Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

...............................

 

EDIT: 0125 EST, filled on the short USD/CAD, canceled the EJ long.

 

EDIT: 0138 EST, exited the USD/CAD for -4 pips (even though the chart annotation says -3, the fill report turns out to say -4)

5aa70f62e55bf_MK05_19_Nov_2009.thumb.png.ea9cfbabb0ebfd8dc0a75f308096382f.png

5aa70f62e92cf_MK06_19_Nov_2009.png.9ee477006a61bfcaf02f5448ebdb485c.png

Edited by MidKnight

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am not trading this, and I will soon be turning in for the night, but here is a case were price would have nicked me into the trade and immediately rewarded me with a resounding stall. This is a case where I'd bring my stop up to -2,-3,-4 ticks or so. If stopped out, I would re-enter a tick above the new high.

 

I have mentioned Mike Reed in other threads here at TL. One thing I learned from Mike is that every trade starts as a scalp. You can always re-enter if price confirms the trades direction. But honestly, every time I enter, I expect price to move quickly and decisively in my favor. Failure to do so often spells trouble. Entry was a buy stop at 1.4930, with a 1.4915 stop loss. Why sit there and hold for a possible -15 tick loss? Cut it at -4, and and set a buy stop for at 1.4932 to get back in. Be ruthless in the protection of yourself.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

 

An excellent post Thales.

 

This is very much an example matching the right entries and exits in a system. I am almost the opposite. First I never ever use breakeven stops and second I wait a long time before moving them.

 

I think this is caused because 1. my entries can be very good but benefit by being allowed to be wrong a bit because I'm picking the trend right but sometimes getting into a retracement too early and, 2. my style of entry doesn't have a really logical "I got stopped out but here's where I get back in" point.

 

I think your approach may be easier to trade ... and it illustrates the need to match ones exits to ones entries when building a strategy. Get either side wrong and an unpleasant experience awaits the :newbie:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Folks,

 

I saw this opportunity on the EURJPY unfolding, but I didn't trade it, and I didn't take a screen shot 'til now.

 

Might I ask if you had been around earlier (with the usual caveats about hindsight) would you have considered a short on a break down of bars 1 2 or 3? Would you have considered a long on a break up of bar 3 ? Thanks as always.

thales.thumb.png.4cd30def527d77a85c2af07c650024d9.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'd like to just dart back to the trade mgmt immediately after the entry is triggered for a moment. A few days ago, Gabe's stops seemed to come up for discussion in that they appeared to be at non-logical levels. Gabe could confirm it for us, but it probably wasn't his stops we were seeing but instead just his exit. In retrospect, Gabe was probably doing what Thales has been talking about here. Taking a small loss and re-entering. Sound about right Gabe?

 

 

I am not sure which trades of mine you are refering to but I still suffer from PMC (Pre Mature Closing) of my trades when the trade goes in my favour)

I was experimenting with closing trades at 1/2 the distance to the nearest swing point instead of waiting to be stopped out at that swing point.

The logic behind this is that at a bar boundry, price in the lower time-frame will cross the boundry of the higher boundry more than once (except in strong moves). So if I take only half the loss, I can go at it twice and be at the same monetary position as if I took the bigger loss.

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Might I ask if you had been around earlier (with the usual caveats about hindsight) would you have considered a short on a break down of bars 1 2 or 3? Would you have considered a long on a break up of bar 3 ? Thanks as always.

 

As Thales is still sleeping I'll take a stab at it :)

I think that the answer is NO because the low of bar 2 did not go below the low of bar 1

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As Thales is still sleeping I'll take a stab at it :)

I think that the answer is NO because the low of bar 2 did not go below the low of bar 1

 

Gabe

 

Yes indeed Gabe. I probably didn't express myself well. What I meant is would TT have considered placing stop entry orders under those bars (which would not have triggered).

 

1 would not have triggered - but was it a potential trade?

2 would trigger on bar 3

3 would trigger on bar 4.

 

Where either of those (2&3) up for consideration? I would have probably considered 3 long too but that did not trigger either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Are you referring to this sequence of discussion?

 

 

 

 

 

 

15402d1258469838-reading-charts-real-time-wtf.jpg

 

The picture I marked up is above.

 

Looking back on it, I wonder? Initially him getting taken out when he did seemed like it didn't make sense to me.

 

But based on this, does it look like after entry price moved enough INITIALLY to want to stay in the trade?

 

Thales brings up a good point. Some trades just fill you and immediately fall on it's face, w/o moving in the direction at all. I haven't trained my eye to recognize this obviously.

 

 

I explained the 1st exit in post #1455.

The second exit was because I was very tired and went to sleep but did not want to hold the position while sleeping.

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes indeed Gabe. I probably didn't express myself well. What I meant is would TT have considered placing stop entry orders under those bars (which would not have triggered).

 

1 would not have triggered - but was it a potential trade?

2 would trigger on bar 3

3 would trigger on bar 4.

 

Where either of those (2&3) up for consideration? I would have probably considered 3 long too but that did not trigger either.

 

 

Bar 2 did not make an L and bar 3 did not make an LH so the conditions were not right for a short.

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.......................

 

 

EDIT: 0552 EST, I probably have the jitters now with the freedom to take a tiny loss. Exited the trade already as it broke 1 tick above to fill me and then retraced back 1/2 way to the stop. Exited for -8. Can't seem to get anything working tonight, probably because I'm fighting this entire move....

5aa70f630c2c9_MK07_19_Nov_2009.png.399257ee2604c59f158fa2dce6af79af.png

5aa70f6311dbe_MK08_19_Nov_2009.png.a471315d6327b8826b6592f6773aa288.png

Edited by MidKnight

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Might I ask if you had been around earlier (with the usual caveats about hindsight) would you have considered a short on a break down of bars 1 2 or 3? Would you have considered a long on a break up of bar 3 ? Thanks as always.

 

Hi Blowfish,

 

I have placed notes on my chart that I hope answer your questions.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f6317b7c_AnswersforBlowfish1.thumb.jpg.c033cc6b7a7b37dc68970f0933ea9752.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Can't seem to get anything working tonight, probably because I'm fighting this entire move....

 

How soon we forget ...

 

Get a demo account, and from now on, every time you fade a trend on a trend day, take a trade with the trend in your demo account. I'll bet that 9/10 times, at the end of the day, you'd gladly trade your real PnL for the demo PnL.

 

The easiest money you will ever make will be resisting the urge to fade the strong move and instead just keep buying new highs and selling new lows.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
.......................

 

 

EDIT: 0552 EST, I probably have the jitters now with the freedom to take a tiny loss. Exited the trade already as it broke 1 tick above to fill me and then retraced back 1/2 way to the stop. Exited for -8. Can't seem to get anything working tonight, probably because I'm fighting this entire move....

 

Maybe you shouldn't try to pick bottoms or tops. Initiate trades with the trend and assume a continuation...just my opinion. I'm saying this because i can't tell when a top or bottom has been reached, so i look for opportunities in the direction of the trend. This is another thing i like about this approach - you don't predict, you let the market do what its going to do - if it moves in your favor, then so be it. Also, i want to see price action that i can understand and is directionally inclined.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks,

 

Current look at the EURJPY - could be an ending diagonal. Ending diagonals do not indicate anything other than that the trend of which it is a part is momentarily losing momentum, and may be coming to an end. In my experience, when an ending diagonal results in a continuation of the trend rather than an end, the move is usually large and subject to continues trending.

 

I do not typically trade the pattern's trendline breaks. I wait for the breaks and then look for my entry.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f631d46e_11-19-2009EURJPYEndingDiagonal1.thumb.jpg.4e43776faa26f3b779a774e2eab51c85.jpg

Edited by thalestrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes indeed Gabe. I probably didn't express myself well. What I meant is would TT have considered placing stop entry orders under those bars (which would not have triggered).

 

1 would not have triggered - but was it a potential trade?

2 would trigger on bar 3

3 would trigger on bar 4.

 

Where either of those (2&3) up for consideration? I would have probably considered 3 long too but that did not trigger either.

 

I don't want to ruffle feathers here nor upset anyone, but to me, bars are irrelevant. Dbphoenix and others are always saying this... Price is moving, you trade the movements...This approach could be done using a line chart, but the range of price is important. I just want to keep things simple. I just have a feeling that a lot of focus has been on individual bars lately. Sure, i'm just a beginner (and what do i know, right?), but the theory is sound.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Current EURUSD

 

If it goes long I'd be looking for +25 and +65 ... if it goes and goes nowhere, I pull the rip cord quickly.

 

If it goes short, I'd be looking at +30 and +70 ... rip cord clause applies.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f632e38a_11-19-2009EURUSD9.thumb.jpg.c05c20cff28815095eea6bf0a840e617.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't want to ruffle feathers here nor upset anyone, but to me, bars are irrelevant. Dbphoenix and others are always saying this... Price is moving, you trade the movements...This approach could be done using a line chart, but the range of price is important. I just want to keep things simple. I just have a feeling that a lot of focus has been on individual bars lately. Sure, i'm just a beginner (and what do i know, right?), but the theory is sound.

 

I've been wanting to say this for a while and for whatever reason I haven't gotten around to it. John is absolutely 100% correct. Bars are irrelevant. A bar is just an arbitrarily selected way to "bundle" price movement.

 

Some here have noted that I sometimes come in "tight," i.e. use few bars to identify an opportunity. Gabe said the other day that he thought you needed at least a certain number of bars before an opportunity presents itself.

 

Watch price move. Trade. Repeat.

 

Look at the chart of the EURJPY in my reply to Blowfish in post #1462. Look at what I say about the bar I label with a "4". What matters is not how many bars price took to get somewhere, what matters is how has price moved. Period.

 

Some have said I seem to have a secret and unknowable way of managing my trades and cutting my losses. I assure you I do not. It is the same thing over and over. I have a good trading friend who always says "Dance with the one that brung ya, and leave with her too.'" What he means is that if you are going to get into a trade because price does xyz, then if it does the same thing but in the opposite direction, get out!

 

If a H-L-LH gets you short, then if price declines and prints a L-H-HL, well, it is time to pull the rip cord, and possibly time to reverse entirely.

 

One of the reasons I do not like mentioning Ross Hook's and Trader Vic 123's is that both understandings tend to place the trader's focus on bars, rather than price levels.

 

John says you can trade this with a line chart. I'll go one farther - when I am trading currency futures, and I am not distracted by other tasks (such as posting on TL) I am watching the DOM only. The chart is always there if I need to check to see if I missed anything, but other wise I just watch where price goes, stops, reverses, etc. In other words, not only do you not need bars to trade this way, you do not need a chart. You just need to see where price is and where it has been in some form or the other.

 

Excellent post John. If the post of the month were still in effect, I'd nominate your post. Anyone struggling with what we are doing here would be well served to print your post and put it in his or her journal.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Edited by thalestrader
spelling, typos

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If it goes long I'd be looking for +25 and +65 ... if it goes and goes nowhere, I pull the rip cord quickly.

 

If it goes short, I'd be looking at +30 and +70 ... rip cord clause applies.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Long at 81, rip cord level will be a 72 print (possibly higher if this thing double tops). At any rate, a -9 or so should be about the worst case.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f63335c4_11-19-2009EURUSD10.thumb.jpg.9b0790482ef3fc20c074a4f611d9e3fd.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

EUR is a bit indecisive as to what kind of day it is going to have. It is waffling against the USD but, checking back in to our potenital ending diagonal, it is trying to gain strength against the JPY. It is likely not going to make up its mind until US equity markets open and give the marching orders for the day.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f634792e_11-19-2009EURJPYendingdiagonal2.thumb.jpg.8ebdab1f09da58465a3439a8c25e915e.jpg

Edited by thalestrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
94 is the level at which I'd go to BE on my stop. It printed 93, so my finger is on the close position button with a hard stop still at 72.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

It gave me every opportunity to take it off at BE or even a +2 or so, but against what proved to be better judgment, I let it clip me for -9. However, initial disaster stop choices were -27 or -38. -9 is much easier to make up than a loss 3 to 4 times as large, wouldn't you say?

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thales,

 

I'm fairly new to this forum. I've been lurking for a little while but haven't made any posts, but I'm gonna start with a question...

 

I took the same EURUSD trade you did (albeit 6E), but I saw it a little differently. I'm watching the 15 min and 13 range charts, and I took the trade off the range chart...

 

1zeqep.jpg

 

I only trade 1 contract so I only have 1 PT.

 

The way I saw it was that price had obviously bounced off the support, then took another attempt and failed, so then I was looking to go long.

 

I was just curious if you consider my execution as a suitable way to handle the move, or if you disagree and why.

 

I've been studing the approach for a couple weeks and began sim trading it this week, and so far I've pretty much approached setups the same way you have, except this one, hence the question.

 

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.