Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

  jbarnby said:
My recommendation is Spydertrader only.

 

The good thing about Spyder is he is a man of few words and speaks in riddles. On the other hand Jack is a man of many words and waffles.

 

No disrespect to either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  wilddog said:
The good thing about Spyder is he is a man of few words and speaks in riddles. On the other hand Jack is a man of many words and waffles.

 

No disrespect to either.

 

Speaking in riddles is a good thing? I don't think so.

 

Heisenberg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Heisenberg said:
Speaking in riddles is a good thing? I don't think so.

 

Heisenberg

 

it is a riddle only if you try to look for a message that isn't there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Tams said:
it is a riddle only if you try to look for a message that isn't there.

 

I got an expression for you: "The blind leading the blind".

Think a bit about that. And that is not a riddle, compared to what you try to write here.

 

No offense. Just trying to be realistic.

 

Heisenberg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  cnms2 said:
Admire Spydertrader's clarity in annotation, the first two steps of MADA!

 

I want to throw out some "riddles" for Heisenberg based on the posted chart.

 

1. There is something critically important missing, without which one is more or less guessing the price move from Pt 1 to Pt 2 of a forming Red Traverse container.

 

2. Pt 3 of the Red Traverse container can not be known that we know until several bars later.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  SK0 said:
I want to throw out some "riddles" for Heisenberg based on the posted chart.

 

1. There is something critically important missing, without which one is more or less guessing the price move from Pt 1 to Pt 2 of a forming Red Traverse container.

 

2. Pt 3 of the Red Traverse container can not be known that we know until several bars later.

 

1. We need the first traverse in order to know Pt 1 of the next traverse? And its Pt 2 must be outside of the previous (first traverse) container.

 

2. We need to wait for increasing red before this Pt3 is "confirmed"?

 

Heisenberg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Heisenberg said:
1. We need the first traverse in order to know Pt 1 of the next traverse? And its Pt 2 must be outside of the previous (first traverse) container.

 

2. We need to wait for increasing red before this Pt3 is "confirmed"?

 

Heisenberg

 

Your answer to second "riddle" is correct. Good. Use this answer to solve first "riddle" accurately.

 

What EVENT, specifically, do you have when this occurs on first "riddle"?

5aa711a12a60b_TraverseMissingPiece.thumb.jpg.2158e5750326b5828741c9466bca9477.jpg

Edited by SK0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  SK0 said:
Your answer to second "riddle" is correct. Good. Use this answer to solve first "riddle" accurately.

 

What EVENT, specifically, do you have when this occurs on first "riddle"?

 

We want to see R2R first?

 

Heisenberg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Spydertrader said:
For those having difficulty understanding the information gucci has attempted to convey, might I suggest continuing the discussion from a slightly different orientation (in an effort to 'fast-forward' the application of said information onto 'present day'). Doing so, allows everyone to 'set aside' that which provides them difficulty - with the goal being to return to reading gucci's words after having the ability to understand 'part' of what gucci hopes to get you to see. Once one solves part of a problem, by definition, one then has a different problem before them.

 

The market begins a new cycle (for all fractals) at 14:15 (Eastern Time) yesterday (10-13-2010). Start the annotation process from that point in time.

 

HTH.

 

- Spydertrader

 

"There is only one problem in life: How do you go about the process of solving problems."

 

One of my favorite exercises in this entire thread. In fact, I love this channel drill so much that I use it as part of the training for each of my students. There's a TON of information within this drill, and it may take you a long time to piece it all together, but it has a bit of everything that one uses in their daily decision making process...sub fractals, containers, ve's, pace accelerations, unobservable events, etc...this list goes on! If you have a problem maintaining fractal integrity, this drill will be a challenge.

 

I don't have time to lead a discussion on this exercise, but I thought it worthwhile for some of you to revisit this drill, and perhaps work through it together.

 

Spyder tells us that a new channel begins at 1415 on 10/13/10. The channel ends at 1030 on 10/15/10.

 

Good luck!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  cnms2 said:
On Friday, Jack posted his open for today, and he was right.

Today he posted his open for tomorrow. Does your MADA agree with it?

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=34007&d=1358217351

 

Great question. My response to Jack in that thread indicated I thought we were forming a pt 3 at the end of the day (see chart snippet) and I anticipated a "long" on the open from pt 3 to ftt. This morning's open invalided my anticipation.

 

I'm still trying to annotate this time period to my satisfaction. How would you annotate the end of yesterday and today's gap adjusted open snippet?

 

-river

5aa711a164885_eod01142013.jpg.3e7158561a8b20e99b5dee342b3958ef.jpg

5aa711a168595_gapadjopen01152013.jpg.08e90ca1a468a4ea515dacd3bcfbd119.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Heisenberg said:
We want to see R2R first?

 

Heisenberg

We know R2R is a component of volume sequences that we don't think too much CONSCIOUSLY about what corresponds on the Traverse channel at the price pane. R2R is not an event on the Traverse channel. (Hint: Read my replies again. What event do you see concurrently on Traverse channel when you see Increasing Red? Pt 1, BO, Pt 2, Pt 3, VE, New Pt 2, New Pt 3, FTT, new FTT. Which one?)

 

I assume that you know the answer by now. Now, what else do you need to see on the price pane to know that you have the event? (Hint: See what I added on the amended chart.) See what I mean something is missing on the chart?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  jbarnby said:
One of my favorite exercises in this entire thread. In fact, I love this channel drill so much that I use it as part of the training for each of my students. There's a TON of information within this drill, and it may take you a long time to piece it all together, but it has a bit of everything that one uses in their daily decision making process...sub fractals, containers, ve's, pace accelerations, unobservable events, etc...this list goes on! If you have a problem maintaining fractal integrity, this drill will be a challenge.

 

I don't have time to lead a discussion on this exercise, but I thought it worthwhile for some of you to revisit this drill, and perhaps work through it together.

 

Spyder tells us that a new channel begins at 1415 on 10/13/10. The channel ends at 1030 on 10/15/10.

 

Good luck!

 

I found it. Thank you very much. I see what you mean it has the whole kit and kaboodle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  river said:
Great question. My response to Jack in that thread indicated I thought we were forming a pt 3 at the end of the day (see chart snippet) and I anticipated a "long" on the open from pt 3 to ftt. This morning's open invalided my anticipation.

 

I'm still trying to annotate this time period to my satisfaction. How would you annotate the end of yesterday and today's gap adjusted open snippet?

 

-river

I believe that lately Jack posts trades based on his price / volume / end effects approach.

5aa711a1c95a3_riverseod01142013.jpg.b723ecaa77661c31f42c00ad43ae60c6.jpg

5aa711a1cd506_riverssgapadjopen01152013.jpg.e00e23bd54af4467ced6a90355fb6414.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  cnms2 said:
I believe that lately Jack posts trades based on his price / volume / end effects approach.

 

I have done a search on ET and cannot find those charts you have posted by Jack, or are they by Jack? I was under the impression Jack uses TN since he has mentioned it a number of times and recently went to their convention.

 

Below are all of Jacks latest post:

 

Forums - Volume

Forums - Did Robert Hoffman really lose 312K in a single TF trade? Yikes!

Forums - Jack Hershey in trading vs Srinivasa Ramanujan in mathematics

Forums - Volume

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  wilddog said:
I have done a search on ET and cannot find those charts you have posted by Jack, or are they by Jack? I was under the impression Jack uses TN since he has mentioned it a number of times and recently went to their convention.

 

Below are all of Jacks latest post:

 

Forums - Volume

Forums - Did Robert Hoffman really lose 312K in a single TF trade? Yikes!

Forums - Jack Hershey in trading vs Srinivasa Ramanujan in mathematics

Forums - Volume

Sorry for the confusion. My statement about Jack's recent posts is not related to the annotations I made on river's charts. Those annotations represent my view, and are in response to river's request.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm somewhat new to JH method.Currently i've a few basic queries :

(1)I read somewhere in ET Forum,where jack says:Both retrace n reversal occur with declining volume n BO of rtl occurs on low volume(middle part of b2b or r2r).Is it true in all context(Tape,traverse,channel)?

At other places some including spyder tells BO to be meaningful ,should occur on high volume .

(2)Again jack says : ftt or FTT doesn't occur in VE LTL.

Is it true even when a translation bar occurs on VE?

(3)Say-A tape ftt doesn't occur but a traverse or channel FTT occur.In this case do we have to reverse if dom volume is still showing an increasing tendency.

(4)Jack says : Internals(ftp,fbp,sym etc) do not indicate change mode.

suppose i'm trading at tape level,what would be best strategies in two scenarios - when we encounter an internal which occur on a relatively low n high volume(indicated byl PRV)

 

(5)Can SCT rules be applied on higher time frame(15/60/daily) for positional commodity trading,if i am unable to trade stocks using JH Equity method.

 

I currently trade crude oil on indian commodity market(MCX).I can use only few basic tools (price,volume,trendline,PRV) .Is it possible to trade JH method successfully at intermediate/expert level with these basic tools?

Thanks n regards

Ravi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  eyeamravi said:
I'm somewhat new to JH method.Currently i've a few basic queries :

(1)I read somewhere in ET Forum,where jack says:Both retrace n reversal occur with declining volume n BO of rtl occurs on low volume(middle part of b2b or r2r).Is it true in all context(Tape,traverse,channel)?

At other places some including spyder tells BO to be meaningful ,should occur on high volume .

(2)Again jack says : ftt or FTT doesn't occur in VE LTL.

Is it true even when a translation bar occurs on VE?

(3)Say-A tape ftt doesn't occur but a traverse or channel FTT occur.In this case do we have to reverse if dom volume is still showing an increasing tendency.

(4)Jack says : Internals(ftp,fbp,sym etc) do not indicate change mode.

suppose i'm trading at tape level,what would be best strategies in two scenarios - when we encounter an internal which occur on a relatively low n high volume(indicated byl PRV)

 

(5)Can SCT rules be applied on higher time frame(15/60/daily) for positional commodity trading,if i am unable to trade stocks using JH Equity method.

 

I currently trade crude oil on indian commodity market(MCX).I can use only few basic tools (price,volume,trendline,PRV) .Is it possible to trade JH method successfully at intermediate/expert level with these basic tools?

Thanks n regards

Ravi

 

eyeamravi,

 

Welcome to the thread. I don’t consider myself an expert on the methodology but I am at least a few steps into the journey. Perhaps someone else will offer their answers to your questions while my post sits in queue to be moderated before it appears and hopefully if anyone finds any of my answers lacking they will post their comments.

 

1) A retrace and a reversal both occur on nondominant volume as price heads toward the RTL, a retrace becomes a reversal as price crosses the RTL on increasing volume. This is true on every fractal.

 

2) Perhaps Jack meant that if price has traversed its container how can it “fail to traverse”?

 

3) A Channel FTT would also be a traverse FTT and a tape FTT. I cannot envision the scenario you describe.

 

4) If we are not in “change” mode, then we must be in “continuation”.

 

5) I am not familiar with any concrete SCT rules. Spydertrader has repeatedly said that the methodology works on any instrument and any timeframe provided there is sufficient liquidity.

 

The tools you mentioned, price, volume, trendlines and PRV, are sufficient for the methodology. Of course, your level of success using the tools available to you depends on your journey.

 

HTH

 

-river

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  jbarnby said:
I've had a lot of success with this method. While I'm grateful to spyder for his insights and guidance, most of my success came through self-discovery, using the basics described in this and other threads. I will upload a couple of recent Traverses in hopes that it might encourage others. Success will only come after you achieve complete understanding of how to build containers correctly and manage fractal nesting,

 

Jbarnby,thank you for posting your charts.10-3-2012 at 14:30 est i believe the market completed a down tape putting it at PT 2 of the down traverse.Then two black bars later you put the traverse level PT 3 and annotated a thicker traverse rtl.In this case there was a break of the down tape rtl on ibv on 14:40 est.I believe this increasing black volume bar coupled with the final push down on irv created the traverse fractal.Would this be correct? If in this exact same situation with the only difference being neither 14:35 or 14:40 est were on ibv would the market still create a down traverse or would the fractal stay a down tape (just be fanned)? Tia

5aa711a3bd913_10-3-12jbarnby.thumb.png.30f06bcb9cfa75c39dc1d3858b40b3b3.png

Edited by patrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  patrader said:
Jbarnby,thank you for posting your charts.10-3-2012 at 14:30 est i believe the market completed a down tape putting it at PT 2 of the down traverse.Then two black bars later you put the traverse level PT 3 and annotated a thicker traverse rtl.In this case there was a break of the down tape rtl on ibv on 14:40 est.I believe this increasing black volume bar coupled with the final push down on irv created the traverse fractal.Would this be correct? If in this exact same situation with the only difference being neither 14:35 or 14:40 est were on ibv would the market still create a down traverse or would the fractal stay a down tape (just be fanned)? Tia

 

The question sounds simple enough but it's really a bit more complicated than i can fully explain here. When you're able to see all the fractals at play, even at the finest level, you can (as spyder said to me once) move everything down one fractal. He actually walked thru a sequence one time doing just that...which kinda rattled my mind at the time. But volume does play a keen role in our analysis. As has been pointed out in this and other threads, increasing dominant volume confirms pt 3. You will never have a tape/traverse/channel without confirming inc dominant vol after a pt 3.

 

One of the most consistent errors I see on charts is misinterpreting increasing volume, and how it relates to formations. I wish more folks would work hard to differentiate that relationship. Additionally, many of the answers to sequences and volume reside in the relationship of peaks & troughs.

 

I spent so many years playing with trendlines (which are important) but failing to realize all of the important elements of volume that really tell the story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  patrader said:
Jbarnby,thank you for posting your charts.10-3-2012 at 14:30 est i believe the market completed a down tape putting it at PT 2 of the down traverse.Then two black bars later you put the traverse level PT 3 and annotated a thicker traverse rtl.In this case there was a break of the down tape rtl on ibv on 14:40 est.I believe this increasing black volume bar coupled with the final push down on irv created the traverse fractal.Would this be correct? If in this exact same situation with the only difference being neither 14:35 or 14:40 est were on ibv would the market still create a down traverse or would the fractal stay a down tape (just be fanned)? Tia

 

patrader, it is probably worth your while re-reading this thread. Sypders constantly reminds us to focus on the volume pane. The price pane is where we like to look since that is where the profits reside, however the sequences lie in the volume pane.

 

HTH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  jbarnby said:
The question sounds simple enough but it's really a bit more complicated than i can fully explain here.

 

jbarnby,thanks again for your comments.I have many questions but will keep it to one question at a time.Hopefully they're not too complicated to answer here.10-3-2012 at 14:30 est i believe the market completed a down tape fractal (where you placed directly below this bar a purple "2"). Would this be correct?

5aa711a40f939_10-3-12jbarnby.thumb.png.1cd967a35f9b5c617052dbeaac2d0a57.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  jbarnby said:
When you're able to see all the fractals at play, even at the finest level, you can (as spyder said to me once) move everything down one fractal.

 

JBarnby, thanks for your posts and your commentary. Would you please explain what you mean "when you move everything down one fractal"?

Is it going from a tape to a traverse or a traverse to a tape?

 

Thank you for your help

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 7th April 2025.   Asian Markets Plunge as US-China Trade War Escalates; Wall Street Futures Signal Further Turmoil.   Global financial markets extended last week’s massive sell-off as tensions between the US and its major trading partners deepened, rattling investors and prompting sharp declines across equities, commodities, and currencies. The fallout from President Trump’s sweeping new tariff measures continued to spread, raising fears of a full-blown trade war and economic recession.   Asian stock markets plunged on Monday, extending a global market rout fueled by rising tensions between the US and China. The latest wave of aggressive tariffs and retaliatory measures has unnerved investors worldwide, triggering sharp sell-offs across the Asia-Pacific region.   Asian equities led the global rout on Monday, with dramatic losses seen across the region. Japan’s Nikkei 225 index tumbled more than 8% shortly after the open, while the broader Topix fell over 6.5%, recovering only slightly from steeper losses. In mainland China, the Shanghai Composite sank 6.7%, and the blue-chip CSI300 dropped 7.5% as markets reopened following a public holiday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index opened more than 9% lower, reflecting deep concerns about escalating trade tensions.           South Korea’s Kospi dropped 4.8%, triggering a circuit breaker designed to curb panic selling. Taiwan’s Taiex index collapsed by nearly 10%, with major tech exporters like TSMC and Foxconn hitting circuit breaker limits after each fell close to 10%. Meanwhile, Australia’s ASX 200 shed as much as 6.3%, and New Zealand’s NZX 50 lost over 3.5%.   Despite the escalation, Beijing has adopted a measured tone. Chinese officials urged investors not to panic and assured markets that the country has the tools to mitigate economic shocks. At the same time, they left the door open for renewed trade talks, though no specific timeline has been set.   US Stock Futures Plunge Ahead of Monday Open   US stock futures pointed to another brutal day on Wall Street. Futures tied to the S&P 500 dropped over 3%, Nasdaq futures sank 4%, and Dow Jones futures lost 2.5%—equivalent to nearly 1,000 points. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, down more than 20% from its recent highs, while the S&P 500 is nearing bear territory. The Dow closed last week in correction. Oil prices followed suit, with WTI crude dropping over 4% to $59.49 per barrel—its lowest since April 2021.   Wall Street closed last week in disarray, erasing more than $5 trillion in value amid fears of an all-out trade war. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, sinking more than 20% from its recent peak. The S&P 500 is approaching bear territory, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average has slipped firmly into correction territory.   German Banks Hit Hard Amid Escalating Trade Tensions   German banking stocks were among the worst hit in Europe. Shares of Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank plunged between 9.5% and 10.3% during early Frankfurt trading, compounding Friday’s steep losses. Fears over a global trade war and looming recession are severely impacting the financial sector, particularly export-driven economies like Germany.   Eurozone Growth at Risk   Eurozone officials are bracing for economic fallout, with Greek central bank governor Yannis Stournaras warning that Trump’s tariff policy could reduce eurozone GDP by up to 1%. The EU is preparing retaliatory tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods—ranging from steel and aluminium to consumer products like dental floss and luxury jewellery.   Starting Wednesday, the US is expected to impose 25% tariffs on key EU exports, with Brussels ready to respond with its own 20% levies on nearly all remaining American imports.   UK Faces £22 Billion Economic Blow   In the UK, fresh research from KPMG revealed that the British economy could shrink by £21.6 billion by 2027 due to US-imposed tariffs. The analysis points to a 0.8% dip in economic output over the next two years, undermining Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ growth agenda. The report also warned of additional fiscal pressure that may lead to future tax increases and public spending cuts.   Wall Street Braces for Recession   Goldman Sachs revised its US recession probability to 45% within the next year, citing tighter financial conditions and rising policy uncertainty. This marks a sharp jump from the 35% risk estimated just last month—and more than double January’s 20% projection. J.P. Morgan issued a bleaker outlook, now forecasting a 60% chance of recession both in the US and globally.   Global Leaders Respond as Trade Tensions Deepen   The dramatic market sell-off was triggered by China’s sweeping retaliation to a new round of US tariffs, which included a 34% levy on all American imports. Beijing’s state-run People’s Daily released a defiant statement, asserting that China has the tools and resilience to withstand economic pressure from Washington. ‘We’ve built up experience after years of trade conflict and are prepared with a full arsenal of countermeasures,’ it stated.   Around the world, policymakers are responding to the growing threat of a trade-led economic slowdown. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced plans to appeal directly to Washington and push for tariff relief, following the US administration’s decision to impose a blanket 24% tariff on Japanese imports. He aims to visit the US soon to present Japan’s case as a fair trade partner.   In Taiwan, President Lai Ching-te said his administration would work closely with Washington to remove trade barriers and increase purchases of American goods in an effort to reduce the bilateral trade deficit. The island's defence ministry has also submitted a new list of US military procurements to highlight its strategic partnership.   Economists and strategists are warning of deeper economic consequences. Ronald Temple, chief market strategist at Lazard, said the scale and speed of these tariffs could result in far more severe damage than previously anticipated. ‘This isn’t just a bilateral conflict anymore — more countries are likely to respond in the coming weeks,’ he noted.   Analysts at Barclays cautioned that smaller Asian economies, such as Singapore and South Korea, may face challenges in negotiating with Washington and are already adjusting their economic growth forecasts downward in response to the unfolding trade crisis.           Oil Prices Sink on Demand Concerns   Crude oil continued its sharp slide on Monday, driven by recession fears and weakened global demand. Brent fell 3.9% to $63.04 a barrel, while WTI plunged over 4% to $59.49—both benchmarks marking weekly losses exceeding 10%. Analysts say inflationary pressures and slowing economic activity may drag demand down, even though energy imports were excluded from the latest round of tariffs.   Vandana Hari of Vanda Insights noted, ‘The market is struggling to find a bottom. Until there’s a clear signal from Trump that calms recession fears, crude prices will remain under pressure.’   OPEC+ Adds Further Pressure with Output Hike   Bearish sentiment intensified after OPEC+ announced it would boost production by 411,000 barrels per day in May, far surpassing the expected 135,000 bpd. The alliance called on overproducing nations to submit compensation plans by April 15. Analysts fear this surprise move could undo years of supply discipline and weigh further on already fragile oil markets.   Global political risks also flared over the weekend. Iran rejected US proposals for direct nuclear negotiations and warned of potential military action. Meanwhile, Russia claimed fresh territorial gains in Ukraine’s Sumy region and ramped up attacks on surrounding areas—further darkening the outlook for markets.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock watch, good buying (+313%) toi hold onto the 173.32 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
    • META stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 507.48, 557.84 at https://stockconsultant.com/?META
    • TMUS T-Mobile stock, watch for a top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?TMUS
    • KULR KULR Technology stock watch, pullback to 1.25 triple support area with bullish indicators at https://stockconsultant.com/?KULR
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.