Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Hi gucci,

 

Bar 10 is OB on increasing volume, bar 7 is IBGS. Do you treat bar 7 as Red bar? TIA

 

Yes I do. It is still part of a down tape (skinny black lines) started by bars 4 and 5, so is the next bar 8. But this bar 7 alone doesn't have much importance in this context.

 

HTH.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Where do you guys exit?

 

Let's say you are in an upchannel...you get an FTT, you short... price goes and touches the RTL...now you either get a Breakout or an FBO. In case of Breakout, you should see increasing Red Volume...but within what timeframe? How long do you wait to make up your mind if this is a BO or an FBO?

If the bar that touches the RTL goes through with conviction, it is easy...but I had some instances where price stops exactly there (but you only get increasing black 2 bars later, getting a small loss- had you exited at the RTL, you would have profited a point or two), some where it walks the line, and some where it does either but eventually goes through.

 

Thanks, Vienna

 

If you reverse on ftt of your fractal, you know what comes next. Based on that I can not answer your question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you reverse on ftt of your fractal, you know what comes next. Based on that I can not answer your question.

 

Thank you. Perhaps somebody else can? Seems like a simple question to me. If you don't want to pollute the style or the thread, please PM me.

 

I understand that Spyder set the style of this thread by letting people find the answers themselves. However, many of the people here asked questions for years and years on ET and got clear answers, which obviously got them to where they are...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thank you. Perhaps somebody else can? Seems like a simple question to me. If you don't want to pollute the style or the thread, please PM me.

 

I understand that Spyder set the style of this thread by letting people find the answers themselves. However, many of the people here asked questions for years and years on ET and got clear answers, which obviously got them to where they are...

 

 

I apologize. I didn't want to imply that I'm the only one who can answer your questions. As I see it, I can not answer your questions in a manner, that would seem acceptable to you.

 

My apologies.

 

By the way, you mixed up a couple of fundamentals in your question. This is why it is difficult to give a simple answer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I apologize. I didn't want to imply that I'm the only one who can answer your questions. As I see it, I can not answer your questions in a manner, that would seem acceptable to you.

 

My apologies.

 

By the way, you mixed up a couple of fundamentals in your question. This is why it is difficult to give a simple answer.

 

No, I apologize. It seems that I have not mastered the art of asking a question that can be answered other than by a koan. Regarding your answer "you mixed up a couple of fundamentals in your question", I apologize for doing so. I would have to ask another question as to which fundamentals you mean by that, by which action I would only prove again that I do not know how to ask a question, for which I apologize.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Where do you guys exit?

 

Let's say you are in an upchannel...you get an FTT, you short... price goes and touches the RTL...now you either get a Breakout or an FBO. In case of Breakout, you should see increasing Red Volume...but within what timeframe? How long do you wait to make up your mind if this is a BO or an FBO?

If the bar that touches the RTL goes through with conviction, it is easy...but I had some instances where price stops exactly there (but you only get increasing black 2 bars later, getting a small loss- had you exited at the RTL, you would have profited a point or two), some where it walks the line, and some where it does either but eventually goes through.

 

Thanks, Vienna

 

maybe a diagram (or a series of diagrams) would help you to convey your hypothetical question?

 

 

or better still, get a real life example, cover up the portions you have in question... then discuss it bar-by-bar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No, I apologize. It seems that I have not mastered the art of asking a question that can be answered other than by a koan. Regarding your answer "you mixed up a couple of fundamentals in your question", I apologize for doing so. I would have to ask another question as to which fundamentals you mean by that, by which action I would only prove again that I do not know how to ask a question, for which I apologize.

 

No need to apologize. I can relate to your frustration.

 

Re.fundamentals. BO or FBO have NOTHING... ZERO to do with the timeframe. The method we are discussing here is not timeframe driven, but event (sequences) driven. If you take your action on ftt (the "real" one) you can not expect any FBOs. What are they anyway? What is a BO? This is nothing else but market showing the dominance in the opposite direction. If you see any FBOs, than you just jumped the fractals. The market simply showed the dominance on a smaller (faster) fractal.

 

Look at the highlighted bars. Why there was no way one could anticipate a BO?

 

HTH.

FBOs.thumb.jpg.470bd75b0d8ab9a115a6d4eeafe480ae.jpg

Edited by gucci
chart

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No need to apologize. I can relate to your frustration.

 

Re.fundamentals. BO or FBO have NOTHING... ZERO to do with the timeframe. The method we are discussing here is not timeframe driven, but event (sequences) driven. If you take your action on ftt (the "real" one) you can not expect any FBOs. What are they anyway? What is a BO? This is nothing else but market showing the dominance in the opposite direction. If you see any FBOs, than you just jumped the fractals. The market simply showed the dominance on a smaller (faster) fractal.

 

HTH.

 

Thanks, that's better...I was about to quote you from ET in 2008 where you ask Spyder "Spydertrader, I've reread it several times now and perhaps due to the fact that english isn't my native language I still can not understand it. Can you just help me by answering my question???"....LOL

 

Regarding the FBO's: I understand it is not a question of time, but of action taking place bar by bar.

 

What I mean refers to what Spyder wrote :"After an FTT manifests, we have three possible results: 1. an FBO (Failure [of Price] to Break Out), 2. a BO ([Price] Break Out) or 3. another FTT (Failure of [Price] to Traverse). Which of these occurrences materializes also maters not, as the trader profits first from the price changes occurring between the FTT point and the resulting 'end effect' (FBO, BO, additional FTT). The trader profits second from the resulting actions taken (Exit, Hold or Reverse) once the 'end effects' of the FTT play out."

 

So- what do you mean "If you take your action on ftt (the "real" one) you can not expect any FBOs"--??? How does an FBO (as Spyder defines it) manifest itself?

 

TIA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks, that's better...I was about to quote you from ET in 2008 where you ask Spyder "Spydertrader, I've reread it several times now and perhaps due to the fact that english isn't my native language I still can not understand it. Can you just help me by answering my question???"....LOL

 

Regarding the FBO's: I understand it is not a question of time, but of action taking place bar by bar.

 

What I mean refers to what Spyder wrote :"After an FTT manifests, we have three possible results: 1. an FBO (Failure [of Price] to Break Out), 2. a BO ([Price] Break Out) or 3. another FTT (Failure of [Price] to Traverse). Which of these occurrences materializes also maters not, as the trader profits first from the price changes occurring between the FTT point and the resulting 'end effect' (FBO, BO, additional FTT). The trader profits second from the resulting actions taken (Exit, Hold or Reverse) once the 'end effects' of the FTT play out."

 

So- what do you mean "If you take your action on ftt (the "real" one) you can not expect any FBOs"--??? How does an FBO (as Spyder defines it) manifest itself?

 

TIA

 

 

LOL. Not only were you about to quote me but you actually quoted me... :)

 

Anyway. The quote from Spyder dates back to the times where he jumped the fractals. You can ask him if you wish. Just check his posts after this one.

 

 

Re. FBOs there aren't any.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LOL. Not only were you about to quote me but you actually quoted me... :)

 

Anyway. The quote from Spyder dates back to the times where he jumped the fractals. You can ask him if you wish. Just check his posts after this one.

 

 

Re. FBOs there aren't any.

 

[quote=

 

Re. FBOs there aren't any.

 

 

Arrgh! What does that mean "there aren't any???"..when did this change in the method occur? So the whole coarse level in the futures thread is now "old method"?

 

I don't really care about all this fine fractal stuff, am OK with coarse. Just want to hit the major turning points... I understand that an FBO in one fractal is something else in a smaller fractal...(Btw-aren't YOU jumping fractals then?)... I get an FTT in an upchannel, now an FBO happens in the same fractal level as the channel- when do you know it is an FBO (which I guess refers to the JH wash trades)?

Re your chart: only the third one would have been an FTT (in my way), based on volume. When would you have known it was an FBO and exited?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
maybe a diagram (or a series of diagrams) would help you to convey your hypothetical question?

 

 

or better still, get a real life example, cover up the portions you have in question... then discuss it bar-by-bar.

 

Yes, thank you.Will try to put one together.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Arrgh! What does that mean "there aren't any???"..when did this change in the method occur? So the whole coarse level in the futures thread is now "old method"?

 

I don't really care about all this fine fractal stuff, am OK with coarse. Just want to hit the major turning points... I understand that an FBO in one fractal is something else in a smaller fractal...(Btw-aren't YOU jumping fractals then?)... I get an FTT in an upchannel, now an FBO happens in the same fractal level as the channel- when do you know it is an FBO (which I guess refers to the JH wash trades)?

Re your chart: only the third one would have been an FTT (in my way), based on volume. When would you have known it was an FBO and exited?

 

Just reading your first sentence of the second paragraph makes me think. How can you possibly not care about "this fine fractal stuff" if the slower fractal can not reach completion unless this stuff you do not care about does? Schould I procede with every following sentence in your paragraph?

 

Re. my chart. None of the bars could possibly be an FTT of the traverse. How can you expect a BO then? If there is no BO there can not be any FBOs.

Edited by gucci

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just reading your first sentence of the second paragraph makes me think. How can you possibly not care about "this fine fractal stuff" if the slower fractal can not reach completion unless this stuff you do not care about does? Schould I procede with every following sentence in your paragraph?

 

Re. my chart. None of the bars could possibly be an FTT of the traverse. How can you expect a BO then? If there is no BO there can not be any FBOs.

 

OK -you need to complete the B2B2R2B on the finer fractal before you look for an FTT?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, general question:

 

You guys know the video by Eric Wilson where he trades the RTL breakout, not even the FTT's? Very basic stuff it seemed (he says "I do not tape" in the video), and apparently stays pretty much in one fractal for 2 to 4 major turning points per day, always in until he gets a TL Break with R2R or B2B. (Since then, It seems that since then the method has changed a lot- there even used to be indicators etc, it has also gone micro, breaking it down into the smallest parts).

 

My questions are:

1. It seems that Eric was successful doing this. Am I wrong in this? (If he was successful, does anybody have some contact info for him, PM me)?

2. Are there people on this board that can trade profitably the way Eric did?

3. Gucci says above that at the beginning, Spyder was "jumping fractals". Apparently, however, Spyder could still trade successfully doing so. Is this correct or am I wrong?

4. If so, is there anybody here who trades the way Spyder originally did in the ET thread, and with success?

 

You see where I am going... it might be much more profitable to trade it the way presented here, but perhaps the easier way for me is to approach it from coarse to fine..

 

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good timing... I've been lurking here for a little while after a multi-year hiatus. Weird to think that people still watch those videos... Those were made a lifetime ago. Personally, being in the leaves (trading tapes, labeling every hitch/dip/etc) psyched me out, so I strived to simplify and use what made intuitive sense to me. That's what I've had the most success with personally, but take that with a grain of salt because my trading record is very short -- my work has a way of keeping me too busy to trade. Lately, I've tried to carve out a little time in the AM for trading and I'm hoping to spend more time here. I've been thrilled to discover that some of the other stuff in these forums that is price/volume related (like VSA) actually backs up / further explains a lot of what folks are doing here, adding context/confidence/understanding to the basics of p/v/channels/ftts. Quite a different environment than EliteTrader.

 

My attitude towards Spyder's futures threads here and at ET is that his training and exercises put you in front of a chart, paying close attention, for enough hours that you will eventually figure out how to trade. Last I checked he doesn't lay out an exact method for entries/exits -- just shows you how to read what you're seeing and keep your head in the game. It might be a mistake to treat this as a method for trading when really it is a method for learning how to trade.

 

Ok, general question:

 

You guys know the video by Eric Wilson where he trades the RTL breakout, not even the FTT's? Very basic stuff it seemed (he says "I do not tape" in the video), and apparently stays pretty much in one fractal for 2 to 4 major turning points per day, always in until he gets a TL Break with R2R or B2B. (Since then, It seems that since then the method has changed a lot- there even used to be indicators etc, it has also gone micro, breaking it down into the smallest parts).

 

My questions are:

1. It seems that Eric was successful doing this. Am I wrong in this? (If he was successful, does anybody have some contact info for him, PM me)?

2. Are there people on this board that can trade profitably the way Eric did?

3. Gucci says above that at the beginning, Spyder was "jumping fractals". Apparently, however, Spyder could still trade successfully doing so. Is this correct or am I wrong?

4. If so, is there anybody here who trades the way Spyder originally did in the ET thread, and with success?

 

You see where I am going... it might be much more profitable to trade it the way presented here, but perhaps the easier way for me is to approach it from coarse to fine..

 

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Enjoy the drill. PAY, PAY, PAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY attention to the tapes and volume ...

 

I'am in a good mood...:)

Hi gucci,

The attached chart was taken from your annotated FDAX March9, 2011. I got two questions after a closer look of the image---

 

A. What's the significance of the slant line which connecting bar 38 low to bar 42 high? Do you use it as a visual aid to determine something?

 

B. Bar 43 is a difficulty for me to read and anticipate WMCN because---

 

a. Bar 43 has increasing red volume and its close is below the low of bar 42.

b. Bar 43 broke the RTL of bar 40 to 42

c. Close of bar 43 sits on blue trend line and above forest green trend line.

 

Could you help to solve the stated questions A and B ? TIA

RTL.GIF.2c9bda6aad14e0d013daf627d89e5d30.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Gucci for the chart ---it highlights a few of my delimmas and I'm hoping to sort some of them out once and for all.

 

In my opinion

1) We can't have FTT at any of these bars because we have yet to have return to Dom---as defined by Vol. on a level of that at red "a" or previous black peak???? I'm just guessing for in realtime I would have seen the 2nd bar as a Jakari change and the 3rd as FTT for sure

 

2) On an unrelated topic----how can Pt. 1 be a FTT when it does in fact traverse and even extend on what seems to be an acceleration of Pace??!!!!

 

3) Assuming FTT at Pt.1, how can Pt. 3 be so far into the previous up traverse?? After the BO of the lateral at Pt.2 (which moved so far into the previous) I would have ceased to look for Pt.3 and assumed an error in annotation leading to a continuation of Dom. Up

 

Could anyone give some insight---

 

Vienna--I really appreciate your questions and can relate to your frustration.

5aa71060cb261_FBOedit.thumb.JPG.4aab53c7e4c9c9dc6cf4ceb8bd02e3d3.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi gucci,

The attached chart was taken from your annotated FDAX March9, 2011. I got two questions after a closer look of the image---

 

A. What's the significance of the slant line which connecting bar 38 low to bar 42 high? Do you use it as a visual aid to determine something?

 

B. Bar 43 is a difficulty for me to read and anticipate WMCN because---

 

a. Bar 43 has increasing red volume and its close is below the low of bar 42.

b. Bar 43 broke the RTL of bar 40 to 42

c. Close of bar 43 sits on blue trend line and above forest green trend line.

 

Could you help to solve the stated questions A and B ? TIA

 

A. This line doesn't carry any significance. I might have put it in real time when the market was creating a pennant on the 39th bar and simply forgot to remove it. Sorry for the confusion.

 

B. The bar in question is a non dom movement of the faster fractal (dark green lines). No need to over-analyse it since it is confined by those lines. Look at the dominant tape (bars 36,37,38) of the faster fractal traverse (dark green). It goes all way through to the LTL so no FTT of the faster fractal traverse yet (dark green). What must come next?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MA Mastercard stock, nice close and bull flag breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?MA
    • Of course, I had to ask what he thought about AI.   Because if you can make an entire film on a laptop in your bedroom, do we even need Hollywood anymore?   Will’s answer: Yes, AI will take jobs. (Production, sets, background extras, you name it.)   Yes, it will make movies cheaper.   But no, it won’t replace human storytelling.   Because AI doesn’t know why you care.   It can generate dialogue, sure. But can it make you feel? Can it tell the definitive story of your life?   (Well, unless you’re a robot, in which case… congratulations on reading this far.)   Confidence Is a Muscle—Here’s How to Build It   Will brought up something crucial.   Most people wait until they feel confident.   That’s a mistake.   Confidence comes after action.   Not before.   So how do you build it?   Manufacture wins—Set tiny goals. Don’t climb the whole mountain. Just put on your hiking boots. Control your input—Stop giving away your power. Just because someone in authority tells you no, doesn’t mean you stop. Hack your own brain—Every morning, tell yourself what you need to hear. And just like that, you’re training your mind the way an athlete trains their body. By James A.  Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • Herbert Wigwe's extended family and the kids he left behind are on a warpath.   The war started immediately. Herbert, the benefactor of the warring parties, was buried last year.   What is at the heart of the war is the vast wealth that Herbert left behind.   What are the issues behind the fight between the two parties, and what are the lessons we can learn from the infighting between the two parties?   It is story time.   1) In 2013, Herbert drafted his will and deposited it with a court in the US.   The will was later reviewed in 2015, 9 years before his actual death.   But he did more than a will.   2) A family office called Tengen Family Office was set up in 2017.   What the finance professionals that work for the family office Tengen Family do is simple.   To manage the wealth of the founders of Tengen: Aigboje Aig-Imoukhuede and Herbert Wigwe.   Aigboje Aig-Imoukhuede is the chairman of Access Bank and the co-founder of Access Bank.   AIG and Herbert founded Access Bank together.   Speaking of Aigboje Aig-Imoukhuede, Herbert made him a trustee of the will he drafted in 2013 because he trusted his friend, brother and business partner to manage and protect his interest when he is no more   And AIG has been doing that since Herbert died.   But the conflict is more than AIG and being an enforcer of Herbert will   3) Before he died, Herbert was a wealthy man, a billionaire in naira and a millionaire in dollars.   He was the largest individual shareholder of Access Bank with a 9% shareholding of the bank.   His shares in the bank are worth 125 billion.   To buttress the kind of wealth that Herbert left behind   After his death, his estate received 1.1 billion in dividends last year for the 2024 dividend from Access Bank that would have gone to Herbert if he were to be alive, but the money will now go to Tochi and her younger siblings, and this payment will continue to the estate as long as Access Bank is in existence and profitable.   But he was wealthier than this.   He owns a vast real estate portfolio scattered all over the country.   He also owns the popular Wigwe University.   He built a palatial mansion at Queen Drive, Ikoyi, a palatial house that Herbert did not get to enjoy before he died.   He also owns substantial dollar savings running into millions of dollars in his dollar domiciliary account.   He also owns a private jet as well.   For a man who was this wealthy, he was intentional about his family and their welfare in the event of his passing.   5) In the will that he wrote in 2013, which was reviewed in 2015, he was very clear with what he wanted.   In the event of his death, his wealth should be managed by his estate and the family office, and the profit from the investment should be enjoyed solely by his kids alone.   Not his father, mother, or siblings.   His kids alone and he was clear with this instruction   When the family office was set up in 2017 to manage his wealth and that of his business partner AIG   The same instructions were left by Herbert to the manager of his wealth.   6) In his lifetime, Herbert had a cousin who is a lawyer, Uche Wigwe, and because Uche enjoys his confidence and trust, he made Uche and AIG, his business partner, the trustee of his will.   7) Herbert died last year; he did not see his death coming and was not ready for it.   But he was prepared.   Herbert was a meticulous man in his lifetime and so had a will and a family office to protect his kids regardless of their age and gender.   It is irrelevant that the only remaining heir is a female.   As long as she is Herbert’s kid, acknowledged by him in his lifetime, she is entitled to enjoy the wealth made by her dad.   8. After his interment last year at Isiokpo, his extended family had a brainwave.   Since Herbert, our benefactor, is no more, we can’t allow the kids to enjoy this vast wealth alone.   They're too young to enjoy such a vast wealth, and besides, the oldest of the surviving kids is a 26-year-old, Tochi.   Tochi is a woman, and in their thinking, too young to control what his late dad left behind. The rest of Tochi‘s surviving siblings are younger than her and they are in secondary schools.   The Herbert Wigwe family is accusing Tochi of living a champagne life, which they believe she is too young to enjoy.   Tochi is living alone with the house servants in the palatial mansion on Queen Drive, Ikoyi, that her dad built, which he did not enjoy before he died.   They also accused her of flying private jets and using the private jet that the dad left behind for her local travel.   To regulate this extravagance and more, they are demanding 20% ownership of the estate (wealth) left behind by their late son.   They also demand joint custody of the kids under the supervision of their 90-year-old dad.   9) When the family could not prevail on AIG and Uche Wigwe, the two trustees that are managing Herbert's wealth, to dance to their tune, the case proceeded to the Lagos High Court last year.   Just last week, the case was thrown out by the court for lack of merit.   To the shock of many following the drama, the Wigwe family went to Appeal court to appeal this verdict by Lagos high court.   10) The biggest lesson to take home from this Wigwe soap opera is simple.   Nobody knows when death will come, but as a rich man or woman living in Nigeria, put a proper structure in place to protect your family from the greed of your family who wants to reap where they did not sow.   Write a will.   Establish a family office to manage your wealth.   Appoint trustworthy people you trust as trustees and enforcers of your will.   This is the debt and the duty you owe your kids.   And this is what Herbert has taught us and is the best exemplifier of this. – Attributed Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/   
    • The following 10 year backtest was generated by my custom trade-stacking EA dedicated to the GBPJPY forex pair. It stacks profitable trades of different lot sizes, so this MT5 EA can be used in both hedging and netting accounts. As the EA stacks winners, and not losers, the floating profit (green line) floats above the equity (blue line) which indicates low drawdown. This strategy requires starting capital of 500,000 USD for an account that allows standard, mini, and micro lots; or 50,000 USD for an account that allows standard, mini, micro, and cent (nano) lots. The full backtest report is available if you request it. I programmed this EA for a commercial trader who could not get enough capital to use it, so I'm selling licensed versions of it. The MQL5 Market has, for the most part, been banned from doing business in the U.S. so this EA is not posted there. Just shoot me a message if you're interested.
    • BAC Bank Of America stock watch, pullback to the 44.05 gap support area with bullish indicators at https://stockconsultant.com/?BAC
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.