Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

Hi Folks,

 

Well, I was right in that the short side looked better. In fact, it was the long side that triggered and immediately reversed to take out a -40 but the short triggered and hit the +100 PT1. Took the second 50% off just now at 1.6377 as price has triggered a long ("dance with the one that brung ya', and go home with her to," as my old Texas trading buddy always told me).

 

Final result for a night of sleep = -40 (100%) + 100(50%) + 91(50%) = -40 + (191/2) = -40 + 95.5 = +55.5 ticks.

 

The potential long was enough to take me out, but I did not outright reverse. There will be other opportunities later today.

 

I'll be back closer to the NY open.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

It looke like you have put on a BRACKET trade.

when you do somethinig like that, do you put the entry of the short below the STp of the long and the entry of the long above the STP of the short by a few pips or it is a STOP and REVERSE where size of the orders cancel the previous trade which means you have to decide wht will trigger first.

 

Thanks

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BTW, with FXCM, I don't see what all the fuss is about. Right now, the tightest spread (EU) is 2.5 ticks!! I don't think I've even seen a spread of less than 2 ticks since I've opened it. Maybe it's just because of news today...

 

I know this is rather random, but since I made this discovery I figured I'd might as well correct myself on here...

 

The spreads I was referring to were with an FXCM standard (demo) account. The FXCM micro spreads are much better...I didn't realize there was a difference but there is.

 

-Cory

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FDAX Long triggered, maybe with a smaller degree

 

Resistance hit, was smaller degree.

 

Long closed for "free trade".

FDAX-05.png.4f977c8b1b04f057889e1afc113b20b5.png

Edited by Marko23
Chart update

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It looke like you have put on a BRACKET trade.

when you do somethinig like that, do you put the entry of the short below the STp of the long and the entry of the long above the STP of the short by a few pips or it is a STOP and REVERSE where size of the orders cancel the previous trade which means you have to decide wht will trigger first.

 

Thanks

 

Gabe

 

Two separate trades, Gabe, but each is the mirror image of the other Long entry = short stop, and vice versa.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks,

 

I did not trade this as I was away form my desk as it presented itself, but the ending diagonal on the GBPUSD did indeed auger an interuption of the immediate downtrend, and it was followed by a nice long that has hit PT1 and PT2 at 1.6450 is still outstanding.

 

This is what I meant in the prior post when I said that I do not use the ending diagonal patern alone as a reason to trade. I will use it to take profits, and it puts me on notice that I shouldn't walk away from my desk for an extended period or time as an opporunity for profit may be ready to launch.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f7b2cc22_12-07-2009GBPUSDEndingDiagonlthenlong1.thumb.jpg.9dc5e786ed32a97e20b1052dcb4bdac0.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Two separate trades, Gabe, but each is the mirror image of the other Long entry = short stop, and vice versa.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

So there is no slight offset between the long a dn the short-stop or the short and the long-stop.

I cannot do that in Oanda because one will cancell the other.

 

Thanks

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So there is no slight offset between the long a dn the short-stop or the short and the long-stop.

I cannot do that in Oanda because one will cancell the other.

 

Thanks

 

Gabe

 

My spelling is not the best today.

We had a death in the family yesterday and everything is upside down.

Trying to get distracted from one reality using another one.

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My spelling is not the best today.

We had a death in the family yesterday and everything is upside down.

Trying to get distracted from one reality using another one.

 

Gabe

 

 

Gabe, i am so sorry to hear that. Please accept my condolences ... and do take care.

 

And, Thales, i'm glad you're feeling better. Please do let us know the results of those tests. May God keep you and your loved ones in the pink of health.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks,

 

If the GU were to flip to short, this is how it would look. Price stalled at a reasonable resistance level, but the first PT on this little swing is less than the initial risk. So, I would have to be reasonably convinced that price was about to decline to lower lows on the day for me to take this short at this level.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f7b3ad89_12-07-2009GBPUSDAnotherShort1.thumb.jpg.baf049da2da1cb9f33a07a9c041ee5a8.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks,

 

Here is one that also got away from me, but it is a good example of why I am as agressive with my stops as I am - there is always another opportunity. The EJ short that I did take was stopped at break even (you can go back to today's earlier posts and see how that trade unfolded), While away, you can see that the break to new lows was an opportunity for a trade that resulted in 50% at 1R, with a +55-60 tick PT2 depending upon your bookie's spread, etc.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f7b401a9_12-07-2009EJTwoShorts2.thumb.jpg.7201c2ccb1821897a971a5c7c9659476.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
the ending diagonal on the GBPUSD did indeed auger an interuption of the immediate downtrend, and it was followed by a nice long that has hit PT1 and PT2 at 1.6450 is still outstanding.

 

Rather than flip to short, the GU continued to rally and has now filled what would have been a reasonable PT2 at 1.6450.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f7b47e5a_12-07-2009GBPUSDEndingDiagonalThenLong1.thumb.jpg.5b316d88505c827d2bf27f48a1afba8c.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rather than flip to short, the GU continued to rally and has now filled what would have been a reasonable PT2 at 1.6450.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Elliottians would call it "5 up" .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rarely i've seen any pro disclosing his life long experience in an open forum. even they don't disclose the chart tf (forget about setup).

 

Thank you for the kind words. I have not disclosed anything here that hasn't been in the public domain for years, shared by those with names like Livermore, Wyckoff, Schabaker, Darvas, O'Neil, Sperandeo, and I'll even throw Joe Ross in there as well. As I have said many times, I am a remarkably unoriginal trader.

 

For every one person who happens across this thread and tries this approach, a hundred others will pay it but slight attention and move on without ever giving us a second thought. And for every one who does become successful with it, there will be at least a handful or two who tried and gave up, moving on to the next thing.

 

Many more will try to apply it but will try to improve it, and in the process, ruin it. As Robert Prechter once said, "most traders take a good system and destroy it by trying to make it into a perfect system.”

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wasn't going to post these trades in here because I'm not using the 1-2-3 method for break outs, but I thought it was kind of funny that the euro did this to me again. This is only my 2nd trade with the euro, is it always this wild? I thought the other day was an anomaly bc of all the economic data.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=16382&stc=1&d=1260232101

127.thumb.png.a0cf804695f6ecc4cef27adbfdbe40bd.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wasn't going to post these trades in here because I'm not using the 1-2-3 method for break outs, but I thought it was kind of funny that the euro did this to me again. This is only my 2nd trade with the euro, is it always this wild? I thought the other day was an anomaly bc of all the economic data.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=16382&stc=1&d=1260232101

 

Post away man! If you look back there are dozens upon dozens of trades that are not using that hook for an entry.

 

I'm looking forward to some big picture "Jon ES trades myself!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wasn't going to post these trades in here because I'm not using the 1-2-3 method for break outs

 

Post away, Jon! I have said repeatedly that this is a "Reading Charts ..." thread not a "Thales Way or the Highway" thread. There are probably folks here who can't get a handle on what I'm doing but they might see something you post and all of a sudden they'll be on their way.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey everyone,

 

I'm going to be taking a little time off from trading.

 

Since I began working with this approach, I've done better than I ever have. Even though I haven't traded too awfully consistently, I had a solid 50% return my first week of sim trading (the week prior to my first post on this thread), struggled a bit going live the next week, and I'm up 44.5 ticks this week (mostly between Sunday night and Monday morning). I'm not trying to brag or anything like that...I just want to share my experience.

 

I feel like this approach really fits me. I feel like it's what I've been searching for...I feel like I've picked it up pretty well and sort of have a knack for it...

 

Up to this point, all of my "education" concerning this method has been strictly from reading this thread. So at this point in time, I'm going to essentially clear my mind and start from scratch. I'm going to begin the "course" that Thales set out in the following post:

 

If I were to train a new trader, I would do it very much as I taught my daughter. While it wasn't formalized before we started, this is more or less the path we took:

 

I'm looking at it like this - the trading performance and education up to this point with this approach was essentially a test run, and I like the approach and want to move forward with it...and I want to do it right. I want to take 100% full advantage of what I've discovered here, rather than rush into it. So I'm not doing this in spite of my performance, but because of it.

 

I have in my possession all five books mentioned in Thales's post. They're short reads so it won't take too much of my time to go through them, especially if I devote my entire day to it.

 

SO, I'm beginning the Thales "course" tomorrow. I'll begin by reading Nicolas Darvas's How I made 2,000,000 in the Stock Market.

 

Cheers!

 

Hey guys,

 

I'm just chiming in to give an update!

 

Well, I've read Nicolas Darvas's How I made 2,000,000 in the Stock Market & Edwin LeFevre's Reminiscences of a Stock Operator...twice!

 

Excellent reads.

 

That does it for "I. Psychology & Emotions" and now I'm moving on to "II. Reading Price - Theory."

 

So, tomorrow I'll begin by reading Stikky Stock Charts.

 

-Cory

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Post away man! If you look back there are dozens upon dozens of trades that are not using that hook for an entry.

 

I'm looking forward to some big picture "Jon ES trades myself!"

 

Haha thanks man, I'm hoping to get some setups tomorrow on ES. I just started watching the euro (6E).

 

From what I've noticed so far, ES is like the charming, polite, and soft spoken girl you take home to meet your parents. 6E is the spontaneous girl you met in the club who smokes constantly, has a tongue ring and is going to break your heart the first chance she gets. :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.