Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

Just thought that it would be easier if the annotation would be on the chart.

I hope you don't mind.

 

BTW Shouldn't #2 be SHORT trades and #3 LONG trades?

 

Gabe

 

Thanks very much, Gabe! Emm, about #3 being a long trade ... beats me :confused: It looked like a B/O of the low at #2?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to suggest that we use a common system of annotating charts.

SOLID RED would indicate a short.

Dashed RED = Stop Loss (SL) for a short entry

SOLID GREEN would indicate LONG

Dashed GREEN = Stop Loss (SL) for a long entry

BLUE = Profit Target

 

If some one has some other suggestions, please put them forward.

 

Gabe

5aa70f51d8ef0_EJPotentialtrades.thumb.png.a4680c9d67aedb4fe2959f604093eaa9.png

Edited by Gabe2004

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It Ain't Over, Till it's Over.

 

It does not look good..

 

Did I do something wrong?

Was the Supportline the entry point was at, the problem?

 

It could still work out in my favour but i am not so confident.

 

Gabe

 

Had enough. Took a hit.

EJ_Nov_9_2009_15min-2.thumb.png.2c9e2757ef1a2684f6afb23e7569975b.png

EJ_Nov_9_2009_15min-3.thumb.png.005d0e8fb0add781b399f3df1e8c33ab.png

Edited by Gabe2004

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

New trade on GU.

So far so good.

1st target hit (+34 pips).

Moved my stop to BE +4 pips and entered a Limit Close on 1/3 at half the distance between the low anf the entry point.

 

Gabe

 

Couldn't take the heat and Futures started to move up.

Closed the other 2/3 for 21 pips gain (total in this trade 76 pips)

 

Gabe

 

Do I feel crappy now :(

GU_Nov_9_2009_15min.thumb.png.7555bb15da375c1b8b1aef58773e5c4d.png

GU_Nov_9_2009_15min-2.thumb.png.40c67153f0255ddc8ced5c881b529d6e.png

GU_Nov_9_2009_15min-3.thumb.png.63b490a46fe09eaedd6d0e5368c08167.png

GU_Nov_9_2009_15min-4.thumb.png.c8cc74c2254623054d6684a4b07c8e4c.png

Edited by Gabe2004

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would like to suggest that we use a common system of annotating charts.

SOLID RED would indicate a short.

Dashed RED = Stop Loss (SL) for a short entry

SOLID GREEN would indicate LONG

Dashed GREEN = Stop Loss (SL) for a long entry

BLUE = Profit Target

 

If some one has some other suggestions, please put them forward.

 

Gabe

 

I typically use solid blue for entry (whether short or long), solid red for stop loss (whether short or long), and green for profit targets. I have several friends with who I share charts, and this has been our convention for years. It is very simple and you know at a glance exactly what is being communicated.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gabe - why did you take the second entry as opposed to (at least what I would consider) the first LH in the series?

 

Cheers!

 

I took it because I missed the 1st one.

As it stands now I left about 50 pips on the table because I chichened out :(

 

Gabe

GU_Nov_9_2009_15min-5.thumb.png.f009633da3c804e186e77eecec5fa7a8.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Had enough. Took a hit.

 

 

Couldn't take the heat and Futures started to move up.

Closed the other 2/3 for 21 pips gain (total in this trade 76 pips)

 

Hi Gabe,

 

Thank you for sharing.

 

So what is your total PnL in ticks/pips between the two trades?

 

It does not look good..

 

Did I do something wrong?

Was the Support line the entry point was at the problem?

 

The short EURJPY was fine, it just didn't move as you anticipated and you took your loss, and thus you move on. Losing trades are not what is going to hurt you. What is going to hurt your results cutting your winners short. If you already had 34 ticks profit in the bank, and a stop loss at BE +4, presumably assuring you of at least another 4 ticks profit on the remaining position, then from where was the "heat" coming? You need the runners to take care of your losers and to feed your family.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Gabe,

 

Thank you for sharing.

 

So what is your total PnL in ticks/pips between the two trades?

 

 

 

The short EURJPY was fine, it just didn't move as you anticipated and you took your loss, and thus you move on. Losing trades are not what is going to hurt you. What is going to hurt your results cutting your winners short. If you already had 34 ticks profit in the bank, and a stop loss at BE +4, presumably assuring you of at least another 4 ticks profit on the remaining position, then from where was the "heat" coming? You need the runners to take care of your losers and to feed your family.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

EJ -39

GU +76

 

Net +37

 

The HEAT was emotional.

On the EJ the best I could do was get out at break even (there were 4 opportunities to do so after my exit at a loss.

On the GU trade, it never hit my 2nd target but in hindsight, I could squeez a few more pips out of the trade.

Had i stuck to the stop loss rules based on the most recent swing point - which was not hit yet - I would still be in the trade with 2/3 of my position.

The problem would have been that 3 and 1/4 hours after my exit and almost 5 hours after my entry the trade is not getting closer to my 2nd profit target but getting away from it, so my thinking is that if my profit target was not hit in such a long period - it will not.

One can argue that if my SL was not hit after such a long time that IT is a valid SL which was placed well.

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thought I would post up my trades from the day. What I need help on is getting my management down solid in some kind of semi-consistent manner. I recognize that some of these timeframes are VERY small in comparison to the 15min examples being shown and thus, the stops/targets reflect that.

 

Rules:

- I'm trying to take entries that allow "room to run" to prior S/R zones and avoiding the entries that are near congestion.

- Taking entries that are at rejection of prior S/R.

- Exiting when/around candles that shows opposing movement or letting strong trends run to prior S/R as targets.

 

Any thoughts / ideas on the entries themselves and more specifically a consistent trade management approach of locking in profits and trailing stops would be greatly appreciated.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=15014&stc=1&d=1257796625

attachment.php?attachmentid=15015&stc=1&d=1257796625

attachment.php?attachmentid=15016&stc=1&d=1257796625

attachment.php?attachmentid=15017&stc=1&d=1257796625

attachment.php?attachmentid=15018&stc=1&d=1257796625

 

Ended up the day:

BP: +2, +25, -9: +18

EC: +5

JY: +6

 

Net: +250.00/per. I'm perfectly content with the overall results, however I feel like I need a bit more consistency in my management approach rather than going purely off of "feel" on some of these exits. I've tried to at the very least let the winners run until there is evidence of potential failure (other color candles) and in those cases allowing trades to run to their predetermined exits at prior S/R. However, one trade (JY - 512T) I felt I kind of had a BS exit, and while there was some backfill I could've gotten more from it had I used a different management technique.

 

Cheers!

pic001.PNG.ce119e5c8b4406512cabce444a4336c6.PNG

pic002.PNG.48e521b63b5b1583f9e6f1c2f1422ac3.PNG

pic003.PNG.36f8c1aa4429ab32bf46c26aa51d67a7.PNG

pic004.PNG.abf979855a7d8c6222a5c3968c801b05.PNG

pic005.PNG.87cff42debcee4ef411175c7fef496bf.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rules:

- I'm trying to take entries that allow "room to run" to prior S/R zones and avoiding the entries that are near congestion.

- Taking entries that are at rejection of prior S/R.

- Exiting when/around candles that shows opposing movement or letting strong trends run to prior S/R as targets.

 

Cheers!

 

What is the time equivalent for the 89/512 tick charts?

 

Thanks

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Comments:

 

Gabe, IMO you must have exit rules in place before the trade takes place. Preferably have some very solid guidelines for all trades. Why? Because cash and the need to be right raise emotional levels and while they distort perception before a trade they distort it far more once in the trade. Unless you are a robot you should determine your rules when you are not affected by fear, greed, or the desire to be right.

 

Later, when one is truly confident in the method then intuition can be permitted because it won't be swamped by emotional responses. Up to you.

 

 

Daedelus,

 

Tick bars on forex are not going to be helpful. First, everyone else here is using time bars so they make comparison difficult. Second, tick on forex is almost as much rubbish as volume on forex - its just what your data provider decides is the tick rate and has no true representation of the "real" forex market. If your data provider is honest then its a representation of his microcosm of the market but you'll probably find that even the "honest" inject ticks at slow time to make the market move - and at any time the ticks are not the real market.

 

I mean, you can choose to use them, but they are not real. And they confuse others.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thoughts on stops:

 

- stops almost always reduce profit simply because they take you out at the worst price (so far) of a swing

- that means that if you are very well controlled the combination of a disaster stop + exit with price improvement after a condition is met may well be best

 

- many markets test one swing but not the second so stops two swings back are recommended by some

- some forex markets seem to stop for the swing, and some overrun it a bit so stops should be adjusted for that

- often swing stops have the worst slippage because everyone's stops are there so sometimes a stop 1 tick inside the swing can be better ... defense of the price still exists ... but you'd have to check how this market and your data/price provider represents thing to find out if thats true.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add to the forex and tick data thing.....a tick in forex is only a bid change and to my knowledge it is not an actual transaction. This is how it used to be 5 years ago. Maybe it has changed somewhat if your feed is from an ecn, I don't know about that though. I'd steer clear of tick charts on FX personally.

 

Currently eur/usd and eur/jpy are at significant resistance. Can it break? They both traveled up into the R area like a bat out of hell. I'm keeping my eyes open for 'obvious' shorts, but also want to keep my mind open to the idea that it may break higher.

5aa70f529fe6b_MK01_10_Nov_2009.thumb.png.b2d498218b63c6ad79237d32895605a7.png

5aa70f52b0dc6_MK02_10_Nov_2009.thumb.png.b40c8c893a17da5bc09e3ff3f48ecb70.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Daedelus,

 

Tick bars on forex are not going to be helpful. First, everyone else here is using time bars so they make comparison difficult. Second, tick on forex is almost as much rubbish as volume on forex - its just what your data provider decides is the tick rate and has no true representation of the "real" forex market. If your data provider is honest then its a representation of his microcosm of the market but you'll probably find that even the "honest" inject ticks at slow time to make the market move - and at any time the ticks are not the real market.

 

I mean, you can choose to use them, but they are not real. And they confuse others.

 

I respectfully disagree. I'm not using ticks on spot forex, but on the CME futures contracts. How is this any different from any tick chart on a regulated exchange?

 

I get that for example purposes everyone can't follow along due to data provider differences but I feel that tick charts clean up the noise and show the real swings that time charts just can't replicate.

 

I should add that I understand and agree with what you are saying about it not being a "true" represenation of the market because each data provider can give you different data - HOWEVER my counter point would be that its no different from basing a buy/sell decision off a time chart bar that has no relevance in the marketplace other than being created due to 5 or 15 minutes passing in the day. It all evens out in my mind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tick bars on forex are not going to be helpful ...

 

 

 

I tend to be of the opinion that price is price, no matter how it is bundled. For example, I have and still do use range charts when trading currency futures. I do agree with Kiwi that if you are using tick data from a bucket shop you are opening yourself up to trading on "bad" information. I may be wrong, but I think daedalus may be trading futures, not spot, and tick counts on futures should be accurate versus "tick counts" at a bucket shop.

 

Also, what is more important than the particular "price bundle" being used is the manner in which the trader identifies opportunities in and around potentially meaningful price levels. I myself do not use tick charts at all, but I would not discourage anyone else's use of such charts here.

 

At any rate, I would like to keep the thread open, and I would like to encourage daedalus's continued participation. One never knows from which direction inspiration might strike.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Areas I am watching on the EUR.USD.

 

Please comment etc - like Thales says - just making notes :)

 

The targets are fine, but like Forrest and Gabe, I do not see this as a short, at least not yet. That does not mean that price cannot or will not simply break lower and reach the targets. But if it does, it will, at least at this point, have to make its way without me.

 

I have mocked up the current EURUSD to show what I would like to see prior to getting short. This is not a prediction.

 

Another scenario would be a poke to a higher high with a reversal down (see the GBPJPY chart posted in post #946 of this thread).

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70f52b648b_11-09-09EURUSDexample2.thumb.jpg.9cec8c639e114a09b858fd357e9b4b4f.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.