Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

Potential GU short...

 

UPDATE: If I was currently allowing myself to actively manage trades, I would have moved my stop down...

5aa7108d40111_GBPUSD(15Min)7_11_2011.jpg.b13bfda5a3b8045053683e20a3ff15c5.jpg

5aa7108d54205_GBPUSD(15Min)7_11_20112.jpg.674eb59a0d4fcddcb5d8db84b535bd7f.jpg

Edited by Cory2679

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Potential GU short...

 

UPDATE: If I was currently allowing myself to actively manage trades, I would have moved my stop down...

 

FINAL UPDATE: It figures the selling party's over the minute I walk in the door!

 

It would have been better to take the trade on the EUR/USD (although still not that great)...I was just feeling that the EU had fallen so much already that maybe the GU had more room to fall, basically. However, maybe I should have focused on selling the EU since it was/is the weaker of the two, plain and simple.

 

Probably should have avoided the trade altogether since I was indeed so late to the party.

 

I feel like I missed out on so much today with that big move down...which is probably why I ended up taking this short at the bottom of the move. I'd been watching the market fall since 5:30am EST and wasn't going to sit on the sidelines anymore...probably a bit more emotional than technical.

 

It's frustrating because if I didn't take this last trade, I wouldn't have had any trades all day...I feel like I've missed out on so much...but the worst thing is that if I had this day again, I don't know how I'd even do it any differently. I just didn't/don't see any great entry opportunities during my trading hours. I know I don't have to have a trade every day, but I feel that it's probably a rare day that I have any excuse not to unless I'm missing out. I read a post of Thales's yesterday reviewing his and his daughter's trades over about 3 days and they had 19 trades (12 wins, 7 losses/breakevens). That's half a dozen trades a day...almost 65% wins. I'm doing something very wrong...even when I'm on a good streak, my trades don't resemble those numbers at all. They were trading the first part of Tokyo in addition to the hours I'm currently trading, but still...

 

And I know it's probably not the best thing to compare myself to others...I need to just worry about myself and my trading and how I'm improving, etc. However, it's nearly impossible not to compare and to use numbers like that as something of a benchmark.

5aa7108d57a47_GBPUSD(15Min)7_11_2011.jpg.7e3b9029e61ed9f8c5a99c5b37e25c5c.jpg

5aa7108d5ba2a_GBPUSD(15Min)7_11_20112.jpg.ea713e4c1ad94a569c7a3e866f925932.jpg

5aa7108d602a9_GBPUSD(15Min)7_11_20113.jpg.4299bac3ccf10c43d304c89c01659f49.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Potential GU short...

 

UPDATE: If I was currently allowing myself to actively manage trades, I would have moved my stop down...

 

FINAL UPDATE: It figures the selling party's over the minute I walk in the door!

 

I posted a little prematurely...I neglected to wait for the loss chime before I made my post...it was a couple ticks from my stop and I wrote it off as a loss. It actually just barely missed it and I'm still in it...I'm heading out for the day but will be keeping an eye on it in case I have to move my stop to break-even. Otherwise, per the current rules, the trade will run without any active management...

5aa7108d63c0b_GBPUSD(15Min)7_11_2011.jpg.4c994ad655ecbd74d64fae44b958b519.jpg

5aa7108d66da8_GBPUSD(15Min)7_11_20112.jpg.5643abf18d7035bcec31d1cf57117c54.jpg

5aa7108d6a488_GBPUSD(15Min)7_11_20113.jpg.16875a9cd5b8a04f8705e6f94ce0e4cc.jpg

5aa7108d6d3fc_GBPUSD(15Min)7_11_20114.jpg.bebc856d3aac2dbd9332921d1f622ce9.jpg

stillinit.thumb.JPG.c6eb5d54fdcfb2e8def3ed65015222e3.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I posted a little prematurely...I neglected to wait for the loss chime before I made my post...it was a couple ticks from my stop and I wrote it off as a loss. It actually just barely missed it and I'm still in it...I'm heading out for the day but will be keeping an eye on it in case I have to move my stop to break-even. Otherwise, per the current rules, the trade will run without any active management...

 

FINAL UPDATE: First half profit, second half break-even. 14 more minutes and I would have been in that trade 24 hours! Take-aways coming soon...

5aa7108daff0b_GBPUSD(15Min)7_12_2011.jpg.e6b8940c9508ba812e38f0ab3cfcedf1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FINAL UPDATE: First half profit, second half break-even. 14 more minutes and I would have been in that trade 24 hours! Take-aways coming soon...

 

Way to hang in there on this one Cory!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Take-aways coming soon...

 

Well, in the end, it turned out to be an all right trade, although it would have been better on the EU.

 

I was so quick to write it off as a mistake when it looked like it was going against me, but it turns out the logic worked out. It's just hard at this point to distinguish between mistakes and trades worth taking that are losers. If I have a losing trade, I can always come up with a reason why I shouldn't have been in it, with the benefit of hindsight.

 

Even though the trade worked out, I still think my hypothetical stop-move was reasonable. I would have taken a small loss on it and had a re-entry opportunity at Tokyo if I was trading then. The trade came within a few ticks of stopping me out for a full 1R loss...any stop move would have taken me out...and the lesson here is not to never, ever move my stop from now on so I don't miss ones like this...because when I'm trading well, I regularly cut losses down to <0.5R...sometimes close to break-even...if I took a full 1R loss on every losing trade, it wouldn't be pretty. But I guess that's what we're putting to the test with the current stop-management exercise!

Edited by Cory2679

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Currently short the EU...aware and a little weary of the potential areas of support indicated by my steel-blue lines, but still feel it worth a shot...

 

Maybe I should have simply respected potential support and avoided the trade.

 

As long as I did take it, this would have been a good candidate for aggresive stop management (because I was basically trading against the immediate trend, into what could be potential support nearby)...either to where my dashed red line is drawn or even to break-even once price made a marginally lower low after retracing to just above the entry...

5aa7108e49f4e_EURUSD(15Min)7_13_20112.jpg.215b9fcc962efc78785de2852388223b.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could have been a decent long off of support...support that I had already acknowledged and drawn...I was just so focused on letting the trades run so I didn't reverse, but I think I may allow an exception to letting all the trades run...if there's a legitimate stop-and-reverse, I'll allow myself to do that. That's far from micromanaging a stop, anyhow.

5aa7108e4f108_EURUSD(15Min)7_13_20113.jpg.c8ab68626e07bbf2684e89e80a90109e.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.