Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

Today on the DAX was a Buy day for me. We therefore needed a decline,

 

DAX decline to the previous day low and failed to go lower, therefore establishing the Buy Day Low and a rally started. PH the previous day High capped the rally so far

5aa70ff89ed12_ScreenHunter_04Apr_1512_32.thumb.jpg.72c74a5148485658512a69aa4d15354f.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
^^ How do you cross apply the MTP software with this analysis?

 

first I must say that i dont you the MTP software the way they teach.

 

I use it for patern recognition and reversal bars.

 

In this case you had the previous day low as the most important clue. that is a gold making clue.

 

we had 2 ABC waves and if you took the 1st ABC as wave A and 2nd as C then wC = 227% of wA at 6254 area

 

if you took last ABC waves C= 227% of A at that same area

 

You also had the DP on 15 min just above

 

so for me (that believe in TTT) PL "Previous Low" is key and worth at least a quicky trade (scalp) .

 

I would have entered at 6256 area with a stop below 6253.50

 

In my trades i never trade 1 lot so with 2 lots i would take profit on the 1st lot at 2R

and run the 2nd lot as long as i could using the ATR or something like that.

 

 

It is funny you ask but I was talking with a customer at that time and discussing the same trade.

 

I hope i explained it properly

5aa70ff8b11f6_ScreenHunter_01Apr_1517_31.thumb.jpg.9fe68871077ead2c05971dc0ff803684.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
first I must say that i dont use the MTP software the way they teach.

 

I know quite a few folks who bought MTP (myself included) who find it useful, but not in the manner in which it is market it to traders. I use it primarily for its position sizing calculator. When I am too lazy to draw the fibs myself, I will sometimes use the "one-click" DP painter to show some of the fib extensions I use, but I am so used to using a standard fib tool, I rarely bother to load MTP on a chart any longer.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A common about which question I get PM's concerns Trader Vic's three books. I have only read his first two books: Trader Vic 1 - Methods of a Wall Street Master and Trader Vic 2: Principles of Professional Speculation.

 

I have not read his book on commodities, and I cannot recommend it one way or the other.

 

If I were starting out, I would focus my attention on his first two books. Trader Vic 1 is excellent from cover to cover. Trader Vic 2's strength is Section 2 on technical analysis and section 4 on psychology/emotions. I did not find section 1 on fundamental analsyis or section 3 on option trading to be very helpful. In fact, I would not be surprised if those sections did not delay my ability to put his technical teaching into practice.

 

For a long time I read and re-read a few pages of Trader Vic every night before I would go to bed, and I recently renewed that practice. I manage to get something out of his pages each time I revisit them.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Edited by thalestrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Check out the difference between my Ninja/Gain chart and my Oanda chart. These are both the 1 minute EUR/USD chart...

 

I've never seen such an extreme difference between the two.

 

This is frustrating...I can't wait to trade futures again! ;)

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=20682&d=1271769265

Chart.thumb.jpg.8f2c720b7c3511ac9c85e7c67a4c008e.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^^ That right there is the perfect illustration of why anyone who defends the superiority and transparency of spot forex over futures to not know what the hell they are talking about.

 

The whole "but my broker isn't making the market" argument goes straight out of the window.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
^^ That right there is the perfect illustration of why anyone who defends the superiority and transparency of spot forex over futures to not know what the hell they are talking about.

 

The whole "but my broker isn't making the market" argument goes straight out of the window.

 

I agree. Trading is hard enough as it is to then also have to be working against your broker to make money...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You guys assume the broker is at fault there but we just don't know that. Remember, interbank is not a centralized exchange and it is easily possible that the banks Oanda use are providing them with quotes near to what they are showing there. I'm not trying to defend them or anything, just putting it into perspective that we cannot just assume they are being dodgy with those quotes.

 

Spot FX brokers that follow an ECN model are the best way to go as you have the best chance of getting the best bid/offer from a variety of banks.

 

While I do agree the futures have benefits if you are trading in the USA timezone and you are only trading from 3 (EUR, GBP, JPY), maybe 4 (maybe add CAD) currencies. If you are not trading a USA timezone and/or are interested in any crossrates then the spot market is all you have.

 

As a minor aside, futures contracts are too big for many small traders making scaling out not an option for their method. Flexible position sizing in spot FX is another advantage IMHO.

 

Like everything in trading, its not a clear cut & dry answer for everyone's circumstances and needs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Check out the difference between my Ninja/Gain chart and my Oanda chart. These are both the 1 minute EUR/USD chart...

 

I've never seen such an extreme difference between the two.

 

This is frustrating...I can't wait to trade futures again! ;)

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=20682&d=1271769265

 

I did the exact same thing and got the exact same results so i decided to not even bother. Instead I decided to start looking at the currencies on the CME and to my surprise they look awesome.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...While I do agree the futures have benefits if you are trading in the USA timezone and you are only trading from 3 (EUR, GBP, JPY), maybe 4 (maybe add CAD) currencies. If you are not trading a USA timezone and/or are interested in any crossrates then the spot market is all you have.

 

As a minor aside, futures contracts are too big for many small traders making scaling out not an option for their method. Flexible position sizing in spot FX is another advantage IMHO.

 

Like everything in trading, its not a clear cut & dry answer for everyone's circumstances and needs.

 

The only reason I can see to trade spot is flexible position size and better cross-rate liquidity. As for the majors, if you can trade futures size (which for the 6B is only $62,500/contract) then futures are markedly superior.

 

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The only reason I can see to trade spot is flexible position size and better cross-rate liquidity. As for the majors, if you can trade futures size (which for the 6B is only $62,500/contract) then futures are markedly superior.

 

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Actually make that "flexible position size and better liquidity." If you look at IB with 1/2 point spreads on the majors during european (and I assume us) hours then the forex offering can be better on the usd pairs as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PT1 filled, holding 1/2 for PT2 with a BE stop ...

 

PT1 & PT2 filled, with the stop loss having been adjusted to the pullback low prior to the rally that took price to the second PT ...

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=20724&stc=1&d=1272033939

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70ffbd4c50_2010-04-236E5.thumb.jpg.5058cc64a114440b6b840c3b42cb1a0c.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Way to come back strong. Oil and Gold got that same up move with different setups. I took the one on Gold.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=20723&stc=1&d=1272032535

 

Here is a look at a 5 minute GC (time frame is really irrelevant) showing a 2B long opportunity this morning just before your long entry on the TL break. You posted a GC chart earlier in the week on another thread that had a very clear 2B short opportunity. That pattern is very common across instruments, and it is a good one to practice seeing. Even if you do not take the more aggressive 2B entry, it should put you on alert for a more conservative entry (e.g. 123 with or w/o a TL break).

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=20726&stc=1&d=1272045171

 

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70ffbe12a6_2010-04-23GC1.thumb.jpg.3ecff85a826917de12324a8e81550647.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is your criteria for taking the 2b trades?

 

I would guess you are looking for them off of support and resistance?

 

One thing I like about 2b trades is the risk/reward is usually huge and you know if you are wrong really fast.

 

What I don't like about them is that if I am not careful I find myself fading the trend way too much. My approach is usually to think counter trend as price approaches support/resistance and then to go with the (hopefully new) trend once I am in a position.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here is a look at a 5 minute GC (time frame is really irrelevant) showing a 2B long opportunity this morning just before your long entry on the TL break. You posted a GC chart earlier in the week on another thread that had a very clear 2B short opportunity. That pattern is very common across instruments, and it is a good one to practice seeing. Even if you do not take the more aggressive 2B entry, it should put you on alert for a more conservative entry (e.g. 123 with or w/o a TL break).

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=20726&stc=1&d=1272045171

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

Natural gas has been serving up some monster moves from these also but on an every other day basis. The big hammer candle just before the break was what I am starting to label the gambler's "tell". I like the TL break but the hammer just adds that extra umph. to my odds of success.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What is your criteria for taking the 2b trades?

 

I would guess you are looking for them off of support and resistance?

 

One thing I like about 2b trades is the risk/reward is usually huge and you know if you are wrong really fast.

 

What I don't like about them is that if I am not careful I find myself fading the trend way too much. My approach is usually to think counter trend as price approaches support/resistance and then to go with the (hopefully new) trend once I am in a position.

 

I don't have criteria beyond what you find in Trader Vic's two books. I will say this, however - I only five a 2B two whacks. If I'm whipped out, and then the 2B presents itself again, I'll have a go at it. If I'm whipped out a second time at the same level, I wait for a 123 or otherwise sit out until the next opportunity at a different level.

 

I do think that certain patterns conducive to a 2B occurring are identifiable. If you use Elliot Wave at all, it is not unusual for wave 5 to end with a 2B reversal after a test of the wave 3 extreme. Linda Raschke has a set up she teaches that is basically a 2B, but I do not recall off the top of my head what it is she calls it. I do recall that she usually uses 3/10 oscillator divergence to "confirm" these entries. The problem with that is two-fold: 1) an oscillator will not always exhibit divergence at a low or high, and 2) by the time the indicator prints the divergence, you may have missed the optimal low risk/high reward entry point.

 

The best way to look for a 2B entry is simply to watch the price DOM as the market tests the prior extreme.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Edited by thalestrader
typo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The best way to look for a 2B entry is simply to watch the price DOM as the market tests the prior extreme.

 

 

What type of action are you watching for on the DOM during the test of the wave 3 extreme (or whatever S/R level you are watching), and how would what you are watching for differ between a reversal versus continuation of the trend?

 

snowbird

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi folks,

 

during my vacation a new method for improvement of my trading performance came to my mind.

I tried it out during the last 8 days and it revealed strange habits during trading hours I was not aware of.

 

This is my setup for trading on a one monitor system; it does not work for an n-screen trader's ego shooter.

 

- I make all my standard charts of exactly same size and stack them one over the other.

There are four for me: FDAX 15m and 60m, FGBL 15m and 60m and no currencies during the experiment.

 

- I setup SnagIt to make a screen shot of this main area of the monitor every 60 seconds with automatic file numbering.

For every trading day I use a different directory for the image files. I use *.gif output files.

SnagIt resides in the system tray and does everything in the background.

 

For a 10 hour session you get about 600 screenshots.

 

On the weekend you reserve two quiet hours and take one of the directories of the last five days

and replay the screenshots with an image viewer. I use IrfanView for that purpose.

A paint program is inappropiate.

 

Then you wonder about what you really had before your eyes during your trading hours.

Edited by Marko23

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.