Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

Here's a trade that I think is similar to what has been posted previously. Blue line is entry, red is stop, green lines are TP1 and TP2. If the trade isn't triggered, a reversal of this (the short of that bar), looks good to me too.

Thales.jpg.5f16923a99a243fa28d9d35f48aababe.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Please, if sombody sees anything that I did wrong in the trades please let me know.

 

Don't you look both ways before you cross the street? When you see nothing but traffic, its best to stay on the sidewalk until it is safe to cross.

 

If you are only going to look at the EURUSD, that is fine. I think focusing on one market is the best way to get a handle on this approach. But you do need to then wait for price to indicate it is ready to move. I also think the 15 minute time frame may be easier to work with initially.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f72e5c60_11-30-2009EUChoppingBlock1.thumb.jpg.4790f7d2b069c228abe13dfbcda9c884.jpg

5aa70f72ebc1c_11-30-2009EJRocket2.thumb.jpg.459cc813844108264f1631c42079ff8e.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just so we do not confuse how I presented it with the way in which some pursue it ...

 

Here is a suggestion (and this isn't just for you, Dinero, but anyone who wants to learn to trade price without using indicators and opinions and conjectures and unsubstantiated and unnecessary theories): Why not take a week, and watch a 15 minute chart of the EURJPY or the EURUSD or the 6J or the 6E, and just focus on what happens if you bought the break up of every low-high-higher low-higher high pivot sequence and sold short every high-low-lower high-lower low pivot sequence.

 

Just mark off the high and low pivots, and make it mechanical if you'd like: Buy stop above a high, with an arbitrary 15 or 20 tick stop loss, and a 30 tick Profit target. Just go ahead and see how you do. Paper trade it - as I stated elsewhere, paper trading is marginally useful, and here is an example of where it can be useful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One last look at the EURUSD and then I am definitely done for the night.

 

Now,let me ask you all (and I would love to wake up to some posted answers as this is not meant to be a strictly rhetorical question): Did it take any special talent or any mystical and magical powers to see that the EURUSD had settled into a tight range of overlapping price movement? Does it take any occult powers or insightful interpretive powers to see the opportunity offered by setting stop entry orders on either side of that range with profit targets at the nest S/R levels?

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f736c063_11-30-2009EURUSDLockedinaBox5.thumb.jpg.53ef238367e6cd5582e213a7683e089e.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Did it take any special talent or any mystical and magical powers to see that the EURUSD had settled into a tight range of overlapping price movement?

 

It would have taken me considerably longer to see it as a range than you have marked above - probably not until 2 bars after the box low. I'm not suggesting that what you marked is when you noticed it, just commenting on when I may have started to consider it was in a tight range.

 

Does it take any occult powers or insightful interpretive powers to see the opportunity offered by setting stop entry orders on either side of that range with profit targets at the nest S/R levels?

 

Yes, I think so. I am interested in knowing why you did not see the same 'opportunity' on GU? It would have yielded a stop out to the upside and probably a small stop out from the downside. I only ask because I know GU is one of your pairs that you are watching and you no doubt have watched it form that pattern tonight except you don't seem interested in the same 'opportunity'.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Edited by MidKnight

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Does it take any occult powers or insightful interpretive powers to see the opportunity offered by setting stop entry orders on either side of that range with profit targets at the nest S/R levels?

 

... and when I opened my 5-minute chart, it had bounced off support so fast I actually jumped in long after what I considered to be a small-scale (pink) HL. I have found drawing in the large-scale (blue) and occasional small-scale (pink) swings a very useful exercise. I really can't thank you enough for inspiring such a simple practice.

5aa70f7378e90_6E12-0912_1_2009(5Min).jpg.c486cdfebac86777da6d76e8c5116976.jpg

Edited by RichardTodd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I ask because you seem to be talking about one style of teaching/learning and its not necessarily completely applicable to trading.

 

I was really just trying to point out that there is a huge chasm between concepts you grasp and skills that you master.

 

I thought most people would remember that driving was awkward and error-prone initially, but quickly mastered via guided practice. No one expects to read a forum thread and then know how to drive a car, but sometimes people expect to read a forum thread and know how to trade. So I thought the example would make it clear.

 

 

Over time, less intellectual and more effective techniques were developed and an important element was less talk and more modeling and shaping. Watch, do, "try pressing down a little with your big toe", wow. Very personal and very effective.

 

I guess I would say "less intellectual and more experience-oriented," if I understand you correctly. It sounds to me like we are in agreement. What in your opinion can be done in this forum to make the process here more effective?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm still new at this...and I have to say I honestly don't see any particaular pattern, other than the H, L, LH pattern that everyone's always looking for...but for some reason I get the impression you might be alluding to something else...something I may not even be familiar with...

 

But if it isn't, and you're just talking about H, L, LH, then that is obviously there...but I feel like that's just too obvious...

 

I haven't taken any trades. I actually just got on here...overslept a bit... :embarassed:[

 

This might well have been answered (Im playing thread catch up) and I might be on the wrong track completely.....but with that caveat take a look at the posts Thales made after the elliot wave document. Many people have described this behaviour in a variety of ways..... whilst price was making hh's it was having a lot more difficulty doing so, the bulls are running out of puff (for the moment).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here you go Cory...some patterns.

 

Im not a great one at drawing but here is an interesting variation where the LL occurs before the LH. This sort of pattern would probably have me looking at a faster chart for entry close to where the LH might be anticipated.

HL_HH_LL.png.e37b3be50aa98bda08bf2f3b2a0f07c0.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Second trade Stoped Out.

 

[ATTACH]16086[/ATTACH]

 

[ATTACH]16087[/ATTACH]

 

Thanks

Don

 

Hi Don, would you have still been in with your management? I guess you would have been short ahead of the break too if you even took the trade? Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One last look at the EURUSD and then I am definitely done for the night.

 

Now,let me ask you all (and I would love to wake up to some posted answers as this is not meant to be a strictly rhetorical question): Did it take any special talent or any mystical and magical powers to see that the EURUSD had settled into a tight range of overlapping price movement? Does it take any occult powers or insightful interpretive powers to see the opportunity offered by setting stop entry orders on either side of that range with profit targets at the nest S/R levels?

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

One of the better things about old JR's work is that he provides some simple 'rules' for spotting range bound markets. One of the ideas he introduces is a 'measuring bar' the first bar of that range was such a bar. Until price can make it out of the confines of that bar it is clearly not making any directional headway. Matching H L or Closes. Alternating closes... all objective ways to say the market is currently sideways and maybe helpful to those that can not just see it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, I think so. I am interested in knowing why you did not see the same 'opportunity' on GU? It would have yielded a stop out to the upside and probably a small stop out from the downside. I only ask because I know GU is one of your pairs that you are watching and you no doubt have watched it form that pattern tonight except you don't seem interested in the same 'opportunity'.

 

You apparently missed this post:

 

Right now we have a buy stop on the GU at 1.6463 and a sell stop at 1.6426.

 

There was no stop out to the upside as price never offered at 1.6463 at FXCM, and according to the Gain data on Ninjatrader, it printed a high at 1.6460. Perhaps some would have been stopped in long at their brokers, but if you are going to trade at a bucket shop, you have to take into account your bucket shop's data and spread, not mine. Also, I use the Ninjatrader charts to illustrate what I am looking at because FXCM's charts are awful. But I set my orders according to the maker of the market we are trading, not Gain. There will at times be differences of as much as 3 ticks between what I post based upon Gain and what I am trading based upon FXCM.

 

There were three trades to the short side. The first two we took, and both were stopped after hitting our BE adjust. I was gone by the time the third trade would have become evident to me, and that would have been a losing effort. But, for the sake of argument, let us call the first and third short trades losses. Let us say each was hit for a full stop of -20 and -25. So there were three trades, all short, for a net loss of -45 ticks.

 

The next opportunity would be the long on the other side of the prior range. That trade hit both PTs for +70 on hald and +100 on the other half for a net of +85 ticks.

 

So, had you watched just this one market taking the opportunities as they appeared on the 15 minute chart, you would have made 4 trades (which is a lot for the time period covered), with 2 losses, 1 break even, and one winning trade. Let's count the break even trade as a loss, and say you had only a 25% win rate yesterday. You still came out with a net of +40 ticks.

 

Now, Midk, I do not know why you are coming across with such a bitterness. I feel I have made every effort to help you.

 

The one suggestion I have made to everyone trying to learn to apply this approach is that they pick one of market, follow it for one week on a fifteen minute chart, and paper trade it. From your posts, I can only assume that you have not taken this suggestion.

 

You are being more than a little unfair to me. You have tried to do what I do your way. It hasn't worked for you. If you wish to be fair, why not try to do what I do my way, at least for a week. Unless and until you do, your negative attitude is unjustified.

 

You are free to trade anyway in which you wish. I continue to hold this thread open to other approaches, including variations of mine. But if you are going to do things differently, you cannot in fairness then turn around and say that my way is somehow to blame.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f73b53d0_11-30-2009GUinarange1.thumb.jpg.484d1c195c8f547f2a47129007b6d801.jpg

5aa70f73bb4a1_11-30-2009GUinarange2.thumb.jpg.2bbe0dc7beed91a044d56f4b6f01a539.jpg

Edited by thalestrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Thales,

 

My first post around here.

I've read the first 60 pages of the thread (planning to read the rest on the following days).

 

Since yesterday I actually started looking at the current posts regarding present price action to get a real-time feeling of the strategy presented.

I have a question regarding post 2044 (maybe this was covered on the posts I skipped earlier). When do you actually decide to move your stops to BE and not use the original "natural stop"?

 

Thanks for your feedback!

 

Best wishes,

Leandro

 

PS: Thank you for all the effort dedicated to the thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am interested in knowing why you did not see the same 'opportunity' on GU? ... I only ask because I know GU is one of your pairs that you are watching and you no doubt have watched it form that pattern tonight except you don't seem interested in the same 'opportunity'.

 

 

I turned in late last night, and I saw this on the EJ before shutting down. I set a sell stop at 130.84 with a 40 tick PT, and I set a buy stop at 131.30 with a 40 tick PT. I have attached a chart and the PnL in ticks from that trade. I was asleep when it triggered, I was asleep whent the PT was filled. Were there other opportunities during that time? You bet. I cannot catch them all, and I certainly cannot post them all. (As a side note, I was going to post this last night, and I drew in the PTs in the manner I did because I was going to illustrate how I select PT's based on prior S/R. I did not end up posting this chart last night because I allowed myself to get distracted by Don's post of his losing 5 minute EU trades).

 

The short triggered and hit +40, the long did not trigger.

 

I do not post every trade I make here. And I do not trade every opportunity that presents itself if two or more show up simultaneously.

 

I was showing the EU last night in response to Don's posts. Don, like you, does things differently. That is fine. But doing it differently while passing it off as the same in what seems at times as an attempt to discredit the approach is disingenuous.

 

Last night, I saw one potential trade on the 15 minute EU during the time that Don was trading for two losses on the 5 minute. The trade I saw was a long. It did not hit the full stop, though it would have been a losing effort (I never said that there would be no losing trades). It gave ample opportunity to cut it lose for a negligible loss.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f73df06e_11-30-2009EJOvernightShort1.thumb.jpg.edb24db5ed0806bb2d3b324353ec5f95.jpg

5aa70f73e1a8c_11-30-2009EJOvernightShort2.jpg.ad84791926659a778b6c0898cdb17b44.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.