Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

My recommendation is Spydertrader only.

 

The good thing about Spyder is he is a man of few words and speaks in riddles. On the other hand Jack is a man of many words and waffles.

 

No disrespect to either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The good thing about Spyder is he is a man of few words and speaks in riddles. On the other hand Jack is a man of many words and waffles.

 

No disrespect to either.

 

Speaking in riddles is a good thing? I don't think so.

 

Heisenberg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Speaking in riddles is a good thing? I don't think so.

 

Heisenberg

 

it is a riddle only if you try to look for a message that isn't there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
it is a riddle only if you try to look for a message that isn't there.

 

I got an expression for you: "The blind leading the blind".

Think a bit about that. And that is not a riddle, compared to what you try to write here.

 

No offense. Just trying to be realistic.

 

Heisenberg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Admire Spydertrader's clarity in annotation, the first two steps of MADA!

 

I want to throw out some "riddles" for Heisenberg based on the posted chart.

 

1. There is something critically important missing, without which one is more or less guessing the price move from Pt 1 to Pt 2 of a forming Red Traverse container.

 

2. Pt 3 of the Red Traverse container can not be known that we know until several bars later.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I want to throw out some "riddles" for Heisenberg based on the posted chart.

 

1. There is something critically important missing, without which one is more or less guessing the price move from Pt 1 to Pt 2 of a forming Red Traverse container.

 

2. Pt 3 of the Red Traverse container can not be known that we know until several bars later.

 

1. We need the first traverse in order to know Pt 1 of the next traverse? And its Pt 2 must be outside of the previous (first traverse) container.

 

2. We need to wait for increasing red before this Pt3 is "confirmed"?

 

Heisenberg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1. We need the first traverse in order to know Pt 1 of the next traverse? And its Pt 2 must be outside of the previous (first traverse) container.

 

2. We need to wait for increasing red before this Pt3 is "confirmed"?

 

Heisenberg

 

Your answer to second "riddle" is correct. Good. Use this answer to solve first "riddle" accurately.

 

What EVENT, specifically, do you have when this occurs on first "riddle"?

5aa711a12a60b_TraverseMissingPiece.thumb.jpg.2158e5750326b5828741c9466bca9477.jpg

Edited by SK0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Your answer to second "riddle" is correct. Good. Use this answer to solve first "riddle" accurately.

 

What EVENT, specifically, do you have when this occurs on first "riddle"?

 

We want to see R2R first?

 

Heisenberg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For those having difficulty understanding the information gucci has attempted to convey, might I suggest continuing the discussion from a slightly different orientation (in an effort to 'fast-forward' the application of said information onto 'present day'). Doing so, allows everyone to 'set aside' that which provides them difficulty - with the goal being to return to reading gucci's words after having the ability to understand 'part' of what gucci hopes to get you to see. Once one solves part of a problem, by definition, one then has a different problem before them.

 

The market begins a new cycle (for all fractals) at 14:15 (Eastern Time) yesterday (10-13-2010). Start the annotation process from that point in time.

 

HTH.

 

- Spydertrader

 

"There is only one problem in life: How do you go about the process of solving problems."

 

One of my favorite exercises in this entire thread. In fact, I love this channel drill so much that I use it as part of the training for each of my students. There's a TON of information within this drill, and it may take you a long time to piece it all together, but it has a bit of everything that one uses in their daily decision making process...sub fractals, containers, ve's, pace accelerations, unobservable events, etc...this list goes on! If you have a problem maintaining fractal integrity, this drill will be a challenge.

 

I don't have time to lead a discussion on this exercise, but I thought it worthwhile for some of you to revisit this drill, and perhaps work through it together.

 

Spyder tells us that a new channel begins at 1415 on 10/13/10. The channel ends at 1030 on 10/15/10.

 

Good luck!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On Friday, Jack posted his open for today, and he was right.

Today he posted his open for tomorrow. Does your MADA agree with it?

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=34007&d=1358217351

 

Great question. My response to Jack in that thread indicated I thought we were forming a pt 3 at the end of the day (see chart snippet) and I anticipated a "long" on the open from pt 3 to ftt. This morning's open invalided my anticipation.

 

I'm still trying to annotate this time period to my satisfaction. How would you annotate the end of yesterday and today's gap adjusted open snippet?

 

-river

5aa711a164885_eod01142013.jpg.3e7158561a8b20e99b5dee342b3958ef.jpg

5aa711a168595_gapadjopen01152013.jpg.08e90ca1a468a4ea515dacd3bcfbd119.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We want to see R2R first?

 

Heisenberg

We know R2R is a component of volume sequences that we don't think too much CONSCIOUSLY about what corresponds on the Traverse channel at the price pane. R2R is not an event on the Traverse channel. (Hint: Read my replies again. What event do you see concurrently on Traverse channel when you see Increasing Red? Pt 1, BO, Pt 2, Pt 3, VE, New Pt 2, New Pt 3, FTT, new FTT. Which one?)

 

I assume that you know the answer by now. Now, what else do you need to see on the price pane to know that you have the event? (Hint: See what I added on the amended chart.) See what I mean something is missing on the chart?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One of my favorite exercises in this entire thread. In fact, I love this channel drill so much that I use it as part of the training for each of my students. There's a TON of information within this drill, and it may take you a long time to piece it all together, but it has a bit of everything that one uses in their daily decision making process...sub fractals, containers, ve's, pace accelerations, unobservable events, etc...this list goes on! If you have a problem maintaining fractal integrity, this drill will be a challenge.

 

I don't have time to lead a discussion on this exercise, but I thought it worthwhile for some of you to revisit this drill, and perhaps work through it together.

 

Spyder tells us that a new channel begins at 1415 on 10/13/10. The channel ends at 1030 on 10/15/10.

 

Good luck!

 

I found it. Thank you very much. I see what you mean it has the whole kit and kaboodle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Great question. My response to Jack in that thread indicated I thought we were forming a pt 3 at the end of the day (see chart snippet) and I anticipated a "long" on the open from pt 3 to ftt. This morning's open invalided my anticipation.

 

I'm still trying to annotate this time period to my satisfaction. How would you annotate the end of yesterday and today's gap adjusted open snippet?

 

-river

I believe that lately Jack posts trades based on his price / volume / end effects approach.

5aa711a1c95a3_riverseod01142013.jpg.b723ecaa77661c31f42c00ad43ae60c6.jpg

5aa711a1cd506_riverssgapadjopen01152013.jpg.e00e23bd54af4467ced6a90355fb6414.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I believe that lately Jack posts trades based on his price / volume / end effects approach.

 

I have done a search on ET and cannot find those charts you have posted by Jack, or are they by Jack? I was under the impression Jack uses TN since he has mentioned it a number of times and recently went to their convention.

 

Below are all of Jacks latest post:

 

Forums - Volume

Forums - Did Robert Hoffman really lose 312K in a single TF trade? Yikes!

Forums - Jack Hershey in trading vs Srinivasa Ramanujan in mathematics

Forums - Volume

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have done a search on ET and cannot find those charts you have posted by Jack, or are they by Jack? I was under the impression Jack uses TN since he has mentioned it a number of times and recently went to their convention.

 

Below are all of Jacks latest post:

 

Forums - Volume

Forums - Did Robert Hoffman really lose 312K in a single TF trade? Yikes!

Forums - Jack Hershey in trading vs Srinivasa Ramanujan in mathematics

Forums - Volume

Sorry for the confusion. My statement about Jack's recent posts is not related to the annotations I made on river's charts. Those annotations represent my view, and are in response to river's request.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm somewhat new to JH method.Currently i've a few basic queries :

(1)I read somewhere in ET Forum,where jack says:Both retrace n reversal occur with declining volume n BO of rtl occurs on low volume(middle part of b2b or r2r).Is it true in all context(Tape,traverse,channel)?

At other places some including spyder tells BO to be meaningful ,should occur on high volume .

(2)Again jack says : ftt or FTT doesn't occur in VE LTL.

Is it true even when a translation bar occurs on VE?

(3)Say-A tape ftt doesn't occur but a traverse or channel FTT occur.In this case do we have to reverse if dom volume is still showing an increasing tendency.

(4)Jack says : Internals(ftp,fbp,sym etc) do not indicate change mode.

suppose i'm trading at tape level,what would be best strategies in two scenarios - when we encounter an internal which occur on a relatively low n high volume(indicated byl PRV)

 

(5)Can SCT rules be applied on higher time frame(15/60/daily) for positional commodity trading,if i am unable to trade stocks using JH Equity method.

 

I currently trade crude oil on indian commodity market(MCX).I can use only few basic tools (price,volume,trendline,PRV) .Is it possible to trade JH method successfully at intermediate/expert level with these basic tools?

Thanks n regards

Ravi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm somewhat new to JH method.Currently i've a few basic queries :

(1)I read somewhere in ET Forum,where jack says:Both retrace n reversal occur with declining volume n BO of rtl occurs on low volume(middle part of b2b or r2r).Is it true in all context(Tape,traverse,channel)?

At other places some including spyder tells BO to be meaningful ,should occur on high volume .

(2)Again jack says : ftt or FTT doesn't occur in VE LTL.

Is it true even when a translation bar occurs on VE?

(3)Say-A tape ftt doesn't occur but a traverse or channel FTT occur.In this case do we have to reverse if dom volume is still showing an increasing tendency.

(4)Jack says : Internals(ftp,fbp,sym etc) do not indicate change mode.

suppose i'm trading at tape level,what would be best strategies in two scenarios - when we encounter an internal which occur on a relatively low n high volume(indicated byl PRV)

 

(5)Can SCT rules be applied on higher time frame(15/60/daily) for positional commodity trading,if i am unable to trade stocks using JH Equity method.

 

I currently trade crude oil on indian commodity market(MCX).I can use only few basic tools (price,volume,trendline,PRV) .Is it possible to trade JH method successfully at intermediate/expert level with these basic tools?

Thanks n regards

Ravi

 

eyeamravi,

 

Welcome to the thread. I don’t consider myself an expert on the methodology but I am at least a few steps into the journey. Perhaps someone else will offer their answers to your questions while my post sits in queue to be moderated before it appears and hopefully if anyone finds any of my answers lacking they will post their comments.

 

1) A retrace and a reversal both occur on nondominant volume as price heads toward the RTL, a retrace becomes a reversal as price crosses the RTL on increasing volume. This is true on every fractal.

 

2) Perhaps Jack meant that if price has traversed its container how can it “fail to traverse”?

 

3) A Channel FTT would also be a traverse FTT and a tape FTT. I cannot envision the scenario you describe.

 

4) If we are not in “change” mode, then we must be in “continuation”.

 

5) I am not familiar with any concrete SCT rules. Spydertrader has repeatedly said that the methodology works on any instrument and any timeframe provided there is sufficient liquidity.

 

The tools you mentioned, price, volume, trendlines and PRV, are sufficient for the methodology. Of course, your level of success using the tools available to you depends on your journey.

 

HTH

 

-river

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've had a lot of success with this method. While I'm grateful to spyder for his insights and guidance, most of my success came through self-discovery, using the basics described in this and other threads. I will upload a couple of recent Traverses in hopes that it might encourage others. Success will only come after you achieve complete understanding of how to build containers correctly and manage fractal nesting,

 

Jbarnby,thank you for posting your charts.10-3-2012 at 14:30 est i believe the market completed a down tape putting it at PT 2 of the down traverse.Then two black bars later you put the traverse level PT 3 and annotated a thicker traverse rtl.In this case there was a break of the down tape rtl on ibv on 14:40 est.I believe this increasing black volume bar coupled with the final push down on irv created the traverse fractal.Would this be correct? If in this exact same situation with the only difference being neither 14:35 or 14:40 est were on ibv would the market still create a down traverse or would the fractal stay a down tape (just be fanned)? Tia

5aa711a3bd913_10-3-12jbarnby.thumb.png.30f06bcb9cfa75c39dc1d3858b40b3b3.png

Edited by patrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jbarnby,thank you for posting your charts.10-3-2012 at 14:30 est i believe the market completed a down tape putting it at PT 2 of the down traverse.Then two black bars later you put the traverse level PT 3 and annotated a thicker traverse rtl.In this case there was a break of the down tape rtl on ibv on 14:40 est.I believe this increasing black volume bar coupled with the final push down on irv created the traverse fractal.Would this be correct? If in this exact same situation with the only difference being neither 14:35 or 14:40 est were on ibv would the market still create a down traverse or would the fractal stay a down tape (just be fanned)? Tia

 

The question sounds simple enough but it's really a bit more complicated than i can fully explain here. When you're able to see all the fractals at play, even at the finest level, you can (as spyder said to me once) move everything down one fractal. He actually walked thru a sequence one time doing just that...which kinda rattled my mind at the time. But volume does play a keen role in our analysis. As has been pointed out in this and other threads, increasing dominant volume confirms pt 3. You will never have a tape/traverse/channel without confirming inc dominant vol after a pt 3.

 

One of the most consistent errors I see on charts is misinterpreting increasing volume, and how it relates to formations. I wish more folks would work hard to differentiate that relationship. Additionally, many of the answers to sequences and volume reside in the relationship of peaks & troughs.

 

I spent so many years playing with trendlines (which are important) but failing to realize all of the important elements of volume that really tell the story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jbarnby,thank you for posting your charts.10-3-2012 at 14:30 est i believe the market completed a down tape putting it at PT 2 of the down traverse.Then two black bars later you put the traverse level PT 3 and annotated a thicker traverse rtl.In this case there was a break of the down tape rtl on ibv on 14:40 est.I believe this increasing black volume bar coupled with the final push down on irv created the traverse fractal.Would this be correct? If in this exact same situation with the only difference being neither 14:35 or 14:40 est were on ibv would the market still create a down traverse or would the fractal stay a down tape (just be fanned)? Tia

 

patrader, it is probably worth your while re-reading this thread. Sypders constantly reminds us to focus on the volume pane. The price pane is where we like to look since that is where the profits reside, however the sequences lie in the volume pane.

 

HTH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The question sounds simple enough but it's really a bit more complicated than i can fully explain here.

 

jbarnby,thanks again for your comments.I have many questions but will keep it to one question at a time.Hopefully they're not too complicated to answer here.10-3-2012 at 14:30 est i believe the market completed a down tape fractal (where you placed directly below this bar a purple "2"). Would this be correct?

5aa711a40f939_10-3-12jbarnby.thumb.png.1cd967a35f9b5c617052dbeaac2d0a57.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When you're able to see all the fractals at play, even at the finest level, you can (as spyder said to me once) move everything down one fractal.

 

JBarnby, thanks for your posts and your commentary. Would you please explain what you mean "when you move everything down one fractal"?

Is it going from a tape to a traverse or a traverse to a tape?

 

Thank you for your help

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • HLF Herbalife stock, watch for a bull flag breakout above 9.02 at https://stockconsultant.com/?HLF
    • Date: 1st April 2025.   Will Gold’s Rally Hold Strong as New Trade Tariffs Take Effect Tomorrow?   Gold continues to increase in value for a sixth consecutive day and is trading more than 17% higher in 2025. Amid fear of higher inflation, a recession and the tariffs war escalating investors continue to invest into Gold pushing demand higher. The trade policy from April 2nd onwards continues to be a key factor for the whole market. Can Gold maintain its upward trend? Trade Policy From Tomorrow Onwards Starting as soon as tomorrow, a 25% tariff will be imposed on all passenger cars imported into the United States. While this White House policy is anticipated to negatively affect European industrial performance, it will also lead to higher transportation and maintenance costs for everyday American taxpayers. The negative impact expected on both the EU and US is one of the reasons investors continue to buy Gold. Additionally, last month, President Donald Trump announced reciprocal sanctions against any trade partners that impose import restrictions on US goods. Furthermore, tariffs on products from Canada and the EU could increase even more if they attempt to coordinate a response. Overall, investors continue to worry that new trade barriers will prompt retaliatory measures, particularly from China, the Eurozone, and Japan. Any retaliation is likely to escalate the trade conflict and prompt another reaction from the US. Experts at Goldman Sachs and other investment banks warn that this will lead to rising inflation and unemployment. They also caution that it could effectively halt economic growth in the US.   XAUUSD 1-Hour Chart   The Weakness In The US Dollar Another factor which is allowing the price of XAUUSD to increase in value is the US Dollar which has been unable to maintain any bullish momentum. Despite last week’s Core PCE Price Index rising to its highest level since February 2024, the US Dollar has been unable to see any significant rise in value. Due to the US Dollar and Gold's inverse correlation, the price of Gold is benefiting from the Dollar weakness. Investors worry that new trade barriers will prompt retaliatory measures from China, the Eurozone, and Japan, potentially escalating the conflict. Experts at The Goldman Sachs Group Inc. believe that such actions by the US administration will drive rising inflation and unemployment while effectively halting economic growth in the country. Can Gold Maintain Momentum? When it comes to technical analysis, the price of Gold is not trading at a price where oscillators are indicating the instrument is overbought. The Relative Strength Index currently trades at 68.88, outside of the overbought area, since Gold’s price fell 0.65% during this morning’s session. However, even with this decline, the price still remains 0.40% higher than the day’s open price. In terms of fundamental analysis, there continues to be plenty of factors indicating the price could continue to rise. However, the price movement of the week will also partially depend on the employment data from the US. The US is due to release the JOLTS Job Vacancies for February this afternoon, the ADP Non-Farm Employment Change tomorrow, and the NFP Change and Unemployment Rate on Friday. If all data reads higher than expectations, investors may look to sell to lock in profits at the high price. Key Takeaway Points: Gold’s Rally Continues – Up 17% in 2025 as investors seek safety from inflation, recession fears, and trade tensions. Trade War Impact – New US tariffs and potential retaliation from China, the EU, and Japan drive uncertainty, boosting Gold demand. Weak US Dollar – The Dollar’s struggle supports Gold’s rise due to their inverse correlation. Gold’s Outlook – Uptrend may continue, but US jobs data could trigger profit-taking. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date: 31st March 2025.   Trump Confirms Tariffs on All Countries, Sending Stocks Lower.   The NASDAQ continues to trade lower due to the US confirming the latest tariffs will be on all countries. In addition to this, bearish volatility also is largely due to the higher inflation data from Friday. The NASDAQ declines to its lowest price since September 11th 2024. Core PCE Price Index - Inflation Increases Again! The PCE Price Index read 2.5% aligning with expert forecasts not triggering any alarm bells. However, the Core PCE Price Index rose from 0.3% to 0.4% MoM and from 2.7% to 2.8% YoY, signalling growing inflationary pressure. This increases the likelihood that the Federal Reserve will maintain elevated interest rates for an extended period. The NASDAQ fell 2.60% due to the higher inflation reading which is known to pressure the stock market due to pressure on consumer demand and a more hawkish Federal Reserve. Boston Fed President Susan Collins recently commented that tariffs could drive up inflation, though the long-term impact remains uncertain. She told journalists that a short-term spike is the most probable outcome but believes the current pause in monetary policy adjustments is appropriate given the prevailing uncertainties. Although, certain investment banks such as JP Morgan actually believe the Federal Reserve will be forced into cutting rates. This is due to expectations that the economy will struggle under the new trade policy. For example, JP Morgan expects the Federal Reserve to delay rate cuts but will quickly cut towards the end of 2025. Market Risk Appetite Takes a Hit! A big factor for the day is the drop in the risk appetite of investors. This can be seen from the VIX which is up almost 6%, Gold which is trading 1.30% higher and the Japanese Yen which is the day’s best performing currency. Most safe haven assets, bar the US Dollar, increase in value. It is also worth noting that all indices are decreasing in value during this morning's Asian session with the Nikkei225 and NASDAQ witnessing the strongest decline. Previously the stock market rose in value as investors heard rumours that tariffs would only be on certain countries. This bullish swing occurred between March 14th and 25th. Over the weekend, President Donald Trump indicated that the upcoming tariffs would apply to all countries, not just those with the largest trade imbalances with the US. NASDAQ - Technical Analysis In terms of technical analysis, the NASDAQ continues to obtain indications that sellers control the price action. The price opens on a bearish price gap measuring 0.30% and trades below all Moving Averages on all timeframes. The NASDAQ also trades below the VWAP and almost 100% of the most influential components (stocks) are declining in value.     The next significant support level is at $18,313, and the resistance level stands at $20,367.95. Key Takeaway Points: NASDAQ falls to its lowest since September 2024 as the US confirms tariffs on all countries, adding to inflation concerns. Core PCE inflation rises to 0.4% MoM and 2.8% YoY, increasing the likelihood of prolonged high interest rates. Investor risk appetite drops as VIX jumps 6%, gold gains 1.3%, and safe-haven assets outperform. NASDAQ shows strong bearish momentum, trading below key technical levels with support at $18,313 and resistance at $20,367.95. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • PM Philip Morris stock, top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?PM
    • EXC Exelon stock, nice range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?EXC
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.