update TradeNavigator finally fixed their Dom Wall symbol locations. Now price can bounce between the blocks or arrows. Previously the ask symbol was below the actual wall level.

 

3. It's a division of time shading, pretty sure it was 5 minute periods, so you'd know where it lined up with the start/end of a 5 min bar.

 

Regards,

 

EZ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yesterday, EOD.

Had to stop around 1:30, so anything after that is hindsight :)

 

HTH, Vienna

 

Hi Vienna,

 

In your 6 Oct 2001 ES chart posted in #3106 (http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/technical-analysis/6320-price-volume-relationship-78.html#post129421), why was the green point 2 of the green up traverse(bar 52 - 61) inside the previous red down traverse? (The pink circle in the attached chart.)

 

I found several source of information mentions: "The point 2 must be outside the RTL of the previous container in the same fractal." Is there something I missed?

 

Here is one of the information:

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/technical-analysis/6320-price-volume-relationship-55.html#post104466

 

 

Thanks.

 

Regards,

Ki

5aa710af30f6e_ViennaOCT6EOD.thumb.gif.4631abf0169db12154ad874358714bad.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here a video I created a few days ago with 2 live trades, one small loser, found myself on the wrong side and a quick correction. I added some comments what I was thinking at that moment. Also some examples of "What wasn't that" which was the reason to hold. If anyone finds it useful, let me know and I post some more with comments. It was produced twice the normal speed.

 

regards,

Ivo

 

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARGQuHP2Rs0]video[/ame]

Edited by ivob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Vienna,

 

In your 6 Oct 2001 ES chart posted in #3106 (http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/technical-analysis/6320-price-volume-relationship-78.html#post129421), why was the green point 2 of the green up traverse(bar 52 - 61) inside the previous red down traverse? (The pink circle in the attached chart.)

 

 

 

Thanks.

 

Regards,

Ki

 

Ki,

 

I think you are right...that looks like just a tape..annotation error. Thanks, :)

 

Vienna

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here a video I created a few days ago with 2 live trades, one small loser, found myself on the wrong side and a quick correction. I added some comments what I was thinking at that moment. Also some examples of "What wasn't that" which was the reason to hold. If anyone finds it useful, let me know and I post some more with comments. It was produced twice the normal speed.

 

regards,

Ivo

 

 

ivo, the video is awesome!

 

Thanks!

 

Regards,

Ki

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks, it's fun to make and forces me to review the day better so will make some more. Of course this is not an average trade as price went quite far so maybe I should record some more (whole day). But anyway, it's the thinking (what wasn't that) that matters because it leads to the correct decission (hold, exit, reverse).

 

Ivo

 

 

ivo, the video is awesome!

 

Thanks!

 

Regards,

Ki

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ki,

 

I think you are right...that looks like just a tape..annotation error. Thanks, :)

 

Vienna

 

Sorry to bring this up, this stumped me and I did not see a reason why a 2 cannot be inside the channel on the same fractal. If you have identified an FTT there is no reason why it cannot be. I went back to the "tapes" (elite trader forum) Spyders old drawings and there are plenty on examples of the above. I have attached one for your review.

04-24-2007-es-5min.thumb.jpg.be8e05d396594758c456791afccda101.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sorry to bring this up, this stumped me and I did not see a reason why a 2 cannot be inside the channel on the same fractal. If you have identified an FTT there is no reason why it cannot be. I went back to the "tapes" (elite trader forum) Spyders old drawings and there are plenty on examples of the above. I have attached one for your review.

I bet that was before 'clean page' time. You got 3 channels there just eliminate one of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • VRA Vera Bradley stock watch, pull back to 5.08 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?VRA
    • MU Micron stock watch, pull back to 102.83 gap support area with high trade quality at https://stockconsultant.com/?MU
    • ACLX Arcellx stock watch, trending at 84.6 support area with bullish indicators at https://stockconsultant.com/?ACLX
    • Here’s something few are talking about: The Chinese are printing money like it's going out of style. Not that you'd hear about it in the mainstream news. But Bitcoin knows.   Bitcoin always knows.   Here’s the thing…   When the Chinese government prints money to paper over the cracks, their smart money doesn't sit around waiting to get devalued.   It usually flows into three things: Bitcoin, gold, and dollars.   After years of being beaten down, gold's having one of its best years in decades. But here's the secret -- whatever gold does, Bitcoin's going to do it bigger.   Much bigger.   Since last November, when China started their printing spree, Bitcoin's been moving in near-perfect correlation with the People's Bank of China's balance sheet. Over 80% correlation, maybe even 90%.   Again, few are talking about it.   But here's why this matters right now: This could be the beginning of a huge breakout in the crypto markets.   Bitcoin broke above its July high, and historically, that's led to new all-time highs over 90% of the time. The only times it failed? COVID and the 2022 bear market.   That's it.” – Chris Campbell   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/     
    • Originally Answered: How can I compete with people who are better than me in every way?   So you want to outcompete people who are smarter, better looking and more experienced than you?   No problem!   All you have to do is outwork them.   Will Smith said, "if we both get on a treadmill either you're going to get off first or I'm going to die trying."     Most people just aren't willing to work that hard. Sure, they'll show up for the job interview and maybe practice in front of the mirror for a few minutes, but they won't do hours and hours of research and prepare for weeks. They won't wake up early and stay up late working on their dreams.   So while all those smart, good-looking, experienced people are waiting around for the next opportunity to come their way, you can outwork them and create your own opportunities.   In a few years, you'll be that "smart" person everyone looks up to. But you'll be different. You'll know it was your hard work, your inner strength and your commitment to living a great life that made you successful and brilliant - not luck or good genes.” – Tom Corson-Knowles, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.