Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

PeterBrazel

MA Slope

Recommended Posts

I am trying to either get hold of code or code myself an MA indicator that changes color depending on the slope of the MA. Say maybe blue for up trending red for downtrending and yellow for flat. I have adjusted the code of an MA to give two colors depending on the plot being > or < than the prior but I am a little stumped on working out exactly how I could achieve the slope measurement that I require.

 

I have had a bit of a look around and cannot locate where this has been done before. I would have thought someone would have posted one somewhere as the codies out there are very good at this sort of stuff, unlike me. But step by step I guess.

 

Any ideas?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[LegacyColorValue = false];

 

{*************************Peter's MA Slope Indicator*********************************

 

This indicator seeks to plot color changes on an MA indicator according to the slope

of an MA.

 

*************************************************************************************}

 

inputs:

Price( Close ),

Length( 9 ),

Displace( 0 ),

colourDeltaBar(1),

UpColor(blue),

DnColor(red),

NColor(yellow);

 

variables:

var0( 0 ) ;

 

 

 

Value1 = AverageFC( Price, Length ) ;

 

Plot1(Value1, "MA Neutral");

 

{***********Color change criteria*************** }

if (Value1 > Value1[2]) then

SetPlotColor[colourDeltaBar](1, upColor)

else if (Value1 < Value1[2]) then

SetPlotColor[colourDeltaBar](1, dnColor);

 

 

if Displace <= 0 then

begin

condition1 = Price crosses over var0 ;

if condition1 then

Alert( "Price crossing over average" )

else

begin

condition1 = Price crosses under var0 ;

if condition1 then

Alert( "Price crossing under average" ) ;

end ;

end;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The above code is a work in progress and currently changes color ONLY dependent on the MA being either > or < the prior close. I would like to change this to make it dependent on the slope of the MA [input].

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

how would you like to define the slope?

 

 

how do you perceive the color change?

 

can you post a mock up?

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An upward sloping MA indicates an uptrend condition.

A downward sloping MA indicates a downtrend condition.

A flat MA indicates an area of congestion.

 

I think the condition that changes the color would have to be one of percentages, that is unless an angle can be defined.

 

Having trouble with attachment. Will include in seperate post.

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't have to re-invent the wheel. This was done a few years ago and I think you'll find it on the old woodiescciclub.com site or their forum. It allowed you to choose over what number of bars you want to define the angle and the degrees of the angle for alerts etc was also chooseable (if there is such a word).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tams,

 

Good grief man...are you a maths guru. I will have to digest this. I am sure you understand what I am trying to do here.

 

Unfortunately I cannot log onto TS at the moment as I keep getting a Com file not initialized at the log in prompt so I cannot show you on a chart what I want to happen. I also cannot access anything from the TS forum. I can log on but as soon as I do a search it throws me back out to the support page. Not sure what the hell is going on there.

 

I think if I can just program a variable for the color change and then just adjust that variable until I get the visual I desire that should do the trick although maybe it is not that simple.

 

Seems as though I will not have access to me charting until I can contact TS support.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is grade 12 mathematics.

 

No, it does not have to be complicated.

 

and NO, I do not know what you are trying to do here. I cannot read your mind.

 

That's why it is important to post a mock up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tams,

 

No offence intended on my part. My education did not extend to year twelve so my knowledge of mathematics is admittedly quite limited. I certainly appreciate your help.

 

Sorry I cannot post a mock up at this point in time as I am unable to access my charts because of a TS login issue. I will do so as soon as I can.

 

In the meantime I am just trying to achieve an indicator that changes color based on its slope and that the extent of the slope that initiates the color change is triggered by a user input variable such as a percent increase or decrease.

 

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tams,

 

I also cannot access anything from the TS forum. I can log on but as soon as I do a search it throws me back out to the support page. Not sure what the hell is going on there.

 

 

Peter, are you using Firefox or another browser other than Internet Explorer? I use Firefox but I found IE worked for the search. Hope it helps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was trying to do something similar like:

 

Gradient[0]=d[0]/x

Gradient[1]=d[1]/x

 

where d[0] = close difference between the current bar and the previous bar.

where d[1] = close difference between the previous bar and two bars ago.

x is time so is always a constant.

 

So if time is a constant then all that matters is to compare d[0] and d[1].

 

If the MA is going up : MA>MA[1]

If d[0]>d[1] then MA is rising faster. If d[0]<d[1] then MA is rising slower.

If the MA is going down: MA<MA[-1]

If d[0]<d[1] then MA is falling faster. If d[0]>d[1] then MA is falling slower.

 

Now, in order for it to change color based on gradient of the slope then I thought to use GradientColor. You can define the minimum value as zero.The only problem is how do you define the MAXIMUM difference of the MA? Will it be 2 points? Will it be 200 points? It depends on the symbol price, compare Google with EURUSD. So you could write:

 

diff=MA-MA[1]  //difference ie. d[0] above

If MA > MA[1] then    //uptrend
MAColor=GradientColor(diff,0,xxxxxxx,Blue, Green);  //where green is steep gradient. It will turn back to blue as the MA slows down.

If BB_Macd < BB_Macd[1] then   //downtrend
MAColor=GradientColor(diff,-xxxxxxx,0,Magenta, Red);  //where magenta is steep gradient. It will turn back to red as the MA slows down.
SetPlotColor(1,MAColor);

 

The problem is how do you define xxxxxxx or the maximum difference?? I thought of using a ratio between d[0] and d[1] and using that but at that point my head was full and decided to put it on the backburner for now.

 

Any comments?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...Sorry I cannot post a mock up at this point in time as I am unable to access my charts because of a TS login issue. I will do so as soon as I can...

 

 

You don't need TradeStation to make a mock up.

Just use the Window's built-in Paint program;

You can whip up something quite quickly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Attached is a mock up but is very basic.

 

I was travelling all day yesterday.

 

Thanks for the help logging into TS Forum that is fixed workiong on TS fix.

 

I will check out the code above to see what I can achieve with it as soon as I get TS working.

 

Thank you everybody thus far with assistance.

Untitled.jpg.10c20d31e90c2780e13ce3049f06e595.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Attached is a mock up but is very basic.

I was travelling all day yesterday.

Thanks for the help logging into TS Forum that is fixed workiong on TS fix.

I will check out the code above to see what I can achieve with it as soon as I get TS working.

Thank you everybody thus far with assistance.

 

 

 

Isn't this what your code (post#3) is doing ?

 

Can you explain the difference?

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No my initial code changes color only from blue to red depending on the value of the prior plot in relation to the current plot.

 

The outcome of what I want to achieve is very very basic.

 

If the indicator is sloping up and price is above it then it should plot blue [upcolor]. If it is sloping down and price is below it it should plot red [dncolor].

 

If the indicator is flat and or prices are closing either side of it and or on it then plot the indicator yellow [ncolor].

 

Thanks,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No my initial code changes color only from blue to red depending on the value of the prior plot in relation to the current plot.

 

The outcome of what I want to achieve is very very basic.

 

If the indicator is sloping up and price is above it then it should plot blue [upcolor]. If it is sloping down and price is below it it should plot red [dncolor].

 

If the indicator is flat and or prices are closing either side of it and or on it then plot the indicator yellow [ncolor].

 

Thanks,

 

 

Finally... a good description of what you want !

 

now re-write that in the following manner:

 

-- write out one thought at a time,

-- write out ONE action at a time,

-- break down complex actions into multiple small actions,

-- write out one action per sentence,

-- write out one sentence per line...

 

you should have your indicator in pseudo code by the end of this exercise !

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.