Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Yeah , you are right !!! Everybody go in his own way , for me is to know what is working and keep it as simple as possible !!! :missy:

 

I have something to refresh your fond memory. No complication. :)

 

from Jack Hershey Jun 2 2000, 3:00 am show options

Newsgroups: misc.invest.technical

From: "Jack Hershey"

Date: 2000/06/02

Subject: 30 minute warmup bar trading.

 

Fundamental Money Making Concepts.

 

I use simple mechanical systems to get people to understand the basic concept of making money steadily and with little or no risk.

 

When you trade daily for 6 1/2 hours a key thing to consider is not doing too much to make some money.

 

By choosing a futures index of any sort on any exchange in the world, you have put yourself, for 6 1/2 hours a day in a place that is truly dull and unexciting. Being there is fairly safe and not too demanding so you can relax and repeat a few tasks over and over to make some money.

 

I work first with 30 minute bars to frankly eliminate any sense of urgency. I use the prior days last bar to get the ball rolling, or I suggest you wait until the second begins to eliminate the end effects of the market.

 

Here is a progression of four mechanical methods to illustrate making money primarily and secondarily to illustrate that losses are neatly reduced more and more as a little sophistication enters the picture. I also introduce how in a trend you can switch to the most favorable side of the channel to exit. Because this is very simple and mechanical there is no need to clutter it with a stop system as yet mostly because it an index tied to the performance of and aggregation of stocks. We can tuck stops in easily though as a commitment to our ordinary discipline.

 

The four items in the progression are:

 

1. break out of prior bar.

2. slope pairs of bars.

3. overlapped pairs slopes

4. retracement.

 

Here is the progression:

 

1. set up a 30 bar display for a futures index.

2. enter on the breakout beyond (above or below) the prior days last bar hi/lo.

3. hold until the current bar breaks out of the other end (from your long or short entry) of the prior bar.

4. hold on inside bars.

5. hold on successive bar break outs in the same trend.

6. on breakout of 3., reverse so you can take on new trend trade.

7. repeat 3. through 6. for remaining bars of the day.

8. settle at end of day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have something to refresh your fond memory. No complication. :)

 

This is bull....if you trade this set of rules is 99% probability to lose your play money...!!!!:haha:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have something to refresh your fond memory. No complication. :)
You know how they say: "it's only a drill, if it were an actual" trading system it would also have the volume and the fractal context.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is bull....if you trade this set of rules is 99% probability to lose your play money...!!!!:haha:

If I were the one who designed the rule set of this method, call it a bull as you like. See who designed it.

 

 

You know how they say: "it's only a drill, if it were an actual" trading system it would also have the volume and the fractal context.

It is not a drill. It was put up as an actual complete trading method for a swing trader leaving plenty of money on the table. FYI his second complete method using slope pairs of bars which leaves not as plenty of money on the table does not use volume nor fractal context.

 

 

I am not here to argue what best or not. Frankly, I have a hard time to make meaningful progress in learning price volume relationship. I thought why not put up his older works as food for thoughts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If I were the one who designed the rule set of this method, call it a bull as you like. See who designed it.

 

 

 

It is not a drill. It was put up as an actual complete trading method for a swing trader leaving plenty of money on the table. FYI his second complete method using slope pairs of bars which leaves not as plenty of money on the table does not use volume nor fractal context.

 

 

I am not here to argue what best or not. Frankly, I have a hard time to make meaningful progress in learning price volume relationship. I thought why not put up his older works as food for thoughts.

Let me trow you a bone , this is the plase where you should enter, or close to this price level to make some $£¥.

image.thumb.jpg.40c120579a561a90254a308b9e6e109f.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm not sure what's your point. Jack's charts show that:

....................

 

As a general note, I'm not defending Jack or Spydertrader, or trying to put one above the other, each one has his merits: we wouldn't have these discussions without either of them. I just post my opinions on a matter or another. I'm always open to learn something, be it something new, or correcting or improving my understanding. :)

 

Hi cnms2, frenchfry.

 

Do you have Jack's new library for TN?

 

Thnak you,

 

Stepan

35523d1364058875-price-volume-relationship-3-21-22-2013-carryover.png.879c5bc48cac16e5023f75e7f5e7856e.png

Edited by stepan7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If I were the one who designed the rule set of this method, call it a bull as you like. See who designed it.

This will explain where Jack was going with it:

https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/misc.invest.technical/MepKxK6hbpk

 

His typical MO, starting at a base line and adding layers. He's done the same with indicators, just how he teaches. Call it a learning tool, training wheels or drill.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi cnms2, frenchfry.

 

Do you have Jack's new library for TN?

 

Thnak you,

 

Stepan

 

Unfortunately, no. On ET you can see that he told me that I could/should get it but when I took him by his words he chickened out.

 

If you look at his chart then you can see that you already have most of what he re-invented. It is basically all the cases and bar numbers. He changed the lateral annotation and added his "U's" as an indication that the bar gives permission to measure volume. I also see he marks the BO's. The rest he seems to add manually. Everything you see on his chart should be pretty easy for you to replicate. If then in addition you can get the intra-bar degapping to work, then you're the man. :) No... in fact... if you add an automatic volume annotation with PPs, bands LVBOs, HVBOs, T1s, etc. then you should have an automated SCT system. Just remember me when you don't need the system anymore. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Unfortunately, no. On ET you can see that he told me that I could/should get it but when I took him by his words he chickened out.

 

If you look at his chart then you can see that you already have most of what he re-invented. It is basically all the cases and bar numbers. He changed the lateral annotation and added his "U's" as an indication that the bar gives permission to measure volume. I also see he marks the BO's. The rest he seems to add manually. Everything you see on his chart should be pretty easy for you to replicate. If then in addition you can get the intra-bar degapping to work, then you're the man. :) No... in fact... if you add an automatic volume annotation with PPs, bands LVBOs, HVBOs, T1s, etc. then you should have an automated SCT system. Just remember me when you don't need the system anymore. :)

 

Thank you. :)

 

It took me significant time to reverse engineer Spyder's Lateral Formation and Lateral Movement and I don't want to repeat this route again.

 

If somebody will come up with defined rules than I have no problem to implement them for benefit of all. Otherwise I will stick to "old" school.

 

What do you mean by "intra-bar degapping"? Intra-day?

 

Stepan :))

Edited by stepan7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What do you mean by "intra-bar degapping"? Intra-day?

Stepan :))

 

Look at the chart you posted. There is often a gap between the close and the open of the next bar. If you take the distance between the close and the open and then shift the previous bars up or down by that distance then you will get a new result. For example without degap you would see an FTP but when you shift the bars then suddenly you have a XB or a Sym.

 

Does it matter? Theoretically, yes... could be. The funny thing is until recently everybody (most) didn't degap intra-bar and SCT still worked... or maybe that's why it didn't work?

 

Maybe those like DB_sezwhat who degap intrabar since some time can share their experience?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Look at the chart you posted. There is often a gap between the close and the open of the next bar. If you take the distance between the close and the open and then shift the previous bars up or down by that distance then you will get a new result. For example without degap you would see an FTP but when you shift the bars then suddenly you have a XB or a Sym.

 

Does it matter? Theoretically, yes... could be. The funny thing is until recently everybody (most) didn't degap intra-bar and SCT still worked... or maybe that's why it didn't work?

 

Maybe those like DB_sezwhat who degap intrabar since some time can share their experience?

 

Todd spoke about that. He felt de-gap from the previous close to the open was sufficient. I have attache DB's de-gapped chart.

2013-02-13_081710.png-2-7-13-ff.png.2965cef6b9a359e99063ea334217ca3b.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
....... If then in addition you can get the intra-bar degapping to work, then you're the man. :).....

 

 

Guys- intra-bar degapping? Are you sure?

 

Just to clarify: you ARE aware that that would mean the trendlines would jump at every bar, right? Or rather- price would jump relative to your trendlines.

Which means you could not draw trendlines, therefore you would not know when you have crossed a TL/ closed outside. And you could not draw an FTT nor a VE either....

 

So- you are saying that it would be advantageous to trade this method without trendlines and without FTT's..??

 

:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guys- intra-bar degapping? Are you sure?

 

Just to clarify: you ARE aware that that would mean the trendlines would jump at every bar, right? Or rather- price would jump relative to your trendlines.

Which means you could not draw trendlines, therefore you would not know when you have crossed a TL/ closed outside. And you could not draw an FTT nor a VE either....

 

So- you are saying that it would be advantageous to trade this method without trendlines and without FTT's..??

 

:)

First time I read this idea from Spydertrader, and I guess Jack took it from him, or as in other cases it might've been an older element of Jack's method uncovered by Spydertrader at a certain moment.

 

Degapping (day to day, and maybe the intra-day too) makes sense especially for the continuity of the order of events, for volume sequences.

 

There is the possibility that it may be useful for volume gating by price internals, and it might not be useful for trendlines. It might be also useful to determine if a VE closed in the zone, or if a lateral ended.

 

If you try to use a concept you don't fully understand, it's likely that you'll use it incorrectly and you'll draw the wrong conclusions.

 

You may have noticed that bar coloring (pennants) is slightly changed too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
First time I read this idea from Spydertrader, and I guess Jack took it from him, or as in other cases it might've been an older element of Jack's method uncovered by Spydertrader at a certain moment.

 

Degapping (day to day, and maybe the intra-day too) makes sense especially for the continuity of the order of events, for volume sequences.

 

There is the possibility that it may be useful for volume gating by price internals, and it might not be useful for trendlines. It might be also useful to determine if a VE closed in the zone, or if a lateral ended.

 

If you try to use a concept you don't fully understand, it's likely that you'll use it incorrectly and you'll draw the wrong conclusions.

 

You may have noticed that bar coloring (pennants) is slightly changed too.

 

"First time I read this idea from Spydertrader, and I guess Jack took it from him, or as in other cases it might've been an older element of Jack's method uncovered by Spydertrader at a certain moment."

Actually, Spyder apparently said on several occasions that de-gapping individual bars makes absolutely no sense. I can get you more info as to when he said that, if needed...

 

"It might be also useful to determine if a VE closed in the zone, or if a lateral ended."

Independent of the fact that if you can't draw a trendline, you obviously can't determine what a VE is: why on earth would you need de-gapped bars to determine either of these??

 

"If you try to use a concept you don't fully understand, it's likely that you'll use it incorrectly and you'll draw the wrong conclusions."

 

 

Very true, see above...

:-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guys- intra-bar degapping? Are you sure?

 

Just to clarify: you ARE aware that that would mean the trendlines would jump at every bar, right? Or rather- price would jump relative to your trendlines.

Which means you could not draw trendlines, therefore you would not know when you have crossed a TL/ closed outside. And you could not draw an FTT nor a VE either....

 

So- you are saying that it would be advantageous to trade this method without trendlines and without FTT's..??

 

:)

 

The trend lines do not jump at all.. Inter-bar degapping IS superior.

 

Also take a look at who found this post useful.

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/technical-analysis/6320-price-volume-relationship-21.html#post77636

 

To each their own though...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The trend lines do not jump at all.. Inter-bar degapping IS superior.

 

Also take a look at who found this post useful.

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/technical-analysis/6320-price-volume-relationship-21.html#post77636

 

To each their own though...

 

 

"The trend lines do not jump at all.. Inter-bar degapping IS superior."-

 

Thank you, now I am really convinced...:-)..."sigh".

 

OF course they jump! How could they not? You need to move either the previous bars or the future bars to remove the gap. The open of each new bar has to line up with the close of the last bar.

NT has an indicator that de-gaps bars, I had it- you try to draw a trendline, good luck. If I remember correctly, it moved the previous bars. If it shifted the current bar to remove a gap, prices would be completely off by the end of day.

 

Unless there is a software that moves the TL's with the price, if so- please let me know which one can do this: i lobbied with the owner of TN for months to achieve it, without success (and several others did too), just to remove the hassle of moving lines in the morning. He was afraid of liability issues for the software if it displayed non-existant price bars and people placed trades based on it.

 

As to Spyder liking that post: I personally know (because we discussed it in the last few days) from somebody who was as close to Spyder as anybody that S. thought that whole intrabar de-gapping thing was complete hogwash. Maybe he changed his mind after that post, I don't know.

 

But enough of this: if you guys can make intrabar degapping and drawing TL's work, please post it here.If you are already doing it- just post a video.Anyways....I'll stop now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They are going to be at Las Vegas (the VP for sure, and possibly their CEO), and even though (at least) two individuals have strongly encouraged Genesis to add a 'Gap Elimination' Option to their software, additional interest for said functionality expressed through direct contact should prove beneficial. ;)After all, The 'opening' gap isn't the only Gap which does not exist.

 

More on this in Las Vegas.

 

- Spydertrader

PTVtrader's chart and post of 10-11-2009 were in reply to the above comment made by Spydertrader.

 

A clarification: I don't use intraday degapping.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PTVtrader,

 

"Inter-bar degapping IS superior", Bold statement (needs to be backed up)

 

Please could you demonstrate with an example where the inter-bar degapping gave you an edge over bars with gaps?

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Let me trow you a bone , this is the plase where you should enter, or close to this price level to make some $£¥.

 

Meaning if you cross the open of the first bar of a trend?

 

Heisenberg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Meaning if you cross the open of the first bar of a trend?

 

Heisenberg

I am not trading JH method....but if you ask me trend lines, and shapes are only in your imagination, and most of TA is crap.....you can't predict what price will do next based on TA principles, Ma's and indicators. The only certain is that most of traders are losers and if you find places where are more of them this is your sweet (G)spot...:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am not trading JH method....but if you ask me trend lines, and shapes are only in your imagination, and most of TA is crap.....you can't predict what price will do next based on TA principles, Ma's and indicators. The only certain is that most of traders are losers and if you find places where are more of them this is your sweet (G)spot...:)

 

So don't keep me in suspense, what are you trading then? And what are you doing among the trader losers?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So don't keep me in suspense, what are you trading then? And what are you doing among the trader losers?

Just looking....:beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer::beer:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.