Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

I think it looks ok. I can see a bit of potential support it may be digging into based on a wider angle. Out of curiosity, has your outlook changed based on the picture I am posting? This is the picture of the E/J, I am reposting.

 

What do you think about the G/U for a long as I have on this picture.... if it puts in a HL. This is the 2nd picture.

 

----EDIT------

Added another picture, with better looking lines. I entered this trade prematurely for sure. But just throwing it up there.

 

P1 hit with a really good fill somehow :cool:

 

Catastrophe Stop on 2nd half below most recent swing low on 5 minute(1.6799).. Going to manage the 2nd half differently. I plan to manage the remaining half on the 5min chart and exit when I get a break after/if a LH appears, the opposite of the entry trigger.

 

 

----EDIT(23:05)-----

Stop at BE on 2nd half, since going through P1.

16Nov2009_GU1.jpg.841b4e97238cbe05b84a8a63fa504ef2.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
P1 hit with a really good fill somehow :cool:

 

Catastrophe Stop on 2nd half below most recent swing low on 5 minute(1.6799).. Going to manage the 2nd half differently. I plan to manage the remaining half on the 5min chart and exit when I get a break after/if a LH appears, the opposite of the entry trigger.

 

 

----EDIT(23:05)-----

Stop at BE on 2nd half, since going through P1.

 

Once again P2 being stopped at BE. :confused:

 

This lack of follow through on what seems to be everyone of my P2's is just killing me:) I either have poor P2 selection or just bad management. This is really making my R:R profile go to $#it

16Nov2009_GU2.jpg.c0f0053385aae877e4e2df3ff79a62ed.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Forrest,

 

I hear ya on that. Part of the problem may be the general market condition. But I don't know exactly. Time of day has an effect in FX for sure, but I cannot come up with any consistent rule on it. Sometimes the biggest moves start in Asia or the Asia/Europe overlap, but usually it does not. I guess it all comes down to what catalysts are driving the market. In my cursory study over the past year of intraday data on a couple pairs, recently, many of the large day moves are happening in USA session keying off news release. I have no solution or idea how to exactly use this information as I'm sure it will change soon enough. Maybe give up sleep?? :\

 

On the subject of R/R. I've been commenting about it quite a bit recently, especially how I'm unable to get even a consistent 1R result on my winners. But, I just realized that the notion of what is at risk with Thales Family Trading Co. techniques is not really the initial stop. Yes, sure, it is at risk at the beginning, but I don't think I've seen him take a full stop out yet. Just yesterday on a short EJ trade he commented about one pattern for aggressively moving to BE. I'd be surprised if his average loser is even 0.5R. Maybe when considering the R/R stats, it would be better to take it from your average loser. If nothing else, it will at least make the numbers look better :thumbs up:

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Gabe,

 

I didn't make that clear. The USA session is consistently more volatile intraday (one bar to the next and even intrabar) than any other session, especially compared with the Asia session.

 

With kind regards,

MK

 

I dunno in my 'gut' I would have to say it was the London session both provide opportunity so it's all good I guess :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Let's see if we can determine the source of the struggle and frustration. Let me ask you (and this is for MidK, Forrest, and anyone else who cares to answer) what do you think of the long GBPUSD trade I posted this morning? Forget about the fact that it was a winning trade. If you were watching, did you see it as I did? Would you have taken it if you had seen it? Why or why not?

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

 

I don't much like it. The 'immediate' trend is down and though there is S down here it seems to have broke through the first levels without much effort. The biggest issue is that there was not a '123' to trade off. Having said that neither was there at the top so on the plus side it would not be unreasonable to anticipate at least a (tradeable) retracement or test of the high.

5aa70f5e37f11_11-16-2009GBPUSDRecap6.thumb.jpg.ad71a9cffdbe9beb57339a0245164b59.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BlowFish,

 

I believe Thales would see that as a 1-2-3 in the making with 1 and 2 complete and anticipating the current bar or the next few to put in the 3. I shouldn't speak for him, but that is how I understand the chart.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes indeed MK. It all depends on how much you zoom in your focus. I notice that Thales looks in quite 'tight' sometimes with BO entry and stop all within the last two bars.

 

Btw I empathise with the points you made in your post yesterday except the last one (about money management).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For the record.

 

You'll recall a few pictures of my peewee system in action. Well its been performing quite well so today I doubled my size ... and guess what ... a record 4 losing trades in a row!!!

 

So, hopefully tomorrow, normalcy will return.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Closed my GU short for another loss. This time 18 pips.

Also closed my UC long for a 3 pip loss.

Total losses for today 81 pips.

:(

 

Gabe

 

And here is UC as I found it this morning.

About 100 pips higher.

So I picked the direction correctly but still lost $$$.

 

I looked at my initial entry with the profit target and the stop loss.

It seems that I did not give the trade enough breathing room.

 

Gabe

UC_Nov_16_2009_15min-2.thumb.png.e969e29cec3bebb61ececd5a0c1e79e8.png

UC_Nov_16_2009_5min-3.thumb.png.01f4529efb3cf196a08cdc769d3d93c2.png

UC_Nov_16_2009_1H-4.thumb.png.0786b54d1c69388e696e4fa25e862ddf.png

UC_Nov_16_2009_15min.thumb.png.a8ef4102bc41915bc7cacdc2cbf5c0f2.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks,

 

Lots of good posts, good quesyions, good observations. I am going to spend some time trying to come up with a better way to communicate what I do with you folks here on this thread.

 

I had an idea flicker a bit last night when I was preparing an initial response to MIdK's list. I will have to work on it.

 

In the mean time, two things: First, here is the current GBPUSD. This is not ideal, because I do see potential support just below what would be a break down point for me. However, the overall presentation of price leads me to at least lean toward this short being a potentially good trade. A quick break and reversal would also not surprise me.

 

As for the EURJPY, I am running a short of time this morning, but the potential long trade I posted last night busted itself up prior to the long trigger. Another long presented itself, though it was for such a small play it may not have been worth while. I went to bed immediately after posting that chart, and I didn't like it enough to do as my daughter does, which is place the order and go to bed.

 

Have a good day, I'll try to check in this evening, but I may be gone for a couple of days.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f5e6068c_11-16-2009GBPUSD6.thumb.jpg.137e05489829efa2a65d4a7279d6a10b.jpg

5aa70f5e66d7c_11-16-2009EURJPY6.thumb.jpg.ff171250f1fd06c9bd7081b3ab254448.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On the subject of R/R. I've been commenting about it quite a bit recently, especially how I'm unable to get even a consistent 1R result on my winners. But, I just realized that the notion of what is at risk with Thales Family Trading Co. techniques is not really the initial stop. Yes, sure, it is at risk at the beginning, but I don't think I've seen him take a full stop out yet. Just yesterday on a short EJ trade he commented about one pattern for aggressively moving to BE. I'd be surprised if his average loser is even 0.5R. Maybe when considering the R/R stats, it would be better to take it from your average loser. If nothing else, it will at least make the numbers look better

 

I do not have time to go back and find the posts now, but many times (and recently, I might add), I have stated the following:

 

1) The only time an initial stop should be hit for a full loss is when I am stopped into a position, and price immediately races against me, and it crosses the stop line quicker than I can hit the flatten button; or I place an entry order, with OCO stop and limits, and the trade occurs while I am alsleep or occupied with other business.

 

2) I always have an initial stop loss, at least one profit target at 1R +/-, and a price level at which I will move the initial stop to BE.

 

Also, I cannot think of anyone whom I know personally, who trades successfully and who does not have a money management regimen that cuts losers small and quick while allowing for average profits larger than the average loss. An edge does not assure profitability. A sound edge can be dulled by money management unsuitable for the nature of the edge. Two different traders can trade the same exact approach (system) and one will be profitable beyond all expectation while the other churns and burns him- or herself to trading death.

 

I may not have explained the nuances of what I do as well as I could hope, but I will try to solve for that over the coming days. But I do believe I have been very clear on the way I trade futures (and now spot). I have also said many times that you should not confuse my money management and stop management on my stock trades to my futures trades, as my approach differs from one to another.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi JohnJohn,

 

Yes, I have a journal. A few of my posts are my thoughts after reading through the journal entries. With regards to EJ, S/R is not a single price like you are describing it, but more like a zone, in my view. I would still consider EJ to be at support, but that is just my outlook.

 

With kind regards,

MK

 

True, s/r is a zone, but the bottom of that consolidation area broke down and then became the top of that congestion area. I normally draw a single line in the area that i find best represents the zone of s/r - i find it easier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And here is UC as I found it this morning.

About 100 pips higher.

So I picked the direction correctly but still lost $$$.

 

I looked at my initial entry with the profit target and the stop loss.

It seems that I did not give the trade enough breathing room.

 

Gabe

 

If the play was long it looks like an outright losing trade eventually. As price made that big swing low before moving up, which would have taken most of us out.

 

Your stops don't seem logical. It seems like you're not using any type of swing point or anything, and just throwing up stops in the middle of nowhere? Am i right or is there a rhyme or reason I'm not seeing?

Edited by forrestang

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And here is UC as I found it this morning.

About 100 pips higher.

So I picked the direction correctly but still lost $$$.

 

I looked at my initial entry with the profit target and the stop loss.

It seems that I did not give the trade enough breathing room.

 

Gabe

 

Here is a picture illustrating what I was saying.

wtf.thumb.jpg.bb7ead4e31cf241bf0df013f23bb71e9.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to dissect that EUR/USD movement a little. On the 1 minute it has made a double bottom pattern with the second bottom coming down from short-term support provided by the congestion area before the first bottom occurred. A possible entry could be at the top of this congestion area for a long. Or a short below the main support level.

range2.thumb.jpg.4fd1484a23895dcdf024abb7932cf3c5.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here is a picture illustrating what I was saying.

 

You are right about the point I was taken out.

I did not wait for the swing point because i was tired and went to sleep, so I closed the trade for a small loss.

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In the mean time, two things: First, here is the current GBPUSD. This is not ideal, because I do see potential support just below what would be a break down point for me. However, the overall presentation of price leads me to at least lean toward this short being a potentially good trade. A quick break and reversal would also not surprise me.

 

Hi Folks,

 

I just came home for lunch, and here is a pic of the GBPUSD I snapped on my way out the door this morning, and the action subsequent to the pic.

 

You may recall a post or two from last week where I showed a price pattern that in Elliot Wave terms is known as an ending diagonal. Funny how this pattern seems to show up at the end of moves. No "wave counting," no "revising a wave count." This is not about using EW to predict and forecast. It is using parts of the theory to recognize and to prepare for probabilities.

 

If you were short the GBPUSD on the break down, and you recognized the ending diagonal, you would have been prepared to cover your short for -7 ticks, while simultaneously entering a long position for two targets +15 and +25, both of which were hit. Net for the two trades would have been +8 and +18. This compared to sitting through a -37 tick loss on a whole position watching price rally through the short's initial stop.

 

See you later tonight.

 

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f5eaeed3_11-17-2009GBPUSDEndingDiagonal1.thumb.jpg.fef5a89953e7593d44c7f4dfd096d0e8.jpg

5aa70f5eb4a45_11-17-2009GBPUSDEndingDiagonal2.thumb.jpg.c16a24a95504efa8feacdd4727a2ca47.jpg

5aa70f5f12265_11-17-2009GBPUSDEndingDiagonal3.thumb.jpg.0374bde8115e51fc43a2b435af8c6e82.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And here is UC as I found it this morning.

About 100 pips higher.

So I picked the direction correctly but still lost $$$.

 

I looked at my initial entry with the profit target and the stop loss.

It seems that I did not give the trade enough breathing room.

 

Gabe

 

 

A quick one for Gabe:

 

Gabe, the swing off of which you were trading was tiny and within a larger chop zone. You could trade it, but for tiny targets. Had I traded that swing, both of my targets would have been well within the chop zone, and one would have been hit, the second half taken out at breakeven. I also show a short in progress at the right hand edge.

 

Here are a couple of charts looking at a larger swing, with an entry point taken at the break of the upper chop zone. Size your targets to the size of the swings prior to entry - it takes a lot of energy to move a pair 100 ticks quickly, so taking a leap off of such a tiny swing in the middle of the chop, you really need to ask for and expect much less from the market than 100 ticks.

 

I have to run, so that is the best I can do as far as notes for now.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f5f1b75e_11-17-2009USDCAD3.thumb.jpg.3e63a6b8c77dff14de8cc6893589b6f9.jpg

5aa70f5f20e8b_11-17-2009USDCAD4.thumb.jpg.49aefcaf5a58112edf40f7c0ccbc948a.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Size your targets to the size of the swings prior to entry

 

The correlation between swing size and trade planning was a big breakthrough moment for me a while ago. I could see swing sizes but I didn't necessarily translate that to the trade management. Still working on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.