Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thalestrader

Reading Charts in Real Time

Recommended Posts

Current look at the ES (15 minute and 240 minute) has me tempted to add a few longs on a break up and hold ... on the 15 minute, the red rectangle represents a small area of nearby minor resistance, where a break up could find itself stopped cold, for now. Again, while a pullback, even one of some extent, could occur at any time, I beleive PA favors at lest a test of the prior break down zone (around 1024 or so) prior to resuming the down trend, if the down trend is indeed in tact.

 

For what its worth, I had been expecting a retest of the March 2009 low, or even a break to lower lows, after the rally off that low finished. PA over the last few weeks has me much less certain that such a retest will occur, and I tend to think that I need to keep my mind open to the possibility that the Big Bad Bear it truly over, and that we are in fact in the early stages of an ere where buy, hold, and forget about it may actually prove a profitable strategy. Of course, that will become most clear at the end of such an era. But right now, I had been expecting to see the reawakening of a full grown hibernating bear. But when I blink, I sometimes think I am seeing the birth of a baby bull.

 

Anything can happen, of course. I am open to all possibilities.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

PS I thought I had taken a pic of the 15 minute prior to the breakout, but I hadn't.

5aa70fd729a25_2010-02-22ES1.thumb.jpg.eb1217bcc3d75e725c91c6951a03f01b.jpg

5aa70fd72ef31_2010-02-22ES2.thumb.jpg.34c777a5ee6dbb4b5f900783117f51ac.jpg

5aa70fd733c97_2010-02-22ES15minute1.thumb.jpg.c74cb32269c6d1c07f73f0738f893455.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the 1440 minute CL showing the prior day's high&low. Price is for the second time today trading above the prior day's high (the orange and blue candles are due to my currency trading friend - he and I have been working together on this CL project, and he uses these colors on his charts, so I have adopted them for my CL chart).

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fd7389d1_2010-02-22CLDailyPriorHighsLows1.thumb.jpg.0332a651958e98a5e6dbdde2c93111fd.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EURUSD/6E is at a level within a zone of some signficance and I would expect a trade that trends away from that level at some point today ...

 

Current view of the EURUSD/6E shows a long sequence in the making as price probed below the level line and rallied. The proposed stop loss may change based upon the depth of this pullback...

 

 

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fd743205_2010-02-226E3.thumb.jpg.f2aac8fac800a4f68673ab31407447b3.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EUR/USD not Short, comes down too fast

 

Thales, did you consider the 123 Short ?

 

I saw the short sequence, but I did not trade it, as the immediately preceding rally looked impulsive, the short sequence corrective. It would have been PT1 and holding for PT2 with a BE stop. Ahhh ... hindsight ...

 

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=19492&stc=1&d=1266855713

 

 

 

At any rate, had the short sequence offered itself from levels closer to the HOD, I'd have taken it. Even with that decline off of that sequence, I am viewing this choppy decline off the HOD as a corrective phase, so my preference goes to longs

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fd7573dd_2010-02-226Ethelongandshortofit2.thumb.jpg.66a54d233b907b2162a21c751cde3974.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very tight and choppy trade all session. Yesterdays lack of news clearly influenced this choppy nature. Nothing to do yesterday and proud of it. I continue to look towards the short side for more continuation today.

 

Only longs to be had will be scalps unless there is a very very clear capitulation. Should it capitulate I will aim to be out of 1/2 by the time we trade the recent multi-day range low and attempt to trail the rest and scaling out the remaining 1/2 into 2 separate exits.

 

The obvious short to look for is in the recent multi-day range low area, ideally in the 1.5660 - 1.5620 area. Shorts there will be aiming for a new low but will be out of 1/2 before making that new low. I'll attempt to trail the other 1/2 with successive LHs from the 60 min chart. Alternatively, can take obvious shorts above 1.5490 area and manage them slightly more aggressive in the beginning with 1/4 off before 1.5450 trades, 1/4 off around 1.5410 area and trail the other 1/2 with successive LHs on the 60m chart.

MK_2010-02-23_115252.thumb.png.1f5ce86ef5b5ed06e1d64f91f65ca88c.png

MK_2010-02-23_115345.thumb.png.4772ee8d78597dcb3f4aa56d79ca5223.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What does YH in the chart stand for?

 

Thanks

Brian

 

MK is correct. The abbreviations are

YH / YL -- yesterdays high / low

ZH / ZL -- day before yesterday high / low

2H / 2L -- two day high / low, including today

3H / 3L -- three day high / low, including today

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

EUR/USD above Thursday's high

 

Thales' long idea was right.

 

ACD method has a huge stop today.

Nice continuation signal for trend followers in 15m chart.

 

Too steep or fast for a long continuation through the ACD level, should consolidate first.

tl-01.thumb.png.56e1533352302631cca54e817264f821.png

tl-02.thumb.png.159cdfe66afe4aed49bf8f52e1fee9c6.png

Edited by Marko23

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am viewing this choppy decline off the HOD as a corrective phase, so my preference goes to longs...

 

My long from 1.3607 proceeded to both profit targets. The atached chart shows that long from yesterday. It also shows a short sequence that occurred for the benefit of our European friends. I was asleep at the time, hece I denoted that trade in dotted lines to indicate that for me it "twas but a dream ..." A t the right hand edge, there is a long sequence with a buy point of 1.3585 for which I was just filled (a quick look at the DOM shows 85/87 bid-offer as I hit the submit button). Not entirely enthralled with this one. That was quite a plummit from the highs, and it looks like price needs at least a re-test of the low, if not a new session low altogether in order to clear this thing for a decent rally, but, if I were to sit this out on that basis, I may miss a +4R trade. It's only going to cost me -1R to find out, so I'm in.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=19519&stc=1&d=1266930319

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70fd867dcf_2010-02-236E1.thumb.jpg.1ea624694c5b1ac98ce0b87543eff636.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... if I were to sit this out on that basis, I may miss a +4R trade. It's only going to cost me -1R to find out, so I'm in.

 

It will cost you at most 1R but more than likely, less than 1R :)

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Outstanding spike like reaction from the obvious R (on the 60m). I continue to favour the short side, especially as that test of obvious R resulted in such a fierce sell response spending very little time in that area.

 

Only longs to be had will be scalps unless there is a very very clear capitulation. Should it capitulate I will aim to be out of 1/2 by the time we trade the recent multi-day range low and attempt to trail the rest and scaling out the remaining 1/2 into 2 separate exits.

 

Obvious shorts above 1.5460 - 1.5490 with the aim of being out of 1/2 before making a new low for the year and trail the other 1/2 as per LHs on the 60m chart.

MK_2010-02-24_104946.thumb.png.f48ac3cee2eb6bb248123ddcb12e58bd.png

MK_2010-02-24_105156.thumb.png.20210c704064c4cc523a96ccd0b8a9b5.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It will cost you at most 1R but more than likely, less than 1R

 

A little less than 1/4R to find out - sometimes it is very clear that it is time to pull the rip cord.

 

I've been going back over the Linda Raschke seminar material again over the last few weeks, and one line that must have resonated with me at the time is this: "The trade must move in your favor right away. Sideways is not an acceptable response."

 

Well, if I'm long, and if sideways is not acceptable, then down is an absolute no-no!

 

I did call Linda's office, and it seems that she has no plans at this time to offer her seminar again. Too bad - it is a wonderful, wonderful learning experience. I have always said I am a most unoriginal trader - everything I do that works I learned from someone else. Going through her seminar materials again, I would say that while the few books and authors whom I have mentioned here in this thread were important, they were but the game pieces. LBR provided the the playing board and the rules. I've been very busy with some other projects, most notably a study of the character CL's intraday price action, but perhaps this weekend I'll have some time to share a few real gems from LBR's seminar.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But surely there are some loose criteria to validate 'sideways', and 'against your position'. The terms are too general I feel, just like the cliche 'cut your losses'. Is 2 ticks against your entry a loss? Many call that getting filled! You see what I mean? This is my difficulty with it and in my case, more often than not I end up thinking that I am cutting my losses at the time, but really I just end up cutting my profits. This small aspect of trade management is extremely hard for me to get a handle on. The problem is that it means something different to everyone based on their style. The guy that originally came up with the term - who knows what he/she really meant!

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... This small aspect of trade management is extremely hard for me to get a handle on....

 

No small aspect, friend Midk, surely!

 

Let me give an example from today:

 

I've mentioned that I've been working with my currency trading friend on a trading plan for crude oil. We're doing basic S/R - sell resistance, buy support - type stuff. We worked up a plan where we enter using limit or market orders, and we have determined that we generally need a 15-20 tick initial disaster stop, though typically price will print a stopping point much closer, sometimes a mere tick or two from our entry, within minutes if not seconds of entry. Our plan also calls for a fixed tick take profit level on the first contract.

 

Today, we did a live test run of our plan. We were not together during the trading day, and we did not communicate between 9AM and 2:30PM - no e-mail no phone, etc. At 2:30, he called to compare notes. We each had five trades. They were all the same. We had 3 wins and 2 losses. Our losses were identical - one for -2 ticks and one for -7 ticks. One winning trade we each made it to target (we were trading one contract and we agreed to exit at our predetermined profit target level. One two other trades, he made it to target, but on each I was stoped out on reactions that hit a trailing stop. The difference? I made close to 72 ticks in spite of myself. He made nearly 50 ticks more than I! Not bad on a day where there was only a 126 tick spread high to low during the pit session!

 

That 50 ticks on 1 CL is $500. So my trade management cost me $500 in profit opportunity. No small amount if averaged over the course of 200 trading days or so. And that is per contract, so multiply that out if trading a 3 lot, a 5 lot, a 10 lot.

 

No sir, friend Midk, trade management is no small matter at all - as my currency trading friend said to me this afternoon, "'tis the key to the kingdom, methinks," I think so too.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But surely there are some loose criteria to validate 'sideways', and 'against your position'. The terms are too general I feel, just like the cliche 'cut your losses'. Is 2 ticks against your entry a loss? Many call that getting filled! You see what I mean?

 

I think, though, if you look at what price did immediately after stopping me in you'd agree that there was no doubt that the best course was to exit at market quickly. I did place a new buy stop at 1.3591 after I exited the trade I had entered at 1.3585. As I tried to explain to Cory last week - pulling te rip cord is fine, but it only works for me over time because I always have a plan to re-enter in the original position should price get in gear. The basic structure of a long sequence was still in place until price made a new low. If you are going to trade based upon those sequences, you have to take them, even if you already had entered once and cut it loose with a small loss.

 

I have always made clear that I re-enter if called for even after pulling the rip cord. Re-entry makes the difference.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think, though, if you look at what price did immediately after stopping me in you'd agree that there was no doubt that the best course was to exit at market quickly. I did place a new buy stop at 1.3591 after I exited the trade I had entered at 1.3585. As I tried to explain to Cory last week - pulling te rip cord is fine, but it only works for me over time because I always have a plan to re-enter in the original position should price get in gear. The basic structure of a long sequence was still in place until price made a new low. If you are going to trade based upon those sequences, you have to take them, even if you already had entered once and cut it loose with a small loss.

 

I have always made clear that I re-enter if called for even after pulling the rip cord. Re-entry makes the difference.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

 

I think that the reentry issue is important because:

- if you can't reenter then exit quick strategies are much harder to take (cause u miss out)

- if you look at breakouts you get quite a few immediate failures but the break of the failure push is a much higher probability situation if the pattern stays clean.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.