Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

PeterBrazel

MA Slope

Recommended Posts

I am trying to either get hold of code or code myself an MA indicator that changes color depending on the slope of the MA. Say maybe blue for up trending red for downtrending and yellow for flat. I have adjusted the code of an MA to give two colors depending on the plot being > or < than the prior but I am a little stumped on working out exactly how I could achieve the slope measurement that I require.

 

I have had a bit of a look around and cannot locate where this has been done before. I would have thought someone would have posted one somewhere as the codies out there are very good at this sort of stuff, unlike me. But step by step I guess.

 

Any ideas?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[LegacyColorValue = false];

 

{*************************Peter's MA Slope Indicator*********************************

 

This indicator seeks to plot color changes on an MA indicator according to the slope

of an MA.

 

*************************************************************************************}

 

inputs:

Price( Close ),

Length( 9 ),

Displace( 0 ),

colourDeltaBar(1),

UpColor(blue),

DnColor(red),

NColor(yellow);

 

variables:

var0( 0 ) ;

 

 

 

Value1 = AverageFC( Price, Length ) ;

 

Plot1(Value1, "MA Neutral");

 

{***********Color change criteria*************** }

if (Value1 > Value1[2]) then

SetPlotColor[colourDeltaBar](1, upColor)

else if (Value1 < Value1[2]) then

SetPlotColor[colourDeltaBar](1, dnColor);

 

 

if Displace <= 0 then

begin

condition1 = Price crosses over var0 ;

if condition1 then

Alert( "Price crossing over average" )

else

begin

condition1 = Price crosses under var0 ;

if condition1 then

Alert( "Price crossing under average" ) ;

end ;

end;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The above code is a work in progress and currently changes color ONLY dependent on the MA being either > or < the prior close. I would like to change this to make it dependent on the slope of the MA [input].

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

how would you like to define the slope?

 

 

how do you perceive the color change?

 

can you post a mock up?

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An upward sloping MA indicates an uptrend condition.

A downward sloping MA indicates a downtrend condition.

A flat MA indicates an area of congestion.

 

I think the condition that changes the color would have to be one of percentages, that is unless an angle can be defined.

 

Having trouble with attachment. Will include in seperate post.

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't have to re-invent the wheel. This was done a few years ago and I think you'll find it on the old woodiescciclub.com site or their forum. It allowed you to choose over what number of bars you want to define the angle and the degrees of the angle for alerts etc was also chooseable (if there is such a word).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tams,

 

Good grief man...are you a maths guru. I will have to digest this. I am sure you understand what I am trying to do here.

 

Unfortunately I cannot log onto TS at the moment as I keep getting a Com file not initialized at the log in prompt so I cannot show you on a chart what I want to happen. I also cannot access anything from the TS forum. I can log on but as soon as I do a search it throws me back out to the support page. Not sure what the hell is going on there.

 

I think if I can just program a variable for the color change and then just adjust that variable until I get the visual I desire that should do the trick although maybe it is not that simple.

 

Seems as though I will not have access to me charting until I can contact TS support.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is grade 12 mathematics.

 

No, it does not have to be complicated.

 

and NO, I do not know what you are trying to do here. I cannot read your mind.

 

That's why it is important to post a mock up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tams,

 

No offence intended on my part. My education did not extend to year twelve so my knowledge of mathematics is admittedly quite limited. I certainly appreciate your help.

 

Sorry I cannot post a mock up at this point in time as I am unable to access my charts because of a TS login issue. I will do so as soon as I can.

 

In the meantime I am just trying to achieve an indicator that changes color based on its slope and that the extent of the slope that initiates the color change is triggered by a user input variable such as a percent increase or decrease.

 

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  PeterBrazel said:
Tams,

 

I also cannot access anything from the TS forum. I can log on but as soon as I do a search it throws me back out to the support page. Not sure what the hell is going on there.

 

 

Peter, are you using Firefox or another browser other than Internet Explorer? I use Firefox but I found IE worked for the search. Hope it helps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was trying to do something similar like:

 

Gradient[0]=d[0]/x

Gradient[1]=d[1]/x

 

where d[0] = close difference between the current bar and the previous bar.

where d[1] = close difference between the previous bar and two bars ago.

x is time so is always a constant.

 

So if time is a constant then all that matters is to compare d[0] and d[1].

 

If the MA is going up : MA>MA[1]

If d[0]>d[1] then MA is rising faster. If d[0]<d[1] then MA is rising slower.

If the MA is going down: MA<MA[-1]

If d[0]<d[1] then MA is falling faster. If d[0]>d[1] then MA is falling slower.

 

Now, in order for it to change color based on gradient of the slope then I thought to use GradientColor. You can define the minimum value as zero.The only problem is how do you define the MAXIMUM difference of the MA? Will it be 2 points? Will it be 200 points? It depends on the symbol price, compare Google with EURUSD. So you could write:

 

diff=MA-MA[1]  //difference ie. d[0] above

If MA > MA[1] then    //uptrend
MAColor=GradientColor(diff,0,xxxxxxx,Blue, Green);  //where green is steep gradient. It will turn back to blue as the MA slows down.

If BB_Macd < BB_Macd[1] then   //downtrend
MAColor=GradientColor(diff,-xxxxxxx,0,Magenta, Red);  //where magenta is steep gradient. It will turn back to red as the MA slows down.
SetPlotColor(1,MAColor);

 

The problem is how do you define xxxxxxx or the maximum difference?? I thought of using a ratio between d[0] and d[1] and using that but at that point my head was full and decided to put it on the backburner for now.

 

Any comments?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  PeterBrazel said:
...Sorry I cannot post a mock up at this point in time as I am unable to access my charts because of a TS login issue. I will do so as soon as I can...

 

 

You don't need TradeStation to make a mock up.

Just use the Window's built-in Paint program;

You can whip up something quite quickly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Attached is a mock up but is very basic.

 

I was travelling all day yesterday.

 

Thanks for the help logging into TS Forum that is fixed workiong on TS fix.

 

I will check out the code above to see what I can achieve with it as soon as I get TS working.

 

Thank you everybody thus far with assistance.

Untitled.jpg.10c20d31e90c2780e13ce3049f06e595.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  PeterBrazel said:
Attached is a mock up but is very basic.

I was travelling all day yesterday.

Thanks for the help logging into TS Forum that is fixed workiong on TS fix.

I will check out the code above to see what I can achieve with it as soon as I get TS working.

Thank you everybody thus far with assistance.

 

 

 

Isn't this what your code (post#3) is doing ?

 

Can you explain the difference?

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No my initial code changes color only from blue to red depending on the value of the prior plot in relation to the current plot.

 

The outcome of what I want to achieve is very very basic.

 

If the indicator is sloping up and price is above it then it should plot blue [upcolor]. If it is sloping down and price is below it it should plot red [dncolor].

 

If the indicator is flat and or prices are closing either side of it and or on it then plot the indicator yellow [ncolor].

 

Thanks,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  PeterBrazel said:
No my initial code changes color only from blue to red depending on the value of the prior plot in relation to the current plot.

 

The outcome of what I want to achieve is very very basic.

 

If the indicator is sloping up and price is above it then it should plot blue [upcolor]. If it is sloping down and price is below it it should plot red [dncolor].

 

If the indicator is flat and or prices are closing either side of it and or on it then plot the indicator yellow [ncolor].

 

Thanks,

 

 

Finally... a good description of what you want !

 

now re-write that in the following manner:

 

-- write out one thought at a time,

-- write out ONE action at a time,

-- break down complex actions into multiple small actions,

-- write out one action per sentence,

-- write out one sentence per line...

 

you should have your indicator in pseudo code by the end of this exercise !

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.