Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Could it be that, in the attached lateral, that at the first bar the previous sequence is complete, but that the actual signal of change happens no the third bar (the outside bar) inside the lateral?

 

--

innersky

 

For me the signal of change in such a context would reside on the 5th bar.FWIW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For me the signal of change in such a context would reside on the 5th bar.FWIW

 

In an uptrend, price making a higher high on increasing volume is a signal of change?

 

--

innersky

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In an uptrend, price making a higher high on increasing volume is a signal of change?

 

--

innersky

 

 

The fact, that price tried to move higher on encreasing volume but failed to break out of the lateral suggested that change is in the cards. Just my 0,2.

Edited by gucci
spelling

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

rs5 - I see today a little bit differently. I marked up your chart.

 

I believe that the volume sequences have all been satisfied for the long. I believe the key area is 12:45 - 13:55 - you have it marked as rising red. To me this appears to be falling black.

 

What is your rationale for annotating volume that way?

 

Comments welcome by all...

 

P.S. the "missing RTL" note is not pointing at anything... you are missing a CO channel from 2/8 (gap adjusted)

rs5-1.thumb.jpg.5a1ca4934ff49b583cf11ca3b88721b8.jpg

Edited by saturo
spelling

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What about this sequence?

 

I'm assuming your interpretation is that the yellow shaded portion of your drawing is action going from pt2 to pt3 of the "higher level" move from pt2 to pt3.

 

As I see it - the volume trend of your "red arrow" trend is rising. Doesn't this disqualify that particular read of the situation?

rs5-2.png.ce6ccc101ac8e02c745fe6f47350bad3.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your input, Saturo. And thank you for the diagram cnms2. That highlighted area did not look like a full sequence for the faster fractal to me. But then I am often wrong. The market should be telling us shortly. Happy MADA!

Edited by rs5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wednesday 10 Feb 2010
I marked on your chart several places where I started those containers at other points than you did (without respecting your line thickness convention). I believe them to be not only better trading points, but also the correct ones based of volume sequences.

es-10Feb10-1819.thumb.jpg.bffc8bd733fe3149809802f68c9663a5.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tuesday, Fed 9 2010

 

I had trouble with finding the Traverses, just annotated the tapes, will check out your charts for ideas. This was an interesting day with the longest Lateral Drill confirming lateral I've seen yet.

5aa70fcc8bb78_Feb92010A.thumb.PNG.b7f281be0c22ee577ab2d7ccfe250e8c.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wednesday 10 Feb 2010

 

rs5 - I marked your chart with an alternate view of the day.

 

Can you explain why you have 12:35 until end of day marked as falling red? On the whole the volume trend over that period appears to be rising -- especially the red bars. Maybe I'm missing some key concept to gaussian annotations. :confused:

rs5-3.thumb.png.fd407468eafac6a6eed85f68a5fda731.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My thoughts on this subject.

 

First off I welcome Spyder to TL.

 

Secondly, I have studied Spyder and Jack's work very carefully as I have also studied Db and Wyckoff.

 

My fundamental belief about trading is that one must find a perspective or context to view the markets, that makes the most sense to them as an individual.

 

That should be your primary goal.

 

Once you find that perspective you have your edge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Could someone be so kind to post a blank today's 5min ES chart from Trade Navigator? I'm trying to compare some data.

 

--

thanks,

innersky

This should work for you.

 

Regards,

 

EZ

5aa70fce03c01_2-11-2010ES5min.thumb.png.e7a9a71ff92b81d9be4b8dcf90c8292c.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rs5 - I marked your chart with an alternate view of the day.

 

Can you explain why you have 12:35 until end of day marked as falling red? On the whole the volume trend over that period appears to be rising -- especially the red bars. Maybe I'm missing some key concept to gaussian annotations. :confused:

 

If you have 10:35 on 2-10 as a Pt1, go B2B to 13:30 Pt2, then 13:30 to 9:50 on 2-11 is decreasing red to Pt3.

 

Now, if you have 13:30 as a Pt3 down, then your view makes more sense and works out a bit cleaner. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you have 10:35 on 2-10 as a Pt1, go B2B to 13:30 Pt2, then 13:30 to 9:50 on 2-11 is decreasing red to Pt3.

 

Now, if you have 13:30 as a Pt3 down, then your view makes more sense and works out a bit cleaner. ;)

Interesting ... Trends overlap. Here the dilemma is: to fan or to accelerate? Which one is correct here? How do you know? Does it matter? Why?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have a question re: carry over channels. with the 'gap down' today, i adjusted previous day's action to today's open.

 

In doing so, the 11:45 bar's breakout of the longer-term down channel from yesterday is no longer 'there'.

 

I guess my question is, are previous channel breakouts 'negated' if there is a gap up or down on the subsequent day? I can post a chart if required.

 

Thanks in advance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I guess my question is, are previous channel breakouts 'negated' if there is a gap up or down on the subsequent day? I can post a chart if required.

 

I'm not really certain what you have attempted to ask here (a good reason to always attach a chart to a question), but if the market exists as a fractal entity (which it does), and gaps do not exist (and they don't) then how is it that a "previous channel breakout" would no longer be valid?

 

'Gaps' have no magical ability to alter the events of a previous day. As such, eliminating gaps also has no effect on that which developed prior to the gap event.

 

- Spydertrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Spyder - thanks for your explanation. Logically I understand what you were saying.

 

I attached a chart. What I had wondered was if the CO channel would still be valid given the 'gap' down today, but as you stated what happened since the breakout of the long down channel yesterday does not negate that it happened.

 

Still learning and working at this hard..:)

Friday.thumb.jpg.3909d6cf298ec91c4d3ab96decfcf843.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 31st March 2025.   Trump Confirms Tariffs on All Countries, Sending Stocks Lower.   The NASDAQ continues to trade lower due to the US confirming the latest tariffs will be on all countries. In addition to this, bearish volatility also is largely due to the higher inflation data from Friday. The NASDAQ declines to its lowest price since September 11th 2024. Core PCE Price Index - Inflation Increases Again! The PCE Price Index read 2.5% aligning with expert forecasts not triggering any alarm bells. However, the Core PCE Price Index rose from 0.3% to 0.4% MoM and from 2.7% to 2.8% YoY, signalling growing inflationary pressure. This increases the likelihood that the Federal Reserve will maintain elevated interest rates for an extended period. The NASDAQ fell 2.60% due to the higher inflation reading which is known to pressure the stock market due to pressure on consumer demand and a more hawkish Federal Reserve. Boston Fed President Susan Collins recently commented that tariffs could drive up inflation, though the long-term impact remains uncertain. She told journalists that a short-term spike is the most probable outcome but believes the current pause in monetary policy adjustments is appropriate given the prevailing uncertainties. Although, certain investment banks such as JP Morgan actually believe the Federal Reserve will be forced into cutting rates. This is due to expectations that the economy will struggle under the new trade policy. For example, JP Morgan expects the Federal Reserve to delay rate cuts but will quickly cut towards the end of 2025. Market Risk Appetite Takes a Hit! A big factor for the day is the drop in the risk appetite of investors. This can be seen from the VIX which is up almost 6%, Gold which is trading 1.30% higher and the Japanese Yen which is the day’s best performing currency. Most safe haven assets, bar the US Dollar, increase in value. It is also worth noting that all indices are decreasing in value during this morning's Asian session with the Nikkei225 and NASDAQ witnessing the strongest decline. Previously the stock market rose in value as investors heard rumours that tariffs would only be on certain countries. This bullish swing occurred between March 14th and 25th. Over the weekend, President Donald Trump indicated that the upcoming tariffs would apply to all countries, not just those with the largest trade imbalances with the US. NASDAQ - Technical Analysis In terms of technical analysis, the NASDAQ continues to obtain indications that sellers control the price action. The price opens on a bearish price gap measuring 0.30% and trades below all Moving Averages on all timeframes. The NASDAQ also trades below the VWAP and almost 100% of the most influential components (stocks) are declining in value.     The next significant support level is at $18,313, and the resistance level stands at $20,367.95. Key Takeaway Points: NASDAQ falls to its lowest since September 2024 as the US confirms tariffs on all countries, adding to inflation concerns. Core PCE inflation rises to 0.4% MoM and 2.8% YoY, increasing the likelihood of prolonged high interest rates. Investor risk appetite drops as VIX jumps 6%, gold gains 1.3%, and safe-haven assets outperform. NASDAQ shows strong bearish momentum, trading below key technical levels with support at $18,313 and resistance at $20,367.95. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • PM Philip Morris stock, top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?PM
    • EXC Exelon stock, nice range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?EXC
    • UTZ Utz Brands stock, watch for a bottom breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?UTZ
    • FL Foot Locker stock, nice breakdown follow through at https://stockconsultant.com/?FL
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.