Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

simterann22

Klinger-Goslin ATR Indicator

Recommended Posts

Here is a 'squeeze-like' indicator I converted from some very good code. Trend39 from the TS forums converted the Klinger and Goslin together adding an ATR factor to it.

 

Here are the links to the originals:

 

http://www.tradestation.com/Discussions/Topic.aspx?Topic_ID=26841

http://www.tradestation.com/Discussions/Topic.aspx?Topic_ID=26605

http://www.tradestation.com/Discussions/Topic.aspx?Topic_ID=37624

 

 


[LegacyColorValue = true]; 

{_KlingerVolume Function}


{KlingerOsc}
value1 = KVO_rd(34, 55);
value2 = Summation(value1, 1);

if 1 <= 1 then begin
_KlingerVol = value1; end
else _KlingerVol = value2;  

 


{KVO Function}

Inputs: 
  FastX(Numeric), 
  SlowX(Numeric); 
Vars: 
  FXAvg(0), 
  SXAvg(0);

FXAvg = XAverage(VForce_rd, FastX);
SXAvg = XAverage(VForce_rd, SlowX);  {Samll change made to Vforce_rd to make volume smaller)}
KVO_rd = (FXAvg - SXAvg);  

 


{V-Force Function}

Vars: TSum(0), Trend(0), DM(0), CM(0); 
TSum = High + Low + Close; 
DM = High - low;

IF TSum > TSum[1] Then
Trend = 1
Else
Trend = -1;

IF Trend = Trend[1] Then
CM = CM + Range
Else
CM = Range + Range[1];
IF CM <> 0 Then
VForce_rd = Volume * AbsValue(2 * (DM/CM) -1) * Trend * 0.01;   {0.01 works great too; original version had * 100.   
Made smaller to decrease the plotted size of volume}

 

 


[LegacyColorValue = true]; 
{Volume Flow Indicator + Klinger Volume Indicator + ATR Summation

Trend39 compiled into one indicator

Simterann22 made changes below:Zeroline turns red when Klinger is below trigger line and green when above trigger line.
Klinger Histogram shows volume increasing or decreasing}

Inputs:
ATRLength(21),
Trigger(13),
SmoothATR(1),
Smooth(5),
UpVolColor(green),
UpVolColor2(darkGreen),
DnVolColor(red),
DnVolColor2(darkRed);

value1= summationif(close > open,truerange,ATRlength);
value2=summationif(close < open,truerange,ATRlength);
value3= value1-value2; {Sum}
value4 = average(value3,SmoothATR)*.5;


value5= Average((_KlingerVol+ Value4)*1/2,Smooth);
plot1(0,"Zero line");
plot98(0,"Zero Line BG");//Aesthetic
plot2(value5,"Klinger+ATR");
plot3 (average(value5,Trigger),"Trigger");

//Histogram

If Plot2>0 and Plot2>Plot2[1] then
setplotcolor(2,UpVolColor);
If Plot2<0 and Plot2>Plot2[1] then
setplotcolor(2,DnVolColor2);
If Plot2<0 and Plot2<PLot2[1] then
setplotcolor(2,DnVolColor);
If Plot2>0 and Plot2<PLot2[1] then
setplotcolor(2,UpVolColor2);


//ZeroLine

If plot2>plot3 then
begin
setplotcolor(1,UpVolColor);
setplotcolor(98,UpVolColor2);//aesthetic only: must plot thicker and darker color than plot1
end;
If plot2<plot3 then
begin
setplotcolor(1,DnVolColor);
setplotcolor(98,DnVolColor2);//aesthetic only: must plot thicker and darker color than plot1
end;

5aa70ef482718_Klinger-GoslinATR.thumb.jpg.bb894d594bceab4cc85c134aeaadd0d2.jpg

@SK_KLINGER GOSLIN ATR.ELD

TradeStation Forum - Klinger Oscillator.pdf

TradeStation Forum -KLINGER VOLUME.pdf

Edited by simterann22

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Do you have this code for Esignal or Amibroker?

 

 

This is a mutual relationship.

You can start by sharing your Amibroker indicators...

and this would encourage others to do the same.

note: when I say "sharing", I don't mean copying indicators from the Amibroker site.

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great indicator!!....just loaded it & found that a input setting of (8,13, 1, 5) was a little fatser in the turns of 116tk(=1min) charts for daytrading the NQ/ES, in backtesting, fyi, imo. Great look on the ta!! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Awesome. I'm happy you're testing these guys out and even happier you're sharing your results. I'm still essentially a newbie trader so although I can see the potential in indicators I often do not know how to really tweak them. Thanks :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awesome. I'm happy you're testing these guys out and even happier you're sharing your results. I'm still essentially a newbie trader so although I can see the potential in indicators I often do not know how to really tweak them. Thanks :)

 

yes..... is relative easy to test them out. What I do is take the original, like this one, then make a copy chart of my trading chart (116tk), one can use any chart you use as an entry chart of any time or tick frame....then backest it over a day or three, of trading by advancing one bar at a time & see how my trades & entries stack up with the new indicator. If is mirrors or is betta than what I do, I leave it alone. If it lags a bit, the I tweek with the input values & make 2-5 charts of the same chart, with each one a different input setting, then advance thru a time in the day I made trades & see which one see's it faster in the turns!!!!....the slow ones I delete, then keep the fast ones. Then will then make more charts of the fast inputs & make slight variations to them either side of the good input values....the one that is the quickest in the turns is the winner!!

 

I usually keep all my input values in Fibonacci vlues (3,5,8,13,21,34, 55,etc) & work with these first. Then if it is close to the fastest one, will then go a half a Fib distance between Fib #'s on either side of it to find THE fastest one in the turns....this to keep the Fib Universal ratio in tact.....generally find that either a whole or half Fib number value/combination works the best every time for any indicator!! My whole system is Fib # based & one of the reasons is so effective for me.....all inputs are Fib #'s & all charts are fib #'s too in time/tick frames.

 

So, try that in backtesting....takes times, like hours of backtesting for just one indicator, but as in all things, nothing good is easy & takes time to get it right. Hope that helps.... :)

 

ajax

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I could not get this indicator to verify in tradestation or multicharts. I have been unable to figure out what the problem is. Could smeone give me a hand?

 

thanks

 

This would be difficult for anyone to help you if you don't give a description of what the issue is. At least the error message you get and the steps you have followed would be needed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Use this. Go to File/new/window/easy lang/indicator and then past this.

 

{ Klinger+ATR Bollinger Band

Source: tradestation.com/Discussions/Topic.aspx?Topic_ID=5 9409&PAGE=3?? }

Inputs:

ATRLength(10),

Trigger(13),

UpColor(green),

DwnColor(magenta),

BandColor(Blue),

SmoothATR(1),

Smooth(1),

 

LengthBB( 20 ),

NumDevsUp( 2 ),

NumDevsDn( -2 ),

Displace( 0 ) ;

 

variables:

PriceBB(0),

Avg( 0 ),

SDev( 0 ),

LowerBand( 0 ),

UpperBand( 0 ) ;

 

PriceBB = (Average((_KlingerVol+ Value4)*1/2,Smooth));

 

Avg = AverageFC( PriceBB, LengthBB ) ;

SDev = StandardDev( PriceBB, LengthBB, 1 ) ;

UpperBand = Avg + NumDevsUp * SDev ;

LowerBand = Avg + NumDevsDn * SDev ;

 

value1= summationif(close > open,truerange,ATRlength);

value2= summationif(close < open,truerange,ATRlength);

value3= value1-value2; {Sum}

value4= average(value3,SmoothATR)*.5;

value5= Average((_KlingerVol+ Value4)*1/2,Smooth);

 

If Displace >= 0 or CurrentBar > AbsValue( Displace ) then

begin

 

 

plot1(value5,"Klinger+ATR");

plot2 (0, "Zero Line");

Plot3[Displace]( LowerBand, "LowerBand", BandColor ) ;

Plot4[Displace]( UpperBand, "UpperBand", BandColor ) ;

Plot5[Displace]( Avg, "MidLine" ) ; end;

 

If Plot1>Plot1[1] then begin

plot1[1](Plot1[1],"Klinger+ATR",upcolor);

plot1(Plot1,"Klinger+ATR",upcolor);

end else begin

 

If plot1<plot1[1]then begin

plot1[1](Plot1[1],"Klinger+ATR",dwncolor);

plot1(Plot1,"Klinger+ATR",dwncolor);

end; end;

 

If plot1>Plot2 then begin

plot2[1](plot2[1],"Zero Line",GREEN);

plot2(plot2,"Zero Line",Green);

end else begin

if plot1<plot2 then begin

plot2[1](plot2[1],"Zero Line",red);

plot2(plot2,"Zero Line",red); end; end;

This was poster by a really nice doctor.

I could use some help converting a long strategy from this into a short strategy. It is awesome.

 

Trade with the trend

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.