Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

The analogy I use when I'm teaching people goes like this ...

 

Perhaps one of the most valuable posts I've read if one accepts the truth contained within, not least of which is this:

 

People cannot be fully spoon-fed skills.

 

It takes practice, practice, practice.

 

A wonderful post, Richard. Thank you.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You will short circuit your progress and short change yourself by continually looking for short cuts.

 

A summary of Plato written anonymously on a publically edited and editable web site is hardly a substitute for reading Plato for yourself.

 

 

My girlfriends grandmother learnt Russian to read war and peace "as it should be read" (to quote her).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For the record, my daughter was never under any threat of punishment, and she was free to give up at any time if she had found the activity boring, uninteresting, or burdensome in any way.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

I wonder whether having implicit trust is something to do with it? I think one of the reasons people have difficulty with trading (in general) is that whilst they acknowledge certain 'truths' they don't completely and unconditionally accept them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wonder whether having implicit trust is something to do with it? I think one of the reasons people have difficulty with trading (in general) is that whilst they acknowledge certain 'truths' they don't completely and unconditionally accept them.

 

I think that is true, and as you and I have both said early on, and others have more recently offered, she did not have a brainful of baggage to contend with as most of us do by the time we get to a place such as this.

 

And of course, another factor in her favor is that she was all about the ticks won vs. lost, and not concerned with making money or losing money. Not too long ago, MidK posted about his struggles and wondered about our weekly PnL. I thought after that that it does more harm and no good to post PnL figures in dollar terms, so any PnL I may mention going forward will be strictly in terms of ticks(pips) won/lost, and not dollar terms. After all, the focus should be on capturing more pips of price movement than one loses. The money will follow.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My girlfriends grandmother learnt Russian to read war and peace "as it should be read" (to quote her).

 

There is much to be said for reading an author in his or her own language, though I do believe a careful and sensitive translator can convey the author's intent (I'm one of those old fashioned folks who think that a writer's intended meaning can be accessible to the reader, even across time and culture). At the same time, a careless translator, or worse, a translator with a certain ideological agenda, can destroy a text beyond recognition in the process of translating. If one were to read Jowett's Republic, and then the Allen Bloom translation, one might find come away feeling that one or the other got something wrong given the differences. By the way, I'd argue that Bloom got it right.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Richard,

 

What were/are you teaching?

 

I ask because you seem to be talking about one style of teaching/learning and its not necessarily completely applicable to trading.

 

Years back I learned to ski. And over time I improved my skiing and like many applied the 1-2 lesson per year approach. Like traders, skiers arrived at instructors with their own baggage (the pain of large crashes, broken bones, the impact of previous styles of skiing and teaching).

 

When we started the Austrians held sway and teaching was as you described. Over time we went through french, american, and even zen influences. Over time, less intellectual and more effective techniques were developed and an important element was less talk and more modeling and shaping. Watch, do, "try pressing down a little with your big toe", wow. Very personal and very effective.

 

 

Discretionary trading is not unlike skiing. Good days truly flow down a slope of unending opportunity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I............... I thought after that that it does more harm and no good to post PnL figures in dollar terms, so any PnL I may mention going forward will be strictly in terms of ticks(pips) won/lost, and not dollar terms................

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

I wonder if that is because your daughters account is larger than yours now :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A good start for the week.

44 pips on EJ with 1 unit only.

Reason was - potential closing of the gap which happens many times on Sunday.

For the rest of the week I will trade/annotate the EJ only as per the system of this thread.

 

Gabe

EJ_Nov_29_2009_15min.thumb.png.1e91cbdd4d3b2289b7137c3371c7f219.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And of course, another factor in her favor is that she was all about the ticks won vs. lost, and not concerned with making money or losing money. Not too long ago, MidK posted about his struggles and wondered about our weekly PnL. I thought after that that it does more harm and no good to post PnL figures in dollar terms, so any PnL I may mention going forward will be strictly in terms of ticks(pips) won/lost, and not dollar terms. After all, the focus should be on capturing more pips of price movement than one loses. The money will follow.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Hi,

 

I don't recall this exactly, but whatever....I think I've always posted any results from this exploration in average pips per trade (accounting for partial exits over the entire position). I may have commented on the Thales Family Trading Co % gains, but not dollars.

 

Anyways, it is with regret that I posted my struggles here and should have known better than to do so in public on the Internet. The exploration has been somewhat beneficial though, so maybe a case of no pain, no gain.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Was the Russian version the first one she read?

 

Gabe

 

She (my GF) believes that she (her Grandmother) first read it in German or possibly Rumanian but had a smattering of Russian already.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
it is with regret that I posted my struggles here and should have known better than to do so in public on the Internet

 

I don't understand the REGRET part.

No one knows who you are.

You were honest with yourself and that is what counts.

I don't know if you were around when I wiped out 1/3 of my account and I was hesitant to post that fact.

But I did.

I told myself that that is the honest thing to do.

For myself and for the rest of the people that saw me gain day after day only to give it back and then some.

 

I am sure that deep inside you feel better. Especcially after Thales commented on your trades (hopefully that was of some benefit)

 

Don't leave us because I will be left alone to call a spade a spade :)

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

......Anyways, it is with regret that I posted my struggles here...

 

I'm sorry to hear that, I am not quite sure why you would feel that. I got something from your posts if that is any consolation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anyways, it is with regret that I posted my struggles here

 

I am sorry to hear that, MidK. It certainly has not been my intent to cause anyone regret, and if you feel I have been picking on you, I apologize. You were kind enough to offer us a most honest and comprehensive view of what you were experiencing, and thus I perhaps over used your example.

 

I hope we don't lose you, but I understand your feelings and I appreciate your contributions here.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
She (my GF) believes that she (her Grandmother) first read it in German or possibly Rumanian but had a smattering of Russian already.

 

I thought so.

My father was 1st violin in a phylharmonic orchestra back in the country that I was born in.

When I was a child I really disliked classical music. Especially violin.

I thought it sounded harsh.

I prefered Elvis, The Shadows, Deep Purple and the likes - music which my father called BANGA BANGA because of the rhythm.

So one day I called him to listen to a guitar section of Highway Star.

I thought that my father will ridicule me again but he said that he is really impressed because the motive is classical.

Then Beethoven's 40th came out as Joy To the World and became a big hit and some others.

I LOVE classical music today. and eventhough it represnts only about 15% of my CD collection if I would have to take 10 cd to a deserted island, probably more than half would be classical and sound tracks (which in my case fall into the same category)

 

The point I am trying to make is that sometimes the way to the original is through the backdoor and thinking that the fake, the immitation, the proccessed version has not relevance is a mistake.

 

Be it music, litrature, furniture or other art forms.

 

If I cannot afford Dali in my house should I not hang a poster of a Dali or Rembrandt, or Escher just because they are not originals?

Should I look down on someone because they like a second class form of expression?

 

Gabe

 

So here is that famous piece :)

Highway Star.mp3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Could you post some losing trades? Thanks, Don

 

We'll give it a try ...

 

GU with a sell stop at 1.6469, go to break even at 1.6436, with PT's at 1.6420 and 1.6369;

 

or

 

GU with a buy stop at 1.6507, go to break even at 1.6526, with PT's at 1.6557 and 1.6607

 

This thing is really rattling around.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f705c813_11-29-2009GUAsiaShort1.thumb.jpg.fe3e63d31620cbb78317b00e9052e99c.jpg

5aa70f7061be7_11-29-2009GUAsiaLong1.thumb.jpg.9fd4b0426a91ababf588a042adfe93f2.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GU with a buy stop at 1.6507, go to break even at 1.6526, with PT's at 1.6557 and 1.6607

 

The Gain data through Ninjatrader shows a 1.6525 high on that little pop, but our broker shows a high of 1.65262, so we are going to break even on this trade.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f706775b_11-29-2009GUAsiaLongBreakeven1.thumb.jpg.7b00e3613b0b2952e483d394b77bc7c7.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... awaiting the next opportunity.

 

Hi folks,

 

My daughter and I were saying good night to her little brother and we missed the entry on this opportunity.

 

Buy stop 1.6528, go to break even at 1.6557, PT1 1.6590, PT2 1.6645.

 

We're in, but not at 1.6528. We bought at market 1.65429. It happens.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f706f176_11-29-2009GUAsiaLongLateentry1.thumb.jpg.7a56fbad9fd9dd053352dae039ce1402.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A break even effort, and awaiting the next opportunity.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

I took this trade!

 

I handled it kinda funny, though...

 

I'm trading the 6B...My initial buy stop was @ 1.6513, with a S/L of 1.6470, with a PT of 1.6554...

 

Pulled out for BE (actually an average of 0.5 ticks of profit)..

 

BTW, got slipped 2 ticks on my entry...geez... EDIT: It was actually 1.5 ticks.

 

THEN, I actually placed a buy stop at 1.6534 (the "high", ie where Thales got BE, was 1.6530 on my chart), so a print of 1.6534 would mean a significant breakout of the high...

 

Then I got filled, put my S/L at 1.6513 (what would have been BE on my original trade), and my PT at the original 1.6554 (about a 1:1 R/R situation).

 

Got profit...ended up with 20.5 ticks of profit between both of the trades.

 

I guess I could have put my second trade buy stop @ 1.6531, but I picked 34 just because it was right in the middle between my original entry of 13 and my original PT of 54.

 

I normally wouldn't handle a trade this way but it seemed reasonable in the moment, and turned out well.

 

-Cory

 

EDIT: It would have probably been more prudent to take the trade Thales just mentioned, rather than doing what I did. Oh well...I think I was a little distracted because I was thinking about the trade I was just in, rather than looking for the next opportunity. Even though it worked just fine this time, and I think my handling of it was all right, I need to forget old trades and move on to new opportunities...

Edited by Cory2679

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I handled it kinda funny, though... It would have probably been more prudent to take the trade Thales just mentioned, rather than doing what I did. Oh well...I think I was a little distracted because I was thinking about the trade I was just in, rather than looking for the next opportunity. Even though it worked just fine this time, and I think my handling of it was all right, I need to forget old trades and move on to new opportunities...

 

Here is how we managed our missed entry. As I said, we bought at market and the fill was 1.65429. We then added twice as price moved in our favor. We now have three positions with an average buy of 1.65494, with a stop on each at 1.6560. We have PT1 limits on the two "first-in" positions at 1.6590, with a limit on the third position at 1.6645.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f7071b45_11-29-2009GUAsiaLongLateentry2.jpg.e204126de4f71bf7dcc641a86b6435f7.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone on here that trades currency futures generally trade the Tokyo session with them?

 

This is my first time tonight, and it seems like overall, the volume, spreads, and slippage (all related, of course) are much less favorable.

 

That's not just based on my experience tonight...I've scrolled back through charts with volume plotted and Tokyo is substantially lower...London tooks all right and defintiely the first half of the NY session...

 

Not to mention, tonight seems like a relatively high volume night compared to some other Tokyo sessions...I could be mistaken though, I didn't do THAT much research.

 

Thanks,

Cory

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.