Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

Weekend Reading

 

Hi Folks,

 

Here is a nice work by the late Stanley Kroll. I also recommend his earlier book, The Professional Commodity Trader. He is an interesting case in that he moved from being a largely discretionary trader to being systems based trader. What matters, however, is that whether he was trading based upon his discretion or his computerized systems, he knew well the importance of consistent and disciplined application of his method.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Kroll_on_Futures_Trading_Strategy_by_Stanley_Kroll.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks,

 

I've been quite distracted with non-trading business the last few weeks, and I likely have several more ahead of me before the Spring/Summer routine becomes a routine, and I can resume regularly posting. However, I got an e-mail today from Mike Reed, who runs a trade service focusing on S/R and providing intraday updates, and the material in his email lends itself to a nice, educational/informational post.

 

Full disclosure: I am not Mike Reed. I have spoken favorably of him and his service here in the past. I have bought and read his material, and a number of years ago, I had, for a while, subscribed to his service. I am no longer a subscriber because I learned to apply what he he taught. In other words, I graduated. His is a very good service, reasonably priced for the value, etc and so on. I do not mean for this to become an infomercial for his service - this is just a matter of full disclosure. And anyway, in an industry such as ours so full of pseudo-gurus, if we do find a service out there that actually is valuable, then why should we not say so, right?

 

One of the "set-ups" Mike teaches is none other than the JR type 123 reversal. His email had a link to two youtube videos showing his trading yesterday's 123 top reversal on the ES. Here is what it looks like on my chart (and I included a potential 123 bottom reversal from this morning as well). Yes, I know this is after the fact (I am not trading it, and I was not even watching the ES this morning). This is meant to be an educational example post, not a "Hey look at me I'm a trader" post.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=20527&stc=1&d=1270737901

 

The 123 bottom has triggered, though nothing says this is going to run like yesterday's top ran - it may be a winner, and it may be loser. That is what a stop loss is for, right?

 

I hope James does not mind me including the two part Youtube videos here. If so, he can delete them. I am posting them for their educational value. I am not Mike Reed. I have no affiliation with Mike Reed other than I am a former student and former subscriber of his services. This is not meant to be spam, and I apologize ahead of time if it is interpreted to be such.

 

I hope the videos are allowed to stand, and that you enjoy them.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

PART 1

 

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFZNy76HoRU]YouTube - 1186.avi[/ame]

 

Part 2

 

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcW3QlXgAIQ]YouTube - 1186a.avi[/ame]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... (and I included a potential 123 bottom reversal from this morning as well). ...The 123 bottom has triggered, though nothing says this is going to run like yesterday's top ran - it may be a winner, and it may be loser. That is what a stop loss is for, right?...

 

Quick update on the ES shows a not very impulsive movement following the 123 trigger, as well as a possible 2B short opportunity. The proverbial "mixed signals," I presume. As price is above the open, I'd have to give preference to staying long, but my stop loss would now be at break even or very close to it. Again, I am not traing this, and if fact, I am on my way out. Have a great day, folks!

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=20528&stc=1&d=1270740116

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70ff5a8c7f_ES2BorNot2B1.thumb.jpg.06d8f52227807ee8bfe839675c2bf966.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... As price is above the open, I'd have to give preference to staying long, but my stop loss would now be at break even or very close to it...

 

Hi Folks,

 

A quick pop in and I see that long was the way to go as the ES has now rallied back to yesterday's prior break down point ...

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=20531&stc=1&d=1270747113

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=20532&stc=1&d=1270747113

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70ff5b4cdc_ESTaleof1231.thumb.jpg.7a7ef1d7c3d6e7ea6d3cbb46b41a01e3.jpg

5aa70ff5ba067_ESTaleof1232.thumb.jpg.aa66fe4506ffe493758f8c9f0e5cdc82.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope you enjoyed your break Marko. I am glad your back today, I was kind of interested in today's DAX opening from a Trader Vic point of view. It was a big gap (with the weekend) and even though it did not close it 'early' in the session it seemed that was the clear intent. Just interested on your take....did the SS day trump the TV opening gap? Or maybe it was as there was no confirming PA?

 

Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Blowfish,

nice to read you. Yes, there is a life without the markets!

I've taken no trades yet.

 

" did the SS day trump the TV opening gap "

 

IMHO the gap closure and the SellShort day are in sync.

The gap was closed straight from the open but was too big for a closure

with one bar on a 30m chart.

 

Regards,

Marko

 

P.S. I just can't tolerate an "SS" in my writing.

Edited by Marko23

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...

 

" did the SS day trump the TV opening gap "

 

IMHO the gap closure and the SellShort day are in sync.

The gap was closed straight from the open but was too big for a closure

with one bar on a 30m chart....

 

My currency trading friend, who was the first to really press upon me the power of the Trader Vic Gap Rule, explains the time element as follows - what is important is not whether or not the Gap fills within 10-15 minutes of the open, but whether or not price gaps open and then trends immediately in the direction of that gap, or does it reverse within 10-15 miutes, and begin trending in the direction of the prior close.

 

As for Taylor, for the US indices, I have today as a Buy day, and Taylor can easily accommodate the overnight gap and subsequent decline for a Buy Day on the US indices as well as for Marko's Short Sale day on the DAX. The reason being that both days are adjacent to one another in the cycle, and depending upon what the market has done during the previous two trading sessions, either day can see an initial rally followed by a decline (in some cases a precipitous decline). The short sale day finishes the previous three day rally. Sometime, momentum from that rally carries the market higher on the Buy day open before the decline sets in that allows traders to get long at more favorable prices for the next three day rally.

 

This is why richbois can say that the often times two traders can be working different cycle days on the same instrument, but if each follows Taylor's rules, and so long as each keeps to his or her labeling, the results should be the same. After all, what Taylor's method is really about using is recent prior highs and lows, and recent opens and closes as S/R levels, while anticipating that most of the time, even in bear markets, a market will spend more time going up than going down, even if the extent of declines outpaces rallies in a bear market. I've been using Taylor since the end of 2005, and I have been on the same cycle, which happens to coincide with richbois's cycle, since June of 2006. It works, and the Trader Vic Gap Rule is a very valuable addition to Taylor, in my opinion.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Edited by thalestrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My currency trading friend, who was the first to really press upon me the power of the Trader Vic Gap Rule, explains the time element as follows - what is important is not whether or not the Gap fills within 10-15 minutes of the open, but whether or not price gaps and trends immediately in the direction of that gap, or does it reverse within 10-15 miutes, and begin trending in the direction of the prior close.

 

After I posted I figured that was possibly a large part of the equation. Thanks for clarifying.

 

I no longer have an office suite on any of my PC's (none that get turned on at least!). I might try running some stats on the phenomena on Zoho spreadsheet (online office suite) if it is up to the task. It would be interested to see if it happens as often as in Vic's day + if the size of the gap makes a different + how long to see if it fills etc. stats can increase confidence after all.

 

@marko do you pay much attention to the first hour's pre market (with respect to the rest of Europe) when dealing with TVGR?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My currency trading friend, who was the first to really press upon me the power of the Trader Vic Gap Rule, explains the time element as follows - what is important is not whether or not the Gap fills within 10-15 minutes of the open, but whether or not price gaps open and then trends immediately in the direction of that gap, or does it reverse within 10-15 miutes, and begin trending in the direction of the prior close.

...

 

Yes, the immediate follow-up should lead to the proper interpretation.

Thanks for the clarification.

 

Re: Taylor cycle. I did NOT read the book during the last 2 weeks. But my own observations seem to resonate with the Taylor cycle.

 

@blowfish: I trade FDAX from 08:00 German time and apply TVGR to the pre market phase. XETRA opens at 09:00 and DAX normally follows FDAX.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Minimum target after yesterdays new high was a new 2DL.

FDAX didn't make that yesterday, but the correction rose into a clearly visible resistance zone,

which is shown on all my charts yesterday.

 

Pivot calculation before todays open gave a PP just in that zone.

The first target down is S1 which coincides with a 2DL below yesterdays low.

 

FDAX gapped just into that position. Today is a Buy day from my rhythm.

That is a consistent picture: price comes down for an opportunity to buy.

Today my English sounds totally broken, hope you can take something out of it.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=20572&stc=1&d=1271140875

tws-0042.thumb.gif.99716b59ab99ec83711346dcdf857d17.gif

Edited by Marko23

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

re TVGR I have a section in the Guide to trading TTT that covers TVGR with some examples. This section came about after a long period of watching daily gap on the US indices. I included a PDF of that section of the book. I know it has nothing to do with TTT but i find it a usefull tool.

 

re FDAX and TTT cycle. As Thales mentioned we can have a different cycle day for the same instrument and still need to trade it in the same manner. Mako had a SS day yesterday which made him look for shorts as the 3 day rally had culminated at the open.

In my case I had Monday as a Buy day. DAX had closed on the highs Friday, we could therefore expect the momentum to take it higher before that decline would start. In this case it had a huge gap up and that gap was above the SS Day high. In my statistics this is a must short at the first sign of reversal. In this case using Thales 1,2,3 method (if I understand it properly) this opportunity came at 9AM at the end of the 1st hour when we broke the low of the 1st 3min outside bar. That break also eliminated TVGR.

TVGR section of TTT Guide.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No follow-up after the signal bar, stop at break even

 

Stopped at b/e.

 

The up signal was immediately followed by a down signal.

I didn't realize what might follow after the b/e stop.

 

The gap is still open. FDAX rebounded twice from the resistance zone from yesterday evening.

Today is a Buy day from my rhythm, the price was pushed down to buy cheap;

at least that's my interpretation of price action.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=20583&stc=1&d=1271169962

 

The same situation in 15m representation looks a bit clearer (after the fact of cause).

Perhaps I should revert to that kind of chart for FDAX.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=20584&stc=1&d=1271171435

tws-0739.thumb.gif.1921857f78ecbd652040f02df31f555d.gif

tws-0767.thumb.gif.9f3c58f7e9b588b1cc7be5090975e9bc.gif

Edited by Marko23

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.